Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 42(4): 467-71, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23576304

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) 'simple' rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. METHODS: A prospective study was performed between January 2011 and June 2012. Eligible patients were women diagnosed with a persistent adnexal mass who presented to the participating centers. Four trainees evaluated the adnexal mass by transvaginal ultrasound under the supervision of an expert examiner. The trainee analyzed the mass according to IOTA simple rules and provided a diagnosis of benign, malignant or inconclusive. All women included in the study underwent surgery and tumor removal in the center of recruitment. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios. RESULTS: A total of 340 women were included (mean patient age, 42.1 (range, 13-79) years). Of the tumors, 55 (16.2%) were malignant and 285 (83.8%) were benign. The IOTA simple rules could be applied in 270 (79.4%) cases. In these cases, sensitivity was 87.9% (95% CI, 72.4-95.2), specificity 97.5% (95% CI, 94.6-98.8), LR+ 34.7 (95% CI, 15.6-77.3) and LR- 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Application of the IOTA simple rules yielded acceptable results in terms of specificity in the hands of non-expert examiners. However, with non-expert examiners there was a 12% false-negative rate, which is relatively high.


Subject(s)
Adnexal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adnexal Diseases/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Menopause , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pelvic Neoplasms/pathology , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
2.
Minerva Ginecol ; 65(2): 143-66, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23598781

ABSTRACT

The imaging techniques have a fundamental role in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ovarian endometriosis (endometrioma) and deep endometriosis can be recognized using transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although transvaginal ultrasound is the first choice of imaging modality when investigating women with pelvic pain, MRI have a role for the wider field of visions. The reproducibility of both techniques has been investigated. The three-dimensional ultrasonography has been proposed. Also studies regarding unusual localizations are reported in the literature. New insights are present about the role of imaging in the detection of the malignant transformations. This review summarizes the current evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of these two techniques in the pre-surgical assessment of endometriosis.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis/diagnosis , Genital Diseases, Female/diagnosis , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/surgery , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/diagnostic imaging , Genital Diseases, Female/surgery , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Ovarian Diseases/diagnosis , Ovarian Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL