What future for coronary artery bypass surgery.

The future of coronary artery bypass graft can be bright if cardiac surgeons will change the paradigm followed so far and will return in history, abandoning the current comfortable life and accepting the burden represented by the cost of innovation, which has a path already mapped out but not sufficiently trodden for guilty lack of commitment.

How to recycle a misused left internal thoracic artery: Tips and tricks.

In this case report, we describe how to recycle the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) when misused but not damaged. Eight years after a left anterior small thoracotomy followed by left anterior descending (LAD) stenting for STEMI in first postoperative day, a 67-years-old woman had an NSTEMI with angiographic evidence of intrastent re-stenosis with a perfectly patent LITA, harvested only from the fourth to the sixth intercostal space. During redo surgery, LITA was harvested as a pedicle from the anastomosis to the fourth intercostal space and primarily from the first to the fourth intercostal space. Special attention was paid at the level of the fourth intercostal space where the vessel was stuck to the sternum: a 15-blade was used being scissors or cautery too dangerous. At the end of harvesting, the LITA was full-length available for a new coronary anastomosis on LAD, distal to the previous one.

Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: The MIST trial.

RATIONALE: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has emerged as a safe alternative to standard cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive coronary surgery (MICS CABG) was developed to allow adequate exposure and complete revascularization in CABG from a small thoracotomy incision without cardiopulmonary bypass. Multiple studies have reported significant shorter length of hospital stay and earlier postoperative physical recovery for MICS CABG patients when compared to sternotomy CABG patients. However, there have been no convincing clinical trials that demonstrate improvement in post-operative quality of life for patients who undergo MICS CABG. STUDY DESIGN: The Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery compared to Sternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MIST) trial is a multi-centered, prospective randomized controlled trial that compares the quality of life and recovery in the early post-operative period between patients undergoing MICS CABG versus patients undergoing sternotomy CABG. Patients will be randomized either to the MICS CABG group or the sternotomy CABG group, and the target enrollment is 88 patients per group. The primary outcome is quality of life assessment performed by SF-36 questionnaire at 1 month. CONCLUSION: The MIST trial is the first prospective study that compares the quality of life between MICS CABG and sternotomy CABG patients. The results of this trial may enhance the procedural desirability of MICS CABG by patients and provide an incentive for surgeons and institutions to increase the availability of MICS CABG in suitable patients.

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in high-risk patients: operative results of a prospective randomized trial (on-off study).

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass complications between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel trial enrolled patients for elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation of 6 or more. The patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. The composite primary end point included operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, reoperation for bleeding and adult respiratory distress syndrome within 30 days after surgery. The total sample size was 693 patients, according to a scheduled interim analysis at 400 patients enrolled (α-spending = 0.029, Pocock method). RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were included in the interim analysis. Randomization assigned 203 patients to on-pump and 208 patients to off-pump treatment. Of the 411 patients, 24 crossed over; thus, 195 patients were actually treated on-pump and 216 off-pump. According to the intention to treat analysis, the rate of the composite primary end point was significantly lower (unadjusted P = .009, adjusted P = .010) in the off-pump group (5.8% vs 13.3%). The risk of experiencing the primary end point was significantly greater for the on-pump group (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-5.10; P = .011; adjusted odds ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-7.14; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces early mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients.