Is Insurance Payer Associated With Hospital Admission of Emergency Department Patients With Mandible Fractures?

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on the optimal triage pathway for emergency department (ED) patients with mandibular fractures. It remains unclear if patient insurance payers predict hospital admission given potentially competing logistical and health system incentives. PURPOSE: To generate nationally representative estimates of the frequency of hospital admission and its association with primary insurance payers for ED patients with mandible fractures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, the largest all-payer database in the United States, to identify patients with mandible fractures. The database includes a stratified sample with discharge weights to generate nationally representative estimates. Patients with other facial fractures and/or concomitant injuries that independently warranted admission were excluded. PREDICTOR: The primary predictor variable was primary payer (public, private, self-pay, and other/no charge). OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was hospital admission (yes/no). COVARIATES: Covariates included patient-, medical/injury-, and hospital-related variables. ANALYSES: Descriptive statistics, along with bivariate and multivariate logistic regression with Bonferroni correction, were used to produce national estimates and identify predictors of admission. P < .01 was considered significant. RESULTS: The cohort included 27,238 weighted encounters involving isolated mandible fractures, of which 5,345(20%) were admitted. The payers for admitted patients were 46% public, 25% private, 22% self-pay, and 7% no charge/other. In bivariate analyses, public insurance was associated with a higher likelihood of admission than private insurance (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.45), though there was no association in the multivariate model (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.28). In multivariate analysis, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.48), alcohol-related disorder (OR 3.47, 95% CI 2.74 to 4.39), substance-related disorder (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.71), and more mandible fractures (OR 3.08, 95% CI 2.65 to 3.59) were associated with admission. Compared to body fractures, subcondylar (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.39 to 6.14), angle (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.84 to 6.09), and symphysis (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.84 to 6.09) fractures had higher odds of admission. Finally, level I (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.41 to 6.98) and level II (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.85 to 5.39) trauma centers had higher odds of admission. CONCLUSIONS: In 2018, 20% of ED patients with isolated mandible fractures were admitted. Several patient and hospital characteristics were predictors of admission. Insurance status was not associated with admission.

Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Midface Fractures in the United States.

PURPOSE: Interfacility hospital transfer for isolated midfacial fractures is common but rarely clinically necessary. The purpose of this study was to generate nationally representative estimates regarding the incidence, risk factors, and cost of transfer for isolated midface fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2018 to identify patients with isolated midface fractures. The primary predictor variable was hospital trauma center designation (Level I, Level II, Level III, and nontrauma center). The primary outcome variable was hospital transfer. Total emergency department (ED) charges were also assessed. Covariates were demographic, medical, injury-related, and hospital characteristics. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were used to evaluate the incidence and predictors of interfacility transfer. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 161,022 ED encounters with a midface fracture as primary diagnosis, of which 5,680 were transferred (3.53%). In an unadjusted analysis, evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center, nonteaching hospital, and numerous demographic, medical, and injury-related variables were associated with transfer (P ≤ .001). In the adjusted model, the strongest independent predictors for hospital transfer were evaluation at a nontrauma center (odds ratio [OR] = 16.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.6-19.4), level III trauma center (OR = 13.4, 95% CI = 11.1-16.1) or level II trauma center (OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 2.66-3.98), any Le Fort fracture (OR = 12.0, 95% CI = 10.4-14.0), orbital floor fracture (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 3.48-4.00), history of cerebrovascular event (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 2.18-3.45), and cervical spine injury (OR = 5.87, 95% CI = 4.79-7.20) (P ≤ .001). The average ED charge per encounter was $7,206 ± 9,294 for a total nationwide charge of approximately 1.16 billion dollars. Transferred subjects had total ED charges of $97 million, not including additional charges at the recipient hospital. CONCLUSION: Isolated midface fractures are transferred infrequently, but given the high incidence have substantial healthcare costs. Predictors of transfer were mixed rather than clustered within one variable type, although it is likely that transfers are driven in part by lack of access to maxillofacial specialists given the predominance of hospital covariates. Programs evaluating necessity of transfer and facilitating specialist evaluation in the outpatient setting may reduce healthcare expenditures for these injuries.

Is Preoperative Serum Albumin Predictive of Adverse Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Patients with head and neck cancer are at increased risk of malnutrition due to tumor burden and surgical morbidity. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative serum albumin and 30-day adverse outcomes in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing an ablative head and neck cancer procedure were included. Patients who had an unclear tumor location based on coding or missing outcome data were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was preoperative albumin categorized as low (<3.4 g/dL), intermediate (3.4 to 3.9 g/dL), or high (>3.9 g/dL). OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was intensive care unit (ICU)-level complications scored using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. This is a tool used to grade surgical complications, with grade IV and V complications defined as requiring ICU-level care. COVARIATES: Covariates were demographic (age, sex, body mass index), medical (smoking, functional status, weight loss), and perioperative (concurrent procedures, tumor location, reconstructive modality). ANALYSES: Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression with bootstrap resampling statistics were used to evaluate the association between albumin and adverse outcomes. A significance level of P ≤ .05 was significant. RESULTS: A total of 4,491 subjects met inclusion criteria and had a documented albumin. There were 435 subjects with low albumin levels, 1,305 with intermediate levels, and 2,751 with high levels. In bivariate analysis, low albumin levels were associated with an increased risk of ICU-level complications, any complication, extended length of stay, and adverse discharge disposition (all P ≤ .001), while high levels were protective (all P ≤ .001). In bootstrapped multivariate analysis using intermediate albumin as the reference group and adjusting for demographics, tumor location, and reconstructive modality among others, low albumin levels were an independent predictor of ICU-level complications (P = .008, odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 2.40), while high levels were protective (P = .014, odds ratio, 0.689; 95% confidence interval, 0.521 to 0.923). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum albumin was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes following ablative head and neck cancer procedures.

Are There Differences in Opioid Prescriptions to Urban and Rural Patients by Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in Massachusetts From 2011 to 2021?

PURPOSE: Oral-maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) are frequent prescribers of opioid analgesics. It remains unclear if prescription patterns differ for urban versus rural patients, given potential differences in access to and delivery of care. This study aimed to characterize urban-rural differences in opioid analgesic prescriptions to patients in Massachusetts by OMSs from 2011 to 2021. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Massachusetts Prescription Monitoring Program database to identify Schedule II and III opioid prescriptions by providers with specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery from 2011 to 2021. The primary predictor variable was patient geography (urban/rural) and secondary predictor was year (2011-2021). The primary outcome variable was milligram morphine equivalent (MME) per prescription. Secondary outcome variables were days' supply per prescription and number of prescriptions received per patient. Descriptive and linear regression statistics were performed to analyze differences in prescriptions to urban and rural patients each year and throughout the study period. RESULTS: The study data, which includes OMS opioid prescriptions (n = 1,057,412) in Massachusetts from 2011 to 2021, ranged annually between 63,678 and 116,000 prescriptions to between 58,000 and 100,000 unique patients. The cohorts each year ranged between 48 and 56% female with mean ages between 37 and 44 years. There were no differences in the mean number of patients per provider in urban and rural populations in any year. The study sample had a large majority of urban patients (>98%). MME per prescription, days' supply per prescription, and prescriptions received per patient were all generally similar between urban and rural patients each year, with the largest MME per prescription difference in 2019 (87.3 for rural to 73.9 for urban patients, P < .01). From 2011 to 2021, all patients had a steady decrease in MME per prescription (ß = -6.64, 95% confidence interval: -6.81, -6.48; R2 = 0.39) and day's supply per prescription (ß = -0.1, 95% confidence interval: -0.1, -0.09; R2 = 0.37). CONCLUSION: In Massachusetts, there were similar opioid prescribing patterns by oral and maxillofacial surgeons to urban and rural patients from 2011 to 2021. There has also been a steady decrease in the duration and total dosage of opioid prescriptions to all patients. These results are consistent with multiple statewide policies over the last several years aimed at curbing opioid overprescribing.

Is Cleft Lip or Palate a Risk Factor for Perioperative Complications in Orthognathic Surgery?

PURPOSE: Perioperative outcomes following cleft orthognathic surgery are not well established. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of orthognathic specific complications (OSCs) in patients with and without cleft lip and/or palate. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program adult and pediatric databases were used to enroll patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. The primary predictor variable was a prior diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate: cleft versus noncleft. The primary outcome variable was OSCs (yes/no) within 30 days of the index operation. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between cleft status and OSCs. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 1,149 subjects: 98 in the cleft group and 1,051 in the noncleft group. The incidence of OSCs was 6.1 and 4.7% for the cleft and noncleft groups, respectively (P = .461). After adjusting for age, cleft status, bone grafting, segmentation of the maxilla, and history of bleeding disorder, classification as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III (P = .002, odds ratio [OR] = 3.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-9.40), ASA IV (P = .039, OR = 9.47, 95% CI 1.12-80.4), and isolated mandibular osteotomies (P = .006, OR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.40-7.48) were independent predictors of OSCs. Length of stay was 1.66 ± 1.14 days compared to 1.37 ± 3.74 days for the cleft and noncleft groups, respectively (P = .443). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative OSCs and length of hospital stay between cleft and noncleft patients. Cleft status was not an independent predictor of OSCs; instead, greater ASA classification and isolated mandibular osteotomies were the only predisposing factors. Patients with clefts undergoing orthognathic surgery do not have an increased risk of short-term OSCs within the limitations of this study.

Evaluation of Accessibility and Content of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Fellowship Program Websites.

PURPOSE: Opportunities for graduating oral and maxillofacial surgery residents to pursue fellowship training are expanding. However, there is a paucity of information in the literature for prospective applicants in our specialty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accessibility and content of oral and maxillofacial surgery fellowship program websites (FPWs). METHODS: The authors designed a cross-sectional study including oral and maxillofacial surgery fellowship programs in North America listed on 4 major websites: 1) The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2) The American Academy of Craniomaxillofacial Surgeons Match, 3) The American Dental Association, and 4) The American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery. The existence and accessibility of stand-alone FPWs from these listings were assessed. Content scores were generated based on the presence or absence of 23 content variables related to program characteristics, fellow recruitment, and fellow education on listings and available webpages. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to evaluate the relationship between predictor variables and content scores. RESULTS: A total of 44 fellowship programs were included. Of these fellowships, 26 (59.1%) had a stand-alone FPW. The mean content score was 10.8 ± 4.82 out of a maximum of 23. Content scores were significantly greater for head and neck oncology fellowships (P ≤ .001), programs with a stand-alone FPW (P ≤ .001), and Commission on Dental Accreditation-accredited programs (P = .046). Programs with a stand-alone FPW had content scores 1.87 times greater than those without and was the predictor variable with the greatest mean difference between groups. There was no significant difference in content scores with respect to geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Oral and maxillofacial surgery FPWs demonstrate deficiencies in content areas relevant to prospective applicants. Optimizing the content of FPWs may represent an opportunity to better inform and recruit graduating residents into fellowship programs.

Is Preoperative Serum Albumin Predictive of Adverse Surgical Outcomes in Maxillofacial Fracture Repair?

PURPOSE: Malnutrition has been recognized as a predictor of postoperative adverse outcomes across many surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between serum albumin and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing operative repair of maxillofacial fractures. METHODS: The authors utilized the 2011 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases to identify patients with facial fractures undergoing operative repair. The primary predictor variable was preoperative serum albumin level. Outcome variables included complications and other adverse outcomes occurring within 30 days of the index operation. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between serum albumin and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period 1211 subjects underwent operative repair of a facial fracture and had a documented serum albumin level. Of these subjects, 1037 (85.6%) had normal albumin levels and 174 (14.4%) had hypoalbuminemia. A total of 90 subjects experienced a complication (7.43%), although albumin level was not associated with surgical complications or any complication. In bivariate analysis, subjects with hypoalbuminemia were significantly more likely to have an extended length of stay (P ≤ .001), adverse discharge disposition (P ≤ .001), and be readmitted (P = .002). In multivariate analysis, hypoalbuminemia was an independent predictor of an extended length of stay (P ≤ .001, 95% CI 2.50 to 7.62), adverse discharge disposition (P = .048, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.75), and readmission (P = .041, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.47). CONCLUSIONS: Serum albumin was not an independent predictor of complications after maxillofacial trauma repair. However, it was an independent predictor of other adverse outcomes including extended length of stay, adverse discharge disposition, and readmission. Targeted nutritional optimization may represent an opportunity to improve outcomes in this demographic.

Is Intensive Care Unit Monitoring Necessary After Maxillomandibular Advancement for Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea?

PURPOSE: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is an accepted treatment modality for obstructive sleep apnea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of complications requiring an intensive care unit (ICU) level of care and the necessity of routine overnight ICU airway monitoring after MMA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MMA at Massachusetts General Hospital from 2003 to 2020. The primary predictor variable was postoperative admission to the ICU versus post anesthesia care unit (PACU) or ward. The primary outcome variable was grade IV or V complications as scored using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome variables included postoperative SpO2 nadir and length of hospital stay. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed to measure the association between complications and predictor variables. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 104 patients (74.0% male, mean age 37.6 ± 12.1 years), 61 of whom were admitted to the ICU (58.7%). During the initial 24 hours of airway monitoring, the mean SpO2 nadir was 93.7 ± 2.59% for patients admitted to the ICU compared with 94.0 ± 6.56% for patients admitted to the PACU or ward (P = .862). Patients experienced 2 grade IV complications (1.92%) and no grade V complications, with no statistical association between complications and postoperative admission location (P = 1.000). Age (P = .002) and operative time (P = .046) were the only variables statistically associated with grade IV or V complications. There was no difference in length of hospital stay between patients admitted to the ICU (2.64 ± 1.37 days) versus PACU or ward (2.58 ± 1.62 days). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of complications requiring ICU-level care after MMA for obstructive sleep apnea is low. Additional studies are warranted to guide development of feasible, cost-effective perioperative protocols for patients undergoing MMA.

Does the Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) Predict Adverse Outcomes in Maxillofacial Fracture Repair?

PURPOSE: Frailty has been recognized as a predictor of postoperative adverse outcomes in many surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between frailty and complications in patients undergoing operative repair of facial fractures. METHODS: The authors utilized the 2011 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases to identify patients with facial fractures undergoing operative repair. The primary predictor variable was frailty as measured by the 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). The primary outcome variable was the postoperative complication rate. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between frailty and complications. RESULTS: During the study period, 4,290 subjects underwent operative repair of a facial fracture. Of these subjects, 4,086 (83.0%) were classified as nonfrail, 626 (12.7%) as moderately frail, and 208 (4.20%) as severely frail. A total of 237 subjects experienced a complication (4.82%), and the incidence of complications increased in a stepwise manner with increasing frailty (P ≤ .001). In multivariate regression, age (P = .050, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.02), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander race (P = .018, 95% CI = 1.23 to 8.63), classification as moderately frail (P = .010, 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.66), classification as severely frail (P = .032, 95% CI = 1.06 to 3.70), mandibular fractures (P = .004, 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.98), and wound classification as contaminated (P ≤ .001, 95% CI = 1.53 to 4.57) or dirty/infected (P = .020, 95% CI = 1.16 to 5.55) were independent predictors of complications. Severely frail subjects also had greater length of hospital admission (P ≤ .001) and higher 30-day readmission rates (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is an independent predictor of complications following facial fracture repair and is associated with greater length of hospital admission and 30-day readmission rates.

Females Have Worse Overall and Disease-Specific Survival in Human Papillomavirus-Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Although sex (male vs female) has been identified as an independent prognostic factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), the role of sex in HPV-negative OPSCC is less understood. The purpose of this study is to measure the association between sex and HPV-negative OPSCC disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This longitudinal, retrospective study examined cases of HPV-negative OPSCC diagnosed in the United States between 2013 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients with primary OPSCC and known HPV-negative status were included. Those with HPV-positive or unknown status and primary lesions located outside the oropharynx were excluded. The primary predictor variable was patient sex (male vs female). Primary outcome variables of interest included DSS and OS. The following patient-level covariates were also assessed: age, race, insurance status, primary anatomical site and histological type of lesion, histologic grade and stage, and disease outcome. A survival analysis was conducted using univariate and multivariate analyses via a cox proportional hazard regression model. An α value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 2,565 cases (25.1% female) of HPV-negative OPSCC. Females presented with lower histologic grade (P = .015) and earlier stage (P = .003). Females demonstrated worse DSS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001). After multivariate adjustment, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.67; P = .002), advanced age (HR = 1.672; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.60; P = .023), advanced overall stage (HR = 4.69; 95% CI, 1.54 to 14.267; P = .006), TNM stage (T4: HR = 5.74; 95% CI, 3.86 to 8.55, P < .001, N3: HR = 3.48; 95% CI, 2.17 to 5.58; P < .001, and M1: HR = 2.80; 95% CI, 2.09 to 3.74; P < .001), subjects residing in counties with the highest rates of smoking (HR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.65; P = .044), and the lack of surgical treatment in patients treated with radiation and/or chemotherapy (HR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.91; P = .012) were correlated with poorer DSS and OS. CONCLUSION: Females with HPV-negative OPSCC demonstrated worse DSS and OS despite better typical prognostic signs such as histologic grade and clinical stage.

Orthognathic Surgery in Older Patients: Is Age Associated With Perioperative Complications?

PURPOSE: The incidence of older patients undergoing orthognathic surgery is increasing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between age and perioperative adverse outcomes in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery in the 2011 to 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. The primary predictor variable was age group (≥40 or <40 years). The primary outcome variable was adverse outcomes occurring within 30 days of the index operation. Descriptive, bivariate, and Firth logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate association between age and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,226 patients underwent an orthognathic procedure and 835 subjects were included. Of these subjects, 145 were 40 years or older (17.4%) and 690 were less than 40 years (82.6%). Subjects 40 years or older were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification II (P ≤ .001), ASA III (P ≤ .001), or diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (P ≤ .001). A total of 34 subjects experienced an adverse outcome (4.07%), though there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse outcomes between age groups (P = .152). In bivariate analysis, hypertension on medication (P = .037), procedure type (P = .001), and segmented Le Fort I osteotomies (P = .039) were associated with adverse outcomes. After controlling for age, hypertension on medication, segmented Le Fort I osteotomies, and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea, isolated mandibular osteotomies were the only independent predictors of adverse outcomes (odds ratio 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.24; P = .038). Length of stay was 1.38 ± 1.43 days for the 40 years or older group compared to 1.06 ± 1.18 in the <40 group (P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher ASA classifications, older patients did not have a significantly greater incidence of perioperative adverse outcomes including airway complications, nor was increased age associated with adverse outcomes in bivariate or multivariate analysis.

Mandibular Fracture Repair in Older Adults: Is Age Associated With Adverse Outcomes?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the association between age and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases (2011 to 2019) to identify patients with mandibular fractures treated with ORIF. The primary predictor variable was age (<45 years, 45 to 54 years, 55 to 64 years, 65 to 74 years, and ≥75 years). The primary outcome variable was surgical complications. Secondary outcome variables included any complication, extended length of stay (LOS ≥95th percentile), and adverse discharge destination. Covariates included demographic, medical, and perioperative covariates. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the association between age and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 2,843 patients underwent ORIF of a mandibular fracture, and 2,168 subjects were included. There were 1,673 subjects aged <45 years (77.2%), 240 subjects aged 45 to 54 years (11.1%), 155 subjects aged 55 to 64 years (7.10%), 53 subjects aged 65 to 74 years (2.40%), and 47 subjects aged ≥75 years (2.20%). A total of 148 subjects (6.83%) experienced a surgical complication; the incidence of surgical complications increased in a step-wise fashion with each decade of life (P ≤ .001). In bivariate analysis, subjects aged 65 to 74 years were more likely to experience extended LOS (P = .004), whereas subjects aged ≥75 years were more likely to have an extended LOS (P ≤ .001) and an adverse discharge destination (P ≤ .001). In multivariate analysis, age 65 to 74 years was an independent predictor of any complication (P = .032, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 5.37), extended LOS (P = .001, 95% CI = 1.72 to 8.79), and adverse discharge destination (P = .050, 95% CI = 1.00 to 14.4), whereas age ≥75 years was an independent predictor of surgical complications (P = .043, 95% CI = 1.03 to 6.68), any complication (P = .018, 95% CI = 1.20 to 6.75), extended LOS (P = .001, 95% CI = 2.35 to 12.3), and an adverse discharge destination (P ≤ .001, 95% CI = 3.01 to 33.2). CONCLUSIONS: The elderly are at increased risk of adverse outcomes with step-wise increases in the odds of select outcomes with increasing age.

Do Patterns of Opioid Prescriptions to Medicare Beneficiaries Differ Between Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Practicing in Urban and Rural Settings?

PURPOSE: This study compared opioid prescription patterns among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) treating Medicare beneficiaries in urban and rural settings, in an effort to identify avenues to further promote responsible opioid prescribing in a patient demographic vulnerable to opioid diversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2014 to 2018, focusing on providers labeled as an OMS. Rural-urban commuting area codes were used to categorize each OMS as urban or rural. The demographic variables included total number of OMSs, provider gender, beneficiaries per provider, beneficiaries' age, and beneficiary hierarchal condition category (proxy for clinical complexity). The outcome variables included opioid prescribing rate, opioid claims per provider, opioid claims per beneficiary, and number of days' supply of opioids per claim. Descriptive statistics, χ2 tests, 2-tailed t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Across all years, the data consisted of mostly urban and male OMSs. The mean number of Medicare beneficiaries prescribed opioids per OMS varied widely, and the mean age of beneficiaries was 70.4 ± 4.4 and 69.9 ± 4.1 years for urban and rural OMSs, respectively. Mean opioid claims per provider were higher among rural OMSs, with large standard deviations among both rural and urban OMSs. However, there were no significant differences in the opioid prescribing rate or in the mean opioid claims per beneficiary in all 5 years included in the study. There were also no clinically significant differences between urban and rural OMSs in the number of days' supply per claim (between 3 and 4 days in all periods). However, in each year, there was a significantly higher proportion of urban OMSs who prescribed more than 7 days' supply per claim. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescription practices were generally similar between rural and urban OMSs treating Medicare beneficiaries. The small subset of longer-term opioid prescribers, which were more prevalent in urban areas, warrants further investigation.

Interfacility Emergency Department Transfer for Mandibular Fractures in the United States.

PURPOSE: Interfacility hospital transfer for isolated mandibular fractures is common but rarely clinically necessary. The purpose of this study was to generate nationally representative estimates regarding the incidence, risk factors, and cost of transfer for isolated mandibular fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2018 to identify patients with isolated mandibular fractures. The primary predictor variable was hospital trauma center designation (Level I, Level II, Level III, and nontrauma center). The primary outcome variable was hospital transfer. Total emergency department (ED) charges were also assessed. Covariates were demographic, medical, injury-related, and hospital characteristics. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were used to evaluate the incidence and predictors of interfacility transfer. RESULTS: A total of 28,357 encounters with mandibular fracture as the primary diagnosis were included. Within this cohort there were 2,893 hospital transfers (10.2%). In unadjusted analysis, evaluation at a nontrauma center, level III trauma center, metropolitan nonteaching hospital, nonmetropolitan nonteaching hospital, micropolitan region, and history of cerebrovascular event was associated with hospital transfer (P ≤ .001). In the adjusted model, independent predictors (risk factors) for hospital transfer were evaluation at a nontrauma center (P ≤ .001, odds ratio [OR] = 12.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.43 to 25.4), level III trauma center (P ≤ .001, OR = 10.7, 95% CI = 5.25 to 21.7), nonmetropolitan nonteaching hospital (P ≤ .001, OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.73 to 3.46), metropolitan nonteaching hospital (P ≤ .001, OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.06), cervical spine injury (P = .002, OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.61 to 7.75), fractures of the mandibular body (P = .007, OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.64), and unspecified mandibular fractures (P = .006, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.99). The average ED charge per encounter was $7,482 ± 565 for a total nationwide charge of $212,172,264. Transferred subjects had total ED charges of $25,632,974, not including additional charges incurred at the recipient hospital. CONCLUSION: Isolated mandibular fractures are common injuries that are frequently transferred and cost the healthcare system millions of dollars annually. Hospital characteristics rather than medical or injury-related variables were the strongest predictors of transfer, suggesting that transfers are primarily driven by need to access maxillofacial surgical services. Programs evaluating necessity of transfer and facilitating specialist evaluation in the outpatient setting may reduce healthcare expenditures for this injury.

Correction of Traumatic Transverse Mandibular Widening With Interdental Wiring.

ABSTRACT: Mandibular symphysis fractures pose several technical challenges for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. One classic challenge is restoration of the transverse dimension when the mandible is widened secondary to splaying of the lingual cortex. Failure to diagnose or correct this problem can result in widening of the lower facial third, inadequate fracture reduction, and/or a malocclusion. Surgeons have traditionally utilized techniques such as manual pressure to the rami or lingual splint application to address transverse defects intraoperatively. However, these methods may be inadequate in situations with significant widening, such as in the case of concomitant subcondylar fractures. More recently, virtual surgical planning and custom hardware have been utilized to address mandibular widening, though this method also has various shortcomings. In this technical note, the authors present a simple technique using interdental wiring to precisely control mandibular width intraoperatively. The technique is cost effective, does not require an assistant, and can be used in conjunction with any of the above methods. The authors also present a case of secondary reconstruction in which use of this technique was necessary given a large degree of mandibular widening not amenable to reduction and fixation with manual pressure alone.

What Factors Are Associated With Open Treatment of Pediatric Mandibular Fractures?

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of data with respect to management of pediatric facial fractures. The purpose of this study was to describe the population of pediatric patients with mandibular fractures at our institution and to assess predictors of fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≤17 years presenting with mandibular fractures. The primary predictor variable was age ≥13 years and <13 years. The primary outcome variable was ORIF (yes or no). Epidemiologic factors and complications were also assessed. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between predictor variables and ORIF. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 84 subjects with 61 subjects aged ≥13 years and 23 subjects aged <13 years. ORIF was used for 21.4% of subjects. Increased age was associated with ORIF (P = .009). After adjusting for the effects of concurrent variables, age (P = .047, OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.01 to 5.24), fracture displacement between 2 and 4 mm (P = .032, OR = 18.1, 95% CI = 1.29 to 254), fracture displacement >4 mm (P = .019, OR = 16.9, 95% CI = 1.60 to 179), and the presence of 3 fractures (P = .027, OR = 30.8, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.641) were positive independent predictors of ORIF. Concomitant facial, skull, or skull base fractures (P = .039, OR = 0.027, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.641) were a negative independent predictor of ORIF. Secondarily, both mechanism of injury and fracture location varied significantly by age and gender. Complication rate was 6.33%. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric mandibular fractures were managed nonoperatively. Increased age, fracture displacement, presence of 3 fractures, and concomitant craniofacial injuries were independent predictors of ORIF. Complication rates were low regardless of treatment modality.

Is Outpatient Management of Mandibular Fractures Associated With Inflammatory Complications? An ACS-NSQIP Study.

PURPOSE: Timing of mandibular fracture repair has long been debated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following open repair of mandibular fractures managed non-urgently in the outpatient setting versus urgently in the inpatient setting. METHODS: The authors utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to enroll a sample of patients with mandibular fractures who underwent open repair. The primary independent variable was treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) versus inpatient (urgent/non-elective). The primary dependent variable was POIC (yes/no). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between treatment protocol and POICs. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 1,848 subjects with 1,134 outpatients and 714 inpatients. The incidence of POICs was 6.53% for the outpatient group compared to 8.96% for the inpatient group, with no significant difference between groups (P= .052). However, subjects treated as inpatients were 1.51 times more likely to experience any complication (P = .008) due to an increase in non-POICs (P = .028), in particular urinary tract infections (P = .035). After adjusting for age, hypertension requiring medical treatment, and smoking, classification as ASA II (P = .046, OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.83), ASA III (P = .020, OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 7.02), diabetes (P = 0.004, OR = 3.11, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.74), and preoperative hematocrit (P = 0.010, OR = 0.950, 95% CI 0.913 to 0.988) were independent predictors of POICs. Length of stay was 0.83 ± 2.61 days compared to 2.36 ± 3.63 days for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in POICs between patients treated as outpatients versus inpatients, though outpatients had fewer non-POICs and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Can Patients With Isolated Mandibular Fractures Be Treated as Outpatients?

PURPOSE: Treating mandibular fractures urgently is controversial. The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the rates of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) in patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated in a nonurgent manner by an outpatient protocol versus a traditional, urgent inpatient protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of patients with isolated mandibular fractures treated with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF). The primary predictor variable was the treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) or inpatient (urgent). The outpatient group was treated with closed reduction and intermaxillary fixation, discharged, and scheduled for definitive treatment as outpatients. The inpatient group was admitted to the hospital, and the fracture was treated with ORIF as soon as possible. The primary outcome variable was POIC (present or absent). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between the treatment protocol and POICs, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: The study sample was composed of 193 patients, with 82 in the outpatient group and 111 in the inpatient group. The frequency of POICs was 17.1% and 18.9% in the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P = .13; relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.0). The time to ORIF was not significantly associated with POICs (P = .71). After adjustment for treatment group, fracture location, and time to fracture stabilization, smoking (P = .04, odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 5.1) and intraoral incision with a transbuccal trocar (P = .02, odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.8) were associated with an increased risk of POICs. Length of stay was 0.6 ± 0.8 days in the outpatient group compared with 2.7 ± 2.0 days in the inpatient group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: An outpatient model to treat isolated mandibular fractures was not associated with an increased risk of POICs. This outpatient care model reduced the hospital length of stay without increasing the risk of POICs.

Modular synthesis and modification of novel bifunctional dendrons.

Herein, we report the design and synthesis of two novel bifunctional dendrons bearing multiple amine termini at the periphery and an azide at the focal point. Copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition enabled modular dendritic scaffold assembly resulting in a first generation dendron carrying six amines and a second generation dendron carrying eighteen amines. Peripheral amines were labeled with multiple copies of a metal isotope, whereas the azide functionality at the focal point was employed in conjugation to a single anti-human CD4 antibody. We demonstrated that the highly monomeric first generation dendron-antibody conjugate selectively detected CD4+ T cells in the PMBC culture.

Long-Term Stability of Condylectomy and Costochondral Graft Reconstruction for Treatment of Idiopathic Condylar Resorption.

PURPOSE: To assess and update long-term outcomes of endoscopic condylectomy and costochondral graft (CCG) reconstruction for treatment of active idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a continuation of a retrospective cohort study of patients with active ICR who underwent bilateral condylectomies and CCG reconstruction from 1999 to 2016. Predictor variables were demographic and operative factors. The primary outcome variable was occlusal stability, as defined by normal overbite (1 to 4 mm) at latest follow-up. Overbite; overjet; the angle formed by the sella, nasion, and B point (SNB); mandibular plane angle; and ramus-and-condyle unit height were measured. Time points were preoperative (T0) and immediate (T1), 1 year (T2), 2 years (T3), 3 to 5 years (T4), and at least 5 years (T5) postoperative. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed. A Firth logistic regression model was used to identify variables associated with occlusal instability. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (25 female; mean age, 23.1 yr) who underwent bilateral endoscopic condylectomies and CCG reconstruction were included: 14 from the original cohort and 12 additional patients for the present analysis. Median follow-up was 3.65 years (range, 1.11 to 17.1 yr). Preoperatively, all patients had a Class II malocclusion with a mean overjet of 6.89 mm (range, 1.2 to 17.1 mm) and a mean anterior open bite of -2.12 mm (range, -0.4 to -7.9 mm). Normal overbite (1 to 4 mm) and overjet (2 to 4 mm) were achieved postoperatively in all patients. There were no significant changes in overjet, overbite, SNB, mandibular plane angle, and ramus-and-condyle unit height from T1 to T4. At latest follow-up, 88.5% of patients had a normal overbite. Three patients developed an anterior open bite postoperatively: 1 at 2 years (0.1 mm; preoperative, -3.4), 1 at 9 years (-0.8 mm; preoperative -7.9), and 1 at 11 years (-1.3 mm; preoperative -1.1). Subjects at T5 (n = 9 of 26) had mean overjet and overbite of 3.48 and 1.56 mm, respectively. Non-white race and follow-up time were significant predictors of occlusal instability in the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Stable and predictable long-term outcomes can be achieved using endoscopic condylectomy and CCG reconstruction for treatment of active ICR.