A rare genomic duplication in 2p14 underlies autosomal dominant hearing loss DFNA58.

Here we define a ~200 Kb genomic duplication in 2p14 as the genetic signature that segregates with postlingual progressive sensorineural autosomal dominant hearing loss (HL) in 20 affected individuals from the DFNA58 family, first reported in 2009. The duplication includes two entire genes, PLEK and CNRIP1, and the first exon of PPP3R1 (protein coding), in addition to four uncharacterized long non-coding (lnc) RNA genes and part of a novel protein-coding gene. Quantitative analysis of mRNA expression in blood samples revealed selective overexpression of CNRIP1 and of two lncRNA genes (LOC107985892 and LOC102724389) in all affected members tested, but not in unaffected ones. Qualitative analysis of mRNA expression identified also fusion transcripts involving parts of PPP3R1, CNRIP1 and an intergenic region between PLEK and CNRIP1, in the blood of all carriers of the duplication, but were heterogeneous in nature. By in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence, we showed that Cnrip1, Plek and Ppp3r1 genes are all expressed in the adult mouse cochlea including the spiral ganglion neurons, suggesting changes in expression levels of these genes in the hearing organ could underlie the DFNA58 form of deafness. Our study highlights the value of studying rare genomic events leading to HL, such as copy number variations. Further studies will be required to determine which of these genes, either coding proteins or non-coding RNAs, is or are responsible for DFNA58 HL.

Molecular and genetic characterization of a large Brazilian cohort presenting hearing loss.

Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory defects, affecting 5.5% of the worldwide population and significantly impacting health and social life. It is mainly attributed to genetic causes, but their relative contribution reflects the geographical region's socio-economic development. Extreme genetic heterogeneity with hundreds of deafness genes involved poses challenges for molecular diagnosis. Here we report the investigation of 542 hearing-impaired subjects from all Brazilian regions to search for genetic causes. Biallelic GJB2/GJB6 causative variants were identified in 12.9% (the lowest frequency was found in the Northern region, 7.7%), 0.4% carried GJB2 dominant variants, and 0.6% had the m.1555A > G variant (one aminoglycoside-related). In addition, other genetic screenings, employed in selected probands according to clinical presentation and presumptive inheritance patterns, identified causative variants in 2.4%. Ear malformations and auditory neuropathy were diagnosed in 10.8% and 3.5% of probands, respectively. In 3.8% of prelingual/perilingual cases, Waardenburg syndrome was clinically diagnosed, and in 71.4%, these diagnoses were confirmed with pathogenic variants revealed; seven out of them were novel, including one CNV. All these genetic screening strategies revealed causative variants in 16.2% of the cases. Based on causative variants in the molecular diagnosis and genealogy analyses, a probable genetic etiology was found in ~ 50% of the cases. The present study highlights the relevance of GJB2/GJB6 as a cause of hearing loss in all Brazilian regions and the importance of screening unselected samples for estimating frequencies. Moreover, when a comprehensive screening is not available, molecular diagnosis can be enhanced by selecting probands for specific screenings.