ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resident-led discharge "televisits" can improve the safety of hospital-to-home transitions by increasing completed follow-up and providing patients access to their inpatient providers to troubleshoot issues. METHODS: This single-center quality improvement study was set in a pediatric unit within an academically affiliated public safety-net hospital. By August 2021, the aim was to use resident-led phone call televisits within 72 hours of discharge to increase completed follow-up from 67% to 85% among patients discharged from the general pediatric unit and compare this to patients scheduled for in person visits. Patients were preferentially scheduled for televisits based on investigator-defined criteria to maximize benefit (eg, prescribed new medications). The process measure was the proportion of televisit slots filled. The balancing measures were 7-day emergency department visits and readmissions. Topics addressed during televisits were categorized to qualitatively assess potential benefits. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen (44.5%) patients had televisits, 234 (33.1%) in person visits, and 159 (22.5%) unconfirmed follow-up. The available televisit appointments scheduled were 315 of 434 (72.5%). Completed follow-up was 88.3% for televisits and 63.3% for in person visits, compared with 67% during the baseline period. Completed follow-up was 4.4 (95% confidence interval 2.9 to 6.8) times more likely for televisits compared with in person visits after controlling for confounding variables. Common topics addressed during televisits were test results, medication issues, and appointment issues. Emergency department revisits and readmissions were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Resident-led discharge televisits are an innovative way to increase completeness of discharge follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Considering that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global challenge, there is a dire need to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of clinicians in AMR endemic countries. The current multicenter, cross-sectional study aimed at highlighting gaps in antimicrobial (AM) stewardship and AMR among practicing doctors working in public tertiary care teaching hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan. A KAP survey, based on a self-administered questionnaire containing 45 questions, was distributed among 336 clinicians in 6 randomly selected hospitals. Overall, 92% of the clinicians considered AMR as a worldwide problem but only 66% disagreed that cold and flu symptoms require antibiotics. Moreover, around 68% of the doctors felt confident about their practice in AM but still, 96% felt the need to get more knowledge about AM drugs. The need for refresher courses on rational antibiotic use was expressed by 84% of the participants. The main contributing factors considered for AMR by the doctors included excessive AM usage in the medical profession (87.1%) and multiple antibiotics per prescription (76.4%). Pharmacologically, AM spectrum was accurately chosen by 1.4% for Ampicillin, 0.003% for Erythromycin and 0% for Levofloxacin. Clinically, more than 50% of the clinicians used miscellaneous AM for empirical therapy of respiratory tract infection and cholecystitis. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. It is concluded that the knowledge of clinicians is relatively poor for AM spectrum and drugs of choice for certain infections. However, the clinicians are aware of their shortcomings and desire for improvement.