Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 49(3): 364-367, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33988114

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is an association between anterior cerebral artery vessel asymmetry and anterior communicating artery aneurysm, presumably based on flow dynamics. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential relationship between aortic arch branching patterns and incidence of intracranial aneurysm. METHODS: This study included patients scanned over 1 year at our tertiary care center who underwent high-resolution imaging (computed tomography angiography or digital subtracted angiogram) of the head and neck arteries, aortic arch, and superior mediastinum. Exclusion criteria included patients with suboptimal images. Patient age, gender, aortic arch branching pattern, and the presence, location, and number of aneurysms were documented. RESULTS: Among the 1082 patients analyzed, 250 (23%) patients had a variant aortic arch branching pattern, 22 (8.8%) of whom had aneurysms. There were 104 patients with 126 aneurysms, with majority of patients with normal aortic arch branching pattern (n = 82, 79%). The most common variant was a common origin of the left common carotid artery and brachiocephalic trunk with or without direct origin of the left vertebral artery. Twenty-two patients with aneurysms had an aberrant aortic arch (21%), compared to 232 patients without an aneurysm (24%). Fischer exact test showed no statistically significant difference between the incidence of aneurysm with different aortic arch variant groups (two-tailed p-value = 0.715). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between aortic arch branching patterns and incidence of intracranial aneurysm. No significant association was found between aortic arch branching pattern and the incidence of intracranial aneurysm.


Subject(s)
Aorta, Thoracic , Intracranial Aneurysm , Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Brachiocephalic Trunk , Carotid Artery, Common , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Aneurysm/epidemiology , Vertebral Artery
2.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 73(3): 542-548, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965171

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine if CT can improve the diagnostic confidence for the detection of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions in patients with equivocal MRI findings. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult patients who had an SIJ MRI and a subsequent SIJ CT within 12 months was conducted. Using a 5-point Likert scale, two reviewers evaluated the de-identified MRI and CT images in randomized order and in separate sessions to answer the question: "Does the patient have SIJ erosions?". A Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the difference in diagnostic confidence, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine interrater reliability. RESULTS: 54 patients were included in the analysis (average age, 43.9 years). The average time interval between initial SIJ MRI and subsequent CT was 14.4 weeks (range, 5.6-50.3 weeks). CT resulted in significantly more cases with definitive diagnostic confidence than cases with probable or equivocal confidence compared to MRI (P < .001). Amongst cases with equivocal findings on MRI, 73.2% of cases had definitive diagnoses on CT. There was moderate interrater agreement for MRI, with an ICC of .490 [95% CI, .258-.669], and excellent agreement for CT, with an ICC of .832 [95% CI, .728-.899]. CONCLUSION: Overall, CT led to significantly increased diagnostic confidence and higher interrater reliability for the detection of SIJ erosions compared to MRI. Judicious use of CT may be useful in detecting SIJ erosions in patients with equivocal MRI findings.


Subject(s)
Joint Diseases , Sacroiliac Joint , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Sacroiliac Joint/diagnostic imaging
3.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 73(2): 396-402, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34328021

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Assessment of patients for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery requires multimodality input, including EEG recordings to ensure optimal surgical planning. Often EEG demonstrates abnormal foci not detected on 1.5T MRI. Ultra-high field MRI at 7T provides improved resolution of the brain. We investigated the utility of 7T MRI to detect potential anatomical abnormalities associated with EEG changes. METHODS: Ultra-high field data were acquired on a 7T MRI scanner for 13 patients with history of drug resistant TLE who had had EEG telemetry recordings. Qualitative evaluation of 7T imaging for presence of focal abnormalities detected on EEG was performed. Correlation of 7T MRI findings with EEG recordings of focal slowing or interictal epileptic spikes (IEDs), and seizures was performed. RESULTS: Assessment of 7T MRI demonstrated concordance with TLE as determined by the multidisciplinary team in 61.5% of cases (n = 8). Among these, 3 patients exhibited supportive abnormal 7T MRI abnormalities not detected by 1.5T MRI. In patients who underwent surgery, 72.7% had concordant histopathology findings with 7T MRI findings (n = 8). However, qualitative assessment of 7T images revealed focal anatomical abnormalities to account for EEG findings in only 15.4% of patients (n = 2). Other regions that were found to have localized IEDs in addition to the lesional temporal lobe, included the contralateral temporal lobe (n = 5), frontal lobe (n = 3), and parieto-occipital lobe (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Ultra-high field 7T MRI findings show concordance with clinical data. However, 7T MRI did not reveal anatomical findings to account for abnormalities detected by EEG.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe , Epilepsy , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/diagnostic imaging , Epilepsy/surgery , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Temporal Lobe
5.
Sports Health ; 13(3): 265-277, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33211984

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Energy drinks are the fastest growing product in the beverage industry. However, there is concern regarding potential for adverse effects with use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reported adverse effects of energy drink consumption. DATA SOURCES: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for relevant studies from inception to November 2019, and pertinent data were abstracted. STUDY SELECTION: Only clinical studies reporting adverse events after energy drink consumption were included. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding sample size characteristics, energy drink characteristics, comparators, and all adverse events were extracted in duplicate and recorded. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies and 96,549 individuals were included. Frequently reported adverse events in the pediatric population were insomnia (35.4%), stress (35.4%), and depressive mood (23.1%). Frequently reported adverse events in the adult population were insomnia (24.7%), jitteriness/restlessness/shaking hands (29.8%), and gastrointestinal upset (21.6%). Alcohol mixed with energy drinks significantly reduced the likelihood of sedation effects but increased the likelihood of stimulatory effects. Energy drink consumption significantly increased the odds of insomnia (OR, 5.02; 95% CI, 1.72-14.63) and jitteriness/activeness (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.28-9.67) compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: The authors recommend that individuals avoid frequent energy drink consumption (5-7 energy drinks/week) and avoid co-consumption with alcohol; increased regulatory standards should be placed in the sale of energy drinks, particularly with regard to the pediatric population.


Subject(s)
Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Caffeine/adverse effects , Depression/etiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/etiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology
6.
HSS J ; 16(3): 261-271, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33088240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears are a very common shoulder injury. The success rate of SLAP repair, particularly in the throwing athlete, has been variable in the literature. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the reported post-operative outcomes of management techniques for failed SLAP repair. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched for relevant studies, and pertinent data was abstracted. Only studies reporting outcomes of management techniques for failed SLAP repairs were included. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (levels III to IV) evaluating 176 patients were included in this systematic review. Most subjects were male (86.6%), with a mean age at surgery of 36.3 years (range, 17 to 67 years). The most commonly reported reason for failed SLAP repair was persistent post-operative mechanical symptoms after index SLAP repair. Common techniques used in the management of failed SLAP repair include biceps tenodesis and revision SLAP repair. Return to activity was significantly higher after biceps tenodesis than after arthroscopic revision SLAP repair. However, compared to primary SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in return to work rates. Complications reported in one case were resolved post-operatively, and there was no reported revision failure or reoperation after revision surgery. CONCLUSION: The most common reason for failed SLAP repair is persistent post-operative mechanical symptoms. Revision surgery for failed SLAP repair has a high success rate. The rate of return to activity after biceps tenodesis was significantly higher than the rate after revision SLAP repair. Large high-quality randomized trials are required to provide definitive evidence to support the optimal treatment for failed SLAP repair.

7.
HSS J ; 16(3): 296-306, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33088243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dislocations can be devastating for an athlete. Coracoid bone block transfer is often used for the treatment of recurrent shoulder instability. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rate and mean time of return to sport in athletes after a coracoid bone block transfer at the pre-operative level of competition, a lower level, or a different level. We also sought to determine how return to sport rates after a coracoid bone block procedure compared with rates after several comparator interventions. Finally, we looked to determine the post-operative clinical outcomes and complications reported after a coracoid bone block procedure. METHODS: We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE) for studies reporting return to sport after a coracoid bone block procedure. RESULTS: A total of 52 studies (with levels of evidence ranging from II to IV) evaluating 2953 shoulders in 2888 patients were included in this systematic review. The mean rate of return to sport at any level was 88.4% (2291 of 2592 patients). However, the rate of return to the pre-operative level was 70.3% (1387 of 1974 patients). The mean time to return to sport was 5.38 months (range 21 days to 36 months). The rate of return to sport was higher after the Latarjet procedure, as compared with Bankart repair (87.0% and 75.8%, respectively). All studies showed improvements in clinical outcome measures after coracoid bone block intervention. The cumulative complication rate was found to be 6.46% (158 of 2446 patients). CONCLUSION: Coracoid bone block transfer allows for a high rate of return to sport, although the rate of return to sport at athletes' pre-operative level is lower. The rate of return to sport after Latarjet procedure is higher in comparison with Bankart repair. Additionally, coracoid bone block transfer is associated with improvements in a number of clinical outcome measures. Common post-operative complications include non-union between bone block and glenoid, hematoma, and infection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL