Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 23(7): 3133-3137, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31076883

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Aim was to assess the influence of a standard autoclaving protocol on the retention of zirconia abutments glued on titanium bases in two-piece implant abutments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four CAD/CAM-generated zirconia abutments were adhesively cemented on prefabricated titanium bases. Before mechanical and thermal aging, the specimens were divided into two groups. Group 1 was subjected to a standard steam autoclaving protocol and Group 2 remained untreated (control). The tensile strength in all specimens was evaluated by a standardized pull-off test limited to a maximum force of 1000 N. RESULTS: Eleven samples in both groups could be subjected to pull-off testing. Ten samples in Group 1 and three samples in Group 2 failed, while all others reached the maximum pull-off force. This difference was statistically significant. The mean retention values for the failed samples were 694.53 ± 369.10 N in Group 1 and 890.78 ± 25.90 N in Group 2. This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A standard autoclaving protocol does not reduce detachment force of two-piece zirconia abutments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinical sterilization processes as recommended by regulatory authorities seem to be harmless to the structural integrity of two-piece zirconia implant abutments, at least with regard to the retention of the components.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Zirconium , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Sterilization , Titanium
2.
Int J Prosthodont ; (3): 149-154, 2024 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350072

ABSTRACT

In our previous test model, the abutment teeth and the model base were printed with resin and bonded with a polyether material. Some abutment teeth were fractured during the mechanical load test. Therefore, the aim was to develop and evaluate a new model under mechanical loading until fracture with zirconia FPD frameworks. At a fracture load of up to 1,636 N, neither the artificial abutment teeth nor the base model fractured. Furthermore, the artificial abutment teeth did not detach from the base model. Therefore, the model should be suitable for mechanical testing of most ceramic-based framework materials for three-unit FPDs.


Subject(s)
Dental Stress Analysis , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Materials Testing , Zirconium , Zirconium/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Abutments , Models, Dental , Dental Materials/chemistry , Denture Design , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL