Transcriptional re-programming of liver-resident iNKT cells into T-regulatory type-1-like liver iNKT cells involves extensive gene de-methylation.

Unlike conventional CD4+ T cells, which are phenotypically and functionally plastic, invariant NKT (iNKT) cells generally exist in a terminally differentiated state. Naïve CD4+ T cells can acquire alternative epigenetic states in response to different cues, but it remains unclear whether peripheral iNKT cells are epigenetically stable or malleable. Repetitive encounters of liver-resident iNKT cells (LiNKTs) with alpha-galactosylceramide (αGalCer)/CD1d-coated nanoparticles (NPs) can trigger their differentiation into a LiNKT cell subset expressing a T regulatory type 1 (TR1)-like (LiNKTR1) transcriptional signature. Here we dissect the epigenetic underpinnings of the LiNKT-LiNKTR1 conversion as compared to those underlying the peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC)-NP-induced T-follicular helper (TFH)-to-TR1 transdifferentiation process. We show that gene upregulation during the LINKT-to-LiNKTR1 cell conversion is associated with demethylation of gene bodies, inter-genic regions, promoters and distal gene regulatory elements, in the absence of major changes in chromatin exposure or deposition of expression-promoting histone marks. In contrast, the naïve CD4+ T cell-to-TFH differentiation process involves extensive remodeling of the chromatin and the acquisition of a broad repertoire of epigenetic modifications that are then largely inherited by TFH cell-derived TR1 cell progeny. These observations indicate that LiNKT cells are epigenetically malleable and particularly susceptible to gene de-methylation.

Transcriptional re-programming of insulin B-chain epitope-specific T-follicular helper cells into anti-diabetogenic T-regulatory type-1 cells.

Systemic delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) coated with mono-specific autoimmune disease-relevant peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II (pMHCII) molecules can resolve organ inflammation in various disease models in a disease-specific manner without impairing normal immunity. These compounds invariably trigger the formation and systemic expansion of cognate pMHCII-specific T-regulatory type 1 (TR1) cells. By focusing on type 1 diabetes (T1D)-relevant pMHCII-NP types that display an epitope from the insulin B-chain bound to the same MHCII molecule (IAg7) on three different registers, we show that pMHCII-NP-induced TR1 cells invariably co-exist with cognate T-Follicular Helper (TFH)-like cells of quasi-identical clonotypic composition and are oligoclonal, yet transcriptionally homogeneous. Furthermore, these three different TR1 specificities have similar diabetes reversal properties in vivo despite being uniquely reactive against the peptide MHCII-binding register displayed on the NPs. Thus, pMHCII-NP treatment using nanomedicines displaying different epitope specificities results in the simultaneous differentiation of multiple antigen-specific TFH-like cell clones into TR1-like cells that inherit the fine antigenic specificity of their precursors while acquiring a defined transcriptional immunoregulatory program.

A T follicular helper cell origin for T regulatory type 1 cells.

Chronic antigenic stimulation can trigger the differentiation of antigen-experienced CD4+ T cells into T regulatory type 1 (TR1) cells, a subset of interleukin-10-producing Treg cells that do not express FOXP3. The identities of the progenitor(s) and transcriptional regulators of this T-cell subset remain unclear. Here, we show that the peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II (pMHCII) monospecific immunoregulatory T-cell pools that arise in vivo in different genetic backgrounds in response to pMHCII-coated nanoparticles (pMHCII-NPs) are invariably comprised of oligoclonal subpools of T follicular helper (TFH) and TR1 cells with a nearly identical clonotypic composition but different functional properties and transcription factor expression profiles. Pseudotime analyses of scRNAseq data and multidimensional mass cytometry revealed progressive downregulation and upregulation of TFH and TR1 markers, respectively. Furthermore, pMHCII-NPs trigger cognate TR1 cell formation in TFH cell-transfused immunodeficient hosts, and T-cell-specific deletion of Bcl6 or Irf4 blunts both the TFH expansion and TR1 formation induced by pMHCII-NPs. In contrast, deletion of Prdm1 selectively abrogates the TFH-to-TR1 conversion. Bcl6 and Prdm1 are also necessary for anti-CD3 mAb-induced TR1 formation. Thus, TFH cells can differentiate into TR1 cells in vivo, and BLIMP1 is a gatekeeper of this cellular reprogramming event.