Clinical experiments in maintenance and discontinuation of imipramine therapy in panic disorder with agoraphobia.

Several issues remain to be ascertained beyond the acute response to imipramine hydrochloride in patients with panic disorder. Study 1 consisted of a prospective, systematic characterization of half-dose 12-month maintenance in patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia who had shown marked and stable response to 6 months of acute-phase treatment with imipramine. Study 2 assessed the 6-month cumulative relapse rate following discontinuation of acute-phase imipramine treatment in a comparable sample of patients. The same assessment battery was used in both studies, and the integrity of experimental drug conditions was verified by plasma drug level determinations. In contrast to the high relapse rate following discontinuation of acute-phase treatment, none of the patients showed relapse or had sustained worsening in panic or phobia measures during the half-dose maintenance period. The results underscore the importance of pharmacological prophylaxis and provide empirical guidelines for a successful low-dose maintenance regimen for patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia who respond markedly to imipramine.

Imipramine dose-response relationship in panic disorder with agoraphobia. Preliminary findings.

At the end of a two-week single-blind placebo baseline, 43 patients with a diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia without significant dysphoria-depression and with moderate to severe panic and phobic symptoms were assigned to, and 32 of them completed, a placebo-controlled (n = 7) dose-response study with three weight-adjusted imipramine hydrochloride dosages: 0.5 mg/kg/d (n = 10), 1.5 mg/kg/d (n = 9), and 3 mg/kg/d (n = 6). Eleven patients, three from the medium-dose and eight from the high-dose conditions, dropped out owing to side effects. No instructions or encouragement for self-directed exposure to phobic situations or other coping strategies with panic or fear were given throughout the trial. Compliance, as assessed by pill counts and by plasma tricyclic levels, was high. Results provided strong evidence for a positive dose-response relationship on panic and phobic symptoms and confirmed earlier suggestions (1) that imipramine without concurrent exposure possesses a significant antipanic and antiphobic effect, (2) that improvement correlates primarily with imipramine but not N-desmethylimipramine plasma levels, and (3) that side effects prevent optimum dose buildup in a substantial proportion of patients with this disorder.

Long-term maintenance and discontinuation of imipramine therapy in panic disorder with agoraphobia.

BACKGROUND: There has been little systematic work done regarding the long-term treatment of panic disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess the 12-month cumulative risk of relapse specifically due to discontinuation of imipramine and to test the hypothesis that maintenance treatment with imipramine protects patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia from such reversals. METHOD: Following an acute-phase open trial with imipramine (2.25 mg/kg per day) involving 110 patients for 6 months, the 56 patients who were in stable remission, did not require additional treatment, and consented to be randomly assigned to double-blind maintenance (n = 29) or discontinuation (n = 27) conditions were followed up with planned assessments every 2 months during a 1-year period. There were no behaviorally oriented interventions or instructions at any time during the 18 months of the study. RESULTS: Maintenance treatment (1 relapse) and discontinuation (10 relapses) conditions had significantly different survival curves (Mantel-Cox statistic chi(2)1 = 10.47, P = .001). None of the additional 10 variables from demographic, clinical, and open-treatment domains considered in the proportional hazard model disrupted the significant relationship between experimental drug condition and relapse; other things being equal, a patient receiving imipramine maintenance was 92.5% lower in the hazard rate of relapse than a patient receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the very high degree of prophylactic effectiveness of maintenance imipramine treatment and demonstrate that relapse, although substantial, occurs in a minority of patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia who are in stable remission prior to treatment discontinuation.

The advantage of early treatment intervention in recurrent depression.

Two key questions regarding the treatment of depression remain unanswered: whether early treatment intervention will shorten the length of the episode and whether a previously successful treatment will be associated with a more rapid response when administered during the subsequent episode. A group of 45 patients with recurrent major depression treated with combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in a similar fashion for two consecutive episodes showed comparable mean times to stabilization of between 11 and 12 weeks. However, the early intervention in the second treatment episode significantly shortened the overall length of the depressive episode by approximately 4 to 5 months.

Early recurrence in unipolar depression.

While some advances have occurred in the maintenance treatment of unipolar depression, empirical data on recurrences of illness following the discontinuation of medication are sparse. We examined survival time during the first 18 months after discontinuation of medication in 74 patients with recurrent unipolar depression. Although demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment variables failed to predict time to recurrence, continued interpersonal psychotherapy was significantly related to longer survival time.

Efficacy of phenelzine and haloperidol in borderline personality disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a neuroleptic (haloperidol) to a monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressant (phenelzine sulfate) against the affective, cognitive, and impulsive-aggressive symptoms of criteria-defined borderline inpatients in an effort to dissect apart affective and schizotypal symptom patterns or subtypes using medication response. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient unit of a tertiary care university psychiatric hospital serving a large public catchment area. PATIENTS: One hundred eight consecutively admitted borderline inpatients defined by Gunderson's Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Patients and DSM-III-R criteria, randomly assigned to 38 phenelzine, 36 haloperidol, and 34 placebo trials. INTERVENTIONS: Following 1 week free of medication, haloperidol (average dose, 4 mg/d), phenelzine sulfate (average dose, 60 mg/d), or placebo were given for 5 weeks with weekly symptom ratings and plasma drug level determinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was measured on depression (Hamilton Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory), global severity (Global Assessment Scale, Symptom Checklist-90 items [SCL-90]), anxiety, anger-hostility (SCL-90, Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale [IMPS], Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory), psychoticism (Schizotypal Symptom Inventory, SCL-90, IMPS), impulsivity (Ward Scale, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Self-Report Test of Impulse Control), and borderline psychotherapy (Borderline Syndrome Index). RESULTS: Three-way comparisons between groups indicated superior efficacy for phenelzine, followed by placebo and haloperidol on measures of depression, borderline psychopathologic symptoms, and anxiety. Pairwise comparisons between medication and placebo revealed significant efficacy for phenelzine against anger and hostility but no efficacy against atypical depression or hysteroid dysphoria. We were unable to replicate prior reports of efficacy for the neuroleptic. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacologic dissection of borderline personality disorder patients into affective and schizotypal subtypes could not be demonstrated.

Progress in pharmacotherapy of borderline disorders. A double-blind study of amitriptyline, haloperidol, and placebo.

In symptomatic patients with borderline disorder, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of haloperidol and amitriptyline hydrochloride to test the differential efficacy of medication against the affective and schizotypal symptoms that characterize the disorder. Sixty-one patients, diagnosed by the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline of Gunderson et al, completed randomized trials of haloperidol (n = 21), amitriptyline (n = 20), and placebo (n = 20). Medications were given in dose ranges of 4 to 16 mg for haloperidol (mean, 7.24 mg) and 100 to 175 mg for amitriptyline hydrochloride (mean, 147.62 mg) for five-week periods, with weekly self-rated and observer-rated measures of mood, schizotypal symptoms, and global functioning. Haloperidol was superior to both amitriptyline and placebo on a composite measure of overall symptom severity, with no difference between amitriptyline and placebo. Haloperidol produced significant improvement on a broad spectrum of symptom patterns, including depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. In contrast, amitriptyline was minimally effective, with small gains limited to some areas of depressive content. The magnitude of change tended to be modest and was more apparent in self-rated than observer-rated measures.

Acute antidepressant effect following pulse loading with intravenous and oral clomipramine.

A double-blind, randomized trial of oral vs intravenous clomipramine hydrochloride pulse-loading dosing regimens was conducted. After a two-week drug-free assessment period, 22 inpatients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder were given either an evening infusion of 150 mg of clomipramine hydrochloride and placebo tablets or 150 mg of oral clomipramine hydrochloride and an isotonic saline infusion. Twenty-four hours later, this procedure was repeated using a dose of 200 mg of clomipramine hydrochloride. Patients received no further medication over the next five days. The mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score for all patients, five days after pulse loading, had dropped by 35% (range, 13.3% to -82.4%). This improvement was significant, as was the amelioration in the Raskin Severity for Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory scores. Although the bioavailability of parenteral clomipramine was greater, there were no significant differences in either efficacy or side effects between the two groups. Pronounced early improvements in severe depressive symptoms may be achieved via loading dose regimens with clomipramine in the absence of continuous treatment.

Clinical implications of imipramine plasma levels for depressive illness.

Sixty depressed nonschizophrenic patients were admitted to a research unit. Following one drug-free week and one week of placebo, patients received 3.5 mg/kg of imipramine hydrochloride for 28 days. Plasma levels of imipramine and its metabolite desipramine hydrochloride (desmethylimipramine) were measured three times weekly and the relationship between plasma steady-state levels and clinical outcome was examined. Steady-state levels ranged from 50 to 1,050 ng/ml. There was a statistically and clinically significant relationship between plasma levels and response. The relationship existed across the entire sample, and was accentuated when the bipolar and unipolar nondelusional populations were examined. Because a strong relationship between sex and outcome was observed, the unipolar nondelusional patients were stratified by sex and a significant relationship still persisted. Only the unipolar delusional patients failed to demonstrate an association between blood level and clinical response.

Imipramine in prepubertal major depressive disorders.

The potential effectiveness of imipramine hydrochloride (up to 5 mg/kg/d) was investigated in 53 prepubertal children suffering from major depressive disorder. Two complementary strategies were used simultaneously: a five-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled design (N = 38), and a plasma level/clinical response study (N = 30). Fifteen of the 16 children randomly assigned to active drug in the first study also participated in the second. Subjects were assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children and diagnosed according to unmodified Research Diagnostic Criteria. Response rates in the double-blind study were similar in both groups (imipramine, 56%; placebo, 68%). In the plasma level study, total maintenance plasma level (imipramine plus desipramine) was found to positively and linearly predict clinical response of the depressive syndrome (P less than .003). No evidence of a curvilinear relationship was found. Depressive hallucinations during the episode negatively predicted clinical response (P less than .05). Weight-corrected imipramine dosage did not predict either clinical response or plasma level in the individual subject. No predictors of response were found in the placebo group. These results suggest that the mean imipramine dosage was too low, and that future double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of imipramine in prepubertal major depression should include plasma level titration to above 150 ng/mL and an initial placebo washout period.

Five-year outcome for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression.

After conducting a randomized, 3-year maintenance trial in 128 patients with recurrent depression who had responded to combined short-term and continuation treatment with imipramine hydrochloride and interpersonal psychotherapy, we asked those individuals who survived the 3-year trial receiving active medication (with or without psychotherapy) to continue in a 2-year additional randomized trial of active medication vs placebo. The question was whether maintaining antidepressant medication at the dosage used to treat the acute episode beyond 3 years would continue to provide a significant prophylactic effect compared with medication discontinuation after the 3 years of effective maintenance treatment. Survival analysis demonstrated a highly significant continued prophylactic effect for active imipramine hydrochloride treatment maintained at an average dose of 200 mg. We conclude that active imipramine treatment is an effective means of preventing recurrence beyond 3 years and that patients with previous episodes less than 2 1/2 years apart, therefore, merit continued prophylaxis for at least 5 years.

Neuroendocrine response to L-5-hydroxytryptophan challenge in prepubertal major depression. Depressed vs normal children.

The neuroendocrine response to L-5-hydroxytryptophan was compared in 37 prepubertal children who met the Research Diagnostic Criteria for major depressive disorder with that in 23 normal children with no lifetime history of any psychiatric disorder and very low rates of depression in both first- and second-degree relatives. Intravenous L-5-hydroxytryptophan (0.8 mg/kg) was given over a 1-hour interval after preloading with oral carbidopa, an inhibitor of peripheral but not central L-5-hydroxytryptophan metabolism. L-5-Hydroxytryptophan, a precursor of serotonin, increases serotonin turnover in the central nervous system when given after carbidopa. Seven (19%) of the 37 children with major depressive disorder and two (9%) of the 23 normal children had nausea or vomiting and therefore did not complete the full infusion. They were subsequently excluded from data analysis. After this stimulation, prolactin, cortisol, and growth hormone secretion were compared between diagnostic groups. The depressed children secreted significantly less cortisol (effect size, 0.70) and significantly more prolactin (effect size, 0.83). There was a sex-by-diagnosis interaction in prolactin response to L-5-hydroxytryptophan and, on examination, the prolactin hypersecretion was seen in depressed girls but not in depressed boys compared with same-sex controls. There was no significant stimulation of growth hormone in either group. These findings are consistent with dysregulation of central serotonergic systems in childhood major depression.

Fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The selective serotonergic medication fluoxetine has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of major depression and has suggested efficacy in the treatment of alcoholism. However, no completed trials with any selective serotonergic medication have been reported in patients who display both major depression and alcoholism, despite previous observations that both depression and alcoholism are associated with low serotonergic functioning. METHODS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed as having comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence were randomized to receive fluoxetine (n = 25) or placebo (n = 26) in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Weekly ratings of depression and alcohol consumption were obtained throughout the 12-week course of the study. RESULTS: The improvement in depressive symptoms during the medication trial was significantly greater in the fluoxetine group than in the placebo group. Total alcohol consumption during the trial was significantly lower in the fluoxetine group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine is effective in reducing the depressive symptoms and the alcohol consumption of patients with comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence. It is unknown whether these results generalize to the treatment of less depressed and less suicidal alcoholics.

Three-year outcomes for maintenance therapies in recurrent depression.

We conducted a randomized 3-year maintenance trial in 128 patients with recurrent depression who had responded to combined short-term and continuation treatment with imipramine hydrochloride and interpersonal psychotherapy. A five-cell design was used to determine whether a maintenance form of interpersonal psychotherapy alone or in combination with medication could play a significant role in the prevention of recurrence. A second question was whether maintaining antidepressant medication at the dosage used to treat the acute episode rather than decreasing to a "maintenance" dosage would provide prophylaxis superior to that observed in earlier trials in which a maintenance dosage strategy was employed. Survival analysis demonstrated a highly significant prophylactic effect for active imipramine hydrochloride maintained at an average dose of 200 mg and a modest prophylactic effect for monthly interpersonal psychotherapy. We conclude that active imipramine hydrochloride maintained at an average dose of 200 mg is an effective means of preventing recurrence and that monthly interpersonal psychotherapy serves to lengthen the time between episodes in patients not receiving active medication.

Growth hormone secretion in children and adolescents at high risk for major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Decreased growth hormone (GH) response to pharmacologic stimulation has been found in children and adolescents during an episode of major depressive disorder and after recovery. In this study, we sought to determine whether GH secretion is similarly altered in children and adolescents who had never experienced depression but were at high risk of developing depression. METHODS: Subjects were 8 through 16 years of age and selected for high- and low-risk status according to familial loading for mood disorders. Sixty-four high-risk and 55 low-risk healthy subjects participated in the study, which assessed the following GH measures: (1) GH before growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) infusion, every 15 minutes for 30 minutes; (2) GH response after intravenous infusion of GHRH (0.1 microg/kg), every 15 minutes for 90 minutes; and (3) nocturnal GH every 20 minutes from 9 PM until morning awakening. RESULTS: After stimulation with GHRH, the high-risk subjects secreted significantly less GH compared with the low-risk healthy controls (effect sizes for mean and peak GH, 0.52 [P =.007] and 0.40 [P =.04], respectively). In contrast, there were no between-group differences in the pre-GHRH and nocturnal GH secretion levels. Exposure to recent stressors was not associated with GH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together with previous evidence of decreased GH after GHRH infusion in acutely depressed and recovered children, these results indicate that the decreased GH response found in high-risk subjects may represent a trait marker for depression in children and adolescents.

Neuroendocrine response to 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan in prepubertal children at high risk of major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Altered serotonergic function has been observed in prepubertal children and adults with an acute episode of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, it is not known whether these alterations are present prior to the onset of MDD. METHODS: A serotonergic precursor, 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan (L-5HTP) (oxitriptan) (0.8 mg/kg), was administered through an indwelling catheter to 36 children at high risk of MDD (with high family loading for MDD), 31 children with MDD, and 23 low-risk normal controls (with low family loading for mood disorders and no history of psychopathology). Blood samples for cortisol, prolactin (PRL), and growth hormone were obtained every 15 minutes for 180 minutes, beginning 30 minutes before L-5HTP infusion. RESULTS: Children at high risk of MDD and children with MDD had similar hormonal responses following L-5HTP infusion. After controlling for baseline values, both groups secreted significantly less cortisol and more PRL than did the low-risk normal controls, with the PRL finding being limited to girls. There were no between-group differences in baseline cortisol, PRL, or growth hormone secretion measures. CONCLUSIONS: Before the onset of affective illness, high-risk children had the same pattern of neuroendocrine response to the L-5HTP challenge as did children with MDD. These results extend earlier findings of altered serotonergic regulation in association with early-onset depression and indicate that these alterations may represent a trait marker for depression in children.

Inverse relationship between fenfluramine-induced prolactin release and blood pressure in humans.

Although substantial evidence from experimental animals suggests that augmentation and reduction in serotonergic neurotransmission both affect arterial blood pressure (BP), it is unknown whether "tonic" central serotonergic activity is related to resting BP variability in humans. We tested this hypothesis in a community sample by evaluating the relationship between resting BP and a neuropharmacologic index of brain serotonergic activity (the fenfluramine challenge test). Subjects were 270 generally healthy men and women aged 25 to 60 years who were not receiving prescribed antihypertensive or psychotropic medications. The sample included 216 non-Hispanic whites and 47 blacks. Resting systolic BP ranged from 85 to 161 mm Hg and diastolic from 58 to 98 mm Hg. Each subject received 0.55 to 0.65 mg/kg D,L-fenfluramine hydrochloride, and the plasma prolactin concentration was measured over 3.5 hours. Analyses revealed a linear, inverse relationship between the maximum fenfluramine-induced prolactin rise and systolic and diastolic BP in whites: r=-0.36 and r=-0.29, respectively (P<0.001 for both). These relationships were not observed in the black participants. In whites, the prolactin response to fenfluramine remained a significant predictor of systolic and diastolic BPs in multivariate models including age, gender, body mass index, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption (P135/85 mm Hg. These data reveal that in white but not black adults, fenfluramine-induced prolactin release correlates inversely with BP and may indicate a role of central serotonergic activity in the pathogenesis of hypertension.

Gauging the effectiveness of extended imipramine treatment for panic disorder with agoraphobia.

BACKGROUND: Imipramine has proven efficacy for panic disorder. This study assesses the net effectiveness of systematic, open imipramine treatment in a homogenous sample of panic disorder patients with agoraphobia. METHODS: One hundred and ten consecutive patients with DSM-III-R moderate to severe panic disorder with agoraphobia were treated with a fixed regimen of imipramine 2.25 mg/kg/day for 24 weeks. No instructions or encouragement for self-directed exposure to phobic situations or other coping strategies with panic or fear were given. Assessments were conducted at the end of the 2-week placebo run-in and at weeks 8, 16, and 24 of treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 53% had a marked and stable response. Most measures revealed that substantial improvement continued beyond week 8 of treatment. Treatment success was accompanied with significant improvements in anxiety sensitivity, dysphoric mood, and functional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a clinically relevant reference with which to compare the effectiveness of alternative treatments in providing nearly complete symptom remission in patients with primary panic disorder with agoraphobia.

Fluvoxamine versus desipramine: comparative polysomnographic effects.

Electroencephalogram sleep measures over a 4-week period were obtained on 35 inpatients with major depression (unipolar) who received either fluvoxamine or desipramine in a randomized double-blind trial. Fluvoxamine showed immediate rapid eye movement (REM) sleep suppression and an alerting effect on sleep continuity measures. In contrast, desipramine administration was associated with REM suppression and sleep continuity improvement. The "alerting" quality of fluvoxamine, similar to other serotonergic antidepressants, appears to be unrelated to a lack of clinical efficacy, but may be related to persistent REM sleep suppression. However, it is premature to comment on the serotonin specificity for REM sleep.

Nocturnal urinary excretion of 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate in prepubertal major depressive disorder.

Levels of the melatonin metabolite, 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate, were measured in overnight urine from 31 prepubertal children with major depressive disorder and 15 normal control children with very low family loading for affective disorder. The two groups did not differ with regard to their nocturnal excretion of this compound, nor was any depressive subgroup identified whose 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate excretion differed from that of the control group. Previous studies of pineal function in depression are reviewed and discussed in the context of the present investigation.