Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2024 supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2024 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2024, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patient·es, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient·e. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Prehabilitation in the lung cancer pathway: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the UK. Treatment outcomes are poor and UK deaths from lung cancer are higher than any other cancer. Prehabilitation has shown to be an important means of preparing patients both physically and psychologically for cancer treatment. However, little is understood about the context and mechanisms of prehabilitation that can impact physiological and psychological wellbeing. Our aim was to review and summarise primary research on prehabilitation in the lung cancer pathway using a realist approach. METHODS: A scoping review of empirical primary research was conducted. Five online medical databases from 2016 - February 2023 were searched. All articles reporting on prehabilitation in lung cancer were included in the review. For this review, prehabilitation was defined as either a uni-modal or multi-modal intervention including exercise, nutrition and/or psychosocial support within a home, community or hospital based setting. A realist framework of context, mechanism and outcome was used to assist with the interpretation of findings. RESULTS: In total, 31 studies were included in the review, of which, three were published study protocols. Over 95% of studies featured an exercise component as part of a prehabilitation programme. Twenty-six of the studies had a surgical focus. Only two studies reported using theory to underpin the design of this complex intervention. There was large heterogeneity across all studies as well as a lack of clinical trials to provide definitive evidence on the programme design, setting, type of intervention, patient criteria, delivery, duration and outcome measures used. CONCLUSION: A standardised prehabilitation programme for lung cancer patients does not yet exist. Future lung cancer prehabilitation programmes should take into account patient led values, needs, goals, support structures and beliefs, as these factors can affect the delivery and engagement of interventions. Future research should consider using a conceptual framework to conceptualise the living with and beyond cancer experience to help shape and inform personalised prehabilitation services.

Training Anesthesiology Residents to Care for the Traumatically Injured in the United States.

Training and education for trauma anesthesiology have been predicated on 2 primary pathways: learning through peripheral "complex, massive transfusion cases"-an assumption that is flawed due to the unique demands, skills, and knowledge of trauma anesthesiology-or learning through experiential education, which is also incomplete due to its unpredictable and variable exposure. Residents may receive training from senior physicians who may not maintain a trauma-focused continuing medical education. Further compounding the issue is the lack of fellowship-trained clinicians and standardized curricula. The American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) provides a section for trauma education in its Initial Certification in Anesthesiology Content Outline. However, many trauma-related topics also fall under other subspecialties, and the outline excludes "nontechnical" skills. This article focuses on the training of anesthesiology residents and proposes a tier-based approach to teaching the ABA outline by including lectures, simulation, problem-based learning discussions, and case-based discussions that are proctored in conducive environments by knowledgeable facilitators.

The incidence of awake tracheal intubation in anesthetic practice is decreasing: a historical cohort study of the years 2014-2020 at a single tertiary care institution.

PURPOSE: Awake tracheal intubation (ATI) is recommended in airway management guidelines when significant difficulty is predicted with airway management. Use of the technique may be declining, which may have implications for patient safety or for skills acquisition and maintenance. This historical cohort database study sought to determine if the use of ATI was decreasing in our adult tertiary care center. METHODS: With institutional research ethics board approval, we queried our anesthesia information management system for cases with ATI descriptors for each year from 2014 to 2020. Records of the retrieved cases were independently reviewed by all three authors to verify they met inclusion criteria for the ATI cohort prior to analysis for the primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included airway device and route used for ATI, first attempt and ultimate success rates, and reported adverse issues recorded in cases of failed ATI or those requiring more than one attempt. RESULTS: A total of 692 cases of ATI were identified between 2014 and 2020. There was a statistically significant decrease in yearly ATIs over the seven-year study period (Chi square goodness of fit, P < 0.001), with ATI use decreasing by about 50%. First attempt success was significantly greater with use of flexible bronchoscopy vs video laryngoscopy to facilitate ATI (84% vs 60%; P < 0.001), while there was no difference in first attempt success with the oral vs nasal route (82% vs 82%; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In this single-center historical cohort study, the use of ATI decreased significantly from 2014 to 2020. Whether this decrease will result in morbidity or mortality related to airway management is currently unclear. Regardless, it has implications for training opportunities and maintenance of competence in performing the procedure.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'intubation trachéale éveillée (ITE) est recommandée dans les lignes directrices de prise en charge des voies aériennes lorsque des difficultés significatives sont anticipées dans la prise en charge des voies aériennes. L'utilisation de cette technique pourrait être en déclin, ce qui pourrait avoir des répercussions sur la sécurité des patients ou sur l'acquisition et le maintien des compétences. Cette étude de cohorte historique visait à déterminer si l'utilisation de l'ITE était en diminution dans notre centre de soins tertiaires pour adultes. MéTHODE: Après avoir obtenu l'approbation du comité d'éthique de la recherche de notre institution, nous avons extrait les données des patients ayant des descripteurs d'ITE de 2014 à 2020 à partir de notre système de gestion de l'information en anesthésie. Les données des dossiers de ces patients ont été examinées de manière indépendante par les trois auteurs afin de vérifier s'ils répondaient aux critères d'inclusion de la cohorte ITE avant l'analyse du critère d'évaluation principal. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient le dispositif d'intubation et la voie d'accès utilisés pour l'ITE, les taux de réussite de la première tentative et de la réussite finale, et les problèmes indésirables signalés enregistrés dans les cas d'échec de l'ITE ou ceux nécessitant plus d'une tentative. RéSULTATS: Au total, 692 cas d'ITE ont été identifiés entre 2014 et 2020. Il y a eu une diminution annuelle statistiquement significative des ITE au cours de la période d'étude de sept ans (test d'adéquation du Chi carré, P < 0,001), l'utilisation de l'ITE diminuant d'environ 50 %. Le succès de l'intubation à la première tentative a été significativement plus important avec l'utilisation de la bronchoscopie flexible en comparaison à la vidéolaryngoscopie pour faciliter l'ITE (84 % vs 60 %; P < 0,001), bien qu'aucune différence n'ait été observée dans le succès de la première tentative par voie orale en comparaison à nasale (82 % versus 82 %; P = 1,0). CONCLUSION: Dans cette étude de cohorte historique monocentrique, l'utilisation de l'intubation trachéale éveillée a diminué de manière significative de 2014 à 2020. Il n'est pas clair si cette diminution entraînera une morbidité ou une mortalité liée à la prise en charge des voies aériennes. Quoi qu'il en soit, cela a des implications pour la formation et le maintien des compétences dans l'exécution de la procédure.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia: Revised Edition 2023.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2023 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2023 supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgment in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2023 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2023, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patients, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Biochemical disturbance in damage control resuscitation: mechanisms, management and prognostic utility.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With advances in resuscitative techniques, trauma patients are surviving increasingly severe injuries and physiological insult. Timely recognition of futility remains important in terms of patient dignity and resource preservation yet is increasingly challenging in the face of these advances. The understanding of biochemical derangement from pathophysiological processes of trauma and iatrogenic effects of resuscitation has expanded recently. RECENT FINDINGS: Acidosis and hypocalcaemia have been recognized as important contributors to mortality among trauma patients. Although less well recognized and studied, critical injury and high blood product volume resuscitation render patients vulnerable to life-threatening hyperkalaemia. The methods of correcting disruptions to acid-base and electrolyte homeostasis during damage control resuscitation have changed little recently and often rely on evidence from undifferentiated populations. Biochemical disturbances have value as ancillary predictors of futility in trauma resuscitation. SUMMARY: These findings will contribute to a greater understanding among anaesthesiologists of the causative mechanisms and effects of biochemical derangement after severe injury and aid them in the delivery of well tolerated and effective damage control resuscitation. Gaps in the evidence base are highlighted to encourage future work.

Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze the validity of electrical bioimpedance-based noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatrics compared with standard methods such as thermodilution and echocardiography. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2000-2019). STUDY SELECTION: Method-comparison studies of transthoracic electrical velocimetry or whole body electrical bioimpedance versus standard cardiac output monitoring methods in children (0-18 yr old) were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Mean differences of cardiac output, stroke volume, or cardiac index measurements were pooled using a random-effects model (R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019). Bland-Altman statistics assessing agreement between devices and author conclusions about inferiority/noninferiority were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-nine of 649 identified studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 25 studies in the meta-analyses. No significant difference was found between means of cardiac output, stroke volume, and cardiac index measurements, except in exclusively neonatal/infant studies reporting stroke volume (mean difference, 1.00 mL; 95% CI, 0.23-1.77). Median percentage error in child/adolescent studies approached acceptability (percentage error less than or equal to 30%) for cardiac output in L/min (31%; range, 13-158%) and stroke volume in mL (26%; range, 14-27%), but not in neonatal/infant studies (45%; range, 29-53% and 45%; range, 28-70%, respectively). Twenty of 29 studies concluded that transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance was noninferior. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry was considered inferior in six of nine studies with heterogeneous congenital heart disease populations. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analyses demonstrated no significant difference between means of compared devices (except in neonatal stroke volume studies). The wide range of percentage error reported may be due to heterogeneity of study designs, devices, and populations included. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance may be acceptable for use in child/adolescent populations, but validity in neonates and congenital heart disease patients remains uncertain. Larger studies in specific clinical contexts with standardized methodologies are required.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2022.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2022 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2022 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2022 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2022, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patients, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Performance assessment of intravenous catheters for massive transfusion: A pragmatic in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Rapid infusion of warmed blood products is the cornerstone of trauma resuscitation and treatment of surgical and obstetric massive hemorrhage. Integral to optimizing this delivery is selection of an intravenous (IV) catheter and use of a rapid infusion device (RID). We investigated which IV catheter and RID system enabled the greatest infusion rate of blood products and the governing catheter characteristics. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The maximum flow rates of nine IV catheters were measured while infusing a mixture of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma at a 1:1 ratio using a RID with and without a patient line extension. To account for IV catheters that achieved the RID's maximum 1000 ml/min, the conductance of each infusion circuit configuration was calculated. RESULTS: IV catheters of 7-Fr caliber or higher reached the maximum pressurized flow rate. The 9-Fr multi-lumen access catheter (MAC) achieved the greatest conductance, over sevenfold greater than the 18 g peripheral catheter (4.6 vs. 0.6 ml/min/mmHg, p < .001). Conductance was positively correlated with internal radius (ß = 1.098, 95% CI 4.286-5.025, p < .001) and negatively correlated with length (ß= - 0.495, 95% CI -0.007 to 0.005, p < .001). Use of an extension line (ß= - 0.094, 95% CI -0.505 to -0.095, p = .005) was independently associated with reduced conductance in large caliber catheters. CONCLUSION: Short, large-diameter catheters provided the greatest infusion rates of massive transfusion blood products for the least pressure. For patients requiring the highest transfusion flow rates, extension tubing should be avoided when possible.

Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia - Revised Edition 2021.

OVERVIEW: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2021 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine their publication and distribution. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia Revised Edition 2021 supersedes all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.

RéSUMé: Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2021 (le Guide), a été préparé par la Société canadienne des anesthésiologistes (SCA), qui se réserve le droit de décider des termes de sa publication et de sa diffusion. Le Guide est soumis à révision et des versions mises à jour sont publiées chaque année. Le Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie, version révisée 2021, remplace toutes les versions précédemment publiées de ce document. Bien que la SCA incite les anesthésiologistes du Canada à se conformer à son guide d'exercice pour assurer une grande qualité des soins dispensés aux patients, elle ne peut garantir les résultats d'une intervention spécifique. Les anesthésiologistes doivent exercer leur jugement professionnel pour déterminer la méthode d'intervention la mieux adaptée à l'état de leur patient. La SCA n'accepte aucune responsabilité ou imputabilité de quelque nature que ce soit découlant d'erreurs ou d'omissions ou de l'utilisation des renseignements contenus dans son Guide d'exercice de l'anesthésie.

Factors Associated With Failure of Spinal Anesthetic: An 8-Year Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Elective Hip and Knee Joint Arthroplasty.

The primary outcome of this 8-year retrospective review was the failure of spinal anesthetic (SA) in elective hip and knee joint arthroplasty surgery. Of 3542 SAs, a total of 135 failures were identified (3.8%). Factors associated with increased odds of failure were younger age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.05), lower body mass index (BMI; OR, 1.04 [1.01-1.08]), hip arthroplasty (OR, 1.90 [1.28-2.84]) compared to knee arthroplasty, needle insertion at L4-5 (OR, 4.61 [2.02-10.54]) and L5-S1 (OR, 7.66 [2.47-23.7]) compared to L2-3, 22-gauge needle size (OR, 2.17 [1.34-3.52]) compared to 25-gauge needle, and hyperbaric bupivacaine (OR, 1.66 [1.09-2.53]) compared to isobaric bupivacaine.

A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: During video laryngoscopy (VL) with angulated or hyper-curved blades, it is sometimes difficult to complete tracheal intubation despite a full view of the larynx. When using indirect VL, it has been suggested that it may be preferable to obtain a deliberately restricted view of the larynx to facilitate passage of the endotracheal tube. We used the GlideScope® GVL video laryngoscope (GVL) to test whether deliberately obtaining a restricted view would result in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view of the larynx. METHODS: We recruited 163 elective surgical patients and randomly allocated the participants to one of two groups: Group F, where a full view of the larynx was obtained and held during GVL-facilitated tracheal intubation, and Group R, with a restricted view of the larynx (< 50% of glottic opening visible). Study investigators experienced in indirect VL performed the intubations. The intubations were recorded and the video recordings were subsequently assessed for total time to intubation, ease of intubation using a visual analogue scale (VAS; where 0 = easy and 100 = difficult), first-attempt success rate, and oxygen saturation after intubation. Complications were also assessed. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to intubation was faster in Group R than in Group F (27 [22-36] sec vs 36 [27-48] sec, respectively; median difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 13; P < 0.001). The median [IQR] VAS rating for ease of intubation was also better in Group R than in Group F (14 [6-42) mm vs 50 mm [17-65], respectively; median difference, 20 mm; 95% CI, 10 to 31; P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding the first-attempt success rate, oxygen saturation immediately after intubation, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Using the GVL with a deliberately restricted view of the larynx resulted in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view and with no additional complications. Our study suggests that obtaining a full or Cormack-Lehane grade 1 view may not be desirable when using the GVL. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02144207.