Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Head Neck ; 46(3): 713-716, 2024 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235914

ABSTRACT

The osteomyocutaneous pectoralis major flap was first described in 1980 and provides a single stage reconstructive option for poor free flap or pectoralis major flap with reconstruction plate candidates requiring bony reconstruction. The flap provides good functional and cosmetic outcomes in appropriately selected patients. We describe the indications and operative techinique for harvesting this flap in written and video format.


Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Pectoralis Muscles/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Ribs/transplantation , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery
2.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 104: 102337, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35051883

ABSTRACT

DNA repair vulnerabilities are present in a significant proportion of cancers. Specifically, germline alterations in DNA repair not only increase cancer risk but are associated with treatment response and clinical outcomes. The therapeutic landscape of cancer has rapidly evolved with the FDA approval of therapies that specifically target DNA repair vulnerabilities. The clinical success of synthetic lethality between BRCA deficiency and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition has been truly revolutionary. Defective mismatch repair has been validated as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint blockade associated with durable responses and long-term benefit in many cancer patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technologies and their decreasing cost have supported increased genetic profiling of tumors coupled with germline testing of cancer risk genes in patients. The clinical adoption of panel testing for germline assessment in high-risk individuals has generated a plethora of genetic data, particularly on DNA repair genes. Here, we highlight the therapeutic relevance of germline aberrations in DNA repair to identify patients eligible for precision treatments such as PARP inhibitors (PARPis), immune checkpoint blockade, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and combined treatment. We also discuss emerging mechanisms that regulate DNA repair.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , DNA Repair/genetics , Germ Cells , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Precision Medicine
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 13518, 2020 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32782288

ABSTRACT

Pathogenic variants (PVs) in multiple genes are known to increase the risk of early-onset renal cancer (eoRC). However, many eoRC patients lack PVs in RC-specific genes; thus, their genetic risk remains undefined. Here, we determine if PVs in DNA damage response and repair (DDRR) genes are enriched in eoRC patients undergoing cancer risk assessment. Retrospective review of de-identified results from 844 eoRC patients, undergoing testing with a multi-gene panel, for a variety of indications, by Ambry Genetics. PVs in cancer-risk genes were identified in 12.8% of patients-with 3.7% in RC-specific, and 8.55% in DDRR genes. DDRR gene PVs were most commonly identified in CHEK2, BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM. Among the 2.1% of patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 PV, < 50% reported a personal history of hereditary breast or ovarian-associated cancer. No association between age of RC diagnosis and prevalence of PVs in RC-specific or DDRR genes was observed. Additionally, 57.9% patients reported at least one additional cancer; breast cancer being the most common (40.1% of females, 2.5% of males). Multi-gene testing including DDRR genes may provide a more comprehensive risk assessment in eoRC patients. Further validation is needed to characterize the association with eoRC.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage/genetics , DNA Repair/genetics , Genetic Variation , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Cohort Studies , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genetic Testing , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
5.
Adv Ther ; 36(10): 2638-2678, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410780

ABSTRACT

In the last few years, immunotherapy has transformed the way we treat solid tumors, including melanoma, lung, head neck, breast, renal, and bladder cancers. Durable responses and long-term survival benefit has been experienced by many cancer patients, with favorable toxicity profiles of immunotherapeutic agents relative to chemotherapy. Cures have become possible in some patients with metastatic disease. Additional approvals of immunotherapy drugs and in combination with other agents are anticipated in the near future. Multiple additional immunotherapy drugs are in earlier stages of clinical development, and their testing in additional tumor types is under way. Despite considerable early success and relatively fewer side effects, the majority of cancer patients do not respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Additionally, while the drugs are generally well tolerated, there is still the potential for significant, unpredictable and even fatal toxicity with these agents. Improved biomarkers may help to better select patients who are more likely to respond to these drugs. Two key biologically important predictive tissue biomarkers, specifically, PD-L1 and mismatch repair deficiency, have been FDA-approved in conjunction with the checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab. Tumor mutation burden, another promising biomarker, is emerging in several tumor types, and may also soon receive approval. Finally, several other tissue and liquid biomarkers are emerging that could help guide single-agent immunotherapy and in combination with other agents. Of these, one promising investigational biomarker is alteration or deficiency in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, with altered DDR observed in a broad spectrum of tumors. Here, we provide a critical overview of current, emerging, and investigational biomarkers in the context of response to immunotherapy in solid tumors.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , B7-H1 Antigen/blood , Brain Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , DNA Damage , Humans , Immunologic Factors/administration & dosage , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL