ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Erenumab, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibody, has been well tolerated with good efficacy for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. Limited post-market observations are available to validate these findings in a real-world tertiary headache clinic population with complex comorbidities and refractory migraine. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to demonstrate the real-world performance of erenumab among patients in a tertiary care headache clinic by describing patient selection, experience, and clinical characteristics after 6 months of erenumab therapy. METHODS: A retrospective, exploratory, observational study was conducted on patients receiving at least 1 erenumab injection (70 or 140 mg). Baseline data obtained by chart review and telephone calls were compared to 6-month follow-up telephone calls. The primary outcome was the reduction in self-reported headache days per month at baseline compared to 6 months for those with complete 6-month data. The significance level was set at P < .05. Secondary analyses explored the distribution of headache severity, responder rates, Migraine Disability Assessment scores, adverse effects, ineffective preventives, comorbidities, wearing-off, and discontinuation. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients who consented to participate, 89.1% (90/101) were women, and the mean age of all patients was 49 years (range, 19-80 years). At baseline, 94.1% (95/101) of patients had chronic migraine, 5.0% (5/101) had episodic migraine, and 18.8% (19/101) had medication overuse headache. The mean (SD) number of baseline headache and migraine days per month for the entire cohort were 24.3 (8.2) and 18.2 (9.3) days, respectively. Participants had numerous comorbidities and had tried a mean of 11.2 unique oral medications and 4.8 unique medication categories before receiving erenumab, including 83.2% (84/101) who had also received onabotulinumtoxinA. Six-month post-erenumab follow-up data were available for 42.6% (43/101) of participants. For these 43 participants, the number of headache days per month decreased significantly by 6.5 days from a baseline mean (SD) of 24.8 (6.47) days to 18.3 (12) days at 6-month follow-up (P < .001); similarly, the monthly migraine days decreased significantly by 8.4 days from a baseline mean of 19.1 (9.3) days to 10.7 days at 6-month follow-up (P < .001). The 50% responder rate was 34.9% (15/43) for monthly headache days and 54.8% (23/43) for monthly migraine days. Of all 101 participants, 28 (27.7%) discontinued erenumab, primarily because it was ineffective (39.3%, 11/28) or because of adverse effects (42.9%, 12/28). CONCLUSION: This post-market observational study of patient experience describes response to erenumab in a real-world tertiary headache clinic with a complex patient population. Overall, these complex patients had a significant positive clinical response to erenumab, but with high rates of discontinuation. This study also noted a 1-week wearing-off response and high rates of constipation. Further post-market studies are needed to better characterize patient selection and real-world response to erenumab.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Young AdultSubject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Nerve Block , Bupivacaine , Emergency Service, Hospital , Headache , Humans , Metoclopramide , Ringer's LactateABSTRACT
Crop-specific diagnostics to simultaneously detect a large number of pathogens provides an invaluable platform for the screening of vegetative material prior to its propagation. Here we report the use of what is to-date the largest published example of a crop-specific macroarray for the detection of 38 of the most prevalent or emergent viruses to infect grapevine. The reusable array consists of 1,578 virus-specific 60 to 70mer oligonucleotide probes and 19 plant and internal control probes spotted onto an 18 × 7 cm nylon membrane. In a survey of 99 grapevines from the United States and Europe, virus infections were detected in 46 selections of Vitis vinifera, V. labrusca, and interspecific hybrids. The majority of infected vines (30) was singly infected, while 16 were mixed-infected with viruses from two or more families. Representatives of the four main virus families Betaflexiviridae, Closteroviridae, Secoviridae, and Tymoviridae present in grapevines were found alone and in combination, with a notable bias in representation by members of the family Tymoviridae. This work demonstrates the utility of the macroarray platform for the multiplex detection of viruses in a single crop, its potential for characterizing grapevine virus associations, and usefulness for rapid diagnostics of introduced material in quarantine centers or in certification programs.
Subject(s)
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Plant Diseases/virology , Plant Viruses/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Vitis/virology , Closteroviridae/genetics , Closteroviridae/isolation & purification , DNA Primers/genetics , DNA, Complementary/genetics , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Nucleic Acid Hybridization , Plant Viruses/genetics , RNA Viruses/genetics , RNA Viruses/isolation & purification , RNA, Viral/genetics , Species Specificity , Tymoviridae/genetics , Tymoviridae/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
The rules regarding the competency of children to consent to medical treatment have traditionally focused on the child's understanding of the proposed treatment. This article argues that this focus has perpetuated an unjustifiably paternalistic attitude to the treatment of children that is inconsistent with obligations under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the common law's preference for upholding personal autonomy. A new test is therefore proposed, abandoning the presumption of incompetency for adolescents and focusing on the understanding of the right to make medical decisions. The application of the proposed test is examined both from a general point of view and with regard to a particularly vulnerable group of young people: those suffering from mental illness.