The use of an esophageal catheter to check the results of left atrial posterior wall isolation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) via catheter, surgical, and hybrid techniques is a promising treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). We investigated whether confirmation of LAPWI can be achieved using an esophageal pacing and recording electrode. METHODS: Patients undergoing PersAF ablation with the intention to achieve LAPWI were enrolled. Two approaches to LAPWI were tested: (1) ablation using endocardial catheter ablation only, and (2) "Staged Hybrid" ablation with thoracoscopic epicardial ablation, followed by endocardial left atrial electrophysiological study and catheter ablation where necessary. Patients enrolled in the study all required further catheter ablation to achieve LAPWI in this group. In both the groups, esophageal recording and esophageal pacing was performed at the start of mapping and electrophysiological study and compared with endocardial electrophysiological findings. This was repeated at the end of the procedure. RESULTS: Twenty patients (16 M, four F) were studied. Endocardial electrophysiological study showed that in none of the cases was the posterior left atrial wall electrically isolated at the start of the study. One patient with Barrett's esophagus failed to sense or pace from the esophagus at any point in the study. In the remaining 19/19, esophageal pacing captured the atrial rhythm at the start of the procedure. LAPWI was then achieved in 17/19 using endocardial catheter ablation; retesting at this point showed sensing and capture of the atrium from the esophagus was abolished. In the remainder sensing and capture persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal pacing can be used to confirm or refute electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation using the Tip-Versatile Ablation Catheter.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) develops are incompletely understood. Consequently, the optimal strategy for the ablative management of PsAF remains debated. Current methods are often time consuming, complex and non-reproducible. We assessed the Tip-Versatile Ablation Catheter (T-VAC) technique, a rapidly delivered, empirical technique based on the box-set concept using duty-cycled linear catheter ablation technology. METHODS: Forty-four procedures in 40 patients undergoing PsAF ablation with the novel technique were prospectively entered onto a database: 27 de novo. Primary endpoint was freedom from arrhythmia at over two-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were time to first arrhythmia recurrence, freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) on and off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), procedural and fluoroscopy duration and complication rate. RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 33 months, absolute freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was 45% in the de novo group. Overall, at 33 (IQR 24-63) months, 60% of de novo patients were in sustained normal sinus rhythm and a further 15% reported only occasional paroxysms of AF at long-term follow-up. Procedure time was 192±25 mins, total energy delivered 2239±883s and fluoroscopy time was 60±10mins. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with persistent AF, a long-term rate of 60% arrhythmia free survival off AAD can be achieved using this novel T-VAC technique.

Transseptal left ventricular lead placement using snare technique.

BACKGROUND: Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy has a failure rate of ∼5-10%. Here we describe a way of implanting an endocardial left ventricular (LV) lead via a transseptal puncture (TSP), using a GooseNeck snare and active fixation lead. METHODS: Three male patients (67-83 years) with failed or extracted epicardial LV leads implanted via the CS had an endocardial LV lead implanted. TSP was performed via a femoral vein. The active fixation pacing lead was advanced to the right atrium from a subclavian vein. A GooseNeck snare was passed via the TSP sheath and used to grasp the tip of the pacing lead. The sheath, GooseNeck snare, and pacing lead tip were then passed to the left atrium by sliding the system up the TSP guidewire and across the interatrial septum before deflecting the lead to permit implantation in the left ventricle. RESULTS: Successful implantation was performed in all patients with an LV implant time of 25-55 minutes. CONCLUSION: The use of a GooseNeck snare via a deflectable transseptal sheath represents a reliable alternative method for endocardial LV lead placement in patients with failed CS LV lead implantation.

Biventricular ICD implant using endocardial LV lead placement from the left subclavian vein approach and transseptal puncture via the transfemoral route.

We present the case of a 72 years old diabetic male patient with severe dilated ischaemic cardiomyopathy and New York Heart Association functional class III symptoms and previous unsuccessful attempts to cardiac resynchronization therapy using the conventional epicardial left ventricular (LV) pacing through the coronary sinus. He also had an indication for ICD implantation. We successfully implanted a biventricular ICD system from the standard left subclavian vein approach using endocardial placement of the LV lead via a transfemorally performed transeptal puncture. This technique offered him a suitable alternative to either a thoracoscopic LV lead placement (not routinely performed in our centre) or a high-risk thoracotomy procedure and multisite pacing using epicardial leads.