Inequities in Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Call to Action.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether selection of treatment for children with infantile spasms (IS) varies by race/ethnicity. METHODS: The prospective US National Infantile Spasms Consortium database includes children with IS treated from 2012 to 2018. We examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and receipt of standard IS therapy (prednisolone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, vigabatrin), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was treatment course, which considered therapy prescribed for the first and, when needed, the second IS treatment together. RESULTS: Of 555 children, 324 (58%) were non-Hispanic white, 55 (10%) non-Hispanic Black, 24 (4%) non-Hispanic Asian, 80 (14%) Hispanic, and 72 (13%) other/unknown. Most (398, 72%) received a standard treatment course. Insurance type, geographic location, history of prematurity, prior seizures, developmental delay or regression, abnormal head circumference, hypsarrhythmia, and IS etiologies were associated with standard therapy. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black children had lower odds of receiving a standard treatment course compared with non-Hispanic white children (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.89; p = 0.02). Adjusted models also showed that children with public (vs. private) insurance had lower odds of receiving standard therapy for treatment 1 (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.21-0.84; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Non-Hispanic Black children were more often treated with non-standard IS therapies than non-Hispanic white children. Likewise, children with public (vs. private) insurance were less likely to receive standard therapies. Investigating drivers of inequities, and understanding the impact of racism on treatment decisions, are critical next steps to improve care for patients with IS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:32-44.

Response to treatment in a prospective national infantile spasms cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Infantile spasms are seizures associated with a severe epileptic encephalopathy presenting in the first 2 years of life, and optimal treatment continues to be debated. This study evaluates early and sustained response to initial treatments and addresses both clinical remission and electrographic resolution of hypsarrhythmia. Secondarily, it assesses whether response to treatment differs by etiology or developmental status. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium established a multicenter, prospective database enrolling infants with new diagnosis of infantile spasms. Children were considered responders if there was clinical remission and resolution of hypsarrhythmia that was sustained at 3 months after first treatment initiation. Standard treatments of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), oral corticosteroids, and vigabatrin were considered individually, and all other nonstandard therapies were analyzed collectively. Developmental status and etiology were assessed. We compared response rates by treatment group using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty infants were enrolled from 22 centers. Overall, 46% of children receiving standard therapy responded, compared to only 9% who responded to nonstandard therapy (p < 0.001). Fifty-five percent of infants receiving ACTH as initial treatment responded, compared to 39% for oral corticosteroids, 36% for vigabatrin, and 9% for other (p < 0.001). Neither etiology nor development significantly modified the response pattern by treatment group. INTERPRETATION: Response rate varies by treatment choice. Standard therapies should be considered as initial treatment for infantile spasms, including those with impaired development or known structural or genetic/metabolic etiology. ACTH appeared to be more effective than other standard therapies.

Response to second treatment after initial failed treatment in a multicenter prospective infantile spasms cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Infantile spasms (IS) represent a severe epileptic encephalopathy presenting in the first 2 years of life. Recommended first-line therapies (hormonal therapy or vigabatrin) often fail. We evaluated response to second treatment for IS in children in whom the initial therapy failed to produce both clinical remission and electrographic resolution of hypsarhythmia and whether time to treatment was related to outcome. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium established a multicenter, prospective database enrolling infants with new diagnosis of IS. Children were considered nonresponders to first treatment if there was no clinical remission or persistence of hypsarhythmia. Treatment was evaluated as hormonal therapy (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH] or oral corticosteroids), vigabatrin, or "other." Standard treatments (hormonal and vigabatrin) were compared to all other nonstandard treatments. We compared response rates using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen infants were included from 19 centers. Overall response rate to a second treatment was 37% (n = 44). Children who received standard medications with differing mechanisms for first and second treatment had higher response rates than other sequences (27/49 [55%] vs. 17/69 [25%], p < 0.001). Children receiving first treatment within 4 weeks of IS onset had a higher response rate to second treatment than those initially treated later (36/82 [44%] vs. 8/34 [24%], p = 0.040). SIGNIFICANCE: Greater than one third of children with IS will respond to a second medication. Choosing a standard medication (ACTH, oral corticosteroids, or vigabatrin) that has a different mechanism of action appears to be more effective. Rapid initial treatment increases the likelihood of response to the second treatment.

Hypsarrhythmia assessment exhibits poor interrater reliability: a threat to clinical trial validity.

OBJECTIVE: Hypsarrhythmia is the classic interictal electroencephalographic pattern associated with infantile spasms, and characterized by high voltage, disorganization, and multifocal independent epileptiform discharges. Given this seemingly simple definition, one might expect excellent interrater reliability (IRR) in the identification of this pattern. Alternatively, it may be argued that assessments of voltage and disorganization are fairly subjective, and thus quite challenging in borderline cases. We sought to test the IRR of hypsarrhythmia assessment in a systematic fashion. METHODS: Six blinded pediatric electroencephalographers from four centers reviewed 22 electroencephalography (EEG) samples from patients with infantile spasms. Each sample was 5 min in duration and included only wakefulness. Raters determined if each EEG was abnormal and if hypsarrhythmia was present/absent, and characterized relevant features: voltage, organization, epileptiform discharges, slowing, interictal attenuations, symmetry, and synchrony. In addition, raters indicated their level of confidence for each assessment. Multirater kappa statistics (κ) were calculated for the assessment of hypsarrhythmia and each feature. RESULTS: Although IRR was favorable in determining whether a study was normal or abnormal (κ=0.89), reliability was unfavorable for assessment of hypsarrhythmia (κ=0.40), modified hypsarrhythmia (κ=0.47), high voltage (κ=0.37), disorganization (κ=0.22), multifocal epileptiform discharges (κ=0.68), interictal voltage attenuations (κ=0.21), slowing (κ=0.20), asymmetry (κ=0.26), and asynchrony (κ=0.08). Despite generally unsatisfactory interrater agreement, raters consistently reported high confidence in assessments. SIGNIFICANCE: This study contradicts the view that hypsarrhythmia assessment is straightforward. Even small variability in the identification of hypsarrhythmia has potentially deleterious consequences for clinical care, as its presence or absence impacts decisions to pursue high-risk and high-cost therapies. These inconsistencies may similarly confound studies in which abolition of hypsarrhythmia is an outcome measure. There is a great need for practical, reliable, and unbiased measures of hypsarrhythmia.

The response to ACTH is determined early in the treatment of infantile spasms.

Although adrenocorticotropic hormone is the most commonly used treatment for infantile spasms in the United States, the optimal regimen for this indication is not known. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the optimal adrenocorticotropic hormone treatment duration. We conducted a retrospective chart review of response to adrenocorticotropic hormone among all patients with infantile spasms managed at our institution from January 2009 to September 2013. Treatment response was defined as clinical remission for greater than or equal to 28 days starting at any point within the adrenocorticotropic hormone course and remission of hypsarrhythmia (or definite EEG improvement if hypsarrhythmia was absent at baseline). For responders, the diagnostic and post-treatment EEG tracings were reviewed. Electroclinical remission was achieved in 21 of 39 patients (54%) receiving adrenocorticotropic hormone, including 11/25 (44%) receiving a long course (typically 12 weeks) and 10/14 (71%) receiving a short course (typically four weeks). The mean time to clinical remission was 5.8 days (median: 5 days; range: 1-20 days). Only one patient responded beyond two weeks of treatment. This study provides Class IV evidence that among patients with infantile spasms, the response to adrenocorticotropic hormone is most often determined early in the treatment course. Given the importance of rapid remission, clinicians should consider adding or changing treatment if infantile spasms do not resolve within two weeks of adrenocorticotropic hormone initiation. Further study is needed to determine the optimal adrenocorticotropic hormone regimen for infantile spasms.

EEG biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of infantile spasms.

Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for young children with infantile spasms (IS), as this maximizes the possibility of the best possible child-specific outcome. However, there are major barriers to achieving this, including high rates of misdiagnosis or failure to recognize the seizures, medication failure, and relapse. There are currently no validated tools to aid clinicians in assessing objective diagnostic criteria, predicting or measuring medication response, or predicting the likelihood of relapse. However, the pivotal role of EEG in the clinical management of IS has prompted many recent studies of potential EEG biomarkers of the disease. These include both visual EEG biomarkers based on human visual interpretation of the EEG and computational EEG biomarkers in which computers calculate quantitative features of the EEG. Here, we review the literature on both types of biomarkers, organized based on the application (diagnosis, treatment response, prediction, etc.). Visual biomarkers include the assessment of hypsarrhythmia, epileptiform discharges, fast oscillations, and the Burden of AmplitudeS and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) score. Computational markers include EEG amplitude and power spectrum, entropy, functional connectivity, high frequency oscillations (HFOs), long-range temporal correlations, and phase-amplitude coupling. We also introduce each of the computational measures and provide representative examples. Finally, we highlight remaining gaps in the literature, describe practical guidelines for future biomarker discovery and validation studies, and discuss remaining roadblocks to clinical implementation, with the goal of facilitating future work in this critical area.

Comparison of Cosyntropin, Vigabatrin, and Combination Therapy in New-Onset Infantile Spasms in a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: In a randomized trial, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cosyntropin injectable suspension, 1 mg/mL, compared to vigabatrin for infantile spasms syndrome. An additional arm was included to assess the efficacy of combination therapy (cosyntropin and vigabatrin) compared with cosyntropin monotherapy. Methods: Children (2 months to 2 years) with new-onset infantile spasms syndrome and hypsarhythmia were randomized into 3 arms: cosyntropin, vigabatrin, and cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. Daily seizures and adverse events were recorded, and EEG was repeated at day 14 to assess for resolution of hypsarhythmia. The primary outcome measure was the composite of resolution of hypsarhythmia and absence of clinical spasms at day 14. Fisher exact test was used to compare outcomes. Results: 37 children were enrolled and 34 were included in the final efficacy analysis (1 withdrew prior to treatment and 2 did not return seizure diaries). Resolution of both hypsarhythmia and clinical spasms was achieved in in 9 of 12 participants (75%) treated with cosyntropin, 1/9 (11%) vigabatrin, and 5/13 (38%) cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. The primary comparison of cosyntropin versus vigabatrin was significant (64% [95% confidence interval 21, 82], P < .01). Adverse events were reported in all 3 treatment arms: 31 (86%) had an adverse event, 7 (19%) had a serious adverse event, and 15 (42%) had an adverse event of special interest with no difference between treatment arms. Significance: This randomized trial was underpowered because of incomplete enrollment, yet it demonstrated that cosyntropin was more effective for short-term outcomes than vigabatrin as initial treatment for infantile spasms.

Association of Time to Clinical Remission With Sustained Resolution in Children With New-Onset Infantile Spasms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standard therapies (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], oral steroids, or vigabatrin) fail to control infantile spasms in almost half of children. Early identification of nonresponders could enable rapid initiation of sequential therapy. We aimed to determine the time to clinical remission after appropriate infantile spasms treatment initiation and identify predictors of the time to infantile spasms treatment response. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed children aged 2-24 months with new-onset infantile spasms at 23 US centers (2012-2018). We included children treated with standard therapy (ACTH, oral steroids, or vigabatrin). Sustained treatment response was defined as having the last clinically recognized infantile spasms on or before treatment day 14, absence of hypsarrhythmia on EEG 2-4 weeks after treatment, and persistence of remission to day 30. We analyzed the time to treatment response and assessed clinical characteristics to predict sustained treatment response. RESULTS: Among 395 infants, clinical infantile spasms remission occurred in 43% (n = 171) within the first 2 weeks of treatment, of which 81% (138/171) responded within the first week of treatment. There was no difference in the median time to response across standard therapies (ACTH: median 4 days, interquartile range [IQR] 3-7; oral steroids: median 3 days, IQR 2-5; vigabatrin: median 3 days, IQR 1-6). Individuals without hypsarrhythmia on the pretreatment EEG (i.e., abnormal but not hypsarrhythmia) were more likely to have early treatment response than infants with hypsarrhythmia at infantile spasms onset (hazard ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.57). No other clinical factors predicted early responders to therapy. DISCUSSION: Remission after first infantile spasms treatment can be identified by treatment day 7 in most children. Given the importance of early and effective treatment, these data suggest that children who do not respond to standard infantile spasms therapy within 1 week should be reassessed immediately for additional standard treatment. This approach could optimize outcomes by facilitating early sequential therapy for children with infantile spasms.

Prioritizing Hormone Therapy Over Vigabatrin as the First Treatment for Infantile Spasms: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infantile spasms (IS) are early childhood seizures with potentially devastating consequences. Standard therapies (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], high-dose prednisolone, and vigabatrin) are strongly recommended as the first treatment for IS. Although this recommendation comes without preference for one standard therapy over another, early remission rates are higher with hormone therapy (ACTH and high-dose prednisolone) when compared with vigabatrin. Using quality improvement (QI) methodology that included hormone therapy as the first treatment, we sought to increase the percentage of children with new-onset nontuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated IS achieving 3-month electroclinical remission from a mean of 53.8% to ≥70%. METHODS: This was an observational consecutive sample cohort study at a single academic tertiary care hospital that compared a prospective intervention cohort (May 2019-January 2022, N = 57) with a retrospective baseline cohort (November 2015-April 2019, N = 67). Our initiative addressed key drivers such as the routine use of vigabatrin over hormone therapy as first treatment and the common initiation of a second treatment after 14 days for initial nonresponders. We included consecutive children without TSC presenting with new-onset IS diagnosed and treated between ages 2 and 24 months. We displayed our primary outcome and process measures as control charts in which the centerline is the quarterly (previous 3 months) mean based on statistical process control methodology. RESULTS: QI interventions that included the standardization of hormone therapy as the first treatment resulted in higher rates of 3-month remission, rising from 53.8% (baseline cohort) to 75.9% (intervention cohort). Process measure results included an increased rate of children receiving hormone therapy as first treatment (mean, 44.6%-100%) and a decreased number of days to both clinical follow-up after first treatment (mean, of 16.3-12.6 days) and starting a second treatment within 14 days for initial nonresponders (mean, 36.3-17.2 days). DISCUSSION: For children with IS, improved rates of 3-month electroclinical remission can be achieved with QI methodology. Implementation of similar QI initiatives at other centers may likewise improve local remission rates.

Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria for Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome - Historical Perspectives and Practical Considerations.

The term infantile spasms has been used inconsistently within the medical literature for decades. We are also without formal consensus on the diagnostic criteria for West syndrome. Author-specific definitions for these terms will determine the populations studied within research studies and thus impact the relevance of the data acquired. In addition, how one defines these terms may have serious consequences for children presenting with infantile spasms such as the inappropriate withholding of standard therapy in those who fail to meet criteria for West syndrome. The overreliance on the term hypsarhythmia is particularly problematic given that many children presenting with infantile spasms will not have this classic pattern and because the determination of hypsarhythmia has poor inter-rater reliability. Herein I review historical perspectives, relying heavily on published monographs and consensus statements, and promote practical definitions and diagnostic criteria for infantile spasms and West syndrome. In an effort to encourage best clinical practice and research methodology, I include guidance for the diagnosis of infantile spasms (a seizure type) and West syndrome (an epilepsy syndrome).

A reliable interictal EEG grading scale for children with infantile spasms - The 2021 BASED score.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an improved interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) grading scale for children with infantile spasms founded on elements with adequate inter-rater reliability (IRR) to justify its further study for clinical and research purposes. METHODS: Three blinded reviewers assessed five-minute sleep epochs in 93 EEGs from 62 children (31 consecutive controls, 31 consecutive infantile spasms [pretreatment and posttreatment studies]) using a longitudinal bipolar montage. We determined the IRR of background amplitude, epileptiform discharges, >3 spike foci (including <50 % or >50 %), grouped multifocal spikes, paroxysmal voltage attenuations, and symmetry of sleep spindles. Data were used to finalize the 2021 BASED (Burden of AmplitudeS and Epileptiform Discharges) score. RESULTS: All elements included in the 2021 BASED score had moderate to near perfect IRR. Among controls, >200 µv background waves occurred commonly in the bilateral posterior temporal (T3-T5, T4-T6) and midline (Fz-Cz, Cz-Pz) regions. Excluding midline and occipital channels (which have normal high amplitude background waves), we designated abnormal high amplitude background waves as >200 µv for most channels, but >300 µv for T3-T5 and T4-T6. The IRR was moderate to near perfect for <50 % >3 spike foci, >50 % >3 spike foci, paroxysmal voltage attenuations, grouped multifocal spikes (GMFS), and symmetric sleep spindles. Paroxysmal voltage attenuations, GMFS, and >50 % >3 spike foci all significantly distinguished pretreatment from posttreatment studies whereas symmetric sleep spindles did not (as planned, the latter was not included in the 2021 BASED score). When the 2021 BASED score was applied to the 22 children with infantile spasms achieving clinical remission with treatment, 19 met criteria for electroclinical remission and three did not. SIGNIFICANCE: The 2021 BASED score includes elements with high levels of IRR and correlates well with the presence or absence of infantile spasms.

Comparative Effectiveness of Initial Treatment for Infantile Spasms in a Contemporary US Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness of initial treatment for infantile spasms. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed children with new onset infantile spasms that began at age 2-24 months at 23 US centers (2012-2018). Freedom from treatment failure at 60 days required no second treatment for infantile spasms and no clinical spasms after 30 days of treatment initiation. We managed treatment selection bias with propensity score weighting and within-center correlation with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Freedom from treatment failure rates were: ACTH 88/190 (46%), oral steroids 42/95 (44%), vigabatrin 32/87 (37%), and non-standard therapy 4/51 (8%). Changing from oral steroids to ACTH was not estimated to affect response (observed 44% estimated to change to 44% [95% CI 34-54]). Changing from non-standard therapy to ACTH would improve response from 8% to 39 [17-67]%, and to oral steroids from 8% to 38 [15-68]%. There were large but not statistically significant estimated effects of changing from vigabatrin to ACTH (29% to 42 [15-75]%), vigabatrin to oral steroids (29% to 42 [28-57]%), and non-standard therapy to vigabatrin (8% to 20 [6-50]%). Among children treated with vigabatrin, those with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) responded more often than others (62% vs 29%; p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Compared to non-standard therapy, ACTH and oral steroids are superior for initial treatment of infantile spasms. The estimated effectiveness of vigabatrin is between ACTH / oral steroids and non-standard therapy, though the sample was underpowered for statistical confidence. When used, vigabatrin worked best for TSC. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for children with new onset infantile spasms, ACTH or oral steroids were superior to non-standard therapies.

Compliance With Standard Therapies and Remission Rates After Implementation of an Infantile Spasms Management Guideline.

BACKGROUND: We implemented an infantile spasms management guideline recommending standard therapies and, early start of next treatment. After six years, we determined (1) our compliance with standard therapies, (2) time to next treatment, and (3) rate of initial and three-month electroclinical remission with first, second, and third treatments. METHODS: This is a retrospective record review of newly diagnosed spasms from September 2012 to September 2018, with the onset age of two months to two years. RESULTS: Standard therapies (hormone or vigabatrin) were the first treatments in 114 of 115 consecutive patients. The second and third treatments were started within 14 days of failed treatment in only 21% and 24%, respectively. Remission with the first and second treatments was similar (41% and 40%). Remission was lower for the third treatment (15%), although higher if standard therapy was used (36%). Initial and three-month remission by the first treatment was significantly higher for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH, 66% and 79%, respectively) and prednisolone (53% and 83%, respectively) than for vigabatrin (19% and 40%, respectively). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or rates of remission between ACTH and prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: Although we achieved excellent compliance with standard therapies as initial treatment, a next treatment often started after two weeks. Given the superiority of hormone therapies over vigabatrin and standard therapies over nonstandard therapies, as well as the potentially negative impact of delays in effective treatment, future interventions need to focus on increasing the use of hormone over vigabatrin (for patients without tuberous sclerosis complex), use of standard therapies as second and third treatments, and reducing delays to next treatment.

Care Delivery for Children With Epilepsy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Survey of Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on global access to care and practice patterns for children with epilepsy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of pediatric neurologists across the world affiliated with the International Child Neurology Association, the Chinese Child Neurology Society, the Child Neurology Society, and the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium. Results were analyzed in relation to regional burden of COVID-19 disease. RESULTS: From April 10 to 24, 2020, a sample of 212 respondents from 49 countries indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed many aspects of pediatric epilepsy care, with 91.5% reporting changes to outpatient care, 90.6% with reduced access to electroencephalography (EEG), 37.4% with altered management of infantile spasms, 92.3% with restrictions in ketogenic diet initiation, 93.4% with closed or severely limited epilepsy monitoring units, and 91.3% with canceled or limited epilepsy surgery. Telehealth use had increased, with 24.7% seeing patients exclusively via telehealth. Changes in practice were related both to COVID-19 burden and location. CONCLUSIONS: In response to COVID-19, pediatric epilepsy programs have implemented crisis standards of care that include increased telemedicine, decreased EEG use, changes in treatments of infantile spasms, and cessation of epilepsy surgery. The long-term impact of these abrupt changes merit careful study.

Management of Infantile Spasms During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic have mandated a change to standard management of infantile spasms. On April 6, 2020, the Child Neurology Society issued an online statement of immediate recommendations to streamline diagnosis and treatment of infantile spasms with utilization of telemedicine, outpatient studies, and selection of first-line oral therapies as initial treatment. The rationale for the recommendations and specific guidance including follow-up assessment are provided in this manuscript. These recommendations are indicated as enduring if intended to outlast the pandemic, and limited if intended only for the pandemic health care crisis but may be applicable to future disruptions of health care delivery.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in a child.

Henoch-Schönlein purpura is an acute leukocytoclastic vasculitis that primarily affects children. Henoch-Schönlein purpura is often associated with an infection, and a wide variety of infectious agents have been implicated in the pathogenesis. We report a child with Henoch-Schönlein purpura associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. Treatment of the Helicobacter pylori infection was accompanied by prompt resolution of the Henoch-Schönlein purpura.

High Amplitude Background Slow Waves in Normal Children Aged 3 to 18 Months: Implications for the Consideration of Hypsarhythmia.

PURPOSE: To assess for the presence of high amplitude EEG background slow waves in normal young children. METHODS: One hundred children with normal development ages 3 to 18 months had normal EEGs for spells and did not have seizures or epilepsy. Three electroencephalographers retrospectively reviewed 5 minutes of stable stage II sleep to measure background slow waves for peak-to-peak amplitudes. A standard 10-20 longitudinal bipolar montage was used. Interrater agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Interrater agreement between reviewers in the assessment of recurrent slow wave amplitudes was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97). Slow wave amplitudes were the highest in the posterior head regions for all patients. We found recurring slow waves of <200 µV, 200 to 299 µV, 300 to 399 µV, 400 to 499 µV, and >500 µV in 17%, 49%, 30%, 3% and 1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although hypsarhythmia typically includes high amplitude background slow waves of >200 or >300 µV, we found that 83% and 34% of normal children had recurring posterior background slow waves of >200 or >300 µV, respectively. These data may be useful in the EEG background assessment of young children, for determining the presence or absence of hypsarhythmia, and determining treatment response in children with epileptic spasms.

Comparative Effectiveness of Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital for Infantile Epilepsy.

Importance: More than half of infants with new-onset epilepsy have electroencephalographic and clinical features that do not conform to known electroclinical syndromes (ie, nonsyndromic epilepsy). Levetiracetam and phenobarbital are the most commonly prescribed medications for epilepsy in infants, but their comparative effectiveness is unknown. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam vs phenobarbital for nonsyndromic infantile epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Early Life Epilepsy Study-a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted from March 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015, in 17 US medical centers-enrolled infants with nonsyndromic epilepsy and a first afebrile seizure between 1 month and 1 year of age. Exposures: Use of levetiracetam or phenobarbital as initial monotherapy within 1 year of the first seizure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The binary outcome was freedom from monotherapy failure at 6 months, defined as no second prescribed antiepileptic medication and freedom from seizures beginning within 3 months of initiation of treatment. Outcomes were adjusted for demographics, epilepsy characteristics, and neurologic history, as well as for observable selection bias using propensity score weighting and for within-center correlation using generalized estimating equations. Results: Of the 155 infants in the study (81 girls and 74 boys; median age, 4.7 months [interquartile range, 3.0-7.1 months]), those treated with levetiracetam (n = 117) were older at the time of the first seizure than those treated with phenobarbital (n = 38) (median age, 5.2 months [interquartile range, 3.5-8.2 months] vs 3.0 months [interquartile range, 2.0-4.4 months]; P < .001). There were no other significant bivariate differences. Infants treated with levetiracetam were free from monotherapy failure more often than those treated with phenobarbital (47 [40.2%] vs 6 [15.8%]; P = .01). The superiority of levetiracetam over phenobarbital persisted after adjusting for covariates, observable selection bias, and within-center correlation (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1-16; number needed to treat, 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7-60]). Conclusions and Relevance: Levetiracetam may have superior effectiveness compared with phenobarbital for initial monotherapy of nonsyndromic epilepsy in infants. If 100 infants who received phenobarbital were instead treated with levetiracetam, 44 would be free from monotherapy failure instead of 16 by the estimates in this study. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings.