A Pathway toward a New Era of Open-Cell Polyurethane Foams-Influence of Bio-Polyols Derived from Used Cooking Oil on Foams Properties.

In order to create greener polyurethane (PUR) foams, modified used cooking oils (UCO) were applied as starting resources for the synthesis of bio-polyols. The bio-polyols were produced using transesterification of UCO with diethylene glycol (UCO_DEG) and triethanolamine (UCO_TEA). Next, open-cell PUR foams were synthesized by replacing 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of the petrochemical polyol with the bio-polyol UCO_DEG or UCO_TEA. It was observed that an increasing bio-polyol content (up to 60%) led to an increase of the closed cell content. However, a further increase in the bio-polyol content up to 100% resulted in foam cell opening. The bio-foams obtained in the experiment had an apparent density of 13-18 kg/m3. The coefficient of thermal conductivity was determined at three different average temperatures: 10, 0 and -10 °C. The PUR bio-foams modified with bio-polyol UCO_TEA had lower values of thermal conductivity, regardless of the average temperature (35.99-39.57 mW/m·K) than the foams modified with bio-polyol UCO_DEG (36.95-43.78 mW/m·K). The compressive strength of most of the bio-foams was characterized by a higher value than the compressive strength of the reference material (without bio-polyol). Finally, it was observed that the bio-materials exhibited dimensional stability at 70 °C.

Enucleated GV oocytes as recipients of embryonic nuclei in the G1, S, or G2 stages of the cell cycle.

Universal recipients in the G2 phase of mitotic cell cycle (preactivated oocytes, zygotes, blastomeres) accept embryonic nuclei in all the stages of their cell cycle. To test if recipients in the G2 of meiotic cycle (immature oocytes) are universal recipients, mouse germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes were enucleated and reconstructed with blastomere nuclei in the G1, S, or G2 stages. Analysis of their maturation has shown that about 30% of the G1 nuclei and 60% of G2 nuclei allow for normal metaphase II (MII), both in the oocytes with and without the first polar body (1st PB). Among oocytes reconstructed with the S phase nuclei, only 8% or less have normal MII, although 75% of them extrude 1st PB. No phase of donor cell cycle prevented the abnormal acceleration of 1st PB extrusion, found in reconstructed GV oocytes. In conclusion, enucleated GV oocytes are not universal recipients of embryonic nuclei, because they do not accept the S donors. However, both the G1 and G2 donor nuclei can be reprogrammed in the GV oocyte cytoplasm.