ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the comparative prognostic utility of commonly used disease prediction scores in adults with presumed community-acquired sepsis in a resource-limited tropical setting. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was performed on the medical ward of a tertiary-referral hospital in Yangon, Myanmar. The ability of the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2), quick NEWS (qNEWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, Universal Vital Assessment (UVA) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores to predict a complicated inpatient course (death or requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) support) in patients with two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria was determined. RESULTS: Among the 509 patients, 30 (6%) were HIV-seropositive. The most commonly confirmed diagnoses were tuberculosis (30/509, 5.9%) and measles (26/509, 5.1%). Overall, 75/509 (14.7%) died or required ICU support. All the scores except the qSOFA score, which was inferior, had a similar ability to predict a complicated inpatient course. CONCLUSIONS: In this resource-limited tropical setting, disease severity scores calculated at presentation using only vital signs-such as the NEWS2 score-identified high-risk sepsis patient as well as the SOFA score, which is calculated at 24 h and which also requires laboratory data. Use of these simple clinical scores can be used to facilitate recognition of the high-risk patient and to optimise the use of finite resources.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/therapy , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myanmar , Organ Dysfunction Scores , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Sepsis/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
Background: The clinical characteristics and course of patients hospitalised with sepsis in Myanmar and the responsible pathogens remain poorly defined. Methods: We performed an observational study of adults admitted from the community to a tertiary referral hospital in Yangon with fever and dysfunction of at least two organ systems. Results: The 120 patients had a median age of 47 y (interquartile range 28-63); 11 (9%) were human immunodeficiency virus positive. Limited laboratory support meant that a microbiological diagnosis was possible in only 35 (29%) patients, but 18 (13%) had pathogens in blood cultures, including 9 (50%) organisms that were multidrug resistant (4 Escherichia coli, 4 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 Burkholderia pseudomallei). Tuberculosis was confirmed in six patients, with two being rifampicin resistant, and dengue infection was confirmed in five patients. Without access to comprehensive intensive care support, 34 (28%) patients died. An admission National Early Warning Score ≥7 (odds ratio [OR] 8.6 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.6 to 28.2], p=0.001) and quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment score ≥2 (OR 3.2 [95% CI 1.3 to 8.0], p=0.02) were helpful in predicting death. Conclusions: Tropical pathogens are a common cause of sepsis in Myanmar. The frequent identification of multidrug-resistant organisms and limited diagnostic and intensive care support hinder patient care significantly. However, simple clinical assessment on admission has prognostic utility.