Olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA 1-2 mutated recurrent platinum sensitive ovarian cancer: Real world data and post progression outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Olaparib is approved as maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA mutated platinum sensitive (PS) recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) after response to last platinum based therapy. Few data are available regarding the use out of the registration trials and on response to further treatments after progression. MATERIALS AD METHODS: In this non interventional, retrospective study, patients treated with olaparib in 13 centers, according to the label, have been collected and analyzed. Primary objectives of the study are to describe effectiveness and safety of olaparib in a real world setting with a focus on post progression treatments and response. RESULTS: 234 patients were analyzed. All patients were BRCA mutated and most of them had germline mutations. Around 50% of the patients received olaparib after 3 or more lines of platinum based chemotherapy achieving a radiologic complete (CR) or partial response. 12.4% patients with stable disease were also included. Median PFS was 14.7 months (95% CI:12.6-18), with statistically longer PFS in patients with normal serum Ca125 at baseline, a CR after last platinum based therapy and that received olaparib after second platinum based therapy. Median OS was not reached. Most frequent G3-G4 toxicity was anaemia (6%) with dose discontinuation and dose reduction in 11 (4.7%) and 49 (20.9%) of cases, respectively. Among 66 patients receiving further treatment after olaparib progression and evaluable for response, ORR was 22.2, 11.1% and 9.5% in patients with Platinum Free interval (PFI) of more than 12 months, between 6 and 12 months and less than 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib is effective and safe in real world setting. Data on post-progression treatments seem to suggest cross resistance with chemotherapy and need to be confirmed in larger studies because of the potential importance in clinical practice decisions.

BMI variation increases recurrence risk in women with early-stage breast cancer.

AIMS: The prognostic role of BMI variation during and/or after treatments for early-stage breast cancer is still unknown. PATIENTS & METHODS: The χ(2) test was conducted to explore the correlation between breast cancer recurrence and BMI changes in 520 early-stage breast cancer patients. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the association of BMI changes, baseline BMI, known prognostic factors and recurrences. RESULTS: BMI gain was significant determinant of recurrences (p = 0.0008). In multivariate analyses, BMI variation more than 5.71% was associated with higher rates of recurrences, as well as age less than 55 years, stage disease and molecular subtype. CONCLUSION: Women who experience BMI gain after breast cancer may be at increased risk of poor outcomes.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for radically resected non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The combination cisplatin/gemcitabine is one of the most active and well-tolerated regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We undertook this pilot study to evaluate postoperative drug delivery and toxicity of cisplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with radically resected stage IB-III NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two consecutive patients were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for 4 planned courses. Most patients (50%) had pathologic stage IIIA disease; all had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. The median age was 63 years (range, 56-73 years). Six out of 22 patients (27.3%) had undergone pneumonectomy. RESULTS: A total of 85 courses of chemotherapy were administered, and the median number of courses was 4 (range, 1-4 courses); twenty-one out of 22 patients received the planned 4 courses of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy caused grade 3 anemia in 1 patient, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in another patient, and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 4 patients; grade 3 vomiting was observed in 3 patients, and grade 3 anorexia and grade 3 asthenia were both observed in 1 patient. No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median delivered dose intensities of cisplatin and gemcitabine were 24.3 mg/m2/week (97.2%) and 700.9 mg/m2 weekly (87.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin/gemcitabine is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in the adjuvant setting. Future trials should better define the best strategy in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life between this combination and the standard regimen, cisplatin plus vinorelbine.

Panitumumab after progression on cetuximab in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a single institution experience.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Few data describe the activity of panitumumab after cetuximab-irinotecan-based regimen failure in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (WT MCRC). METHODS: The aim of this study is to assess if panitumumab has some activity in this setting. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed 25 patients with KRAS WT MCRC who received panitumumab from July 2009 to January 2013 after progression on cetuximab. All patients had previously received cetuximab and irinotecan (20 patients) or oxaliplatin (5 patients). We withdrew cetuximab for intolerance in 4 patients (16%). Twenty-one patients (84%) who had previously responded to cetuximab (overall response rate [ORR] plus stable disease ≥5 months) received panitumumab off-label after progression on cetuximab because they were strongly motivated to continue treatment without chemotherapy. The median number of cycles of panitumumab was 7 (range 1-54). Only 20 patients were evaluable for ORR (5 patients received 1-2 cycles and then died). We observed 1 (5%) partial response, 5 (25%) stable disease, median duration 9 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 (3-28) and 8 (5-41) months, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. No patients developed anemia or neutropenia. One patient (4%) developed grade 2 thrombocytopenia, 8 patients (32%) grade 2-3 dry skin or rash, and 2 patients (8%) grade 2 nausea-vomiting (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data, with all the limits of a retrospective analysis, show longer PFS and OS as compared to other series in the same setting, demonstrating that panitumumab has treatment effectiveness in patients with KRAS WT MCRC who progressed on prior cetuximab. Further confirmatory prospective studies with a larger series of patients are necessary.

Clinical outcomes and cardiac safety of continuous antiHer2 therapy in c-erbB2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To explore clinical outcomes and cardiac safety of continuous antiHer2 therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluates overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and cardiac safety of 80 consecutive Her2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients that received ≥ 12 months of therapy with trastuzumab, followed by lapatinib-based or trastuzumab-based therapy. RESULTS: All patients received trastuzumab as first antiHer2 therapy; 54% received lapatinib in the second or subsequent line. Median OS was 34 months (12-120 months). Median OS was 48 months in the subgroup of 43 patients who received lapatinib and 26 months in the 37 patients who did not. Median TTF was shorter for lapatinib. There were three cardiac events and trastuzumab-based chemotherapy (CT) was interrupted in one patient because left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased to ≤ 40%. CONCLUSION: Continuous antiHer2 therapy provides good clinical outcomes, especially in those patients who received lapatinib. Cardiac dysfunction was a rare event, reversible, associated to trastuzumab and not related to treatment duration.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP): rationale, preclinical and clinical evidences of its inhibition as breast cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The chance to take advantage of genetic defects of cancer cells is a promising clinical tool in breast cancer therapy. Among the genetic aberrations, dysfunctions in DNA repair mechanisms are quite common and suitable for an attractive antitumor effect. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase I (PARP-1) is an enzyme with many functions in transcriptions and cell cycle regulation and in coordination of cellular response to DNA damage. Its involvement in tumorigenesis is witnessed by the overexpression found in different primary human tumors, where the increased enzymatic activity leads to cancer cell protection against DNA damage and instability. Therefore, activity of PARP and the opportunity to block it, mainly in cancer cells also deficient in other mechanisms of repair, are promising. AREAS COVERED: In this review, areas covered include the main DNA repair mechanisms, the role of PARP enzymatic activity in diverse cell pathways as well as the preclinical and clinical data with PARP inhibitors. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the theoretical role of PARP inhibitors as therapeutic strategy in specific subtypes of breast cancer (hereditary BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation-related cancers and sporadic triple-negative breast cancer), questions are still open. More exhaustive knowledge is needed about other important functions of PARPs in cellular homeostasis and about escape mechanisms of cancer cells to inhibitory effect of PARP inhibitors.