Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(3): 565-573, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838792

ABSTRACT

Influenza virus infections (IVI) may pose a vital threat to immunocompromised patients such as those suffering from malignancies, but specific data on epidemiology and outcome in these patients are scarce. In this study, we collected data on patients with active cancer or with a history of cancer, presenting with documented IVI in eight centres in Germany. Two hundred and three patients were identified, suffering from haematological malignancies or solid tumours; 109 (54 %) patients had active malignant disease. Influenza A was detected in 155 (77 %) and Influenza B in 46 (23 %) of patients (genera not determined in two patients). Clinical symptoms were consistent with upper respiratory tract infection in 55/203 (27 %), influenza-like illness in 82/203 (40 %), and pneumonia in 67/203 (33 %). Anti-viral treatment with oseltamivir was received by 116/195 (59 %). Superinfections occurred in 37/203 (18 %), and admission on an intensive care unit was required in 26/203 (13 %). Seventeen patients (9 %) died. Independent risk factors for death were delayed diagnosis of IVI and bacterial or fungal superinfection, but not underlying malignancy or ongoing immunosuppression. In conclusion, patients with IVI show high rates of pneumonia and mortality. Early and rapid diagnosis is essential. The high rate of pneumonia and superinfections should be taken into account when managing IVI in these patients.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/pathology , Neoplasms/complications , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Critical Care , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza B virus/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/mortality , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Societies , Superinfection/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
2.
Ann Hematol ; 95(6): 1001-9, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27021301

ABSTRACT

Azole prophylaxis has been shown to be effective in preventing invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and increasing survival in patients with prolonged neutropenia after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for haematological malignancies. Similarly, empirical antifungal therapy for persistent neutropenic fever has been shown to reduce IFI-related mortality. However, to date, there is little information with regard to the outcome of patients who receive both strategies. Here, we present our retrospective data on three cohorts of patients receiving empirical or targeted antifungal therapy after different antifungal prophylaxis regimens. All records from patients who received myelosuppressive induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in our centre from 2004-2010 were analysed. From 2004-2006, itraconazole was used as antifungal prophylaxis; for the first 6 months in 2007, local polyenes and from mid-2007 till 2010, posaconazole. Data of 315 courses of chemotherapy in 211 patients were analysed. Antifungal therapy (empirical or targeted, time point and antifungal agent at the physician's discretion) was initiated in 50/174 (29 %), 7/18 (39 %) and 34/123 courses (28 %, p = 0.615) in the itra cohort, the cohort without systemic prophylaxis and the posa cohort, respectively, and was effective in 24/50 (48 %), 5/7 (71 %) and 22/34 courses (65 %, p = 0.221), respectively. IFI occurred in 25/174 (14 %), 4/18 (22 %) and 16/123 (13 %) courses, respectively (p = 0.580). IFI-related survival was not different in the three cohorts. Antifungal treatment in patients with AML who received azole prophylaxis resulted in the expected efficacy-importantly, prior posaconazole prophylaxis did not render subsequent antifungal treatment less effective than prior itraconazole prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Empirical Research , Febrile Neutropenia/drug therapy , Itraconazole/administration & dosage , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Aged , Cohort Studies , Febrile Neutropenia/diagnosis , Febrile Neutropenia/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome
3.
Genes Immun ; 16(1): 83-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427560

ABSTRACT

Infectious complications continue to be one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can affect the genetic susceptibility to infections or even sepsis. We sought to investigate the impact of different SNPs on the incidence of developing sepsis and pneumonia in patients with newly diagnosed AML following induction chemotherapy. We analyzed three SNPs in the TLR2 (Arg753Gln) and TLR4 (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) gene in a cohort of 155 patients with AML who received induction chemotherapy. The risk of developing sepsis and pneumonia was assessed by multiple logistic regression analyses. The presence of the TLR2 Arg753Gln polymorphism was significantly associated with pneumonia in AML patients (odds ratio (OR): 10.78; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-58.23; P=0.006). Furthermore, the cosegregating TLR4 polymorphisms Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile were independent risk factors for the development of both sepsis and pneumonia (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 1.21-10.4, P=0.021 and OR: 3.57, 95% CI: 1.3-9.86, P=0.014, respectively). To our best knowledge, this study represents the first analysis demonstrating that polymorphisms of TLR2 and TLR4 influence the risk of infectious complications in patients with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Pneumonia/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sepsis/genetics , Toll-Like Receptor 2/genetics , Toll-Like Receptor 4/genetics , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Toll-Like Receptor 2/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptor 4/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL