Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Health Commun ; 21(12): 1269-1275, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892827

ABSTRACT

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) to monitor population trends in cancer communication practices, information preferences, health risk behaviors, attitudes, and cancer knowledge. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognized HINTS as a unique data resource for informing its health communication endeavors and partnered with NCI to field HINTS-FDA 2015. HINTS-FDA 2015 was a self-administered paper instrument sent by mail May 29 to September 8, 2015, using a random probability-based sample of U.S. postal addresses stratified by county-level smoking rates, with an oversampling of high and medium-high smoking strata to increase the yield of current smokers responding to the survey. The response rate for HINTS-FDA 2015 was 33% (N = 3,738). The yield of current smokers (n = 495) was lower than expected, but the sampling strategy achieved the goal of obtaining more former smokers (n = 1,132). Public-use HINTS-FDA 2015 data and supporting documentation have been available for download and secondary data analyses since June 2016 at http://hints.cancer.gov . NCI and FDA encourage the use of HINTS-FDA for health communication research and practice related to tobacco-related communications, public knowledge, and behaviors as well as beliefs and actions related to medical products and dietary supplements.


Subject(s)
Health Communication/trends , Health Surveys , Information Services/trends , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasms , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Preference , Risk-Taking , Smoking/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
2.
AIDS Behav ; 15(3): 613-20, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20652629

ABSTRACT

This study examined factors associated with communication about condom use and unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in a U.S. sample of immigrant Latino MSM (N = 356), with a focus on culturally based beliefs. Logistic regression analysis revealed that communication about condom use at participants' most recent encounter was associated with a lower likelihood of UAI during that encounter. UAI was more likely when the partner was a main partner and there was seroconcordance. A separate logistic regression indicated that communication about condom use was less likely when the most recent encounter involved a main partner, greater sexual desire, and intoxication due to substance use. Although cultural beliefs were not predictive of communication about condom use or UAI at the most recent encounter, they were related to the occurrence of UAI in the previous three months. There is a need for more research on the interplay of culture, safer sex communication, and sexual risk.


Subject(s)
Communication , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Homosexuality, Male/ethnology , Risk-Taking , Sexual Partners , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Culture , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Reduction Behavior , Socioeconomic Factors , Unsafe Sex/ethnology , Young Adult
3.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 113(2): 241-50, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23351627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration is considering changes to the Nutrition Facts label to help consumers make more healthful choices. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of modifications to the Nutrition Facts label on foods that can be listed as having 1 or 2 servings per container, but are reasonably consumed at a single eating occasion. DESIGN: Participants were randomly assigned to study conditions that varied on label format, product, and nutrition profile. Data were collected via an online consumer panel. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Adults aged 18 years and older were recruited from Synovate's online household panel. Data were collected during August 2011. A total of 32,897 invitations were sent for a final sample of 9,493 interviews. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to one of 10 label formats classified into three groups: listing 2 servings per container with a single column, listing 2 servings per container with a dual column, and listing a single serving per container. Within these groups there were versions that enlarged the font size for "calories," removed "calories from fat," and changed the wording for serving size declaration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The single product task measured product healthfulness, the amount of calories and various nutrients per serving and per container, and label perceptions. The product comparison task measured ability to identify the healthier product and the product with fewer calories per container and per serving. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Analysis of covariance models with Tukey-Kramer tests were used. Covariates included general label use, age, sex, level of education, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Single-serving and dual-column formats performed better and scored higher on most outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: For products that contain 2 servings but are customarily consumed at a single eating occasion, using a single-serving or dual-column labeling approach may help consumers make healthier food choices.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Food Labeling/methods , Health Behavior , Community Participation/psychology , Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Energy Intake/physiology , Female , Food/classification , Food Labeling/instrumentation , Food Preferences/psychology , Health Education/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Policy , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/prevention & control , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL