[Efficacy Analysis of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Acute Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding].

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the treatment of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB), and to guide clinical practice and continue to optimize diagnosis and treatment strategies. Methods: This retrospective study included 266 patients who underwent angiography due to ANVUGIB between March 2016 and March 2021. Data on the positive rate of angiography, the technical success rate and clinical success rate of TAE, and the rebleeding rate and the all-cause mortality within 30 days after TAE treatment were collected, and the influencing factors relevant to the above events were analyzed accordingly. Results: All 266 patients completed angiography--the positive rate of angiography was 54.1% (144/266), the total technical success rate was 97.3% (217/223), the clinical success rate was 73.1% (155/212), and the rebleeding rate and all-cause mortality within 30 days were 26.9% (57/212) and 16.1% (35/217), respectively. This study found that shock index>1 ( OR=5.950; 95% CI: 1.481-23.895; P=0.012), computed tomography angiography (CTA) positive result ( OR=6.813; 95% CI: 1.643-28.252; P=0.008) and interval<24 h ( OR=10.530; 95% CI: 2.845-38.976; P<0.001) were independent predictors of positive angiography. Shock index>1 ( OR=2.544; 95% CI: 1.301-4.972; P=0.006) and INR>1.5 ( OR=3.207; 95% CI: 1.381-7.451; P=0.007) were independent risk factors for rebleeding. Patients with postoperative bleeding ( OR=3.174; 95% CI: 1.164-8.654; P=0.024) and patients with rebleeding after embolization ( OR=34.665; 95% CI: 11.471-104.758; P<0.001) had a higher risk of death within 30 days. Conclusion: TAE is safe and effective in the treatment of ANVUGIB. Patients with shock index>1 and positive CTA are more likely to be angiographic positive, and should undergo angiography as early as possible after bleeding. In addition, rebleeding after embolization deserves high attention.

[Role of Hemostatic Clips as Guidance during Transcatheter Arterial Embolization in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding after Endoscopic Treatment Failure].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization using hemostatic clips as the guidance in the patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic treatment failure. METHODS: From February 2009 to October 2018, 33 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who were treated with transcatheter arterial embolization after endoscopic treatment failure were included in the study. Clinical success rate, 30-d mortality rate and complication rate were observed. RESULTS: According to Forrest grading of ulcer bleeding on endoscopy, 8 patients (24.2%) were defined as Ⅰa, 14 patients (42.5%) Ⅰb, 4 patients (12.1%) Ⅱa, and 7 patients (21.2%) Ⅱb. There were 8 patients not given endoscopic treatment due to poor vision. In 25 patients who received endoscopic treatment, 7 patients did not achieve primary endoscopic hemostasis and 18 patients had re-bleeding despite successful primary hemostasis. The mean interval time from endoscopic treatment failure to transcatheter arterial embolization was (35.42±67.54) h. All patients underwent arterial angiography, and 18 patients with positive angiographic findings were treated with embolization. Among the 15 patients with negative angiographic findings, hemostatic clip could be observed fluoroscopically in 8 patients and used as guidance for embolization. Prophylactic embolization was performed in 4 out of 7 patients without visualization of clip fluoroscopically. The clinical success rates in negative angiographic findings patients with and without clip guidance were 75.0% and 28.6% respectively. The clinical success rate with positive angiographic findings was 66.7%. The overall clinical success rate and 30-d mortality rate were 60.0% and 20.0% respectively. No complication related to embolization was observed. CONCLUSION: The preliminary clinical study demonstrates that transcatheter arterial embolization with the guidance of clips is effective and safe for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic treatment failure.

[Efficacy of Transcatheter Embolization for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in 17 Cases].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transcatheter embolization for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. METHODS: From June 2006 to June 2019, 17 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor and who were gastrointestinal bleeding treated with transcatheter embolization due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage in our hospital were included in this study. The technical and clinical success rates and clinical success rate were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Among 17 patients who underwent angiography before embolotherapy, 5 patients (29.4%) showed tumor staining and contrast extravasation, 9 patients (52.9%) showed tumor staining but no significant contrast extravasation, and 3 patients (17.6%) were negative. 14 patients had with positive angiographic findings and then underwent transcatheter embolization. Technical success was achieved in 13 patients (76.5%). Of the 13 technically successful patients, 12 patients (70.6%) achieved clinical success, one patient (5.9%) suffered from repeated gastrointestinal bleeding, which was improved after conservative treatment. No embolization-related complication occurred. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolization for gastrointestinal stromal tumor with gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique.