Padded Headgear in Junior and Youth Australian Football: Player Insights From a National Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate beliefs and factors associated with padded headgear (HG) use in junior (<13 years) and youth (≥13 years) Australian football. DESIGN: Online survey. SETTING: Junior and youth athletes in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Australian football players aged U8 to U18. ASSESSMENT OF VARIABLES: Survey questions regarding demographics, HG use, concussion history, beliefs about HG, and risk-taking propensity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of padded HG use, and beliefs associated with HG use. RESULTS: A total of 735 players (including 190, 25.9% female) representing 206 clubs participated. Headgear was worn by 315 players (42.9%; 95% CI: 39.3-46.4). Most (59.5%) HG users wore it for games only and wore it voluntarily (59.7%), as opposed to being mandated to do so. Junior players were more likely than youth players to agree to feeling safer ( P < 0.001) and being able to play harder while wearing HG ( P < 0.001). Median responses were "disagree" on preferring to risk an injury than wear HG, and on experienced players not needing to wear HG. Beliefs did not differ between males and females. Headgear use was associated with players belonging to a club where HG was mandated for other age groups (OR 16.10; 95% CI: 7.71-33.62, P < 0.001), youth players (OR 2.79; 95% CI: 1.93-3.93, P < 0.001), and female players (OR 1.57; 95% CI: 1.07-2.30, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Club HG culture, older age and being female were prominent variables associated with voluntary HG use. Players reported believing that HG offers protection. The rate of voluntary and mandated HG use identified is at odds with current scientific evidence that does not support HG as effective concussion prevention.

Interdisciplinary rehabilitation for persisting post-concussion symptoms after mTBI: N=15 single case experimental design.

BACKGROUND: Despite clinical guidelines recommending an interdisciplinary approach to persisting post-concussion symptom (PPCS) management, evaluations of interdisciplinary interventions remain scant. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an interdisciplinary intervention for PPCSs. METHOD: A single-case experimental design with randomisation to multiple baselines (2, 4, or 6 weeks) was repeated across 15 participants (53% female) with mild traumatic brain injury (mean age 38.3 years, SD 15.7). The 12-week treatment incorporated psychology, physiotherapy, and medical interventions. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and retention rates, adverse events, treatment adherence and fidelity. Patient-centred secondary outcomes included the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), assessed 3 times per week during the baseline and treatment phases, and at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Other secondary outcomes included measures of mood, sleep and fatigue, physical functioning, health-related quality of life, illness perceptions, and goal attainment. Changes in PPCSs were evaluated using systematic visual analysis and Tau-U. Clinically significant changes in secondary outcomes were explored descriptively. RESULTS: 16/26 individuals assessed for eligibility were enroled (61% recruitment rate); 15 completed the post-treatment follow-ups, and 13 completed the 1- and 3-month follow-up assessments (81% retention rate). High treatment adherence and competence in delivering treatments was observed. Moderate-large effect sizes for reducing PPCSs were observed in 12/15 cases, with 7/15 reaching statistical significance. Improvements were maintained at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups and were accompanied by reductions in fatigue, sleep difficulties, and mood symptoms, and changes in illness perceptions. All participants had clinically significant improvements in at least 1 outcome, with 81% of individual therapy goals achieved. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provided preliminary support for a subsequent randomised controlled trial (RCT), with satisfactory recruitment, retention, treatment compliance, and treatment fidelity. Improvement was evident on participant outcomes including symptom reduction and goal attainment, suggesting that progressing to a phase-II RCT is worthwhile. Findings highlight the potential benefit of individualized interdisciplinary treatments.

Moving forward on the road to recovery after concussion: participant experiences of interdisciplinary intervention for persisting post-concussion symptoms.

PURPOSE: Many factors contribute to persisting post-concussion symptoms (PPCSs), necessitating multi-modal treatment. Quantitative investigations have shown the potential of interdisciplinary intervention to reduce the burden of PPCSs and facilitate return to activities. There are often varied responses to intervention, warranting further investigation of potential factors underlying treatment response. This study aimed to explore participant experiences of i-RECOveR, an interdisciplinary intervention for PPCSs and its impact on symptoms, daily function, and concussion beliefs. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted 1-month post-treatment via videoconferencing with 13 individuals (61% female) with mild traumatic brain injury (Mage=39.77 years, SD = 16.27) who participated in i-RECOveR. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three themes reflected participants' treatment journeys from concussion to life after treatment: (1) Dissatisfaction with Previous Consultations, reflected personal experiences prior to commencing treatment; (2) Perceived Active Ingredients of Intervention, reflected participant experiences of i-RECOveR; and (3) Impact of Interdisciplinary Intervention, reflected a range of positive changes after completing i-RECOveR. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight current gaps in the acute management of concussion and provide end-user insights into the facilitators and barriers of treatment engagement and response. Responses also highlight the potential positive impact of interdisciplinary treatments. Clinician perspectives should be explored in future research.

Access to additional training in concussion care and referral pathways may help medical practitioners manage patients after concussion.Clinicians working with individuals with persisting post-concussion symptoms should develop an understanding of the individual's perceived control over their symptoms, and work with them toward increasing autonomy and control and recognition that symptoms are often multifactorial in nature.Persisting post-concussion symptom rehabilitation may be improved by taking an interdisciplinary approach that is integrated individualised, and is specialised for concussion.Telehealth and hybrid treatment models are well tolerated by individuals with persisting post-concussion symptoms and may facilitate treatment engagement, especially for individuals with mild traumatic brain injury who report disabling symptoms made worse by travelling to in-person treatments.

The association of padded headgear with concussion and injury risk in junior Australian football: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether padded headgear was associated with incidence of suspected sports-related concussion, non-sports-related concussion head injury, and injuries to other body regions in junior Australian football. DESIGN: Prospective cohort injury surveillance. METHODS: There were 400 junior players (42.5% female) enrolled across two seasons. Suspected sports-related concussion was defined by detection of observable signs on the field and medical assessment or missed match(es) due to suspected sports-related concussion. Non-sports-related concussion head injury and injuries to other body regions were defined as those that received medical assessment or resulted in a missed match. RESULTS: There were 20 teams monitored over 258 matches. 204 players (2484 player hours) wore mandated headgear throughout the season and 196 (2246 player hours) did not. The incidence rate of suspected sports-related concussion was 3.17 (95% confidence interval: 3.04-3.30) per 1000 player-hours and no differences were observed between males and females (risk ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.40-3.06). Headgear use was not associated with suspected sports-related concussion (risk ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.41-2.97), non-sports-related concussion head injury (risk ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval: 0.06-1.31), or injuries to other body regions (risk ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.79-2.53). CONCLUSIONS: Headgear use was not associated with reduced risk of suspected sports-related concussion, non-sports-related concussion head injury or injuries to other body regions. There was no difference in the rate of suspected sports-related concussion in female compared to male players, however, rates of non-sports-related concussion head injury and injuries to other body regions were higher in male players.

A pilot case crossover study of the use of padded headgear in junior Australian football.

Aim: To explore soft-shell padded headgear (HG) use, player behavior and injuries associated with HG in junior Australian football. Methods: Prospective case-crossover with head impact measurement, injury surveillance and video review. Results: 40 players (mean age: 12.43 years, standard deviation: 1.36) across 15 matches were observed. Frequency of head/neck (p = 0.916) or body (p = 0.883) contact events, and match incidents were similar between HG and no HG conditions. Without HG, females had higher frequency of body contacts compared with males (p = 0.015). Males sustained more body contacts with HG than without HG (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Use of HG in junior football was not associated with injury or head contact rate. Associations between HG use and body contact may differ across sexes. (ID: ACTRN12619001165178).

Soft-shell headgear, concussion and injury prevention in youth team collision sports: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between soft-shell headgear (HG) use and sports-related concussion (SRC). Secondary objectives were to assess the association between HG and superficial head injury and investigate potential increase in injury risk among HG users. DESIGN: A systematic search in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PsycINFO and SPORTDiscus was conducted in April 2020. Inclusion criteria were youth <18, English language, in vivo studies published after 1980 that evaluated SRC and other injury incidence in HG users compared with non-users. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence rates of SRC, superficial head injury or other injuries. RESULTS: Eight studies were eligible. The majority (n=5) reported no difference in the rate of SRC among HG users versus non-users. One rugby study identified significantly lower risk of SRC for non-HG users (risk ratio (RR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98) compared with HG users, whereas a cross-sectional survey of soccer players indicated higher risk of SRC for non-HG users (RR 2.65; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.12) compared with HG users. Three of the four studies investigating superficial head injury found no significant differences with HG use, though the soccer survey reported reduced risk among HG users (RR 1.86; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.11). Increased incidence of injuries to all body regions for rugby HG users was reported in two studies with adjusted RRs of 1.16 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.29) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.50). CONCLUSIONS: HG use was not associated with reduced rates of SRC or superficial head injury in youth soccer and rugby. The possibility of increased injury risk to all body regions for rugby HG users was raised. The need for research specific to youth and female athletes was highlighted. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018115310.