Effect of stress on clinical reasoning during simulated ambulatory consultations.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of subjective and physiological stress responses on medical students' diagnostic reasoning and communication skills. METHOD: A prospective randomized quantitative study was undertaken, looking at ambulatory consultations in internal medicine. On the first day (baseline day), volunteer year 6 students (n = 41) participated in a simulated ambulatory consultation with standardized patients (SPs). On the second day (study day), one week later, they were randomly assigned to two groups: a low stress (n = 20) and a high stress (n = 21) simulated ambulatory consultation. Stress was measured using validated questionnaires and salivary cortisol. The SPs assessed the students' reasoning and communication. The students completed assessments of their clinical reasoning after the consultations. RESULTS: Although stress measures were all significantly higher in the high-stress condition (all p < 0.05), no differences were found in diagnostic accuracy and justification scores. However, correlational analyses revealed a negative correlation between multiple-stress measures and the students' ability to generate arguments for differential diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Stress was associated with impairments in clinical reasoning, of a nature typically suggestive of premature closure.

On the difficulty of noticing obvious features in patient appearance.

Medical students and experts were given head-and-shoulder photographs of patients, each showing a key feature of the patient's problem. Three quarters of these pictures were taken from textbooks. Noticing these supposedly obvious features was difficult and strongly influenced by contextual factors. Both experts and students gained about 20% in diagnostic accuracy by having the key features verbally described for them, although these were clearly visible on the photographs. Conversely, both experts and students reported seeing more of these features when the correct diagnosis was suggested to them. This facilitation resulted from an increase in sensitivity to depicted features, rather than a response bias. The properties of these features that allow such failures of noticing are discussed.