Diverted versus undiverted restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis: an analysis of long-term outcomes after pouch leak short title: outcomes after pouch leak.

BACKGROUND: The safety of undiverted restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is debated. This study compares long-term outcomes after pouch leak in diverted and undiverted RPC patients. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained registry from a single surgical practice. One-stage and staged procedures with an undiverted pouch were considered undiverted pouches; all others were considered diverted pouches. The outcomes measured were pouch excision and long-term diversion defined as the need for loop ileostomy at 200 weeks after pouch creation. Regression models were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: There were 317 diverted and 670 undiverted pouches, of which 378 were one-stage procedures. Pouch leaks occurred in 135 patients, 92 (13.7%) after undiverted, and 43 (13.6%) after diverted pouches. Eighty-six (64%) leaks were diagnosed within 6 months of pouch creation. Undiverted patients underwent more emergent procedures within 30 days of pouch creation (p < 0.01). Pouch excision occurred in 14 (33%) diverted patients and 13 (14%) undiverted patients (p = 0.01). Thirteen (32%) diverted patients and 18 (21%) undiverted patients (p = 0.17) had ileostomies at 200 weeks after surgery. In multivariable analyses, diverted patients had a higher risk of pouch excision (HR 3.67 p < 0.01), but similar rates of ileostomy at 200 weeks (HR 1.8, p = 0.19) compared to undiverted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a likely selection bias in which "healthier" patients undergo an undiverted pouch, our data suggest that diversion does not prevent pouch excision and the need for long-term diversion after pouch leak. These findings suggest that undiverted RPC is a safe procedure in appropriately selected patients.

Assessment of Bowel End Perfusion After Mesenteric Division: Eye Versus SPY.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications related to tissue ischemia cause morbidity in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Surgeons' standard practice to predict bowel perfusion is inspection of mesenteric perfusion before anastomosing bowel ends. Augmenting this assessment with fluorescent imaging is under study. A standardized system to evaluate this imaging has not yet been developed. This study compared the surgeon's intraoperative assessment to a novel GI-specific imaging analysis method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing open or laparoscopic-assisted bowel resections were enrolled. After mesenteric division, the surgeon marked the site for bowel transection. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging was performed on the marked bowel ends. Imaging analysis identified theoretical transection sites based on the quantification of arterial and microvascular inflow (Perfusion) and venous outflow (Timing). The primary outcome was the measured disparity between the site marked by the surgeon using current standard of care parameters and the imaging-determined site. No clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-two bowel end segments from 46 patients were analyzed. Disparity was found in 11 of 72 (15%) bowel end segments. In five (7%), the disparity was due to either Perfusion or Timing (single), and in six (8%), due to both Perfusion and Timing (combined). In the single disparity group, the median disparity distance was 2.0 cm by Perfusion and 4.0 cm by Timing, and in the combined group, 3.8 cm by Perfusion and 3.5 cm by Timing. Disparity (either single or combined) was in 25% of colon and 11.5% of small bowel (P = NS). Combined and single disparity had equivalent lengths of disparity distance (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Imaging coupled with this GI-specific analysis provides objective, real-time, and interpretable data of intramural blood supply. A 15% disparity rate from current clinical practice was observed.

Fistula-Associated Anorectal Cancer in the Setting of Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Cancer arising from perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease is rare. There are only a small series of articles that describe sporadic cases of perianal cancer in Crohn's disease fistulas. Therefore, there are no clear guidelines on how to appropriately screen patients at risk and choose proper management. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe patients diagnosed with cancer in perianal fistulas in the setting of Crohn's disease. DESIGN: The study involved an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of medical charts of patients with perianal Crohn's disease. The data extracted from patient charts included demographic and clinical characteristics. SETTINGS: Patients seen at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were included. PATIENTS: We identified patients who were diagnosed with perianal cancer in biopsies of fistula tracts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We observed the number of patients with Crohn's disease who had fistulas, cancer in fistula tract, and time to diagnosis. RESULTS: The charts of 2382 patients with fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease were reviewed. Cancer in a fistula tract was diagnosed in 19 (0.79%) of these patients, 9 with squamous-cell carcinoma and 10 with adenocarcinoma. The majority of the 19 patients (68%) had symptoms typical of perianal fistula. The mean time from diagnosis of Crohn's disease to fistula diagnosis and from fistula diagnosis to cancer diagnosis was 19.4 and 6.0 years. In 5 patients (26%), cancer was not diagnosed in the first biopsy obtained from the fistula tract. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective chart review of a rare outcome; the results may not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: Routine biopsies of long-standing fistula tracts in patients with Crohn's disease should be strongly considered and may yield an earlier diagnosis of cancer in the fistula tracts.

Television viewing, physical activity and venous thromboembolism risk: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study.

INTRODUCTION: Television (TV) viewing may be associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk independent of VTE risk factors including physical activity. This association was assessed in a large biracial US cohort of Black and White adults. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2007 The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study recruited 30,239 participants aged ≥45 years, who were surveyed for baseline TV viewing and followed for VTE events. TV viewing was categorized as <2 hours (light), 2 to 4 hours (moderate), and ≥4 hours (heavy) per day. Physical activity was classified as poor, intermediate, or ideal based on reported weekly activity. Hazard ratios of TV viewing and physical activity were calculated adjusting for VTE risk factors. Multiple imputation for missingness was used as a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Over 96,813 person-years (median: 5.06 years) of follow-up there were 214 VTE events. Heavy TV viewing was not associated with VTE risk in the unadjusted and fully adjusted model (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62, 1.36]). Ideal physical activity trended toward a reduced VTE risk (HR: 0.71 [95%CI: 0.51, 1.01]). There was no evidence of an interaction between TV viewing, physical activity, and risk of VTE. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary racially and geographically diverse US cohort, there was no association between TV viewing and VTE risk, before and after accounting for physical activity. The high burden of traditional VTE risk factors in REGARDS may mask any association of TV viewing with VTE, or TV viewing may have only a modest association with VTE risk.