Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 75(1): 39-48, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182316

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine whether administration of higher doses of naloxone for the treatment of opioid overdose is associated with increased pulmonary complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of 1,831 patients treated with naloxone by the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. Emergency medical services and hospital records were abstracted for data in regard to naloxone dosing, route of administration, and clinical outcomes, including the development of complications such as pulmonary edema, aspiration pneumonia, and aspiration pneumonitis. For the purposes of this investigation, we defined high-dose naloxone as total administration exceeding 4.4 mg. Multivariable analysis was used to attempt to account for confounders such as route of administration and pretreatment morbidity. RESULTS: Patients receiving out-of-hospital naloxone in doses exceeding 4.4 mg were 62% more likely to have a pulmonary complication after opioid overdose (42% versus 26% absolute risk; odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 3.18). This association remained statistically significant after multivariable analysis with logistic regression (odds ratio 1.85; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 3.04). A secondary analysis showed an increased risk of 27% versus 13% (odds ratio 2.57; 95% confidence interval 1.45 to 4.54) when initial naloxone dosing exceeded 0.4 mg. Pulmonary edema occurred in 1.1% of patients. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of naloxone in the out-of-hospital treatment of opioid overdose are associated with a higher rate of pulmonary complications. Furthermore, prospective study is needed to determine the causality of this relationship.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/poisoning , Drug Overdose/drug therapy , Lung Diseases/etiology , Naloxone/adverse effects , Narcotic Antagonists/adverse effects , Administration, Intranasal/adverse effects , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies
2.
Prog Transplant ; 34(3): 81-88, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105243

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Frailty and cognitive function are often measured during kidney transplant evaluation. However, patient perspectives on the ethical considerations of this practice are unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are patient perspectives on the use of aging metrics in kidney transplant decision-making? DESIGN: One hundred participants who were evaluated for kidney transplantation and were enrolled in an ongoing prospective cohort study (response rate = 61.3%) were surveyed. Participants were informed of the definitions of frailty and cognitive impairment and then asked survey questions regarding the use of these measures of aging to determine kidney transplant candidacy. RESULTS: Participants (75.6%) thought it was unfair to prevent older adults from receiving a kidney transplant based on age, but there was less agreement on whether it was fair to deny frail (46.5%) and cognitively impaired (45.9%) patients from accessing kidney transplantation. Compared to older participants, younger participants had 5.36-times (95%CI:1.94-14.81) the odds of choosing a hypothetical younger, frail patient to list for kidney transplantation than an older, non-frail patient; they also had 3.56-times (95%CI:1.33-9.56) the odds of choosing the hypothetical frail patient with social support rather than a non-frail patient without social support. Participants disagreed on the use of patient age as a listing criterion; 19.5% ranked it as the fairest and 28.7% as the least fair. CONCLUSION: The patient views highlighted in this study are an important step toward developing ethical guidelines to ensure fair use of frailty, cognitive function, and chronological age for kidney transplant decision-making.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Prospective Studies , Adult , Frailty , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aging/psychology , Age Factors
3.
Genome Announc ; 3(3)2015 Jun 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26089410

ABSTRACT

Mycobacteriophages Cambiare, FlagStaff, and MOOREtheMARYer are newly isolated phages of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc(2) 155 recovered from soil samples in Pittsburgh, PA. All three genomes are closely related to cluster G mycobacteriophages but differ sufficiently in nucleotide sequence and gene content to warrant division of cluster G into several subclusters.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL