ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are a global high-stakes patient safety issue. Key stakeholder perspectives regarding their role and experiences with pressure injuries is critical as part of the solution to minimizing HAPI occurrence and attain sustainability. DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive approach provided multiple perspectives of key stakeholders to support the complexity of HAPI care. The qualitative data are a part of a mixed method convergent research study examining pressure injury prevention and management practices. METHODS: Nursing system theory, mixed method convergent design, and participatory action research methodologies were chosen to address both the gap analysis development and results, achieve collaborative comprehensiveness, and enable key stakeholder involvement throughout this HAPI prevention and management initiative. Participants were recruited and enrolled from a large Level I trauma hospital and the key stakeholders. Demographic information were collected prior to the individual interview. Focused interviews were conducted virtually using zoom technology. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo software and thematic analysis was confirmed across the co-investigators for congruence and applicability to the research questions. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with 26 key stakeholders provided data to support and integrate a link with gap analysis results on the complex health issue of HAPIs. Specific barrier and recommendation themes identified interventions that could be prioritized. The 52 barrier and 52 recommendation themes/sub-theme(s) respectively were organized by Donabedian (structure, process, and outcome) with structure elements the majority. The top three structure barrier themes involved equipment and standards for use, staff prevention education, and specialized health professionals. The top three structure recommendation themes involved specialized health professionals, equipment and standards for use, and an educational plan for those at risk or with HAPIs. CONCLUSION: The article provides findings from the qualitative portion of a mixed method study related to HAPIs. The qualitative findings associated with the gap analysis quantitative results, achieved the goal of the participatory action research key stakeholders' input into HAPI care and can be replicated internationally. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The benefit of key stakeholder's involvement in solving a clinical problem is sustainability. A quantitative approach and integrating qualitative stakeholders' perspectives provide an in-depth solution that will advance nursing capacity toward health care delivery and HAPI nursing science and policy development on a global level.
Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Policy Making , Palliative Care , Health Services Research , Hospitals , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The experiences of graduate nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitate a trauma-informed approach to education. Three hundred graduate nursing students responded to a discussion assignment in a doctoral-level health care policy course. Thematic analysis identified common themes of fear, anxiety, frustration, and exhaustion ( n = 93). Conflict and strain were identified in relation to all major roles (provider, student, and family member), ultimately creating physical and mental barriers to fulfilling each of the roles. Curricular standards must maintain rigor while incorporating flexibility into design standards to assist students when faced with trauma or crisis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing, Graduate , Students, Nursing , Humans , PandemicsABSTRACT
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to assess the evidence on the effectiveness of implementation of a pay-for-performance program on clinical outcomes in the adult chronic kidney disease (CKD) patient receiving hemodialysis.The review question is: What is the effectiveness of implementation of a pay-for-performance program on clinical outcomes in the adult CKD patient receiving hemodialysis, as compared to the period immediately before implementation of the program?More specifically, the objectives are to identify.