ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), extent of extranodal extension (ENE) (minor, ≤2 mm; major, >2 mm) is differentially prognostic, whereas limitations exist with the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer TNM N-classification (TNM-8-N). METHODS: Resected OSCC patients at four centers were included and extent of ENE was recorded. Thresholds for optimal overall survival (OS) discrimination of lymph node (LN) features were established. After dividing into training and validation sets, two new N-classifications were created using 1) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and 2) adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and were ranked against TNM-8-N and two published proposals. RESULTS: A total of 1460 patients were included (pN0: 696; pN+: 764). Of the pN+ cases, 135 (18%) had bilateral/contralateral LNs; 126 (17%) and 244 (32%) had minor and major ENE, and two (0.3%) had LN(s) >6 cm without ENE (N3a). LN number (1 and >1 vs. 0: aHRs, 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-2.55] and 3.21 [95% CI, 2.44-4.22]), size (>3 vs. ≤3 cm: aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.44-2.45]), and ENE extent (major vs. minor: aHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.05-1.87]) were associated with OS, whereas presence of contralateral LNs was not (aHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.81-1.36]). The aHR proposal provided optimal performance with these changes to TNM-8-N: 1) stratification of ENE extent, 2) elimination of N2c and 6-cm threshold, and 3) stratification of N2b by 3 cm threshold. CONCLUSION: A new N-classification improved staging performance compared to TNM-8-N, by stratifying by ENE extent, eliminating the old N2c category and the 6 cm threshold, and by stratifying multiple nodes by size.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Prognosis , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common head and neck malignancy arising from the oral mucosa and the skin. The histologic and immunohistochemical features of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) are similar, making it difficult to identify the primary site in cases of metastases. With the advent of immunotherapy, reliable distinction of OSCC and HNcSCC at metastatic sites has important treatment and prognostic implications. Here, we investigate and compare the genomic landscape of OSCC and HNcSCC to identify diagnostically useful biomarkers. Whole-genome sequencing data from 57 OSCC and 41 HNcSCC patients were obtained for tumor and matched normal samples. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) mutational signatures, frequent chromosomal alterations, somatic single nucleotide, and copy number variations were analyzed. The median TMB of 3.75 in primary OSCC was significantly lower (P < .001) than that of 147.51 mutations/Mb in primary HNcSCC. The COSMIC mutation signatures were significantly different (P < .001) between OSCC and HNcSCC. OSCC showed COSMIC single-base substitution (SBS) mutation signature 1 and AID/APOBEC activity-associated signature 2 and/or 13. All except 1 HNcSCC from hair-bearing scalp showed UV damage-associated COSMIC SBS mutation signature 7. Both OSCC and HNcSCC demonstrated a predominance of tumor suppressor gene mutations, predominantly TP53. The most frequently mutated oncogenes were PIK3CA and MUC4 in OSCC and HNcSCC, respectively. The metastases of OSCC and HNcSCC demonstrated TMB and COSMIC SBS mutation signatures similar to their primary counterparts. The combination of high TMB and UV signature in a metastatic keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma suggests HNcSCC as the primary site and may also facilitate decisions regarding immunotherapy. HNcSCC and OSCC show distinct genomic profiles despite histologic and immunohistochemical similarities. Their genomic characteristics may underlie differences in behavior and guide treatment decisions in recurrent and metastatic settings.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics , DNA Copy Number Variations , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Genomics , Biomarkers, Tumor/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the young (<50 years), without known carcinogenic risk factors, is on the rise globally. Whole genome duplication (WGD) has been shown to occur at higher rates in cancers without an identifiable carcinogenic agent. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of WGD in a cohort of OSCC patients under the age of 50 years. METHODS: Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on 28 OSCC patients from the Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute (SHNCI) biobank. An additional nine cases were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: WGD was seen in 27 of 37 (73%) cases. Non-synonymous, somatic TP53 mutations occurred in 25 of 27 (93%) cases of WGD and were predicted to precede WGD in 21 (77%). WGD was significantly associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.01) and was frequent in patients with recurrences (87%, p = 0.36). Overall survival was significantly worse in those with WGD (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data, based on one of the largest WGS datasets of young patients with OSCC, demonstrates a high frequency of WGD and its association with adverse pathologic characteristics and clinical outcomes. TP53 mutations also preceded WGD, as has been described in other tumors without a clear mutagenic driver.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Gene Duplication , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/geneticsABSTRACT
Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) represents a spectrum of histologic changes in the oral cavity mucosa that has the potential to transform into oral squamous cell carcinoma. Predicting the risk of malignant transformation is predominantly based on clinicopathologic correlation, histologic examination and grading. OED often poses a diagnostic challenge, primarily due to its histologic mimics and a large number of terminologies used in the literature. The grading system for OED is also fraught with significant interobserver variability. This review summarizes the essential clinical and histopathologic features of OED and its mimics. Practical preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical considerations for anatomic pathologists are discussed to improve the diagnostic accuracy and increase the reproducibility in the grading of OED.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Precancerous Conditions , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Humans , Hyperplasia , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Pathologists , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To validate the newly proposed American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging in early T1 and T2 oral cavity cancers and its effect in predicting tumour control. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes of 441 T1 to T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and tumour control were calculated and compared between the AJCC 7 and 8 staging systems. RESULTS: The 5-year OS was 78% and 61% for T1 and T2 tumours, respetively (P < 0.001) (AJCC 7) vs 87% and 67% (P < 0.001) (AJCC 8). The 5-year DSS was 78% and 61% for T1 and T2, respectively (P < 0.001) (AJCC 7) vs 89% and 71% (P < 0.001) (AJCC 8). For stages I and II tumours the 5-year OS was 81% and 76%, respectively (P < 0.302) (AJCC 7) vs 87% and 73% (P < 0.017) (AJCC 8). The 5-year DSS was 83% and 82% (P < 0.222) vs 89% and 77% (P < 0.016). With the AJCC eighth edition the 5-year local, regional, and distant control rates for T1 vs T2 tumours were 85% vs 74% (P = 0.003), 95% vs 77% (P = 0.001), and 95% vs 80% (P = 0.014), respectively. CONCLUSION: The AJCC 8th staging system provided for more accurate prediction of OS, DSS, and disease control in early oral cavity cancers.
Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortalityABSTRACT
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the second most prevalent malignancy, most frequently occurring in the head and neck (head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma). Treatment of locally advanced or metastatic disease is associated with functional morbidity and disfigurement. Underlying genetic mechanisms are poorly understood. Targeted sequencing of 48 clinically relevant genes was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded high-risk primary head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas that remained non-metastatic at minimum follow-up of 24 months. Associations of somatic mutations with clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated and compared with those described in the literature for metastatic disease. Alterations in 44 cancer-associated genes were identified. TP53 was mutated in 100% of cases; APC, ATM, ERBB4, GNAQ, KIT, RB1 and ABL1 were altered in 60% of cases. FGFR2 mutations (40%) were exclusively seen in patients with perineural invasion. MLH1 mutations were exclusively seen in the two younger patients (<45 years). Lower incidences of NOTCH1 mutations were observed compared with that described in metastatic head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in the literature. Somatic mutations susceptible to EGFR inhibitors, and other small molecular targeted therapeutics were seen in 60% of cases. This study provides insights into somatic mutations in non-metastatic, high-risk head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and identifies potential therapeutic targets. Alterations in FGFR2 and NOTCH1 may have roles in local and distant disease progression.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Adenomatous Polyposis Coli Protein/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/genetics , Female , GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-4/genetics , Retinoblastoma Binding Proteins/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) uses the same nodal staging system for cutaneous and mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in its 8th edition (AJCC 8) despite differences in the etiology, risk factors, and clinical behavior of the two diseases. This study aims to evaluate the performance of the AJCC 8 nodal staging system by direct comparison of cutaneous (cSCC) versus oral squamous cell carcinoma (oSCC) patients. METHODS: Patients with metastatic cSCC (N = 382) and oSCC (N = 325) were identified from a prospective database (years 1987-2016). Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards competing risk model. To assess staging system performance, an explained variation measure (proportion of variation explained, PVE) as well as a discrimination measure (Harrell's concordance index, C-index) were used. RESULTS: Inclusion of extranodal extension (ENE) in AJCC 8 increased the proportion of patients in N3b category (48.7% in cSCC, 40.3% in oSCC). AJCC 8 stratified poorly with regards to risk of death from cSCC and oSCC and showed limited monotonicity of the nodal categories. Estimates of model performance revealed modest predictive capacity for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in oSCC (Harrell's C of 0.66 in both) and weak predictive capacity in cSCC (Harrell's C of 0.58 and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC 8 nodal staging system performs poorly in terms of stratifying survival by N category, especially in cSCC. The data indicate that cSCC merits an independent nodal staging system from that for mucosal SCC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/secondary , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Rate , Tumor Burden , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) provides the same nodal staging system for mucosal and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNcSCC) and includes extranodal extension (ENE) as an adverse prognostic criterion. This study evaluates the prognostic efficacy of the AJCC8 pathologic nodal staging system (pN) for HNcSCC. METHODS: Univariate analysis of 382 patients with metastatic HNcSCC staged according to both the 7th (AJCC7) and the 8th edition staging systems. RESULTS: The AJCC7 pN3 category was associated with reduced disease specific survival (DSS HR 5.49; 95% CI: 1.83-16.53; P = 0.002) and overall survival (OS HR 3.42; 95% CI: 1.54-7.58; P = 0.002) as compared with pN1. However, no difference was observed between pN1, pN2, and pN3 categories as defined by the AJCC8. Also, when comparing Stages III and IV as defined by AJCC8, there was no difference in DSS (HR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.34-1.67; P = 0.478) or OS (HR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.51-1.51; P = 0.648). CONCLUSION: The AJCC8 performed poorly as a prognostic indicator for patients with metastatic HNcSCC in this cohort. HNcSCC would benefit from a staging system that accounts for its unique biologic characteristics distinct from mucosal SCC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the factors affecting outcomes in surgically salvaged, locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (SCCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent successful salvage of locoregionally recurrent SCCT, we performed this observational analytical study to determine survival and its determinants. Details extracted from our database were patient characteristics (age, gender, tobacco use), treatment characteristics, and characteristics of recurrent disease (stage and adverse pathologic features [APFs] such as grade, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular invasion). Overall survival (OS) curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of patient, disease, and treatment characteristics on OS. RESULTS: Of 52 patients with locoregional recurrences of surgically treated SCCT, 25 (48.1%) underwent surgical salvage with curative intent. The median overall OS for this cohort was 26 months. Factors predictive of worse OS were previous adjuvant therapy (P = .016) and increasing APFs in recurrent tumor histology (P = .008). Lymphovascular invasion in recurrent tumor histology and patients with a disease-free interval of less than 6 months showed worse survival (P = .008 and P = .058, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with locoregional recurrence, the number who are eligible for curative-intent surgical salvage is small. Those who received previous adjuvant therapy and those with increasing APFs in recurrent tumors had poor outcomes despite attempts at surgical salvage, particularly patients with early recurrence.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Salvage Therapy , Tongue Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Tongue Neoplasms/mortality , Tongue Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The rectus myocutaneous free flap (RMFF) is used for medium to large maxillectomy defects. However, in patients with central obesity the inset could be difficult due to the bulk from excessive layer of adipose tissue. We describe a modification of the RMFF for patients with excessive central obesity with a flap consisting of adipose tissue with minimal rectus muscle; the musculo-adipose rectus free flap (MARF). METHODS: Five cases of MARF reconstruction were performed between 2003 and 2013, with patients' body mass indexes ranging from 29.0 to 41.2 kg/m2 . All patients had sinonasal tumor, of which three were adenoid cystic carcinoma, one squamous cell carcinoma, and one melanoma. Four patients had Codeiro IIIb defects and one had Codeiro II defect. Using the MARF technique, the maxillectomy defect was obliterated with vascularized adipose tissue overlying the rectus muscle and was trimmed to fit the maxillectomy defect. The adipose tissue was allowed to granulate and mucosalize. RESULTS: The volume of adipose tissue harvested was between 120 and 160 mL. All flaps survived with no requirement for re-exploration. Complete oro-nasal separation was achieved in all patients. The time to commencement of oral intake ranges from 5 to 15 days. One patient developed seroma and one developed wound breakdown on the donor site. The length of stay at the hospital ranges from 9 to 22 days. On follow-up ranging 7.5-32.8 months, two patients died from their malignancies. The other three patients were able to tolerate oral soft diet. CONCLUSION: The MARF may be considered as an alternative to myocutaneous rectus free flap particularly for the reconstruction of maxillary defects in patients with central obesity. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:137-141, 2017.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps/surgery , Maxilla/surgery , Nose Neoplasms/surgery , Obesity/complications , Rectus Abdominis/transplantation , Adipose Tissue/blood supply , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps/blood supply , Humans , Nose Neoplasms/complications , Palatal Neoplasms/complications , Palatal Neoplasms/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Rectus Abdominis/blood supplyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the prognostic value of perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and whether PNI alone warrants consideration of adjuvant therapy is controversial. We evaluated whether histopathological sub-categorization of PNI improves risk stratification. METHODS: PNI was evaluated for nerve size, number of foci, and distance from the tumor in 318 OSCC patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, with local failure (LF) and disease-specific survival (DSS) as the primary endpoints. RESULTS: PNI did not influence prognosis when classified as absent versus present. In contrast, multifocal PNI was associated with LF (P = 0.049) and decreased DSS (P = 0.043) on multivariable analyses. The size of the involved nerve separated those with multifocal PNI into intermediate (<1 mm) and high-risk (≥1 mm) groups. Unifocal PNI and distance from the tumor did not influence prognosis. Multifocal PNI was associated with worse prognosis irrespective of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT). CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal PNI is associated with poor outcomes even with PORT suggesting consideration of therapeutic escalation, particularly with involved nerves ≥1 mm. Unifocal PNI did not affect prognosis even in the absence of PORT, which may not be required if this is the sole risk factor. Prospective validation and testing of these hypotheses is essential before implementation.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Peripheral Nerves/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
AIMS: To identify adverse pathological features (APF) predicting nodal failure in clinically node negative T1 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODOLOGY: This study evaluated patients with T1N0 (≤5 mm depth of invasion (DOI) and ≤2 cm diameter) oral cancers from a prospectively maintained database between 1988 and 2020. All patients underwent surgical excision of the primary lesion without neck dissection. Patients underwent three monthly clinical surveillance and salvage neck dissection was performed if nodal relapse was diagnosed. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients were included. Nodal relapse was reported in 16/141 (11.3%) patients. Factors impacting regional recurrence-free survival were DOI ≥3 mm (HR: 2.4, P < 0.001), maximum tumour diameter ≥12 mm (HR: 1.1, P = 0.009), perineural invasion (PNI) (HR 7.5, P = 0.002) and poor differentiation (HR 5.3, P = 0.01). Rates of nodal relapse increased from 2% amongst patients with no APFs to 100% for those with four APFs. Patients with two or more APFs had significantly poorer 5-year regional recurrence-free survival (94.8% vs. 56.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with T1N0 OSCC with two or more APFs (DOI ≥3 mm, diameter ≥12 mm, PNI or poor differentiations) should be considered for elective neck dissection.
Subject(s)
Elective Surgical Procedures , Mouth Neoplasms , Neck Dissection , Neoplasm Staging , Humans , Neck Dissection/methods , Male , Female , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Adult , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Lymphatic Metastasis , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm InvasivenessABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap is a novel approach to the challenge of reconstructing the maxilla. We report on our experience using the ZIP flap technique for patients undergoing infrastructure maxillectomy at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Thirteen patients who underwent a ZIP flap reconstruction between August 2019 and August 2021 were identified. Demographic, surgical, and histopathological information was collected. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) was assessed using the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer module, the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Speech Handicap Index. RESULTS: A total of 44 zygomatic implants were placed, of which 42 (95%) survived. The median time from surgery to dental rehabilitation was 35 days. HRQOL data was available for nine patients over 24 months, demonstrating improved speech and swallowing outcomes over the follow up period. CONCLUSIONS: The ZIP flap is a reproducible surgical technique that facilitates rapid dental rehabilitation post infrastructure maxillectomy.
Subject(s)
Plastic Surgery Procedures , Quality of Life , Surgical Flaps , Zygoma , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Zygoma/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Maxilla/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Dental Implants , Maxillary Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Occlusal-based virtual surgical planning (VSP) prioritises the placement of endosseous dental implants, over replicating native bone contour. This may compromise facial aesthetics. This study aimed to compare function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following maxillomandibular reconstruction according to the ability to replicate preoperative soft-tissue contour and virtual plan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent occlusal based VSP osseous free flap reconstruction of the maxilla or mandible with high-resolution pre- and post-operative facial computerised tomography imaging and completed the FACE-Q questionnaire were retrospectively identified. Accuracy of reconstruction compared to preoperative soft tissue contour and virtual plan, was measured using 3DSlicer® and CloudCompare® in three dimensions. Random effects modelling determined the associations between bony and soft tissue accuracy and HRQOL/functional domains. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. For mandibular and maxillary reconstructions, better soft tissue accuracy was associated with improved appearance (p = 0.048) and appearance distress (p = 0.034). For mandibular reconstructions, better soft tissue accuracy was associated with improved smile (p = 0.039) and smile distress (p = 0.031). For maxillary reconstructions, better bony accuracy was associated with improved appearance (p = 0.023) and drooling distress (p = 0.001). Unexpectedly, better bony accuracy was associated with worse eating and drinking (p = 0.015), oral competence (p = 0.005) and eating distress (p = 0.013) in mandibular reconstructions. CONCLUSION: Whilst soft tissue accuracy was associated with better functional and HRQOL outcomes, bone accuracy was associated with worse oral function or distress in mandibular reconstruction. These results require validation but should be considered when performing occlusal-based VSP, which prioritises dental rehabilitation over replicating facial bony contour.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Perineural spread (PNS) is associated with a poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCCHN). Hence, investigating facilitators and barriers of early diagnosis and treatment of PNS in cSCCHN may improve outcomes. METHODS: Patients were recruited from an institutional database. Semi-structured interviews were conducted according to the Model of Pathways to Treatment. Thematic analysis was based on the four main intervals in the framework using a data-driven analytical method. RESULTS: Seventeen participants were interviewed. Facilitators included patients' past experiences, symptom progression, trust in healthcare professionals (HCPs), and capacity to leverage relationships. Barriers included difficult diagnoses, limited access to cancer services, lack of care coordination, and lack of awareness of PNS among primary health care providers. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasise the complexity early diagnosis and treatment of PNS. Interventions like clinical practice guidelines, education for HCPs, and telehealth could facilitate timely detection and management.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Middle Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnosis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Qualitative Research , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathologyABSTRACT
Background: Facial cancer surgery involving the midface (comprising the lower eyelids, nose, cheeks, and upper lip) can have debilitating life-changing functional, social, and psychological impacts on the patient. Midface symptoms are inadequately captured by existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are increasingly used for individual patient care, quality improvement, and standardized reporting of treatment outcomes. This study aimed to present our findings from the first phase of the development of a midface, specifically periocular and nasal, PROM. Methods: After international guidance for PROM development, the first phase comprised identification of salient issues and item generation. Fifteen patients who had midface surgery and 10 clinicians from various specialties with more than 5 years' experience treating these patients were recruited. Semi-structured interviews explored aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological outcomes, with specific attention to deficiencies in current PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop an item pool, and group interviews with clinicians were carried out to create and refine PROM scales. Results: Qualitative data from patient interviews were grouped into aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial domains for the eyelids and nose. Ninety-nine draft items were generated across these domains. Following focus group discussions, the final version of the midface-specific PROM contained 31 items (13 eye-specific, 10-nose-specific, eight general midface items). Conclusions: This midface-specific PROM is valuable in assessing and comparing patient-reported outcomes in those who have undergone complex resection and reconstruction of the midface. This PROM is currently undergoing field testing.
ABSTRACT
A biomarker is a measurable indicator of biological or pathological processes or the response to an exposure or intervention and is used to guide management decisions. In head and neck pathology, biomarkers are assessed by histological criteria and immunohistochemical and molecular studies. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management of many head and neck malignancies. Adjuvant radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy may be administered depending on the presence of adverse prognostic factors identified on histopathological or immunohistochemical examination. In this review, we outline the clinically relevant prognostic and predictive factors in head and neck malignancies including conventionally recognised factors such as tumour size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular and perineural invasion and margin status as well as novel evolving factors such as recurrent genetic rearrangements and assessment of immune checkpoints. Practical issues are discussed to assist with recognising and reporting of these factors. A summary of useful tools such as structured pathology report formats is also included to assist with comprehensive reporting of all clinically relevant parameters, minimise risk and improve workflow efficiencies.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Shoes , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Jaw-in-a-Day (JIAD) procedure aims to achieve immediate functional occlusion via a single-stage approach to maxillofacial reconstruction. While JIAD has gained popularity since its inception by Levine and colleagues, efficacy and outcome data remain limited. In this report, we discuss our experience with the JIAD technique at an Australian tertiary referral centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of all JIAD procedures performed from April 2022 to December 2023 was conducted. Clinicopathologic data reviewed included demographic information, primary diagnosis, anatomical site of disease, and history of pre-operative radiotherapy. Outcome measures of interest included operative time, number of implants placed, post-operative complications and implant survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were identified for the study. Two maxillary and 17 mandibular JIAD procedures were performed. The most common indications were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 8) and ameloblastoma (n = 5). Surgical complications included recipient site wound infection (n = 3), flap dehiscence (n = 2), haematoma formation (n = 1), and neck abscess associated with partial flap failure (n = 1). No total flap failures were identified. Of the 55 total implants placed, one implant failure occurred 2-months post-operatively. No loss of irradiated implants (n = 21) was observed. The median time to adjuvant radiotherapy was 57 days (range, 32-61). Eighteen of 19 patients (95%) achieved immediate dental rehabilitation, and 15/19 patients (79%) retained a functional prosthesis by the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our series supports the feasibility of single-stage reconstruction for both benign and malignant indications. Further research is required to understand the long-term functional, aesthetic, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes with the JIAD technique.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify predictors of distant metastatic recurrence (DMR) in patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with nodal metastases treated with curative intent. METHODS: Predictors of DMR were identified using Cox regression in a multicenter study of 1151 patients. RESULTS: The 5-year risk of DMR was 9.6%. On multivariate analysis, immunosuppression (HR 2.93; 95% CI: 1.70-5.05; p < 0.001), nodal size >6 cm [versus ≤3 cm (HR 2.77; 95% CI: 1.09-7.03; p = 0.032)], ≥5 nodal metastases [versus 1-2 (HR 2.79; 95% CI: 1.63-4.78; p < 0.001)], and bilateral disease (HR 3.11; 95% CI: 1.40-6.90; p = 0.005) predicted DMR. A DMR risk score was developed that stratified risk from 6.6% (no risk factors) to 100% (≥3 risk factors) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DMR in nodal metastatic HNcSCC increases with immunosuppression, nodal size >6 cm, ≥5 nodal metastases, and bilateral disease. A simple DMR risk score estimated prior to treatment may be clinically useful.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite introduction of extranodal extension (ENE) into the AJCC 8th edition of oral cancer staging, previous criticisms persist, such as limited discrimination between sub-stages and doubtful prognostic value of contralateral nodal disease. The purpose of this study was to compare our novel nodal staging system, based on the number of positive nodes and ENE, to the AJCC staging system in surgically treated patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 4710 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated with surgery±adjuvant therapy in 8 institutions in Australia, North America and Asia. With overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) as endpoint, the prognostic performance of AJCC 8th and 7th editions were compared using hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, likelihood difference and balance. RESULTS: Our new nodal staging system (PN) a progressive and linear increase in hazard ratio (HR) from pN0 to pN3, with good separation of Kaplan Meier curves. Using the predetermined criteria for evaluation of a staging system, our proposed staging model outperformed AJCC 8th and 7th editions in prediction of OS and DSS. CONCLUSION: PN was the lymph node staging system that provided the most accurate prediction of OS and DSS for patients in our cohort of OSCC. Additionally, it can be easily adopted, addresses the shortcomings of the existing systems and should be considered for future editions of the TNM staging system.