Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer-can we improve cycle outcome?

PURPOSE: Several replacement protocols for frozen-thawed ET (FET) exist, with no advantage of one protocol over the others. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the outcome of natural cycle FET with modified luteal support. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing natural or artificial hormone replacement (AHR) day-2/3 FET cycles between May 2012 and June 2015 in our IVF unit were evaluated. While AHR FET cycles were consistent, those undergoing natural cycle FET received progesterone luteal support, and from June 2014, patients received two additional injections, one of recombinant hCG and the other of GnRH-agonist, on day of transfer and 4 days later, respectively (modified luteal support). RESULTS: Patients' clinical characteristics and laboratory/embryological variables were comparable between those undergoing natural vs. AHR cycles, during the earlier as compared to the later period. Moreover, while implantation, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher during the later period in patients undergoing the natural cycle FET with the modified luteal support (31, 51, and 46 %, respectively), as compared to natural (17, 26, and 20 %, respectively), or AHR FET in the late study period (15, 22, and 17 %, respectively), the natural cycle FET without the additional two injections yielded the same results, as the AHR cycles. CONCLUSIONS: We therefore suggest that in ovulatory patients undergoing FET, natural cycle FET with the modified luteal support should be the preparation protocol of choice. Further large prospective studies are needed to elucidate the aforementioned recommendation prior to its routine implementation.

Modifying the luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer improves cycle outcome.

With the recent trend toward single embryo transfer (ET), cryopreservation of extraneous embryos is becoming increasingly prevalent. Several replacement protocols for frozen-thawed ET (FET) exist, with no advantage of one protocol over the others. All consecutive patients undergoing natural cycle Day-3 FET cycles between May 2012 and March 2015 in our IVF unit were evaluated. While following spontaneous ovulation, all patients received progesterone luteal support. Since June 2014, patients underwent the same aforementioned natural cycle FET cycles, with two additional injections, one of recombinant hCG (250 mcg) and the other of GnRH-agonist (triptorelin 0.1 mg), on the day of transfer and 4 d later, respectively. While the patients' clinical characteristics, the prevalence of embryos that survived the thawing process and the number of embryos transferred were comparable between the earlier as compared with the later period, implantation rate, positive ß-hCG, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher during the later period. We, therefore, suggest that when natural cycle FET is offered, the addition of two injections of recombinant hCG and GnRH-agonist, on the day of transfer and 4 d later, respectively, might increase clinical pregancy rates. Further large prospective studies are needed to elucidate the aforementioned recommendation prior to its routine implementation.

BRCA mutation carriers show normal ovarian response in in vitro fertilization cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between carriage of BRCA1/2 mutations and ovarian performance, as demonstrated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary IVF centers. PATIENT(S): BRCA mutation carriers undergoing IVF for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or fertility preservation were compared with non-BRCA PGD or fertility preservation patients, matched by age, IVF protocol, IVF center, and cancer disease status. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization cycles for PGD and fertility preservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Outcome of IVF: oocyte yield, poor response rate, number of zygotes, pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): A total of 62 BRCA mutation carriers and 62 matched noncarriers were included; 42 were fertility preservation breast cancer patients, and 82 were PGD non-cancer patients. Mean (± SD) age of patients was 32 ± 3.58 years. Number of stimulation days and total stimulation dose were comparable between carriers and noncarriers. Their cycles resulted in comparable oocyte yield (13.75 vs. 14.75) and low response rates (8.06% vs. 6.45%). Number of zygotes, fertilization rates, and conception rates were also comparable. CONCLUSION(S): Both healthy and cancer-affected BRCA mutation carriers demonstrated normal ovarian response in IVF cycles.

Tamoxifen co-administration during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization in breast cancer patients increases the safety of fertility-preservation treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of tamoxifen co-administration during conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols for a fertility-preservation IVF cycle in breast cancer patients. DESIGN: Two groups: retrospective descriptive cohort study and prospective study. SETTING: Breast cancer oncology and fertility-preservation centers in a tertiary hospital. PATIENT(S): Two groups of breast cancer patients: premenopausal patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen; and patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) for fertility preservation. INTERVENTION(S): Fertility-preservation cycles, tamoxifen co-administration during conventional IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Endocrine records, and IVF results. RESULT(S): Estradiol (E2) levels were chronically high (mean 2663 pmol/L, maximum: 10,000 pmol/L) in 38 of 46 breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Co-administration of tamoxifen (48 cycles) during conventional IVF or without tamoxifen (26 cycles), using either the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist or-antagonist protocols, resulted, respectively, in a mean of 12.65 and 10.2 oocytes retrieved, and 8.5 and 6.4 embryos cryopreserved. Average peak E2 levels were 6,924 pmol/L and 5,093 pmol/L, respectively, but long-term recurrence risk (up to 10 years) was not increased. CONCLUSION(S): In breast cancer patients, co-administration of tamoxifen during conventional COH for fertility preservation does not interfere with IVF results. The high serum E2 levels during COH should be considered safe, as it simulates the high prevalence of persistently high serum E2 levels in premenopausal breast cancer patients safely treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.