Radial strain delay based on segmental timing and strain amplitude predicts left ventricular reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dyssynchrony assessment based on the timing of regional contraction is inherently independent of underlying myocardial contractility. We tested the hypothesis that patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) would be enhanced using a parameter derived from the net radial strain delay (RSD) for the 12 basal and mid-left ventricular segments (calculated radial strain delay RSD [RSDc]), based on not only timing but also amplitude of segmental strain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiographic data were analyzed in 240 patients with symptomatic heart failure undergoing CRT (New York Heart Association class III/IV; QRS >120 milliseconds; ejection fraction, 23±7%). RSDc was calculated as the sum of difference between peak radial strain and radial strain at aortic valve closure before CRT implantation. CRT response was defined as >15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume at 6 months. In a derivation group (n=102), RSDc was higher in responders compared with nonresponders (74±39% versus 29±15%; P<0.001) and related to the change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (r=-0.53; P<0.001). RSDc >40% predicted remodeling (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 88%). In the validation group (n=108), RSDc similarly predicted response (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 84%). Survival at long-term follow-up was greater in patients with RSDc >40% (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RSDc, based on both the timing and the amplitude of segmental strain, has a strong predictive value for CRT remodeling response and long-term survival.

Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of targeted left ventricular (LV) lead placement on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Placement of the LV lead to the latest sites of contraction and away from the scar confers the best response to CRT. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to compare a targeted approach to LV lead placement with usual care. METHODS: A total of 220 patients scheduled for CRT underwent baseline echocardiographic speckle-tracking 2-dimensional radial strain imaging and were then randomized 1:1 into 2 groups. In group 1 (TARGET [Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]), the LV lead was positioned at the latest site of peak contraction with an amplitude of >10% to signify freedom from scar. In group 2 (control) patients underwent standard unguided CRT. Patients were classified by the relationship of the LV lead to the optimal site as concordant (at optimal site), adjacent (within 1 segment), or remote (≥2 segments away). The primary endpoint was a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were clinical response (≥1 improvement in New York Heart Association functional class), all-cause mortality, and combined all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization. RESULTS: The groups were balanced at randomization. In the TARGET group, there was a greater proportion of responders at 6 months (70% vs. 55%, p = 0.031), giving an absolute difference in the primary endpoint of 15% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 28%). Compared with controls, TARGET patients had a higher clinical response (83% vs. 65%, p = 0.003) and lower rates of the combined endpoint (log-rank test, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard CRT treatment, the use of speckle-tracking echocardiography to the target LV lead placement yields significantly improved response and clinical status and lower rates of combined death and heart failure-related hospitalization. (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [TARGET] study); ISRCTN19717943).

Effect of low-amplitude two-dimensional radial strain at left ventricular pacing sites on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement to areas of scar has detrimental effects on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Speckle-tracking radial two-dimensional strain offers assessment of the extent of regional myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of LV lead placement at areas of low-amplitude strain on CRT response. METHODS: The optimal cutoff of radial strain amplitude at the LV pacing site associated with an unfavorable CRT response was determined in a derivation group (n = 65) and then tested in a second consecutive validation group (n = 75) of patients with heart failure. Patients had concordant LV leads if placed at the most delayed site, and dyssynchrony was defined as anteroseptal to posterior delay ≥ 130 msec. CRT response was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. RESULTS: In the derivation group, a derived cutoff for radial strain amplitude of <9.8% defined low-amplitude segments (LAS) and had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting LV reverse remodeling, suggesting a strong negative predictive value. In the validation group, compared with patients without LAS at the LV pacing site, in patients with LAS (n = 16), CRT response was significantly lower (62.7% vs 31.3%, P < .05). By multivariate analysis, LV lead concordance and the absence of an LAS at the LV pacing site but not dyssynchrony were significantly related to CRT response. CONCLUSION: LV lead placement over segments with two-dimensional radial strain amplitudes <9.8% is associated with poor outcomes of CRT.