Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bendamustine Hydrochloride , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone , Neoplasm, Residual , Rituximab , Splenic Neoplasms , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Bendamustine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Rituximab/administration & dosage , Splenic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) remains the consolidation therapy of choice in Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The prognostic value of measurable levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) at time of conditioning is a matter of debate. We analyzed the predictive relevance of MRD levels before transplantation on the clinical outcome of Ph+ ALL patients treated with chemotherapy and imatinib in 2 consecutive prospective clinical trials. MRD evaluation before transplantation was available for 65 of the 73 patients who underwent an alloHSCT in CR1. A complete or major molecular response at time of conditioning was achieved in 24 patients (37%), whereas 41 (63%) remained carriers of any other positive MRD level in the bone marrow. MRD negativity at time of conditioning was associated with a significant benefit in terms of risk of relapse at 5 years, with a relapse incidence of 8% compared with 39% for patients with MRD positivity (P = .007). However, thanks to the post-transplantation use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), disease-free survival was 58% versus 41% (P = .17) and overall survival was 58% versus 49% (P = .55) in MRD-negative compared with MRD-positive patients, respectively. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was similar in the 2 groups. Achieving a complete molecular remission before transplantation reduces the risk of leukemia relapse even though TKIs may still rescue some patients relapsing after transplantation.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis , Precursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Secondary Prevention , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Developing optimal radiation-free central nervous system prophylaxis is a desirable goal in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, to avoid the long-term toxicity associated with cranial irradiation. In a randomized, phase II trial enrolling 145 adult patients, we compared intrathecal liposomal cytarabine (50 mg: 6/8 injections in B-/T-cell subsets, respectively) with intrathecal triple therapy (methotrexate/cytarabine/prednisone: 12 injections). Systemic therapy included methotrexate plus cytarabine or L-asparaginase courses, with methotrexate augmented to 2.5 and 5 g/m(2) in Philadelphia-negative B- and T-cell disease, respectively. The primary study objective was the comparative assessment of the risk/benefit ratio, combining the analysis of feasibility, toxicity and efficacy. In the liposomal cytarabine arm 17/71 patients (24%) developed grade 3-4 neurotoxicity compared to 2/74 (3%) in the triple therapy arm (P=0.0002), the median number of episodes of neurotoxicity of any grade was one per patient compared to zero, respectively (P=0.0001), and even though no permanent disabilities or deaths were registered, four patients (6%) discontinued intrathecal prophylaxis on account of these toxic side effects (P=0.06). Neurotoxicity worsened with liposomal cytarabine every 14 days (T-cell disease), and was improved by the adjunct of intrathecal dexamethasone. Two patients in the liposomal cytarabine arm suffered from a meningeal relapse (none with T-cell disease, only one after high-dose chemotherapy) compared to four in the triple therapy arm (1 with T-cell disease). While intrathecal liposomal cytarabine could contribute to improved, radiation-free central nervous system prophylaxis, the toxicity reported in this trial does not support its use at 50 mg and prompts the investigation of a lower dosage. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT-00795756).
Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Cytarabine/administration & dosage , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/diagnosis , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Liposomes , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Young AdultABSTRACT
We evaluate the long-term results of a prospective clinical study enrolling more than 100 adult patients with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia. Depending on extent of disease, treatment consisted of six to eight rituximab infusions and four to six courses of intensive chemotherapy (attenuated in patients aged >55 years) with high-dose methotrexate, fractionated ifosfamide/cyclophosphamide, other drugs in rotation, and intrathecal chemoprophylaxis. One-hundred five patients were treated (median age 47 years, range 17-78 years); 48% had Burkitt leukemia, 25% were older than 60 years, 37% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score >1, and 14% were positive for human immunodeficiency virus. The complete response rate and 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 79%, 67% and 75%, respectively, ranging from 100% to 45% for survival (P=0.000) and from 100% to 60% for disease-free survival (P=0.01) in patients with low, intermediate and high adapted International Prognostic Index scores. In multivariate analysis, only age (≤ versus >60 years) and performance status (0-1 versus >1) retained prognostic significance, identifying three risk groups with overall and disease-free survival probabilities of 88% and 87.5%, 57% and 70.5%, 20% and 28.5% (P=0.0000 and P=0.0001), respectively. The relapse rate was only 7% in patients treated with an intercycle interval ≤ 25 days. This regimen achieved 100% curability in patients with low adapted International Prognostic Index scores (21% of total), and very close to 90% in patients aged ≤ 60 years with performance score 0-1 (48% of total). Rapid diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia with prompt referral of patients to prevent clinical deterioration, and careful supervision of treatment without chemotherapy delay can achieve outstanding therapeutic results. ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT01290120.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Burkitt Lymphoma/diagnosis , Burkitt Lymphoma/drug therapy , Leukemia/diagnosis , Leukemia/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Burkitt Lymphoma/epidemiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Leukemia/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction/methods , Rituximab , Survival Rate/trends , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: According to Europe's Beating Cancer Plan, the number of cancer survivors is growing every year and is now estimated at over 12 million in Europe. A main objective of the European Commission is to ensure that cancer survivors can enjoy a high quality of life, underlining the role of digital technology and eHealth apps and tools to achieve this. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is the development of a user-centered artificial intelligence system to facilitate the input and integration of patient-related biopsychosocial data to improve posttreatment quality of life, well-being, and health outcomes and examine the feasibility of this digitally assisted workflow in a real-life setting in patients with colorectal cancer and acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: A total of 60 patients with colorectal cancer and 30 patients with acute myeloid leukemia will be recruited from 2 clinical centers: Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (Mainz, Germany) and IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori" (IRST, Italy). Psychosocial data (eg, emotional distress, fatigue, quality of life, subjective well-being, sleep problems, and appetite loss) will be collected by questionnaires via a smartphone app, and physiological data (eg, heart rate, skin temperature, and movement through step count) will be collected by a customizable smart wrist-worn sensor device. Each patient will be assessed every 2 weeks over their 3-month participation in the ONCORELIEF study. Inclusion criteria include patients with the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia or colorectal cancer, adult patients aged 18 years and older, life expectancy greater than 12 months, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and patients who have a smartphone and agree to use it for the purpose of the study. Exclusion criteria include patients with a reduced cognitive function (such as dementia) or technological illiteracy and other known active malignant neoplastic diseases (patients with a medical history of treated neoplastic disease are included). RESULTS: The pilot study started on September 1, 2022. As of January 2023, we enrolled 33 patients with colorectal cancer and 7 patients with acute myeloid leukemia. As of January 2023, we have not yet started the data analysis. We expect to get all data in June 2023 and expect the results to be published in the second semester of 2023. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based and mobile apps use methods from mathematical decision support and artificial intelligence through a closed-loop workflow that connects health professionals and patients. The ONCORELIEF system has the potential of continuously identifying, collecting, and processing data from diverse patient dimensions to offer health care recommendations, support patients with cancer to address their unmet needs, and optimize survivorship care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) 00027808; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00027808. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/45475.
ABSTRACT
Carbon monoxide (CO) exposure of an islet donor frequently leads to islet allograft long-term survival and tolerance in recipients. We show here that CO confers its protective effects at least in part by suppressing Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) up-regulation in pancreatic beta cells. TLR4 is normally up-regulated in islets during the isolation procedure; donor treatment with CO suppresses TLR4 expression in isolated islets as well as in transplanted grafts. TLR4 up-regulation allows initiation of inflammation, which leads to islet allograft rejection; islet grafts from TLR4-deficient mice survive indefinitely in BALB/c recipients and show significantly less inflammation at various days after transplantation compared with grafts from a control donor. Isolated islets preinfected with a TLR4 dominant negative virus before transplantation demonstrated prolonged survival in recipients. Despite the salutary effects of TLR4 suppression, HO-1 expression is still needed in the recipient for islet survival: TLR4-deficient islets were rejected promptly after being transplanted into recipients in which HO-1 activity was blocked. In addition, incubation of an insulinoma cell line, betaTC3, with an anti-TLR4 antibody protects those cells from cytokine-induced apoptosis. Our data suggest that TLR4 induction in beta cells is involved in beta cell death and graft rejection after transplantation. CO exposure protects islets from rejection by blocking TLR4 up-regulation.
Subject(s)
Carbon Monoxide/pharmacology , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/therapy , Graft Survival/physiology , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Toll-Like Receptor 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Adenoviridae/genetics , Animals , Blotting, Western , Graft Rejection/immunology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Immune Tolerance/physiology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred DBA , Mice, Knockout , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/metabolism , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is curable in about 40-50% of adult patients, however this is subject to ample variations owing to several host- and disease-related prognostic characteristics. Currently, the study of minimal residual disease (MRD) following induction and early consolidation therapy stands out as the most sensitive individual prognostic marker to define the risk of relapse following the achievement of remission, and ultimately that of treatment failure or success. Because substantial therapeutic advancement is now being achieved using intensified pediatric-type regimens, MRD analysis is especially useful to orientate stem cell transplantation choices. These strategic innovations are progressively leading to greater than 50% cure rates.