ABSTRACT
While primarily described in children, adult-onset Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) has been reported, albeit infrequently. In the present scenario, we unveil a unique case of adult-onset LCH in an HIV-infected individual. After the diagnosis was made, the patient was successfully treated and demonstrated total disease remission. This case illustrates the diagnostic challenge that rare clinical entities such as LCH pose, especially in the context of an untreated HIV infection. Furthermore, the complexity of treating adult-onset Langerhans cell histiocytosis in an HIV-positive patient is highlighted, with emphasis given on a multidisciplinary approach. LEARNING POINTS: Novelty: the case study provides knowledge on the uncommon occurrence of LCH in adults, especially within the setting of untreated HIV infection, underlining the significance of prompt detection and medical treatment.Diagnostic challenges: The scenario depicts the difficulty in diagnosing LCH in the presence of HIV, necessitating an array of diagnostic procedures.Multidisciplinary approach: This case's effective management emphasises the crucial role of a multidisciplinary approach when dealing with complex medical conditions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to estimate vaccination and susceptibility rates against vaccine-preventable diseases among healthcare personnel (HCP) in eight hospitals. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: A total of 1284 HCP participated (physicians: 31.3%, nursing personnel: 36.6%, paramedical personnel: 11.1%, administrative personnel: 13.2%, supportive personnel: 7.3%). Vaccination rates were 32.9% against measles and mumps, 38.1% against rubella, 5.7% against varicella, 9.2% against hepatitis A, 65.8% against hepatitis B, 31.8% against tetanus-diphtheria, 7.1% against pertussis, 60.2% against influenza, and 80.1% against COVID-19. Susceptibility rates were as follows: 27.8% for measles, 39.6% for mumps, 33.4% for rubella, 22.2% for varicella, 86.3% for hepatitis A, 34.2% for hepatitis B, 68.2% for tetanus-diphtheria, and 92.9% for pertussis. Older HCP had higher susceptibility rates against mumps, rubella, varicella, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus-diphtheria, and pertussis (p-values <0.001 for all). Mandatory vaccinations were supported by 81.85% of HCP. CONCLUSIONS: Although most HCPs supported mandatory vaccinations, significant vaccination gaps, and susceptibility rates were recorded. The proportion of susceptible HCP to measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella has increased in the past decade, mostly because of reduction in acquired cases of natural illness. Vaccination programs for HCP should be developed. A national registry to follow HCP's vaccination rates is urgently needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Chickenpox , Diphtheria , Hepatitis A , Hepatitis B , Measles , Mumps , Rubella , Tetanus , Whooping Cough , Attitude , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery of Health Care , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Tertiary Care Centers , Vaccination , Vaccination CoverageABSTRACT
Most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) experience mild, non-specific symptoms, but many develop severe symptoms associated with an excessive inflammatory response. Elevated plasma concentrations of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) provide early warning of progression to severe respiratory failure (SRF) or death, but access to suPAR testing may be limited. The Severe COvid Prediction Estimate (SCOPE) score, derived from circulating concentrations of C-reactive protein, D- dimers, interleukin-6, and ferritin among patients not receiving non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation during the SAVE-MORE study, offers predictive accuracy for progression to SRF or death within 14 days comparable to that of a suPAR concentration of ≥6 ng/mL (area under receiver operator characteristic curve 0.81 for both). The SCOPE score is validated in two similar independent cohorts. A SCOPE score of 6 or more is an alternative to suPAR for predicting progression to SRF or death within 14 days of hospital admission for pneumonia, and it can be used to guide treatment decisions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Insufficiency , Biomarkers , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Prognosis , Receptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 2019, WHO reported that the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance to first-line regimens of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is increasing in countries with a low number of therapeutic options. This increasing prevalence of drug resistance is an important threat to ending the AIDS pandemic, as it compromises individual clinical outcomes and increases the risk of transmission. In countries with a high number of therapeutic options, little global information is available regarding the prevalence of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infections, which presents a potential challenge for the clinical management of people with HIV. Even after the approval of two new antiretroviral drug classes in 2007, which were intended to help alleviate this problem, some cases of infection with HIV-1 that show limited susceptibility to the five available antiretroviral classes have been described. We did a thorough in-vitro evaluation of the drug resistance profile of HIV-1 from an observational case to show that five-class pan-resistant clinical cases do exist. METHODS: We investigated a case of a highly treatment-experienced Caucasian male with HIV-1 who had a poor virological response to previous combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) and who was not responding to a dolutegravir-based regimen. For the complete panel of approved antiretrovirals, we examined genotypic resistance using the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database interpretation algorithm, and we examined phenotypic resistance using the PhenoSense and Trofile assays. Using viral gp160 sequence analysis, we also explored the potential susceptibility of this virus to novel therapeutic drugs targeting viral envelope binding. FINDINGS: The individual was diagnosed with HIV-1 on Sept 29, 1989. Since starting antiretroviral treatment in 1995, the individual had received more than 14 different antiretroviral drugs over the course of his illness. In November, 2017, a blood sample was collected from the individual and we did drug resistance analysis tests. We found that this individual was infected with a pan-resistant HIV-1 subtype B strain that showed broad genotypic and phenotypic cross-resistance to all approved antiretroviral drugs, including the newest second-generation integrase inhibitors, dolutegravir and bictegravir. With no remaining clinical options available, except for investigational drugs, this case provides evidence that new antiretroviral drugs with different mechanisms of action are needed. INTERPRETATION: Our case report shows that HIV-1 multidrug cross-resistance remains an important concern, despite the extensive number of antiretroviral drugs currently available. Highly treatment-experienced patients, especially those who have been given suboptimal combination ART, can develop highly complex resistance-associated mutation patterns, conferring cross-resistance to all widely available ARTs. The identification and reporting of cases, such as the one described in this report, are needed to increase awareness of emerging trends that have the potential to affect patient management. FUNDING: None.