ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify factors of incomplete treatment after segmental transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for treatment-naive and solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 consecutive patients (age, 68.5 years [SD ± 8.0]; 25/75 [33.3%] women) with treatment-naive, solitary HCC underwent segmental or subsegmental TARE with glass microspheres (tumor size, 3.8 cm [SD ± 2.2]; administered dose, 222.6 Gy [SD ± 123.9]) at a single institution from November 2015 to June 2022. Radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed as per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: Complete treatment was achieved in 48 of 75 (64.0%) patients (mean follow-up, 33.2 months [SD ± 27.4]). Patients with incomplete treatment (27/75, 36%) presented with larger tumor size (5.0 [SD ± 2.5] vs 3.1 [SD ± 1.6] cm; P = .0001), with more tumors located in the watershed zone (81.5% vs 41.7%; P = .001). These patients were less likely to be bridged to transplant or resection (22.2% vs 52.1%; P = .015). Watershed tumors demonstrated worse target tumor PFS (median PFS, 19 months vs not reached; P = .0104) and overall PFS (9.1 months vs not reached; P = .0077). Watershed location was associated with worse PFS among tumors >3 cm in size (8.4 months vs not reached; P = .035) but not in tumors ≤3 cm in size (52.2 months vs not reached; P = .915). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size and watershed location were associated with incomplete treatment after segmental TARE for HCC. Watershed tumors were associated with worse PFS, particularly tumors larger than 3 cm. These tumors may require careful treatment planning and repeated treatments to ensure a durable response.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Disease Progression , Embolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Microspheres , Progression-Free Survival , Radiopharmaceuticals , Tumor Burden , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Radiopharmaceuticals/administration & dosage , Radiopharmaceuticals/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Yttrium Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Yttrium Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Purpose: Technology advances in cancer care have paralleled rapidly increasing expenditures in radiation therapy. The use and costs of shorter cancer radiation therapy offer potential utility in clinical practice. We evaluate use and expenditures of Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries receiving hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HF-WBI) compared with conventionally fractionated whole breast irradiation (CF-WBI) in the United States and examine the relationship of patient characteristics with HF-WBI use. Methods and Materials: We performed a retrospective analysis of radiation therapy in MA beneficiaries using private employer-sponsored insurance claims for a pooled cross-sectional evaluation from 2009 to 2017. The study population included female MA beneficiaries with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and whole breast irradiation. Results: A total of 9957 women received HF-WBI, and 18,920 received CF-WBI. Older age, greater distance from home to treatment facility, and a higher proportion of college graduates in the community of residence were associated with increased HF-WBI use. Mean insurer-paid radiation therapy expenditures were significantly lower for HF-WBI versus CF-WBI (adjusted difference, $4113; 95% CI, $4030-$4,197). Mean patient out-of-pocket expenditure for HF-WBI was $426 less than that of CF-WBI. Across US states, geographic variation existed in the ratio of costs for HF-WBI relative to CF-WBI (range, 0.41-0.87). Conclusions: HF-WBI use among MA beneficiaries with breast cancer has dramatically increased over time, surpassing CF-HBI as the dominant form of radiation therapy. HF-WBI clinical adoption has outpaced any continual cost decrease, despite wide variation across US states for this shorter radiation therapy treatment. As MA enrollment continues to expand, identifying the drivers of HF-WBI use and the sources of variation in costs of HF-WBI will help direct the quality of cancer care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: We aimed to assess geographic and physician-level variation for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use for early-stage breast cancer patients in the United States. We further evaluated the association between HF-WBI use and demographic factors after accounting for these variations. Methods and Materials: We performed a retrospective study of early-stage breast cancer patients using private employer-sponsored insurance claims from 2008 to 2017. Patients were clustered according to geographic level and by radiation oncologist. Bayesian cross-classified multilevel logistic models were used to examine the geographic heterogeneity and variation of radiation oncologists simultaneously. Intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC) and median odds ratios (MOR) were calculated to quantify the variation at different levels. We also used the cross-classified model to identify patient demographic factors associated with receiving HF-WBI. Results: The study included 79,747 women (74.0%) who received conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI) and 27,999 women (26.0%) who underwent HF-WBI. HF-WBI adoption increased significantly across time (2008-2017). The variation in HF-WBI utilization was attributed mostly to physician-level variability (MOR = 2.59). The variability of HF-WBI utilization across core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) (MOR = 1.55) was found to be the strongest among all geographic classifications. After accounting for variability in both CBSAs and radiation oncologists, age, receiving chemotherapy, and several community-level factors, including distance from home to facility, community education level, and racial composition, were found to be associated with HF-WBI utilization. Conclusion: This study demonstrated geographic and physician-level heterogeneity in the use of HF-WBI among early-stage breast cancer patients. HF-WBI utilization was also found to be associated with patient and community-level characteristics. Given observed physician-level variability, intervention through continuing medical education could help doctors to better understand the advantages of HF-WBI and promote the adoption of HF-WBI in the U.S. Influence of physician-level characteristics on HF-WBI utilization merits further study.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Infants who survive prematurity and other critical illnesses and require continued invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) postdischarge (at home) are at high risk of developmental delays and disabilities. Studies of extremely preterm cohorts (<28-week gestation) demonstrate rates of 25% for intellectual disability (ID) and 7% for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Rates of ASD and ID in children with IMV are unknown. This study aimed to determine neurodevelopmental disability risk in a cohort of children with postdischarge IMV. DESIGN/METHODS: A consecutive series of children with IMV were assessed 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after discharge. Cognitive, social, and communicative domains were assessed by a Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrician using (1) clinical adaptive test/clinical linguistic and auditory milestone scale (CAT/CLAMS) of the capute scales; (2) pediatric evaluation of disability inventory computer adaptive test (PEDI-CAT); and (3) modified checklist for autism in toddlers, revised (MCHAT-R). Red flag signs and symptoms of ASD using DSM-V criteria were noted. Longitudinal testing was reviewed. Expert consensus impressions of evolving ASD and/or ID were determined. RESULTS: Eighteen children were followed for 1 year; at 1 year, the median age (range) was 23 (17-42) months. Children were 44% male, 33% non-Hispanic White, 39% non-Hispanic Black, and 28% Hispanic. Fifteen (83%) children were prematurity survivors. Median (range) developmental quotients (DQs): full-scale DQ 59 (11-86), CAT DQ 66.5 (8-96), and CLAMS DQ 49.5 (13-100). Twelve (67%) children were highly suspicious for ASD and/or evolving ID. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This cohort of children with at-home IMV demonstrates a higher risk of ASD and ID than prior premature cohorts. Larger investigations with longer follow-up are needed.
Subject(s)
Tracheostomy , Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Infant, Newborn , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Ventilators, Mechanical , Intellectual Disability , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/etiology , Neurodevelopmental Disorders/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/etiology , Infant, PrematureABSTRACT
(1) Objectives: To investigate the effect of individual-level, neighborhood, and environmental variables on uterine fibroid (UF) prevalence in a Chicago-based cohort. (2) Methods: Data from the Chicago Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS) were analyzed. Individual-level variables were obtained from questionnaires, neighborhood variables from the Chicago Health Atlas, and environmental variables from NASA satellite ambient air exposure levels. The Shapiro-Wilk test, logistic regression models, and Spearman's correlations were used to evaluate the association of variables to UF diagnosis. (3) Results: We analyzed 602 participants (mean age: 50.3 ± 12.3) who responded to a question about UF diagnosis. More Black than White participants had a UF diagnosis (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.62-2.79). We observed non-significant trends between individual-level and neighborhood variables and UF diagnosis. Ambient air pollutants, PM2.5, and DSLPM were protective against UF diagnosis (OR 0.20, CI: 0.04-0.97: OR 0.33, CI: 0.13-0.87). (4) Conclusions: Associations observed within a sample in a specific geographic area may not be generalizable and must be interpreted cautiously.
Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Leiomyoma , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Prevalence , Chicago/epidemiology , Leiomyoma/epidemiology , Air Pollutants/analysis , Logistic ModelsABSTRACT
Importance: General anesthesia for cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal morbidity, and Black and Hispanic pregnant patients have higher rates of general anesthesia use compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts. It is unknown whether risk factors and indications for general anesthesia differ among patients of differing race and ethnicity. Objective: To evaluate differences in general anesthesia use for cesarean delivery and the indication for the general anesthetic by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study, electronic medical records for all 35â¯117 patients who underwent cesarean delivery at Northwestern Medicine's Prentice Women's Hospital from January 1, 2007, to March 2, 2018, were queried for maternal demographics, clinical characteristics, obstetric and anesthetic data, the indication for cesarean delivery, and the indication for general anesthesia when used. Data analysis occurred in August 2023. Exposure: Cesarean delivery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The rate of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery by race and ethnicity. Results: Of the 35â¯117 patients (median age, 33 years [IQR, 30-36 years]) who underwent cesarean delivery, 1147 (3.3%) received general anesthesia; the rates of general anesthesia were 2.5% for Asian patients (61 of 2422), 5.0% for Black patients (194 of 3895), 3.7% for Hispanic patients (197 of 5305), 2.8% for non-Hispanic White patients (542 of 19â¯479), and 3.8% (153 of 4016) for all other groups (including those who declined to provide race and ethnicity information) (P < .001). A total of 19â¯933 pregnant patients (56.8%) were in labor at the time of their cesarean delivery. Of those, 16â¯363 (82.1%) had neuraxial labor analgesia in situ. Among those who had an epidural catheter in situ, there were no racial or ethnic differences in the rates of general anesthesia use vs neuraxial analgesia use (Asian patients, 34 of 503 [6.8%] vs 1289 of 15â¯860 [8.1%]; Black patients, 78 of 503 [15.5%] vs 1925 of 15â¯860 [12.1%]; Hispanic patients, 80 of 503 [15.9%] vs 2415 of 15â¯860 [15.2%]; non-Hispanic White patients, 255 of 503 [50.7%] vs 8285 of 15â¯860 [52.2%]; and patients of other race or ethnicity, 56 of 503 [11.1%] vs 1946 of 15â¯860 [12.3%]; P = .16). Indications for cesarean delivery and for general anesthesia were not different when stratified by race and ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: Racial disparities in rates of general anesthesia continue to exist; however, this study suggests that, for laboring patients who had labor epidural catheters in situ, no disparity by race or ethnicity existed. Future studies should address whether disparities in care that occur prior to neuraxial catheter placement are associated with higher rates of general anesthesia among patients from ethnic and racial minority groups.