ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Combination checkpoint inhibition therapy with yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization represents an emerging area of interest in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCRN GI15-225 is an open-label, single-arm multicenter, pilot study (NCT03099564). METHODS: Eligible patients had poor prognosis, localized HCC defined as having portal vein thrombus, multifocal disease, and/or diffuse disease that were not eligible for liver transplant or surgical resection. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks in conjunction with glass yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization TheraSphere. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Between October 23, 2017 and November 24, 2020, 29 patients were enrolled: 2 were excluded per protocol. Fifteen of the remaining 27 patients were free of progression at 6 months (55.6%; 95% CI, 35.3-74.5) with median PFS 9.95 months (95% CI, 4.14-15.24) and OS 27.30 months (95% CI, 10.15-39.52). One patient was not evaluable for response due to death; among the remaining 26 patients, ORR was 30.8% (95% CI, 14.3-51.8) and DCR was 84.6% (95% CI, 65.1-95.6). CONCLUSION: In patients with localized, poor prognosis HCC, pembrolizumab in addition to glass Y90 radioembolization demonstrated promising efficacy and safety consistent with prior observations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03099564; IRB Approved: 16-3255 approved July 12, 2016).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Yttrium Radioisotopes , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/radiotherapy , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pilot Projects , Progression-Free Survival , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: FOLFIRI is a standard regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized that a pharmacogenomic-directed strategy where more efficient irinotecan metabolizers (UGT1A1 *1/*1 homozygotes and *1/*28 heterozygotes) receive higher-than-standard irinotecan doses would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to non-genotype selected historical controls with acceptable toxicity. METHODS: In this phase II multicenter study irinotecan dosing in first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab for mCRC was based on UGT1A1 genotype with *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients receiving 310 mg/m2, 260 mg/m2, and 180 mg/m2, respectively. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were investigator and patient-reported adverse events, and estimation of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One-hundred patients were enrolled with 91 evaluable for PFS and 83 evaluable for best response. Median PFS was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 15.4), shorter than the anticipated alternative hypothesis of 14 months. PFS by genotype was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 17.4) for *1/*1, 14.6 months (90% CI 11.8, 17.5) for *1/*28, and 6 months (90% CI 2.3, 7.7) for *28/28, respectively. OS was 24.5 months (90% CI 19.1, 30.7) and by genotype was 26.5 (90% CI 19.1, 32.9), 25.9 (90% CI 17.6, 37.7), and 13.4 (90% CI 2.3, 20.5) months for *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28, respectively. G3/4 toxicity was similar between all subgroups, including diarrhea and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacogenomic-directed irinotecan strategy improved PFS in the *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes with higher rates of neutropenia and similar rates of diarrhea compared to expected with standard FOLFIRI dosing. However, improvements in response rate and PFS were modest. This strategy should not change standard practice for mCRC patients in the first-line setting.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is often administered to patients with KRAS wild-type (KRAS-WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), although resistance inevitably develops. We hypothesized that co-inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with cetuximab and downstream cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 with palbociclib would be effective for anti-EGFR rechallenge in KRAS-WT mCRC. METHODS: We designed a single-arm, Simon's 2-stage, phase II trial of cetuximab and palbociclib in KRAS-WT mCRC treated with ≥2 prior lines of therapy. We report here on cohort B rechallenging patients with anti-EGFR-based therapy who had disease control of at least 4 months on prior anti-EGFR therapy. Primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 4 months. RESULTS: Ten evaluable patients were enrolled in this cohort. The 4-month DCR was 20%, which did not fulfill the prespecified 4-month DCR rate to continue. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months and median overall survival was 6.6 months. Three patients had stable disease, although overall response rate was 0%. Most common treatment-related grades 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia and leukopenia. CONCLUSION: Selection of patients for anti-EGFR rechallenge using clinical criteria alone was insufficient to identify response to palbociclib + cetuximab. Additional biomarkers are needed to select anti-EGFR rechallenge and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is planned for samples collected in this study. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03446157).
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf , Membrane Proteins , GTP PhosphohydrolasesABSTRACT
This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to address key clinical questions. These include the comparison of (1) surgical gastrojejunostomy to the placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant GOO, (2) covered versus uncovered SEMS for malignant GOO, and (3) endoscopic and surgical interventions for the management of benign GOO. Recommendations provided in this document were founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of benefits and harms, considerations of patient and caregiver preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.
Subject(s)
Gastric Outlet Obstruction , Self Expandable Metallic Stents , Stomach Neoplasms , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/etiology , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/surgery , Humans , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Stomach Neoplasms/complications , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
CRLX101 is a nanoparticle-drug conjugate with a camptothecin payload. We assessed the toxicity and pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of CRLX101 with standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. A single-arm study was conducted with a 3â¯+â¯3 dose escalation phase Ib followed by phase II at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Thirty-two patients were enrolled with 29 (91%) patients having T3/4 and 26 (81%) N1/2 disease. In phase Ib, no patient experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) with every other week dosing, while 1/9 patients experienced a DLT with weekly dosing. The weekly MTD was identified as 15 mg/m2. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was lymphopenia, with only 1 grade 4 event. pCR was achieved in 6/32 (19%) patients overall and 2/6 (33%) patients at the weekly MTD. CRLX101 at 15 mg/m2 weekly with neoadjuvant CRT is a feasible combination strategy with an excellent toxicity profile. Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02010567.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/therapeutic use , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Cyclodextrins/therapeutic use , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Cyclodextrins/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Background HER3/EGFR heterodimers have been implicated as a mode of resistance to EGFR-directed therapies. Methods This Phase 1 trial assessed the tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the HER-3 antibody seribantumab in combination with cetuximab (Part I) or cetuximab and irinotecan (Part II) in patients with EGFR-dependent cancers. In Part I, escalating doses of seribantumab and cetuximab were administered. In Part II of the trial, escalating doses of seribantumab/cetuximab were combined with irinotecan 180 mg/m2 administered every two weeks. Results 34 patients were enrolled in Part I (seribantumab/cetuximab) and 14 patients were enrolled in Part II (seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan). Common toxicities of seribantumab/cetuximab included acneiform rash, diarrhea, stomatitis, and paronychia. The MTD of Part I was seribantumab 40 mg/kg bolus, then 20 mg/kg weekly combined with cetuximab 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 250 mg/m2 IV weekly. Common toxicities reported in the seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan combination were similar to the Part I portion. However, toxicities were more frequent and severe with the triplet combination. There was one treatment-related death in Part II secondary to Grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. Other dose-limiting toxicities in Part II were Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 diarrhea. A cholangiocarcinoma patient, previously untreated with EGFR-directed therapy, had a confirmed partial response (PR). One colorectal cancer patient, previously treated with EGFR-directed therapy, had an unconfirmed PR. Conclusions Seribantumab/cetuximab was well tolerated and patients experienced toxicities typical to EGFR inhibition. Unlike the seribantumab/cetuximab doublet, seribantumab/cetuximab/irinotecan was difficult to tolerate in this heavily pretreated population. There was limited efficacy of the combination therapy.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antineoplastic Agents , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Cetuximab , Receptor, ErbB-3/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Camptothecin/adverse effects , Camptothecin/pharmacology , Camptothecin/therapeutic use , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Cetuximab/pharmacology , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Female , Humans , Irinotecan , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A multidisciplinary approach in the management of complex malignancies is becoming more common, and likewise, adopting such an approach to the care of patients with locally advanced esophageal is recommended in order to optimize clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this review, we discuss both the surgical and medical oncology perspectives in the management of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. We review the data supporting the current standard-of-care approach, namely trimodality therapy with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery. Other aspects of managing these patients including the control of dysphagia and pain as well as nutritional support are discussed. Finally, we review data that support the importance of incorporating a multidisciplinary streamlined approach in the management of these patients. RESULTS: Rather than having patients see each provider separately, a multidisciplinary approach to esophageal cancer allows for the seamless flow of communication and proactive management of the patient's symptoms. These benefits include increasing the likelihood of evidence-based decision making, shorter time to treatment, and increased patient quality of life, all of which can result in improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of a multidisciplinary team can lead to a more accurate staging paradigm and thereby, better management decisions that translate to improved clinical outcomes. Therefore, optimizing the multidisciplinary approach for the care of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer is essential for successful and individualized patient care.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Physician's Role , SurgeonsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Expression of PD-L1 has been shown to be upregulated in some patients with gastric cancer. As part of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-012 study, we aimed to assess the safety and activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. METHODS: This study was a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial done at 13 cancer research centres in the USA, Israel, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. Patients received intravenous pembrolizumab at 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for 24 months or until progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Response was assessed every 8 weeks in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary objectives were safety in patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab and the proportion of patients achieving overall responses in patients who received at least one pembrolizumab dose and who either had a post-baseline scan or who discontinued therapy because of clinical disease progression or a treatment-related adverse event before the first post-baseline scan. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01848834, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: From Oct 23, 2013, to May 5, 2014, 39 patients were enrolled. 36 were evaluable for response by central assessment. Eight (22%, 95% CI 10-39) patients were judged to have had an overall response at central review; all responses were partial. All 39 patients were included in the safety analyses. Five (13%) patients had a total of six grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, consisting of two cases of grade 3 fatigue, one case each of grade 3 pemphigoid, grade 3 hypothyroidism, and grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy, and one case of grade 4 pneumonitis. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: In this population of patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive gastric cancer, pembrolizumab had a manageable toxicity profile and promising antitumour activity, warranting further study in phase 2 and 3 trials. FUNDING: Merck & Co.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival RateABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Few treatment options are available for patients with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on preclinical and early clinical efficacy signals and lack of overlapping toxicity, we undertook this multicenter phase II trial to estimate efficacy and safety of everolimus and pasireotide in advanced HCC. METHODS: Patients with advanced HCC not amenable to locoregional therapy and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis received everolimus 7.5 mg PO daily and pasireotide LAR 60 mg IM every 28 days. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), with 26 events needed to evaluate if everolimus + pasireotide improved TTP from 2.8 to 4.4 months, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints included response as measured by RECIST modified for HCC, treatment-emergent adverse events, and overall survival. RESULTS: After 24 patients were enrolled, results of a randomized trial showing no benefit of everolimus in HCC were released prompting an unplanned interim analysis that found the conditional probability of rejecting the null hypothesis based on events in those patients was 0.08. Therefore accrual was halted. Patients had a median age of 59 years, 21 (88%) had BCLC stage C cancer, and 11 (46%) metastatic disease. Median TTP was 3.5 months (95% CI 2-5.8) and median survival 6.7 months (95% CI 6-infinity). Best response was stable disease in ten patients. Grade 3 hyperglycemia occurred in 6 (25%). There were no grade 4 treatment-emergent events. CONCLUSION: Despite promising early efficacy signals, we found no benefit for the combination of everolimus and pasireotide in HCC.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Everolimus/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , Somatostatin/administration & dosage , Somatostatin/adverse effects , Somatostatin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The oral PI3K inhibitor BKM120 has been reported as safe and well tolerated in early phase clinical trials of advanced cancer patients. We performed a phase I trial of BKM120 plus mFOLFOX6 (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin), a common chemotherapeutic backbone in GI malignancies, to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the safety and tolerability of the combination. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BKM120 daily combined with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of a 28 day cycle. The study utilized a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schema. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients received treatment with BKM120, 13 of which were evaluate for dose limited toxicity (DLT). The most common tumor types were colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. DLT included grade 3 hyperglycemia, grade 3 AST/ALT elevation, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. A total of 76 % of patients experienced treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), the most common of which were neutropenia, fatigue, leukopenia, hyperglycemia and thrombocytopenia. One patient demonstrated an unconfirmed partial response and three patients had stable disease. DISCUSSION: The MTD of BKM120 in combination with standard doses of mFOLFOX6 was 40 mg daily, which is well below the 100 mg daily dose proven effective and tolerable both as a single agent and in combination with other chemotherapeutics. In addition, the regimen of BKM120 with mFOLFOX6 in patients with refractory solid tumors resulted in increased toxicity than would be expected from either the PI3K inhibitor or the chemotherapy backbone alone.
Subject(s)
Aminopyridines/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Morpholines/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aminopyridines/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Leucovorin/adverse effects , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Morpholines/adverse effects , Nausea/chemically induced , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Mutational loss of CDKN2A (encoding p16INK4A) tumor-suppressor function is a key genetic step that complements activation of KRAS in promoting the development and malignant growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, pharmacologic restoration of p16INK4A function with inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6) has shown limited clinical efficacy in PDAC. Here, we found that concurrent treatment with both a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and an ERK-MAPK inhibitor (ERKi) synergistically suppresses the growth of PDAC cell lines and organoids by cooperatively blocking CDK4/6i-induced compensatory upregulation of ERK, PI3K, antiapoptotic signaling, and MYC expression. On the basis of these findings, a Phase I clinical trial was initiated to evaluate the ERKi ulixertinib in combination with the CDK4/6i palbociclib in patients with advanced PDAC (NCT03454035). As inhibition of other proteins might also counter CDK4/6i-mediated signaling changes to increase cellular CDK4/6i sensitivity, a CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screen was conducted that revealed a spectrum of functionally diverse genes whose loss enhanced CDK4/6i growth inhibitory activity. These genes were enriched around diverse signaling nodes, including cell-cycle regulatory proteins centered on CDK2 activation, PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling, SRC family kinases, HDAC proteins, autophagy-activating pathways, chromosome regulation and maintenance, and DNA damage and repair pathways. Novel therapeutic combinations were validated using siRNA and small-molecule inhibitor-based approaches. In addition, genes whose loss imparts a survival advantage were identified (e.g., RB1, PTEN, FBXW7), suggesting possible resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibition. In summary, this study has identified novel combinations with CDK4/6i that may have clinical benefit to patients with PDAC. SIGNIFICANCE: CRISPR-Cas9 screening and protein activity mapping reveal combinations that increase potency of CDK4/6 inhibitors and overcome drug-induced compensations in pancreatic cancer.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/metabolism , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic treatments available and a 5-y survival less than 10%. Pancreatic cancers have been found to be immunogenically "cold" with a largely immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. There is emerging evidence that focused ultrasound can induce changes in the tumor microenvironment and have a constructive impact on the effect of immunotherapy. However, the immune cells and timing involved in these effects remain unclear, which is essential to determining how to combine immunotherapy with ultrasound for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We used low-intensity focused ultrasound and microbubbles (LoFU + MBs), which can mechanically disrupt cellular membranes and vascular endothelia, to treat subcutaneous pancreatic tumors in C57BL/6 mice. To evaluate the immune cell landscape and expression and/or localization of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) as a response to ultrasound, we performed flow cytometry and histology on tumors and draining lymph nodes 2 and 15 d post-treatment. We repeated this study on larger tumors and with multiple treatments to determine whether similar or greater effects could be achieved. Two days after treatment, draining lymph nodes exhibited a significant increase in activated antigen presenting cells, such as macrophages, as well as expansion of CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells. LoFU + MB treatment caused localized damage and facilitated the translocation of DAMP signals, as reflected by an increase in the cytoplasmic index for high-mobility-group box 1 (HMGB1) at 2 d. Tumors treated with LoFU + MBs exhibited a significant decrease in growth 15 d after treatment, indicating a tumor response that has the potential for additive effects. Our studies indicate that focused ultrasound treatments can cause tumoral damage and changes in macrophages and T cells 2 d post-treatment. The majority of these effects subsided after 15 d with only a single treatment, illustrating the need for additional treatment types and/or combination with immunotherapy. However, when larger tumors were treated, the effects seen at 2 d were diminished, even with an additional treatment. These results provide a working platform for further rational design of focused ultrasound and immunotherapy combinations in poorly immunogenic cancers.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Ultrasonic Therapy , Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Animals , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , HMGB1 Protein , Immunity , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor Microenvironment , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Curcumin inhibits UDP-glucuronyltransferases, a primary metabolic pathway for cancer chemotherapeutic agents like irinotecan. Concurrent administration of both agents may exacerbate irinotecan toxicity. We conducted this phase I study to determine the safety of concurrent curcumin and irinotecan administration. Ten participants with advanced solid tumors received one of four doses (1, 2, 3, and 4 g) of a curcumin phosphatidylcholine complex (PC) orally daily, and 200 mg/m2 of i.v. infusion irinotecan on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PC. Thirteen participants received 4 g of PC (MTD) to assess the effect on the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38G. Irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G exposure equivalence with and without curcumin was assessed using area under the plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to 6 h (AUC0-6h ). Safety assessments and disease responses were also evaluated. The combination of irinotecan and PC was well-tolerated. Because there was no dose limiting toxicity, the maximum dose administered (4 g) was defined as the recommended phase II dose of PC. PC did not significantly alter the plasma exposure and other PK properties of irinotecan and its metabolites. There was no apparent increase in the incidence of irinotecan-associated toxicities. The objective response rate was 3/19 (22%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-39%), median progression free survival and overall survival (n = 23) were 4 months (95% CI: 2.9-8.9 months) and 8.4 months (95% CI: 3.7 - not evaluable [NE]), respectively. Future studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic , Curcumin , Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Curcumin/adverse effects , Humans , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
Concurrent administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been increasingly used in cancer treatment, leading to improvements in survival as well as quality of life. Currently, it is a feasible preference, often regarded as the standard therapeutic option, for many locally confined solid tumors, including anal, bladder, cervical, esophageal, gastric, head and neck, lung, pancreatic and rectal cancers. In patients with these tumors, combined modality therapy improves local tumor control and survival while, in some instances, obviating the need for surgical removal of the organ of origin. The scientific rationale for the use of chemoradiation derives from the preclinical and clinical observations of synergistic interactions between radiotherapy and chemotherapy. When chemotherapy and radiotherapy are administered together, the chemotherapeutic agents can sensitize the cancer cells to the effects of ionizing radiation, leading to increased tumor-killing effects within the radiotherapy field. This, in turn, can improve local control of the primary tumor and, in some cancers, render surgical resection unnecessary. In other cases, patients with tumors that were initially considered unresectable are able to undergo curative interventions after completing chemoradiation. The chemotherapy component can address any potential micrometastatic disease that, without therapy, leads to an increased risk of distant recurrence. A large body of evidence exists that supports the use of chemoradiotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers. In fact, one of the first tumor types in which the superior efficacy of chemoradiation was described was anal cancer. Since then, chemoradiotherapy has been explored in other gastrointestinal malignancies with superior outcomes when compared with either radiation or chemotherapy alone. This article aims to recapitulate the clinical evidence supporting the use of chemoradiotherapy in a variety of gastrointestinal tumor types.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is frequently classified as a 'universal' tumor associated antigen due to its expression in a vast number of cancers. We evaluated plasmid DNA-encoded hTERT as an immunotherapy across nine cancer types. METHODS: A phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in adult patients with no evidence of disease following definitive surgery and standard therapy, who were at high risk of relapse. Plasmid DNA encoding one of two hTERT variants (INO-1400 or INO-1401) with or without plasmid DNA encoding interleukin 12 (IL-12) (INO-9012) was delivered intramuscularly concurrent with the application of the CELLECTRA constant-current electroporation device 4 times across 12 weeks. Safety assessments and immune monitoring against native (germline, non-mutated, non-plasmid matched) hTERT antigen were performed. The largest cohort of patients enrolled had pancreatic cancer, allowing for additional targeted assessments for this tumor type. RESULTS: Of the 93 enrolled patients who received at least one dose, 88 had at least one adverse event; the majority were grade 1 or 2, related to injection site. At 18 months, 54.8% (51/93) patients were disease-free, with median disease-free survival (DFS) not reached by end of study. For patients with pancreatic cancer, the median DFS was 9 months, with 41.4% of these patients remaining disease-free at 18 months. hTERT immunotherapy induced a de novo cellular immune response or enhanced pre-existing cellular responses to native hTERT in 96% (88/92) of patients with various cancer types. Treatment with INO-1400/INO-1401±INO-9012 drove hTERT-specific IFN-γ production, generated hTERT-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing the activation marker CD38, and induced hTERT-specific activated CD8 +CTLs as defined by cells expressing perforin and granzymes. The addition of plasmid IL-12 adjuvant elicited higher magnitudes of cellular responses including IFN-γ production, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and activated CD8+CTLs. In a subset analysis of pancreatic cancer patients, the presence of immunotherapy-induced activated CD8+ T cells expressing PD-1, granzymes and perforin correlated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Plasmid DNA-encoded hTERT/IL-12 DNA immunotherapy was well-tolerated, immune responses were noted across all tumor types, and a specific CD8+ phenotype increased by the immunotherapy was significantly correlated with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Subject(s)
DNA/genetics , Immunotherapy/methods , Interleukin-12/metabolism , Neoplasms/genetics , Plasmids/metabolism , Telomerase/genetics , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality. Creatine metabolism was previously shown to critically regulate colon cancer progression. We report that RGX-202, an oral small-molecule SLC6A8 transporter inhibitor, robustly inhibits creatine import in vitro and in vivo, reduces intracellular phosphocreatine and ATP levels, and induces tumor apoptosis. RGX-202 suppressed CRC growth across KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant xenograft, syngeneic, and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors. Antitumor efficacy correlated with tumoral expression of creatine kinase B. Combining RGX-202 with 5-fluorouracil or the DHODH inhibitor leflunomide caused regressions of multiple colorectal xenograft and PDX tumors of distinct mutational backgrounds. RGX-202 also perturbed creatine metabolism in patients with metastatic CRC in a phase 1 trial, mirroring pharmacodynamic effects on creatine metabolism observed in mice. This is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of preclinical and human pharmacodynamic activity for creatine metabolism targeting in oncology, thus revealing a critical therapeutic target.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Creatine/metabolism , Creatine/pharmacology , Creatine/therapeutic use , Humans , Membrane Transport Proteins , Mice , Mice, Nude , Mutation , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Plasma Membrane Neurotransmitter Transport Proteins/genetics , Plasma Membrane Neurotransmitter Transport Proteins/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/drug therapy , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Azetidines/administration & dosage , Azetidines/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Piperidines/adverse effects , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by a paucity of tumor-proximal CD8+ T cells and resistance to immunotherapeutic interventions. Cancer-associated mechanisms that elicit CD8+ T-cell exclusion and resistance to immunotherapy are not well-known. Here, using a Kras- and p53-driven model of PDA, we describe a mechanism of action for the protumorigenic cytokine IL35 through STAT3 activation in CD8+ T cells. Distinct from its action on CD4+ T cells, IL35 signaling in gp130+CD8+ T cells activated the transcription factor STAT3, which antagonized intratumoral infiltration and effector function of CD8+ T cells via suppression of CXCR3, CCR5, and IFNγ expression. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling in tumor-educated CD8+ T cells improved PDA growth control upon adoptive transfer to tumor-bearing mice. We showed that activation of STAT3 in CD8+ T cells was driven by B cell- but not regulatory T cell-specific production of IL35. We also demonstrated that B cell-specific deletion of IL35 facilitated CD8+ T-cell activation independently of effector or regulatory CD4+ T cells and was sufficient to phenocopy therapeutic anti-IL35 blockade in overcoming resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Finally, we identified a circulating IL35+ B-cell subset in patients with PDA and demonstrated that the presence of IL35+ cells predicted increased occurrence of phosphorylated (p)Stat3+CXCR3-CD8+ T cells in tumors and inversely correlated with a cytotoxic T-cell signature in patients. Together, these data identified B cell-mediated IL35/gp130/STAT3 signaling as an important direct link to CD8+ T-cell exclusion and immunotherapy resistance in PDA.
Subject(s)
B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/immunology , Interleukins/immunology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , STAT3 Transcription Factor/immunology , Animals , Apoptosis/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/genetics , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/therapy , Case-Control Studies , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Humans , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Interleukins/genetics , Lymphocyte Activation , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Receptors, CCR5/genetics , Receptors, CCR5/immunology , Receptors, CXCR3/genetics , Receptors, CXCR3/immunology , STAT3 Transcription Factor/genetics , Signal Transduction/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Xenograft Model Antitumor AssaysABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The influence of the transcriptional and immunologic context of mutations on therapeutic outcomes with targeted therapy in cancer has not been well defined. BRAF V600E-mutant (BM) colorectal cancer comprises two main transcriptional subtypes, BM1 and BM2. We sought to determine the impact of BM subtype, as well as distinct biological features of those subtypes, on response to BRAF/MEK/EGFR inhibition in patients with colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paired fresh tumor biopsies were acquired at baseline and on day 15 of treatment from all consenting patients with BM colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab. For each sample, BM subtype, cell cycle, and immune gene signature expression were determined using RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), and a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to determine association with progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Confirmed response rates, median PFS, and median overall survival (OS) were higher in BM1 subtype patients compared with BM2 subtype patients. Evaluation of immune contexture identified greater immune reactivity in BM1, whereas cell-cycle signatures were more highly expressed in BM2. A multivariate model of PFS incorporating BM subtype plus immune and cell-cycle signatures revealed that BM subtype encompasses the majority of the effect. CONCLUSIONS: BM subtype is significantly associated with the outcome of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and panitumumab therapy and may serve as a standalone predictive biomarker beyond mutational status. Our findings support a more nuanced approach to targeted therapeutic decisions that incorporates assessment of transcriptional context.