ABSTRACT
From November 2014 to May 2017, 332 patients homogeneously treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction, autologous stem cell transplant, and VRD consolidation were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD; 161 patients) vs RD plus ixazomib (IRD; 171 patients). RD consisted of lenalidomide 15 mg/d from days 1 to 21 plus dexamethasone 20 mg/d on days 1 to 4 and 9 to 12 at 4-week intervals, whereas in the IRD arm, oral ixazomib at a dose of 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 was added. Therapy for patients with negative measurable residual disease (MRD) after 24 cycles was discontinued, whereas those who tested positive for MRD remained on maintenance with RD for 36 more cycles. After a median follow-up of 69 months from the initiation of maintenance, the progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in both arms, with a 6-year PFS rate of 61.3% and 55.6% for RD and IRD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.136; 95% confidence interval, 0.809-1.603). After 2 years of maintenance, treatment was discontinued in 163 patients with negative MRD, whereas 63 patients with positive MRD continued with RD therapy. Maintenance discontinuation in patients tested negative for MRD resulted in a low progression rate (17.2% at 4 years), even in patients with high-risk features. In summary, our results show the efficacy of RD maintenance and support the safety of maintenance therapy discontinuation in patients with negative MRD at 2 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02406144 and at EudraCT as 2014-00055410.
Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/therapyABSTRACT
Despite the significant proportion of older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), most clinical trials driving therapeutic decisions in routine practice include younger and presumably healthier patients than those in the real world. Furthermore, longitudinal studies suggest that elderly, transplant-ineligible patients with MM are not benefitting enough from new anti-MM agents. We retrospectively analyzed the profile of and treatment patterns and outcomes in 675 transplant-ineligible patients with MM who started frontline therapy in routine practice. The mean (SD) age was 75.6 (6.7) years; 152 (47.4%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2-4, and 73 (25.1%) had high cytogenetic risk. The most frequent frontline therapy was non-VMP bortezomib-based regimens (n=207; 30.7%), which were more frequent among patients with ECOG PS 0/1 and higher risk (e.g., international staging system (ISS) stage III, severely impaired glomerular filtrate rate (GFR), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and high-risk cytogenetics); 185 patients (27.4%) started an attenuated (lite) VMP regimen, and 159 (23.6%) a VMP (VISTA) regimen. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 15.3 months (95%CI 14.0-16.9) and 33.5 months (95%CI 29.1-37.2), respectively; 405 patients (78.2%) achieved partial response or better. Age, ECOG PS, ISS stage, serum LDH, GFR, cytogenetic risk, and treatment regimen significantly influenced OS. In this study, a remarkable proportion of transplant-ineligible patients with MM were older, frontline regimens were highly heterogeneous, and patients at higher risk often received less efficacious combinations. These findings suggest that clinicians have limited objective criteria for therapeutic decisions for this patient group.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Melphalan/adverse effects , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Risk associated to FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may depend on mutational burden and its interaction with other mutations. We analyzed the effect of FLT3-ITD/FLT3 wild-type (FLT3wt) ratio depending on NPM1 mutation (NPM1mut) in 303 patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics AML treated with intensive chemotherapy. Among NPM1mut patients, FLT3wt and low ratio (<0.5) subgroups showed similar overall survival, relapse risk, and leukemia-free survival, whereas high ratio (≥0.5) patients had a worse outcome. In NPM1wt AML, FLT3-ITD subgroups showed a comparable outcome, with higher risk of relapse and shortened overall survival than FLT3wt patients. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CR1 was associated with a reduced relapse risk in all molecular subgroups with the exception of NPM1mut AML with absent or low ratio FLT3-ITD. In conclusion, effect of FLT3 burden is modulated by NPM1 mutation, especially in patients with a low ratio.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Adult , Alleles , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gene Duplication , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Nucleophosmin , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Risk Factors , Secondary Prevention , Tandem Repeat Sequences , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Conventional amphotericin B (c-AmB) remains the empirical antifungal treatment of choice for neutropenic patients with persistent fever of unknown origin (FUO). Unfortunately, empirical treatment with c-AmB is hampered by its safety profile, with frequent infusion-related adverse events (IRAEs) and renal toxicity. Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) has been investigated for this indication due to its low toxicity profile. The recommended dose of ABLC is 5 mg/kg/d, which is five to seven times higher than the recommended dose of c-AmB. METHODS: This randomized, controlled trial includes 105 adult patients with hematologic malignancies and with FUO after receiving chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients were randomly allocated to receive ABLC at 1 mg/kg/d or c-AmB at 0.6 mg/kg/d for empirical antifungal therapy. RESULTS: The incidence of renal toxicity was significantly lower in the ABLC group, compared with c-AmB group: 8% vs. 32%, respectively (P = 0.003). The rates of IRAEs were similar in both groups (73% for ABLC vs. 77% for c-AmB). The overall response rate was 72% for ABLC compared with 48% for c-AmB (P = 0.018). This difference was mainly due to the significantly higher renal toxicity in the c-AmB group. The number of emergent fungal infections and overall mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial suggests that ABLC at 1 mg/kg/d produces less nephrotoxicity than c-AmB, without differences in the incidence of IRAEs and with similar efficacy.
Subject(s)
Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Fever of Unknown Origin/etiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Mycoses/drug therapy , Neutropenia/etiology , Phosphatidylcholines/administration & dosage , Phosphatidylglycerols/administration & dosage , Adult , Amphotericin B/adverse effects , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Combinations , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Hypokalemia/chemically induced , Immunocompromised Host , Incidence , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Mycoses/etiology , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Phosphatidylcholines/adverse effects , Phosphatidylcholines/therapeutic use , Phosphatidylglycerols/adverse effects , Phosphatidylglycerols/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infection remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with neutropenia, and the beneficial effects of oral prophylaxis remain controversial. METHODS: From 1993 to December 1999, the authors analyzed the clinical and microbiologic outcomes of 144 episodes of febrile neutropenia among adult patients with acute leukemia. RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive episodes occurred among patients who were on ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during 1993-1996 (ciprofloxacin group), and 101 subsequent episodes occurred among patients who were not exposed to ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (control group). There were no differences in clinical presentation, antibiotic treatment received for the episode, or a worse outcome between groups. The rate of bacteremia was similar (12 of 43 patients [28%] vs. 26 of 101 patients [26%], respectively). There was a trend toward a higher rate of Gram positive bacteremia in the control group (12 of 101 patients [12%] vs. 2 of 43 patients [5%]) and a higher rate of Gram negative bacteremia in the ciprofloxacin group (11 of 43 patients [26%] vs. 15 of 101 patients [15%]). Resistance to fluoroquinolones was greater in Escherichia coli blood isolates from patients in the ciprofloxacin group (7 of 8 patients vs. 2 of 9 patients; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for patients with febrile neutropenia may be abandoned safely in areas with a high prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacteria.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Escherichia coli Infections/prevention & control , Leukemia/complications , Neutropenia/complications , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Leukemia/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Short, intensive multiagent chemotherapy has resulted in significant progress in Burkitt's lymphoma and leukemia. A protocol was designed to treat all adult patients with mature B-cell lymphoma or leukemia with the aims of comparing the response to therapy and survival with regards to their HIV infection status. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-three adult patients with advanced stage Burkitt's lymphoma or Burkitt's leukemia were treated. Response to therapy, survival and toxicity were evaluated according to their HIV infection status. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 15-74). There were no differences in CR rates between HIV-negative (77%) and HIV-positive patients (71%). Only age > 60 years was associated with a lower CR rate (OR 0.18, 95%CI 0.04-0.81, p=0.026). The 2-year overall survival (OS) probability was 51% (95%CI, 38%-64%) for the 53 patients. The OS of HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients did not significantly differ. Only age > 60 years was associated with a shorter OS (OR 5.1, 95%CI 2.0-12.7, p=0.001). The 2-year disease free survival (DFS) for the 40 patients achieving CR was 60% (95%CI, 45%-75%). Age > 60 years was the only identified factor associated with a shorter DFS (OR 5.2, 95%CI 1.4-20, p=0.015). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of intensive strategies in adult patients with advanced stage Burkitt's lymphoma or leukemia. It also shows the feasibility of these strategies in individuals with HIV infection with comparable results. Advanced age proved to be the main adverse prognostic factor for response to therapy and survival.