Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prostate ; 79(14): 1705-1714, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We identify and validate accurate diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer through a systematic evaluation of DNA methylation alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assembled three early prostate cancer cohorts (total patients = 699) from which we collected and processed over 1300 prostatectomy tissue samples for DNA extraction. Using real-time methylation-specific PCR, we measured normalized methylation levels at 15 frequently methylated loci. After partitioning sample sets into independent training and validation cohorts, classifiers were developed using logistic regression, analyzed, and validated. RESULTS: In the training dataset, DNA methylation levels at 7 of 15 genomic loci (glutathione S-transferase Pi 1 [GSTP1], CCDC181, hyaluronan, and proteoglycan link protein 3 [HAPLN3], GSTM2, growth arrest-specific 6 [GAS6], RASSF1, and APC) showed large differences between cancer and benign samples. The best binary classifier was the GAS6/GSTP1/HAPLN3 logistic regression model, with an area under these curves of 0.97, which showed a sensitivity of 94%, and a specificity of 93% after external validation. CONCLUSION: We created and validated a multigene model for the classification of benign and malignant prostate tissue. With false positive and negative rates below 7%, this three-gene biomarker represents a promising basis for more accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , DNA Methylation/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/classification , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , DNA/isolation & purification , Epigenesis, Genetic , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/analysis , Extracellular Matrix Proteins/genetics , Glutathione S-Transferase pi/analysis , Glutathione S-Transferase pi/genetics , Humans , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/analysis , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/chemistry , Proteoglycans/analysis , Proteoglycans/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Explor Target Antitumor Ther ; 5(5): 1100-1109, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39351438

ABSTRACT

Aim: Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is a well-established prognostic and predictive biomarker. It is an FDA-approved therapeutic target for HER2 positive breast, gastroesophageal, and more recently, lung and colon cancers. It is an emerging biomarker in biliary tract, bladder, cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. The emergence of new indications warrants further characterization of HER2 expression in diverse cancer populations. This study investigated HER2 expression in solid tumour samples and the feasibility of obtaining these results. Methods: Prospective consent was obtained at a Canadian tertiary academic cancer center from adult oncology patients who were referred for molecular genetic testing of malignant tissue samples. Standard HER2-targeted malignancies were considered breast and gastroesophageal, and were excluded from this study. Between July 2020 and November 2023, 499 samples of solid tumors underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 staining. A median turnaround time (TAT) of 14 days would be considered feasible for clinical decision making. Results: The mean age (± SD) of participants was 67 ± 12.5 years, with 270 (54%) male and 229 (46%) female. HER2 protein expression was measured in 42 unique cancer types. IHC levels of 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ were reported and were 43%, 12%, 35%, and 10% of all analyzable samples respectively (tissue inadequate in 3% of samples). The median TAT for HER2 expression results from time of request to result in release was 18 (interquartile range, 11 to 30) days. Conclusions: HER2 protein expression varies widely between different cancer types. TAT for HER2 IHC results was a median of 18 days, which is close to our feasibility cut-off.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL