Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 42(7): 1063-1065, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30758053

ABSTRACT

We report the first-in-human retrieval of a chronically implanted Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). A 41-year-old woman suffering from third-degree atrioventricular block was successfully implanted with a TPS in the low septum of the right ventricle. After 29 months, due to an increased electrical threshold and 100% pacing percentage, the device showed low battery voltage. Despite the long implant duration, the attempt of device retrieval using a snare loop inserted in the delivery system of a TPS was successful. In the same procedure, a new leadless pacemaker was implanted in the high right ventricular septum with optimal pacing threshold.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Device Removal/methods , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Electric Power Supplies , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Reoperation
2.
J Electrocardiol ; 53: 5-7, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30572227

ABSTRACT

We describe a management strategy of a leadless pacemaker recall (LP) via extraction in a pacemaker-dependent patient with a history of multiple previous device implants. We performed a two-step procedure. First, we implanted a second LP in the right ventricle. Then, 3 days later for concerns about the stability of the newly-implanted device, we retrieved the first LP, 3 years after its original implant. The patient was hemodynamically stable throughout the two procedures and no adverse event occurred in the 3 days of coexistence of the two LPs. Although the limitation of a single case experience, this approach may be taken into consideration when facing similar high-risk cases.


Subject(s)
Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Device Removal , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Angiography , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Equipment Design , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Male
3.
Europace ; 18(2): 301-3, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26467399

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are well known for heart failure; however, some patients might experience complications related to the coronary sinus (CS) lead (high pacing threshold, phrenic nerve stimulation, and dislodgment) with unfavourable impact on quality of life, costs, and management. Lead stability is one of the most common unmet needs for CRT procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Recently, new model Medtronic 20066 Attain Stability(®) (Maastricht, The Netherlands) active fixation LV lead has been released, to overcome this issue. The lead has a small side helix of 0.20 mm (0.008 in.) that allows for secure placement of the lead within the vein at the desired location. We report our first experience with the extraction of this novel active fixation left ventricular lead. CONCLUSION: In our case, to our knowledge the first reported in humans, the extraction of this new model of active fixation lead was proved to be a safe and effective procedure at 8 months after implantation. Indeed, under angiographic and fluoroscopic check, there was no documented dissection or damage to the CS during and after removal of the lead. The rotation manoeuvre was effective when combined with moderate traction of the lead itself.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Coronary Sinus , Device Removal/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/etiology , Humans , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium/complications , Male , Phlebography , Treatment Outcome
4.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 13(3): 122-5, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23840107

ABSTRACT

Complications related to coronary sinus lead are not infrequent in recipients of cardiac resynchronization devices. We describe the case of a patient with a biventricular implantable cardioverter defibrillator with persistent phrenic nerve stimulation, previous coronary sinus lead fracture, and severe left subclavian vein stenosis. The reimplantation of a new coronary sinus lead on the left side, ipsilateral to the original implant, was unsuccessful. In order to avoid more complex and risky procedures, we performed the repair of the fractured abandoned lead with the reconstruction of the unipolar lead terminal. Effective biventricular pacing was obtained with satisfactory electrical parameters and it was maintained at twelve months follow-up.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL