Hepatectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy with 3-Month Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

LESSONS LEARNED: Three-month adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination (CAPOX) appeared to reduce recurrence, with mild toxicity in postcurative resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). Recurrence in patients who underwent the 3-month adjuvant CAPOX after resection of CLM was most commonly at extrahepatic sites. BACKGROUND: The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of initially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) is still unclear. We evaluated the feasibility of 3-month adjuvant treatment with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination (CAPOX) for postcurative resection of CLM. METHODS: Patients received one cycle of capecitabine followed by four cycles of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of CLM. Oral capecitabine was given as 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks in a 3-week cycle, and CAPOX consisted of oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 in a 3-week cycle. Primary endpoint was the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), dose intensity, and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 69.5 years, 54% of patients had synchronous metastases, and 29% were bilobar. Mean number of lesions resected was two, and mean size of the largest lesion was 31 mm. Among patients, 20 (71.4%; 95% confidence interval, 53.6%-89.3%) completed the protocol treatment and met its primary endpoint. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicity was neutropenia (29%). Five-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 65.2% and 87.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Three-month adjuvant treatment with CAPOX is tolerable and might be a promising strategy for postcurative resection of CLM.

Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). CONCLUSIONS: GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Safety and efficacy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 combination therapy in patients with previously untreated HER2-negative unresectable, advanced, or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: a phase II trial (KSCC1501A).

BACKGROUND: In a randomized pivotal global phase III study, S-1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 (SOX100) combination chemotherapy was as effective as S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and showed a favorable safety profile. In this phase II study, we analyzed survival outcomes to assess the efficacy and safety of the SOX regimen with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (SOX130) in AGC. METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative AGC received 80 mg/m2/day S-1 orally on days 1-14 and 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until the criteria for treatment withdrawal were fulfilled. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and the null hypothesis of RR in the current trial was 45%. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to CTCAE version 4.0. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled from June 2015 to November 2016, but eight were excluded for ineligibility. Therefore, all final analyses were conducted with 63 patients. The confirmed RR was 46.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 36.1-56.3), and the disease control rate was 77.8% (90% CI: 68.1-85.1). The median PFS and OS were 4.9 (95% CI: 4.2-7.1) and 14.8 (95% CI: 11.1-18.9) months, respectively. Incidences of grade 3-4 AEs > 10% were anorexia (19.0%), peripheral neuropathy (12.7%), nausea (11.1%), and thrombocytopenia (11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first evaluation of SOX130 in patients with HER2-negative AGC. SOX130 showed an acceptable safety profile, but the prespecified statistical efficacy targets were not achieved.

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).

LESSONS LEARNED: A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycles and prognosis of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV. BACKGROUND: TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has shown promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the previously reported dose and schedule for the TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks) plus BEV (5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks) regimen is complicated by severe hematological toxicities and difficult administration schedules. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more convenient biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies were enrolled. Patients received biweekly TAS-102 (twice daily on days 1-5, every 2 weeks) with BEV (5mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16-w PFS rate). RESULTS: From October 2017 to January 2018, 46 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day). Of the 44 eligible patients, the 16-w PFS rate was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3%-56.8%), and the null hypothesis was rejected (p < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.29 months and 10.86 months, respectively. Disease control rate was 59.1%. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (15.9%), and leucopenia (15.9%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising antitumor activity with safety.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to indicate conversion surgery in patients with initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy have enabled conversion of initially unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to a resectable disease. However, definitive criteria for conversion surgery have not been established. We evaluated the potential of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to indicate conversion surgery in patients with primary UR-LA PDAC. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with UR-LA PDAC underwent chemoradiation or chemotherapy followed by assessment with FDG-PET. We defined PET responders (standardized uptake value <3.0) with marked reduction (>80%) of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as potential candidates for conversion surgery. Outcomes were compared with those of the patients with resectable (R; n = 94) and borderline resectable (BR; n = 37) PDAC. RESULTS: Eight of the 20 patients (40%) were considered PET responders with marked reduction of CA19-9 and received conversion surgery (UR-LAR) 3-9 months (median, 5 months) after the initiation of therapy. Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) with UR-LAR. There was no significant difference in R0 rates, morbidity, or mortality among the UR-LAR, R and BR groups. The overall survival (OS) curve was better in the UR-LAR group than in the group that did not receive surgery. There was no significant difference in OS between the UR-LAR and the R or BR groups. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET could be a potential indicator for conversion surgery in patients with primary UR-LA PDAC and may help in selecting patients who qualify for complete surgical resection and have a promising prognosis.

Phase I study of primary treatment with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, levofolinate, and panitumumab combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer involving the wild-type RAS gene: the JACCRO CC-14 study.

BACKGROUND: FOLFOXIRI is now regarded as the chemotherapy regimen that offers the best platform for the treatment of colorectal cancer. However, the safety and efficacy of FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab has not been demonstrated. We conducted a phase I study to determine the recommended dose of FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab as first-line treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Patients received combination therapy consisting of panitumumab (6 mg/kg on day 1) + FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan (CPT-11), oxaliplatin (L-OHP) 85 mg/m2, and folinate (LV) 200 mg/m2] on day 1, followed by fluorouracil (5-FU) 3200 mg/m2 infused as a 46-h continuous infusion starting on day 1) repeated every 2 weeks as first-line treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC patients. A decrease in CPT-11 dose was planned (started at level 1: CPT-11 165 mg/m2). RESULTS: Seven patients were enrolled, and six were assessed for safety and efficacy. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached at level 1; all patients were treated at these levels. The common Grade 3 or 4 relevant toxicities were diarrhea (50%), hypokalemia (33%) and stomatitis (33%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Of the six patients assessed four had partial response and the two others had stable disease; hence, the response rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval 28.9-100%) and the disease control rate was 100%. Time to protocol treatment failure was 7.2 (1.4-7.3) months. CONCLUSION: The FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated by our patients with mCRC and showed promising anti-tumor activity. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be the same as the standard doses of this regimen used worldwide.

[Significance of Immune-Cell Infiltration in Gastric].

There are many reports on the association between infiltrating immune cells andcancer prognosis. It is generally thought that cancer cells escape from the immune surveillance system in vivo. Cells associatedwith tumor immunosuppressive mechanisms include macrophages, regulatory T cells, bone marrow-derived immunosuppressive cells(MDSC), andneutrophils. These immunosuppressive cells enhance the production of TGF-b andIL -10 andthe expression of PDL-1 by cytokines producedby stromal cells such as cancer cells andfibroblasts, thereby inducing cytotoxic T cells lymphocytes(CTL). On the other hand, it has been proved that CD8+ T cells react in an antigen-specific manner even in advanced gastric cancer, suggesting the possibility that memory T cells, NK cells andNKT cells in gastric cancer tissues correlate with goodprognosis. Recently, it has been reportedthat the presence of follicular lymphoidstructure calledtertiary lymphoidstructure(TLS)in gastric cancer tissue is associatedwith favorable prognosis. Although immune responses are suppressedin gastric cancer tissues, the effectiveness of an immune checkpoint inhibitor(anti-PD-1 antibody)has been provedin 2017. The tumor-infiltrating immune cells is known as a predictive effect biomarker. As cancer genome research progresses, which type of immune response is induced is gradually being elucidated in near future. Thus, assessing the invasive morphology and function of various tumorinfiltrating immune cells is considered to be extremely important in Precision Medicine for gastric cancer.

Clinical impact of the extent of lymph node micrometastasis in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to examine expansion of micrometastasis in regional LNs to clarify the importance of lymphadenectomy for undifferentiated-type EGC. METHODS: Clinicopathological features of 307 patients with undifferentiated-type EGC who underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between 1997 and 2010 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University, were retrospectively reviewed. Micrometastasis in LNs was detected by immunohistochemistry using anticytokeratin antibody. RESULTS: The incidence of LN metastasis was 1.8% in patients with mucosal (pT1a) tumors and 17.3% in those with submucosal (pT1b) tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphatic invasion and tumor depth were independently related to LN metastasis. Micrometastasis was found in 41 (13.3%) patients. Twenty-two patients with pN0 had micrometastasis in the perigastric region. Micrometastasis had spread to the area along the left gastric or common hepatic artery in 12 patients. Patients with an upgraded stage by micrometastasis had significantly worse disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: LN micrometastasis was observed beyond the perigastric LNs and correlated with poor outcomes in patients with undifferentiated-type EGC. These data underscore the importance of adequate lymphadenectomy for patients with undifferentiated-type EGC. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Role of tumor-infiltrating CD11b+ antigen-presenting cells in the progression of gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating antigen-presenting cells (APCs), involving tumor-associated macrophages and tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, play an important role in tumor immunity and immune escape. The aim of this study was to determine whether tumor infiltrating CD11b(+) APCs may affect tumor progression and clinical outcome. METHODS: The immunohistochemical analysis was used to evaluate the expression of CD11b, FOXP3, and CD8 in 214 gastric cancer tissues. Concentrations of immunosuppressive cytokines in medium conditioned by gastric cancer cells were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Effects of addition of tumor-conditioned media on CD11c(+) cells were examined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Almost all tumor-infiltrating CD11b(+) cell expressed CD11c and was considered to be APCs. High CD11b(+) cell infiltration was significantly correlated with huge tumor, positive venous invasion, lymph node metastasis, and tumor, node, metastasis stage. Patients with high CD11b(+) cell infiltration had a poorer surgical outcome than those with low CD11b infiltration. Multivariate analysis revealed that CD11b(+) cell infiltration was one of the independent prognostic factors. Tumor-conditioned medium obtained from several gastric cancer cell lines contained immunosuppressive cytokines, transforming growth factor-beta, interleukin-10, and vascular endothelial growth factor. The addition of tumor-conditioned medium decreased the expression of major histocompatibility complex-II and increased the expression of CD11b and programmed death ligand 2 on CD11c(+) APCs. Infiltration of CD11b(+) cells significantly correlate with the degree of FOXP3(+) cell infiltration but not with CD8(+) cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor-infiltrating CD11b(+) APCs affected local tumor cell-immune cell interactions and correlated to the poor prognosis of the patients with gastric cancer.

[A case requiring differentiation of IgG4-related sclerosing disease from periampullary cancer].

A 56-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with right upper quadrant abdominal pain. Laboratory investigations revealed liver dysfunction and elevation of serum HbA1C and CA19-9 levels. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a diffuse enlarged pancreas, stenosis of the main pancreatic duct and lower bile duct, and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed stenosis of the lower bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography demonstrated short-segmental, irregular narrowing of the main pancreatic duct. Brush cytology of biliary stenosis and biliary cytology were negative. The serum IgG and IgG4 levels were elevated. The observations were compatible with lgG4-related sclerosing diseases. Steroid hormone therapy (prednisolone) at a primary dose of 30 mg/day resulted in dramatic improvement of symptoms and of blood chemistry data in addition to shrinkage of the diffuse enlarged pancreas, and decreased the thickness of the bile ducts. Because malignant tumors are frequently suspected on initial presentation, IgG4-related sclerosing disease should be considered during differential diagnosis to avoid unnecessary surgery. We report this case of IgG4-related sclerosing disease that required differentiation from periampullary cancer.

FOLFIRINOX as First-line Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients Suffering from Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (KOBE FOLFIRINOX Study).

Background/Aim: FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) combination chemotherapy is the gold-standard therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. In this study, FOLFIRINOX dosages for Japanese patients were established enabling FOLFIRINOX therapy optimization for efficient use. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with varying doses of FOLFIRINOX to determine the optimum dosage for highest remission outcomes with the least post-chemotherapy toxicities. Results: Patients given 180 mg of irinotecan and a 400 mg bolus of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) showed a marked difference in outcome when compared to irinotecan 180 mg given without the 5-FU bolus, with the overall response rate being 28%, a survival time of 6.4 months and progression-free survival time of 4.5 months. Conclusion: The optimum dose of FOLFIRINOX was a dosage combination of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , irinotecan 180 mg/m 2 , l-leucovorin 400 mg/m 2  and 5-FU 2,400 mg/m 2 , administered as a continuous 46-h infusion.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy: OGSG1201.

BACKGROUND: There is no standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized, selection-design phase II trial to compare docetaxel (DTX) and paclitaxel (PTX) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTX (70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or PTX (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of each 49-day cycle). The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR) and safety. RESULTS: Seventy-eight eligible patients (N = 39 in each group) were included for efficacy analysis. OS was significantly longer in the PTX group than in the DTX group (median, 8.8 versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = 0.047). A significant benefit of PTX over DTX was also apparent in PFS (median, 4.4 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.49; P = 0.002) and TTF (median, 3.8 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.45; P < 0.001). RR (25.6% versus 7.7%, P = 0.065) were higher in the PTX group than in the DTX group. Compared to the PTX group, neutropenia (28% versus 80%) and leukopenia (28% versus 76%) of grade ≥3 as well as febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 46%, P < 0.0001) occurred more frequently in the DTX group. CONCLUSION: PTX showed a significantly better efficacy as well as a more manageable toxicity compared with DTX. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000007940.

Survival Benefit of Crossover Administration of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of a Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Multicenter Observational Study (REGOTAS).

Background: The survival benefits of regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) have been demonstrated in chemorefractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the effects of crossover administration of REG and TFTD on patient survival remain unclear. The present study evaluated the association between exposure to REG and TFTD and overall survival (OS) in patients with mCRC using data from the REGOTAS study. Patients and Methods: We analyzed patients registered in the REGOTAS study, which retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of use of REG or TFTD as later-line chemotherapy for chemorefractory mCRC patients. We compared the survival outcomes of cohort A (treated using both REG and TFTD) and cohort B (treated using either REG or TFTD). Results: A total of 550 patients (cohort A, n = 252; cohort B, n = 298) met the inclusion criteria. The median OS was significantly increased in cohort A compared with cohort B [9.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.9-10.9 months) vs. 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.0 months), P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis revealed that cohort A was independently associated with a significant increase in OS [A vs. B: Hazard ratios (HR), 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.72; P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis adjusted using multivariate Cox model revealed a consistently better trend in most subgroups for cohort A compared with cohort B. Conclusions: Our study revealed prolonged survival in patients treated with REG and TFTD. Therefore, all active agents, including REG and TFTD, should be made available to mCRC patients.

[Clinical experience of chemotherapy with S-1/CDDP for highly-advanced gastric cancer].

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with S-1/CDDP for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer at Fuchu Hospital. METHODS: The participants were 24 patients treated at our hospital. S-1 was given orally at 80 mg/m/2 for days 1-21, and 60 mg/m2 of CDDP was administered on day 8, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 5-week course. RESULTS: Results were rated as a partial response in 12 cases and a stable response in 4 cases. The response rate was 50% (12/24), and median survival time was 273 days. The total incidence of grade 3 or greater adverse reactions including leucopenia, neutropenia, anemia, general fatigue, and eruption, was 25% (6/24). CONCLUSION: The combination of S-1/CDDP therapy appears to be highly efficacious and safe and showed promise as a useful treatment strategy, even in an outpatient clinic.

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with solid tumors with resolved HBV infection.

BACKGROUND: Reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in solid tumors are very limited, and their frequencies and risk factors were previously unknown. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of HBV reactivation in patients with solid tumors with resolved HBV infection. METHODS: All 1088 patients with solid tumors were assessed for eligibility; 251 patients had resolved HBV infection (negative for HBs antigen and positive for anti-HBc antibody and/or positive for anti-HBs antibody), and HBV-DNA was assessed for 243 of these patients in whom we analyzed the prevalence of HBV reactivation. Risk factors for HBV reactivation were exploratorily evaluated by analysis of a case-control study. RESULTS: The prevalence of HBV-DNA reactivation was 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-3.9%). We did not observe any exacerbation of HBV-DNA by early intervention. A low anti-HBs antibody titer (<10.0 mIU/mL) and high average daily dexamethasone dose (>1.0 mg/day) were high risk factors, with odds ratios of 5.94 (95% CI, 1.15-30.6, P = 0.03) and 8.69 (95% CI, 1.27-58.8, P = 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: HBV reactivation in solid tumor patients was relatively rare. Therefore, risk factors that can identify targets for HBV screening must be determined in future studies.

First-line chemotherapy with capecitabine/oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer: A phase I study.

Combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer (G-XELOX) is considered as a potentially promising regimen. However, the use of the G-XELOX regimen in Japanese patients has not been investigated to date, and recommended doses of G-XELOX for Japanese patients with metastatic gastric cancer have not been established. The aim of the present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) for systemic chemotherapy with G-XELOX for metastatic gastric cancer. The enrolled patients received systemic chemotherapy with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day, b.i.d. for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks. A decrease in oxaliplatin dose was planned from start level 1 (130 mg/m2). A total of 6 patients were enrolled between January and July 2015. MTD was not reached at level 1. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day b.i.d. could be administered with acceptable toxicity, and all patients were treated at these doses. One case of grade 3 stomatitis was considered as a dose-limiting toxicity at level 1; however, excluding this case, no grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity was observed. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median relative dose intensity was 71.3% for capecitabine and 92.1% for oxaliplatin. Of the 6 patients, 3 had measurable lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; the response rate and disease control rate were both 67%. Therefore, systemic chemotherapy with G-XELOX was well-tolerated by patients with advanced gastric cancer. The RD was defined as oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day b.i.d.

Phase I Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.

AIM: To determine the recommended dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of combined capecitabine and oxalipatin (G-XELOX) for locally advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin on day 1 and capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2/day, b.i.d.) on days 1-14, repeated every 3 weeks. They then underwent gastrectomy with curative D2/3 lymph-node dissection followed by adjuvant therapy with S-1 for 1 year. De-escalation of oxaliplatin dose was planned (starting at level 1, oxalipatin 130 mg/m2). RESULTS: Six patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached at level 1. Oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 combined with capecitabine at 2,000 mg/m2/day, b.i.d. had acceptable toxicity. No treatment-related death occurred. Most frequent drug-related adverse events during neoadjuvant G-XELOX were nausea and peripheral sensory neuropathy. One patient declined surgical resection, leaving five undergoing resection with curative intent, of whom four achieved pathological down-staging after neoadjuvant G-XELOX. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant G-XELOX was feasible in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Phase I study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for locally advanced gastric cancer (Neo G-SOX PI).

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer, such as clinical T4 disease, bulky nodal involvement, type 4 and large type 3 gastric cancer, remains unsatisfactory, even with D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. One promising approach is neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) is recognised as a potentially promising regimen for gastric cancer. However, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of SOX for locally advanced gastric cancer has not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of preoperative chemotherapy combined with SOX for locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients received two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin on day 1, as well as S-1 (80 mg/m2/day, twice daily) for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks. They then underwent gastrectomy with curative D2/3 lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant S-1 (80 mg/m2/day, twice daily) for 1 year. Escalation of oxaliplatin dose was planned (starting at level 0, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2; level 1, 130 mg/m2). RESULTS: Six patients were enrolled. MTD was not reached at level 1. Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with S-1 80 mg/m2/day twice daily could be administered with acceptable toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in all patients but with no functional disorders. No treatment-related death was observed and the incidence of operative morbidity was tolerable. Resection with curative intent was undertaken in all patients with R0 resection performed in five (83%) and R1 in one. Two of the six patients had a pathological complete response (33%). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with an SOX regimen was feasible in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in combination with S-1 80 mg/m2/day, twice daily.

Alteration of CD4 T cell subsets in metastatic lymph nodes of human gastric cancer.

Studies of tumor-infiltrating immune cells have revealed that immune escape plays an important role in tumor growth. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of metastasis affecting CD4+ T cell subsets in human clinical samples. Single-cell suspensions derived from tumor-draining lymph node (TDLN) and primary cancer specimens were assessed by flow cytometry, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. In the CD4+ T cell subsets detected in TDLN, effector T cells (TE) in metastatic TDLN (mTDLN) was significantly lower than that in metastatic-free TDLN (mfTDLN). TE in mfTDLN were increased compared with normal controls. Similarly, effector memory T cells (TEM) in mTDLN was significantly lower than in control and mfTDLN. There was a significantly positive correlation between the proportion of TEM in TDLN and number of tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Th1 to Th2 ratio was lower in mTDLN, and Treg in mTDLN was significantly higher than in mfTDLN. CD4+ T cell and TE subsets in TDLN were significantly affected by metastasis. Immunosuppressive cells exhibit increased migration to TDLN, in which a subset of CD4+ TE is skewed towards immune tolerance in the tumor microenvironment.