ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prevention and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatic resections is still an unresolved issue. Continuous irrigation of the peripancreatic area is frequently used to treat necrotizing pancreatitis, but its use after elective pancreatic surgery is not well-known. With this systematic review, we sought to evaluate the current knowledge and expertise regarding the use of continuous irrigation in the surgical area to prevent or treat POPF after elective pancreatic resections. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, screening the databases of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid MEDLINE. Because of the heterogeneity of the included articles, a statistical inference could not be performed and the literature was reviewed only descriptively. The study was pre-registered online (OSF Registry). RESULTS: Nine studies were included. Three studies provided data regarding the prophylactic use of continuous irrigation after distal and limited pancreatectomies. Here, patients after irrigation showed a lower rate of clinically relevant POPF, related complications, lengths of stay, and mortality. Six other papers reported the use of local lavage to treat clinically relevant POPF and subsequent fluid collections, with successful outcomes. CONCLUSION: In the current literature, only a few publications are focused on the use of continuous irrigation after pancreatic resection to prevent or manage POPF. The included studies showed promising results, and this technique may be useful in patients at high risk of POPF. Further investigations and randomized trials are needed.
Subject(s)
Pancreas , Pancreatectomy , Postoperative Complications , Therapeutic Irrigation , Humans , Elective Surgical Procedures , Pancreas/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & controlABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe PNI and to evaluate its impact on disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although PNI is a prognostic factor for survival in many GI cancers, there is limited knowledge regarding its impact on tumor recurrence, especially in ''early stage disease'' (PDAC ≤20 mm, R0/ N0 PDAC). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients undergoing PDAC resection between 2009 and 2014. The association of PNI with DFS and OS was analyzed using Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: PNI was found in 87% of 778 patients included in the study, with lower rates in PDAC ≤20 mm (78.7%) and in R0/N0 tumors (70.6%). PNI rate did not differ between patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery (88% vs 84%, P = 0.08). Although not significant at multivariate analysis ( P = 0.07), patients with PNI had worse DFS at univariate analysis (median DFS: 20 vs 15 months, P < 0.01). PNI was the only independent predictor of DFS in R0/N0 tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.2) and in PDAC ≤ 20 mm (HR: 1.8). PNI was an independent predictor of OS in the entire cohort (27 vs 50 months, P = 0.01), together with G3 tumors, pN1 status, carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19.9 >37 and pain. CONCLUSIONS: PNI represents a major determinant of tumor recurrence and patients' survival in pancreatic cancer. The role of PNI is particularly relevant in early stages, supporting the hypothesis that invasion of nerves by cancer cells has a driving role in pancreatic cancer progression.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , CA-19-9 Antigen , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intractable pancreatic pain is one of the most common symptoms of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Celiac neurolysis (CN) and splanchnicectomy were already described as effective methods to manage abdominal pain in unresectable PDAC, but their impact on overall survival (OS) has not yet been established. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the impact of CN and splanchnicectomy on the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed and Cochrane Library according to predefined searching terms was conducted in March 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) of OS data were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel model for random effects or fixed effects. RESULT: Four randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 non-RCTs with a total of 2,507 patients were identified. The overall pooled HR did not reveal any relevant effect of CN and splanchnicectomy on OS (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.81-1.32), which was also underlined by the sensitivity analysis of RCTs (HR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.72-1.39) and non-RCTs (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.71-1.63). However, subgroup analyses depending on tumor stage revealed that CN or splanchnicectomy was associated with a worsened OS in AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage III patients with unresectable PDAC (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03-1.45), but nor for AJCC stage IV patients (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.9-1.80). CONCLUSION: Although only few data are currently available, this systematic review with meta-analysis showed that in unresectable PDAC, CN or splanchnicectomy is associated with a worsened survival in stage III PDAC patients, with no effect on stage IV PDAC patients. These data call for caution in the usage of CN or splanchnicectomy in stage III PDAC and for further studies addressing this observation.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/complications , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Proportional Hazards Models , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The malignant potential and the surgical management of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) remain controversial. Enucleation (EN), as parenchyma-sparing resections of the pancreas, may be a valuable alternative to standard resections (SR), e.g., Whipple or distal pancreatectomy, for the treatment of BD-IPMN. However, its role is still poorly defined. The objective of this review is to compare indications and postoperative outcomes after pancreatic EN versus SR. METHODS: A review of the literature was carried out. Short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of both surgical approaches were evaluated. RESULTS: EN is associated with shorter operation time and less blood loss than SR. The overall surgical morbidity does not differ between the two approaches. Although EN is less invasive, the development of pancreatic fistula is the most important complication after EN, as several studies have reported a higher rate of pancreatic fistula than after SR. However, the differences between the two procedures are mitigated in high-volume centres. EN more frequently allows the preservation of pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function in comparison to SR and this is the most important advantage of this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: EN appears to be a safe and effective alternative to treat low-risk BD-IPMN, and allows preservation of endocrine and exocrine function. Moreover, postoperative complications and recurrence rates after EN are comparable to the much more extensive surgical procedures. However, pancreatic EN should be performed by experienced surgeons and, as non-oncological procedure, patients should be very accurately selected. This underlines the importance of treatment in high-volume institutions.
Subject(s)
Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize an international cohort of resected cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (cPanNENs) and identify preoperative predictors of aggressive behavior. BACKGROUND: The characteristics of cPanNENs are unknown and their clinical management remains unclear. An observational strategy for asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2âcm has been proposed by recent guidelines, but evidence is scarce and limited to single-institutional series. METHODS: Resected cPanNENs (1995-2017) from 16 institutions worldwide were included. Solid lesions (>50% solid component), functional tumors, and MEN-1 patients were excluded. Aggressiveness was defined as lymph node (LN) involvement, G3 grading, distant metastases, and/or recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 263 resected cPanNENs were included, among which 177 (63.5%) were >2âcm preoperatively. A preoperative diagnosis of cPanNEN was established in 162 cases (61.6%) and was more frequent when patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound [EUS, odds ratio (OR) 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-4.77] and somatostatin-receptor imaging (OR 3.681, 95% CI 1.809-7.490), and for those managed in specialized institutions (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.57-6.21). Forty-one cPanNENs (15.6%) were considered aggressive. In the whole cohort, LN involvement on imaging, age >65 years, preoperative size >2âcm, and pancreatic duct dilation were independently associated with aggressive behavior. In asymptomatic patients, older age and a preoperative size >2âcm remained independently associated with aggressiveness. Only 1 of 61 asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2âcm displayed an aggressive behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of cPanNENs is increased by the use of EUS and somatostatin-receptor imaging and is higher in specialized institutions. Preoperative size >2âcm is independently associated with aggressive behavior. Consequently, a watch-and-wait policy for sporadic asymptomatic cPanNENs ≤2âcm seems justified and safe for most patients.
Subject(s)
Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Endosonography , Female , Humans , Male , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The role of diabetes in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) is not known. We investigated the prevalence of diabetes among patients with resected IPMNs and the association between diabetes, clinical and morphological features, and high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer. METHODS: We collected clinical, pathology, laboratory, and demographic data from 134 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN from a referral center in Germany. We identified 50 patients with diabetes (37%). RESULTS: Higher proportions of patients with diabetes were male and older, but did not have increased body mass index, compared to patients without diabetes. Diabetes was significantly associated with main-duct involvement (odds ratio [OR], 2.827; 95% CI, 1.059-7.546; P = .038) and high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma (OR, 2.692; 95% CI, 1.283-5.651; P = .009). Risk of high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer was even higher in patients with new-onset or worsening diabetes (OR, 4.615; 95% CI, 1.423-14.698; P = .011). Fifty-eight percent of patients (18/31) with weight loss at diagnosis had diabetes vs 32% of patients (31/97) without weight loss (P = .009). However, when the analysis was restricted to IPMNs with low-grade dysplasia, weight loss and diabetes were no longer associated (42% [5/12] vs 21% [9/44]; P = .133). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPMNs, diabetes is associated with increased risk of main duct involvement and high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. Studies are needed to determine the relationship between diabetes and progression of IPMNs, which might lead to strategies for early detection and prevention of invasive cancer. Findings from this study should be considered in the guidelines for management of IPMN.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Diabetes Mellitus , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/complications , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Weight LossABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This survey aimed to register changes determined by the COVID-19 pandemic on pancreatic surgery in a specific geographic area (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) to evaluate the impact of the pandemic and obtain interesting cues for the future. METHODS: An online survey was designed using Google Forms focusing on the local impact of the pandemic on pancreatic surgery. The survey was conducted at 2 different time points, during and after the lockdown. RESULTS: Twenty-five respondents (25/56) completed the survey. Many aspects of oncological care have been affected with restrictions and delays: staging, tumor board, treatment selection, postoperative course, adjuvant treatments, outpatient care, and follow-up. Overall, 60% of respondents have prioritized pancreatic cancer patients according to stage, age, and comorbidities, and 40% opted not to operate high-risk patients. However, for 96% of participants, the standards of care were guaranteed. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had an important impact on pancreatic cancer surgery in central Europe. Guidelines for prompt interventions and prevention of the spread of viral infections in the surgical environment are needed to avoid a deterioration of care in cancer patients in the event of a second wave or a new pandemic. High-volume centers for pancreatic surgery should be preferred and their activity maintained. Virtual conferences have proven to be efficient during this pandemic and should be implemented in the near future.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Pancreatectomy/trends , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Aftercare/trends , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/trends , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatectomy/standards , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pandemics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Perioperative Care/methods , Perioperative Care/standards , Perioperative Care/trends , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Time-to-Treatment/standards , Time-to-Treatment/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The first COVID-19 pandemic wave hit most of the health-care systems worldwide. The present survey aimed to provide a European overview on the COVID-19 impact on surgical oncology. METHODS: This anonymous online survey was accessible from April 24 to May 11, 2020, for surgeons (n = 298) who were contacted by the surgical society European Digestive Surgery. The survey was completed by 88 surgeons (29.2%) from 69 different departments. The responses per department were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the departments, 88.4% (n = 61/69) reported a lower volume of patients in the outpatient clinic; 69.1% (n = 47/68) and 75.0% (n = 51/68) reported a reduction in hospital bed and the operating room capacity, respectively. As a result, the participants reported an average reduction of 29.3% for all types of oncological resections surveyed in this questionnaire. The strongest reduction was observed for oncological resections of hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) cancers. Of the interviewed surgeons, 68.7% (n = 46/67) agreed that survival outcomes will be negatively impacted by the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The first COVID-19 pandemic wave had a significant impact on surgical oncology in Europe. The surveyed surgeons expect an increase in the number of unresectable cancers as well as poorer survival outcomes due to cancellations of follow-ups and postponements of surgeries.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/surgery , Oncology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/diagnosis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate recurrence patterns of surgically resected PDAC patients with negative (pN0) or positive (pN1) lymph nodes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer death by 2030. This is mostly due to early local and distant metastasis, even after surgical resection. Knowledge about patterns of recurrence in different patient populations could offer new therapeutic avenues. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were collected for 546 patients who underwent resection of their PDAC between 2005 and 2016 from 2 tertiary university centers. Patients were divided into an upfront resection group (n = 394) and a neoadjuvant group (n = 152). RESULTS: Tumor recurrence was significantly less common in pN0 patients as compared with pN1 patients, (upfront surgery: 55% vs. 77%, P < 0.001 and 64% vs. 78%, P = 0.040 in the neoadjuvant group). In addition, time to recurrence was significantly longer in pN0 versus pN1 patients in the upfront resected patients (median 16 mo pN0 vs. 10 mo pN1 P < 0.001), and the neoadjuvant group (pN0 21 mo vs. 11 mo pN1, P < 0.001). Of the patients who recurred, 62% presented with distant metastases (63% of pN0 and 62% of pN1, P = 0.553), 24% with local disease (27% of pN0 and 23% of pN1, P = 0.672) and 14% with synchronous local and distant disease (10% of pN0 and 15% of pN1, P = 0.292). Similarly, there was no difference in recurrence patterns between pN0 and pN1 in the neoadjuvant group, in which 68% recurred with distant metastases (76% of pN0 and 64% of pN1, P = 0.326) and 18% recurred with local disease (pN0: 22% and pN1: 15%, P = 0.435). CONCLUSION: Time to recurrence was significantly longer for pN0 patients. However, patterns of recurrence for pN0 vs. pN1 patients were identical. Lymph node status was predictive of time to recurrence, but not location of recurrence.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cause of Death , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Germany , Humans , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are frequently and incidentally detected, it is a challenge to determine their risk of malignancy. In immunohistochemical and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analyses of tissue and cyst fluid from pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, the monoclonal antibody Das-1 identifies those at risk for malignancy with high levels of specificity and sensitivity. We aimed to validate the ability of Das-1 to identify high-risk PCLs in comparison to clinical guidelines and clinical features, using samples from a multicenter cohort. METHODS: We obtained cyst fluid samples of 169 PCLs (90 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 43 mucinous cystic neoplasms, and 36 non-mucinous cysts) from patients undergoing surgery at 4 tertiary referral centers (January 2010 through June 2017). Histology findings from surgical samples, analyzed independently and centrally re-reviewed in a blinded manner, were used as the reference standard. High-risk PCLs were those with invasive carcinomas, high-grade dysplasia, or intestinal-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with intermediate-grade dysplasia. An ELISA with Das-1 was performed in parallel using banked cyst fluid samples. We evaluated the biomarker's performance, generated area under the curve values, and conducted multivariate logistic regression using clinical and pathology features. RESULTS: The ELISA for Das-1 identified high-risk PCLs with 88% sensitivity, 99% specificity, and 95% accuracy, at a cutoff optical density value of 0.104. In 10-fold cross-validation analysis with 100 replications, Das-1 identified high-risk PCLs with 88% sensitivity and 98% specificity. The Sendai, Fukuoka, and American Gastroenterological Association guideline criteria identified high-risk PCLs with 46%, 52%, and 74% accuracy (P for comparison to Das-1 ELISA <.001). When we controlled for Das-1 in multivariate regression, main pancreatic duct dilation >5 mm (odds ratio, 14.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.63-108; P < .0012), main pancreatic duct dilation ≥1 cm (odds ratio, 47.9; 95% confidence interval, 6.39-490; P < .0001), and jaundice (odds ratio, 6.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-36.7; P = .0397) were significantly associated with high-risk PCLs. CONCLUSIONS: We validated the ability of an ELISA with the monoclonal antibody Das-1 to detect PCLs at risk for malignancy with high levels of sensitivity and specificity. This biomarker might be used in conjunction with clinical guidelines to identify patients at risk for malignancy.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/chemistry , Pancreatic Cyst/chemistry , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/chemistry , Pancreatic Neoplasms/chemistry , Adult , Aged , Antibodies/immunology , Antibody Specificity , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/immunology , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/pathology , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/surgery , Pancreatic Cyst/immunology , Pancreatic Cyst/pathology , Pancreatic Cyst/surgery , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/immunology , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/immunology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine (1) whether preoperative factors can predict resectability of borderline resectable (BR) and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, (2) which patients might benefit from adjuvant therapy, and (3) survival differences between resected BR/LA patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and upfront resected patients. BACKGROUND: Patients with BR/LA PDAC are often treated with FOLFIRINOX to obtain a margin-negative resection, yet selection of patients for resection remains challenging. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data of PDAC patients surgically explored between 04/2011-11/2016 in a single institution were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, 141 patients were surgically explored (BR: 49%, LA: 51%) and 110 (78%) were resected. Resected patients had lower preoperative CA 19-9 levels (21 vs 40âU/mL, P = 0.03) and smaller tumors on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan (2.3 vs 3.0âcm, P = 0.03), but no predictors of resectability were identified. Median overall survival (OS) was 34.2 months from diagnosis for all FOLFIRINOX patients and 37.7 months for resected patients. Among resected patients, preoperative CA 19-9 >100âU/mL and >8 months between diagnosis and surgery predicted a shorter postoperative disease-free survival (DFS); Charlson comorbidity index >1, preoperative CA 19-9 >100âU/mL and tumor size (>3.0âcm on CT or >2.5âcm on pathology) predicted decreased OS. DFS and OS were significantly better for BR/LA PDAC patients treated with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX compared with upfront resected patients (DFS: 29.1 vs 13.7, P < 0.001; OS: 37.7 vs 25.1 months from diagnosis, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: BR/LA PDAC patients with no progression on neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX should be offered surgical exploration. Except size, traditional pathological parameters fail to predict survival among resected FOLFIRINOX patients. Resected FOLFIRINOX patients have survival that appears to be superior than that of resectable patients who go directly to surgery.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Irinotecan/therapeutic use , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Oxaliplatin/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Previous nomogram models for patients undergoing resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) have been relatively small single-institutional series. Our objective was to improve upon these studies by developing and independently validating a new model using a large multiinstitutional dataset. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: IPMNs represent the most common radiographically identifiable precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer. They are a heterogenous group of neoplasms in which more accurate markers of high-grade dysplasia or early invasive carcinoma could help avoid unnecessary surgery in 1 case and support potentially curative intervention (resection) in another. METHODS: Prospectively maintained databases from 3 institutions were queried for patients who had undergone resection of IPMNs between 2005 and 2015. Patients were separated into main duct [main and mixed-type (MD)] and branch duct (BD) types based on preoperative imaging. Logistic regression modeling was used on a training subset to develop 2 independent nomograms (MD and BD) to predict low-risk (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) or high-risk (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) disease. Model performance was then evaluated using an independent validation set. RESULTS: We identified 1028 patients who underwent resection for IPMNs [MD: n = 454 (44%), BD: n = 574 (56%)] during the 10-year study period. High-risk disease was present in 487 patients (47%). Patients with high-risk disease comprised 71% and 29% of MD and BD groups, respectively (P <0.0001). MD and BD nomograms were developed on the training set [70% of total (n = 720); MD: n = 318, BD: n = 402] and validated on the test set [30% (n = 308); MD: n = 136, BD: n = 172]. The presence of jaundice was almost exclusively associated with high-risk disease (57 of 58 patients, 98%). Cyst size >3.0âcm, solid component/mural nodule, pain symptoms, and weight loss were significantly associated with high-risk disease. C-indices were 0.82 and 0.81 on training and independent validation sets, respectively; Brier scores were 0.173 and 0.175, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with suspected IPMNs, we present an independently validated model for the prediction of high-risk disease.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Nomograms , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Preliminary work by our group suggested that proteins within the pancreatic cyst fluid (CF) may discriminate degree of IPMN dysplasia. We sought to externally validate these markers and determine whether their inclusion in a preoperative clinical nomogram could increase diagnostic accuracy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: IPMN is the most common radiographically identifiable precursor to pancreatic cancer; however, the timing and frequency of its malignant progression are unknown, and there are currently no reliable preoperative tests that can determine the grade of dysplasia in IPMN. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data, as well as CF samples, were obtained from 149 patients who underwent resection for IPMN at 1 of 3 institutions. High-risk disease was defined as the presence of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma. Multianalyte bead array analysis (Luminex) of CF was performed for 4 protein markers that were previously associated with high-risk disease. Logistic regression models were fit on training data, with and without adjustment for a previously developed clinical nomogram and validated with an external testing set. The models incorporating clinical risk score were presented graphically as nomograms. RESULTS: Within the group of 149 resected patients, 89 (60%) had low-risk disease, and 60 (40%) had high-risk disease. All 4 CF markers (MMP9, CA72-4, sFASL, and IL-4) were overexpressed in patients with high-risk IPMN (P < 0.05). Two predictive models based on preselected combinations of CF markers had concordance indices of 0.76 (Model-1) and 0.80 (Model-2). Integration of each CF marker model into a previously described clinical nomogram leads to increased discrimination compared with either the CF models or nomogram alone (c-indices of 0.84 and 0.83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study validated 2 CF protein marker models for preoperative identification of high-risk IPMN. When combined with a clinical nomogram, the ability to predict high-grade dysplasia was even stronger.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cyst Fluid/metabolism , Decision Support Techniques , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Nomograms , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/metabolism , Pancreatic Intraductal Neoplasms/surgery , Preoperative Care/methods , Radiography , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the development of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs). We evaluated long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients with BD-IPMNs to determine risk of malignancy and define a subset of low-risk BD-IPMNs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 577 patients with suspected or presumed BD-IPMN under surveillance at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Patients underwent cross-sectional imaging analysis at 3 months or later after their initial diagnosis. The diagnosis of BD-IPMN was based on the presence of unilocular or multilocular cysts of the pancreas and a non-dilated main pancreatic duct (<5 mm). We collected demographic, clinical, and pathology data. Cysts were characterized at the time of diagnosis and during the follow-up period. Follow-up duration was time between initial cyst diagnosis and date of last visit or death for patients without development of pancreatic cancer, date of surgery for patients with histologically confirmed malignancy, or date of first discovery of malignancy by imaging analysis for patients with unresectable tumors or who underwent neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. The primary outcome was risk of malignancy, with a focus on patients followed for 5 years or more, compared with that of the US population, based on standardized incidence ratio. RESULTS: Of the 577 patients studied, 479 (83%) were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 363 (63%) underwent endoscopic ultrasound at least once. The median follow-up time was 82 months (range, 6-329 months) for the entire study cohort; 363 patients (63%) underwent surveillance for more than 5 years, and 121 (21%) for more than 10 years. Malignancies (high-grade dysplasia or invasive neoplasm) developed after 5 years in 20 of 363 patients (5.5%), and invasive cancer developed in 16 of 363 patients (4.4%). The standardized incidence ratio for patients with BD-IPMNs without worrisome features of malignancy at 5 years was 18.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.7-32.8; P < .001). One hundred and eight patients had cysts ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years of follow-up; only 1 of these patients (0.9%) developed a distinct ductal adenocarcinoma. By contrast, among the 255 patients with cysts >1.5 cm, 19 (7.5%) developed malignancy (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of patients with BD-IPMNs under surveillance, their overall risk of malignancy, almost 8%, lasted for 10 years or more, supporting continued surveillance after 5 years. Cysts that remain ≤1.5 cm for more than 5 years might be considered low-risk for progression to malignancy.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/pathology , Pancreatic Cyst/pathology , Pancreatic Ducts/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Referral and Consultation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Boston/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals, General , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/epidemiology , Pancreatic Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Cyst/epidemiology , Pancreatic Ducts/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in imaging and the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy puts the contemporary utility of staging laparoscopy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) into question. This study aimed to develop a prognostic score to optimize prevention of an unnecessary laparotomy and minimize the rate for unnecessary laparoscopy. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were evaluated for all patients undergoing surgical intervention for PDAC between 2001 and 2015, who were stratified into group 1 (2001-2008) and group 2 (2009-2014). RESULTS: The study identified 1001 patients eligible for analysis, 331 (33%) of whom underwent a staging laparoscopy before exploration. An unnecessary laparotomy was prevented for 44.4% of the patients in period 1 and for 24% of the patients in period 2 (p < 0.001). Male gender [odds ratio (OR), 1.8; p < 0.05], preoperative resectability (borderline resectable OR 2.1; p < 0.019; locally advanced OR 7.6; p < 0.001), CA 19-9 levels higher than 394 U/L (OR 3.1; p < 0.001), no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.7; p = 0.012), and pancreatic body or tail lesions (OR 1.8; p = 0.063) were predictive of occult metastatic disease. The developed scoring index demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.729. The observed-to-expected ratio for the index at every score level validated the index's model. A score cutoff at 4 was able to detect 76.1% of radiographically occult metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: The rate for unnecessary laparotomy among patients with PDAC has decreased in contemporary times, but unnecessary laparotomy still occurs for 1 in 4 patients. Using our scoring system, a cutoff of 4 allows 76% of radiographically occult metastases to be predicted, thereby selecting high-risk patients for laparoscopic biopsy and potentially avoiding a non-therapeutic laparotomy.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Laparoscopy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic NeoplasmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While the association between Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is well recognized, its importance in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) is not well-defined. We sought to examine the associations of DM with degree of dysplasia and morphological subtypes in IPMN. METHODS: In 454 patients with resected IPMN, we evaluated associations of DM with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), invasive carcinoma, precursor epithelial subtype (gastric, intestinal, oncocytic, pancreatobiliary), and histological type of invasive carcinomas (tubular, colloid, oncocytic) using logistic regression. We performed multivariate analyses adjusting for worrisome features and high-risk stigmata of malignancy in a subset of 289 patients with annotated radiological characteristics. RESULTS: The prevalence of DM in our study was 34%. DM was significantly associated with HGD (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.02-4.01, P = 0.045) and invasive carcinoma (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.08-3.87, P = 0.027) after adjusting for worrisome features. Compared to patients without DM, those with recent-onset DM (≤5 years before surgery) had 6.9-fold (95% CI 2.38-19.92, P < 0.001) higher risk of invasive carcinoma. DM was associated with increased likelihood of intestinal-type precursor epithelium (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.47, P = 0.022) and colloid carcinomas (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.01-5.99, P = 0.047) CONCLUSION: Preoperative DM was associated with significantly higher risk of HGD and invasive carcinoma in resected IPMN, and risk of invasive carcinoma was highest in patients with recent-onset DM. Patients with DM were more likely to harbor intestinal-type IPMN and colloid carcinomas. Our findings suggest that a diagnosis of DM in patients with IPMN may warrant more aggressive surveillance.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Diabetes Mellitus/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The minimum number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) required for adequate staging and best prediction of survival has not been established in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of ELN on staging and survival in PDAC. METHODS: Patients undergoing partial or total pancreatectomy for PDAC at two European university hospitals between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate Cox regression model and survival analyses were performed to verify adequate staging. RESULTS: Overall 341 (73 per cent) patients showed lymph node metastasis (N1/N2), whereas 125 (27 per cent) patients had no lymph node involvement (N0). With increasing number of ELN, the proportion of positive lymph nodes increased. The minimum number of ELN needed to detect lymph node involvement was 21. In multivariate analysis, examination of <21 lymph nodes was a significant negative predictor for survival. Examination of ≥21 ELN reversed this effect and ruled out possible misclassification. CONCLUSION: The number of ELN affects survival in PDAC. Possible misclassification was identified when <21 lymph nodes were examined. Therefore, at least 21 lymph nodes must be examined to avoid false lymph node classification in all types of resection.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgeryABSTRACT
Background: Arterial resection (AR) during pancreatectomy for curative R0 resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a controversial procedure with high morbidity. Objective: To investigate the feasibility and oncological outcomes of pancreatectomy combined with AR at a high-volume center for pancreatic surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our experience in PDAC patients, who underwent pancreatic resection with AR and/or venous resection (VR) between 2007 and 2021. Results: In total 259 PDAC patients with borderline resectable (n = 138) or locally advanced (n = 121) PDAC underwent vascular resection during tumor resection. From these, 23 patients had AR (n = 4 due to intraoperative injury, n = 19 due to suspected arterial infiltration). However, 12 out of 23 patients (52.2%) underwent simultaneous VR including 1 case with intraoperative arterial injury. In comparison, 11 patients (47.8%) underwent AR only including 3 intraoperative arterial injury patients. Although the operation time and bleeding rate of patients with AR were respectively longer and higher than in VR, no significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between VR and AR (P = 0.11). The final histopathological findings of PDAC patients were similar, including M stage, regional lymph node metastases, and R0 margin resection. The mortality of the entire cohort was 6.2% (16/259), with a tendency to increase mortality in the AR cohort, yet without statistical significance (VR: 5% vs AR: 21.1%; P = 0.05). Although 19 (82.6%) patients had PDAC in the final histopathology, only 6 were confirmed to have infiltrated arteria. The microscopic distribution of PDAC in these infiltrated arterial walls on hematoxylin-eosin staining was classified into 3 patterns. Strikingly, the perivascular nerves frequently exhibited perineural invasion. Conclusions: AR can be performed in high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery with an acceptable morbidity, which is comparable to that of VR. However, the likelihood of arterial infiltration seems to be rather overestimated, and as such, AR might be avoidable or replaced by less invasive techniques such as divestment during PDAC surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drain use in pancreatic surgery remains controversial. This survey sought to evaluate habits, experiences, and opinions of experts in the field on the use of drains to provide interesting insights for pancreatic surgeons worldwide. METHODS: An online survey designed via Google Forms was sent in December 2020 to experienced surgeons of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. RESULTS: Forty-two surgeons (42/63, 67%) completed the survey. During their career, 74% (31/42) performed personally >500 pancreatic resections; of these, 9 (21%) >1,500. Sixty-nine percent of the respondents (29/42) declared to always use drains during pancreatic resections and 17% (7/42) in >50% of the operations. For these participants, the use of drains does not increase but reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula and other complications, and more importantly, helps to detect them earlier and manage them better. By contrast, 2 surgeons (5%) declared to never apply drains, whereas other 4 (10%) use drains only in selective cases, deeming that drains increase the risk of infection and other complications. When applied, drains are managed very heterogeneously as for the type of drains, enzyme testing, and removal schedules. Four participants declared to practice continuous irrigation. Twenty-two surgeons (55%) remove drains routinely within the third postoperative day, other 11 (27.5%) only in selected cases, whereas 7 (17.5%) normally keep drains longer. CONCLUSION: Despite plenty of publications on this topic, drain management in pancreatic surgery remains very heterogeneous. Safety and the surgeon´s personal experience seem to play a determining role.
Subject(s)
Drainage , Postoperative Complications , Drainage/methods , Humans , Pancreatic Fistula/epidemiology , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Background: Pancreatic fistula/PF is a challenging surgical complication. We could recently show that intestinal bacteria such as Enterobacterales colonize the PF fluid even after a "sterile" operation like distal pancreatectomy/DP. Therefore, we explored the bacterial flora of the human pancreatic duct in a patient collective undergoing pancreatic surgery. Methods: In this observational study, upon transection of the pancreas during surgery, a swab was inserted into the main duct, and the micro-organismal content was correlated with clinical characteristics. Results: Between February 2017 and February 2020, an intraoperative swab from the pancreatic duct was obtained from a total of 54 patients who underwent pancreatico-duodenectomy/PD or DP. The swabs were sterile in 39 cases (72.2%), detected intestinal bacteria in 10 cases (18.5%), and other bacteria in 5 cases (9.3%). There was no correlation of the micro-organismal content of the pancreatic duct swab with bacteria detected in the PF fluid or bile. Preoperative ERCP was associated with a higher frequency of bacterial colonization of the pancreatic duct (33.3% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.005). There was no correlation of the pancreatic duct swabs with postoperative complications. Discussion: The human main pancreatic duct is usually sterile, and its bacterial colonization does not correlate with the occurrence of PF. Therefore, the mechanisms leading to infection of PF warrant in-depth, mechanistic investigation.