Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 35(1): 105-8, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22302465

ABSTRACT

The Australian radiation protection and nuclear safety agency (ARPANSA) has continuously provided a level 1 mailed thermoluminescence dosimetry audit service for megavoltage photons since 2007. The purpose of the audit is to provide an independent verification of the reference dose output of a radiotherapy linear accelerator in a clinical environment. Photon beam quality measurements can also be made as part of the audit in addition to the output measurements. The results of all audits performed between 2007 and 2010 are presented. The average of all reference beam output measurements calculated as a clinically stated dose divided by an ARPANSA measured dose is 0.9993. The results of all beam quality measurements calculated as a clinically stated quality divided by an ARPANSA measured quality is 1.0087. Since 2011 the provision of all auditing services has been transferred from the Ionizing Radiation Standards section to the Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS) which is currently housed within ARPANSA.


Subject(s)
Government Agencies , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Australia , Humans , Postal Service/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Control
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(9): 095011, 2020 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32182598

ABSTRACT

The IAEA is currently coordinating a multi-year project to update the TRS-398 Code of Practice for the dosimetry of external beam radiotherapy based on standards of absorbed dose to water. One major aspect of the project is the determination of new beam quality correction factors, k Q , for megavoltage photon beams consistent with developments in radiotherapy dosimetry and technology since the publication of TRS-398 in 2000. Specifically, all values must be based on, or consistent with, the key data of ICRU Report 90. Data sets obtained from Monte Carlo (MC) calculations by advanced users and measurements at primary standards laboratories have been compiled for 23 cylindrical ionization chamber types, consisting of 725 MC-calculated and 179 experimental data points. These have been used to derive consensus k Q values as a function of the beam quality index TPR20,10 with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.6%. Mean values of MC-derived chamber-specific [Formula: see text] factors for cylindrical and plane-parallel chamber types in 60Co beams have also been obtained with an estimated uncertainty of 0.4%.


Subject(s)
Cobalt Radioisotopes/analysis , Monte Carlo Method , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Consensus , Humans , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Uncertainty
3.
Phys Med Biol ; 61(14): N362-72, 2016 07 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27366933

ABSTRACT

Dosimetry protocols for external beam radiotherapy currently in use, such as the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51, were written for conventional linear accelerators. In these accelerators, a flattening filter is used to produce a beam which is uniform at water depths where the ionization chamber is used to measure the absorbed dose. Recently, clinical linacs have been implemented without the flattening filter, and published theoretical analysis suggested that with these beams a dosimetric error of order 0.6% could be expected for IAEA TRS-398, because the TPR20,10 beam quality index does not accurately predict the stopping power ratio (water to air) for the softer flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam spectra. We measured doses on eleven FFF linacs at 6 MV and 10 MV using both dosimetry protocols and found average differences of 0.2% or less. The expected shift due to stopping powers was not observed. We present Monte Carlo k Q calculations which show a much smaller difference between FFF and flattened beams than originally predicted. These results are explained by the inclusion of the added backscatter plates and build-up filters used in modern clinical FFF linacs, compared to a Monte Carlo model of an FFF linac in which the flattening filter is removed and no additional build-up or backscatter plate is added.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiometry/methods , Water/chemistry , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Radiotherapy Dosage
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 155(1): 100-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23152147

ABSTRACT

The ARPANSA calibration service for (60)Co gamma rays is based on a primary standard graphite calorimeter that measures absorbed dose to graphite. Measurements with the calorimeter are converted to the absorbed dose to water using the calculation of the ratio of the absorbed dose in the calorimeter to the absorbed dose in a water phantom. ARPANSA has recently changed the basis of this calculation from a photon fluence scaling method to a direct Monte Carlo (MC) calculation. The MC conversion uses an EGSnrc model of the cobalt source that has been validated against water tank and graphite phantom measurements, a step that is required to quantify uncertainties in the underlying interaction coefficients in the MC code. A comparison with the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) as part of the key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 showed an agreement of 0.9973 (53).


Subject(s)
Cobalt Radioisotopes , Graphite/radiation effects , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Water/chemistry , Absorption , Calibration , Humans , Radiation Dosage
6.
Genetics ; 60(1): Suppl:29-30, 1968 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4888902
8.
Radiat Res ; 42(2): 430-2, 1970 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4909929
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL