The Quadrangular Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Surgically Focused CT Dimensional Analysis of Black African and Caucasian Populations.

The apparent lack of quadrangular cartilage in Black African noses is commonly observed both from a radiological and clinical point of view. To the best of our knowledge, only a few research papers have been conducted on the facial proportions and structural anatomy of black people of Southern and Eastern Africa. The aim of this retrospective comparative study is a radiological assessment of the total amount of septal quadrangular cartilage by measuring its area in sagittal CT views, in two selected Black South African and Caucasian (CA) samples and the comparison with the literature in our hands. Statistical analysis was conducted, categorical variables are shown as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables as means and standard deviations. Normal distribution of variables was verified using the Shapiro-Wilk test or by means of skewness and kurtosis values. Differences among unpaired groups were evaluated using the independent Student's t-test for normally distributed data (complemented by the Cohen's d to show the effect size with the following cutoff: d = 0.2, "small" effect size; d = 0.5, "medium" effect size; d = 0.8, "large" effect size) and Mann-Whitney U test in case of non-normal distribution. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 setting the α-error probability at 5%. This study shows that, on average, there is 30% more cartilage available in CA compared with Black African noses and confirms the apparent lack of quadrangular cartilage and in Black African noses which is commonly observed in surgery. The need for an adequate amount of autologous septal cartilage makes cartilage availability a major concern before surgery and being able to preoperative accurately measure the amount of septal cartilage that is available to be harvested for other grafts in the surgery is essential.

Middle Vault Dorsal Augmentation in Rhinoplasty as "Push-up" Preservation Technique or as "Modified Dorsal Split Extended Push-up" Procedure.

BACKGROUND: Primary or secondary dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty addresses aesthetic and functional issues related to a deficient, under-projected, or depressed nasal dorsum, frequently in middle vault. Traditional treatments often involve costal cartilage grafts, which can result in palpable irregularities and additional morbidity. Implementing dorsal preservation techniques in selected patients may improve predictability and outcomes of dorsal augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a case series involving 12 patients with saddle nose deformities and significant nasal function impairment. All patients underwent either "push-up" preservation technique or "modified dorsal split extended push-up" technique. The techniques were evaluated for feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Functional outcomes were assessed using the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale preoperatively and three months postoperatively. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent "push-up" technique, and four patients required "dorsal split extended push-up" technique due to extensive scarring and mucosal adhesions from previous surgeries. All patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvement in nasal function as indicated by a reduction in NOSE scores (p < 0.05). Aesthetic outcomes showed a naturally augmented and smooth dorsum with no palpable irregularities. Patient satisfaction was rated very high (9 or 10 out of 10) in 10 patients and high (7 or 8 out of 10) in 2 patients. Follow-up was 6 months. CONCLUSION: "Push-up" preservation technique and its extended variant provide a new surgical alternative for primary and secondary rhinoplasty with costal cartilage. These techniques offer improved and highly predictable aesthetic outcomes of the nasal dorsum with decreased morbidity, demonstrating significant potential for clinical practice and future research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Hybrid Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: Reediting an Aesthetic Dorsum.

BACKGROUND: The prerequisite of a well-shaped dorsum with proper dorsal aesthetic lines that needs no modifications in its width and symmetry is key to letdown and push-down techniques as classically described. The common current concept is that total preservation of the middle vault is obligatory. This, however, obviously limits the indications, since nasal dorsum with natural aesthetic dorsal lines per se is relatively few. The recent, impressive, revival of letdown and push-down procedures has progressively generated numerous technical variations, but all those essentially still left the middle vault unmodified. The concept of splitting the middle vault and modifying its width and symmetry, while leaving the crucial dorsal (central) and lateral Keystone area intact, represents a new hybrid approach to the nasal dorsum. The structural benefits of classical component separation are combined with the major advantage of preserving the flexible chondro-osseous joint at the keystone junction. Osteotomies and/or osteoplasty can be done as necessary to modify the bony dorsum and at the same time any type of septal deformity can be addressed according to the time-tested L-strut principle, a Cottle septoplasty included. This hybrid approach expands indications beyond those of the conventional push-down/letdown technique, including moderate asymmetries of the bony and cartilaginous dorsum. Although splitting the middle vault along the septal T will also facilitate middle vault reshaping in cases where a full letdown procedure is indicated, this paper will clarity address only those instances where no circumferential osteotomy is done. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The dorsal bony nasal pyramid is always addressed first by rhinosculpture (osteoplasty) with piezoelectric inserts and/or burrs, in combination with different types of osteotomies as needed. This will allow narrowing of the bridge and correction of bony asymmetries. The osseous-cartilaginous connection of the central dorsal keystone area (DKA) is totally preserved. At this point, three main variations are possible: Type 1) preservation of the septal T and push-down by a high-middle septal strip resection, two different variations (1A and 1B) are possible here, Type 2) reduction in width of the septal T-segment and middle vault restoration by spreader flaps without any push-down of the septal T and Type 3) preservation of the septal T and letdown by low strip resection. CONCLUSION: Hybrid Dorsal Preservation involves concepts of Structure and Preservation Rhinoplasty. Dorsal and lateral keystone area are preserved, and the middle vault could be modified splitting the septal T in the anatomical plane, expanding patient indications and improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combining Piezo and Power Tools for a Better Outcome in Hybrid Structural-Preservation Rhinoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decade, rhinoplasty has seen an unprecedented evolution in concepts, techniques and tools. New concepts have led to new techniques, prevalently but not exclusively related to preservation rhinoplasty, and the use of new tools has made such techniques easier, more precise and thus better reproducible. Power tools can presently be considered only relatively new, while Piezo has gained great popularity over the last years. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This article is focused on how power tools (diverse burrs with specific spherical, cylindrical, conical, discoid tips) can be integrated efficiently together with the use of Piezo and its different inserts in a logical and effective manner. DISCUSSION: This combination should be implemented in a progressive fashion into specific steps of surgery, although, in general, burrs should be used for reshaping and piezo for cutting bone. Specific and notable exceptions to this rule will be mentioned in the paper. Obviously, cost should be considered, but the benefits are evident: heightened control, reduced asymmetries, smoother bony and middle vault contour, and a more precise management of septum and turbinates. We have come to this conclusion following the combined experience of the two centers participating in the study, with over 350 patients over the last three years. CONCLUSIONS: The article focuses on the modified dorsal split preservation hybrid rhinoplasty favored by the senior author, but its principles will easily apply to any structural, preservation, or hybrid rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Modified Dorsal Split Preservation Hybrid Rhinoplasty for Cartilaginous Pushdown and Full Letdown Applications: A PROM-Based Review of 100 Consecutive Cases.

Splitting the middle vault on an anatomical plane along the "Septal T" allows a new hybrid perspective on the many modifications of "surface" preservation techniques. The "dorsal split preservation" concept can be applied both to cartilaginous pushdown as well as to full letdown techniques. The dorsal keystone area is maintained, while the middle vault is reshaped. The septum is addressed by conventional L strut septoplasty. Precise direct suture fixation of the high-middle strip is easily accomplished after flexing the osseous-chondral junction at the K area. Specific technical points are described to allow exact and stable configuration of the dorsum.A retrospective analysis on 100 consecutive patients demonstrated aesthetic and functional improvement.

Three-Dimensional Technology in Rhinoplasty.

Rhinoplasty is uniquely suited to capitalize on different aspects of three-dimensional (3D) modeling technology. Currently, 3D surface imaging of preoperative and postoperative nasal structure provides a platform for better surgical planning and patient counselling as well as objective postoperative measurements. Physical nasal models using 3D printing technology can improve rhinoplasty performance intraoperatively, postoperative outcomes, together with nasal prosthetic manufacture, by tailoring to specific patient anatomy. Advances in tissue engineering using 3D-printed biocompatible scaffolds have shown excellent nasal cartilage mimicry and hold promise for increasingly versatile directed tissue regeneration in rhinoplasty and nasal reconstructive surgery. As health care innovations are expected to become increasingly common in standard rhinoplasty practices in the future, we give an account of how 3D technologies can create new opportunities to optimize surgical planning and improve overall the patient experience.

The "3 Points Compartmentalization" Technique in Subperichondrial-Subperiosteal Dissection in Primary Rhinoplasty to Reduce Edema and Define Contour.

Proper control of postoperative edema in rhinoplasty matters significantly, both regarding patient satisfaction and preventing loss of definition and aesthetic surface contour in the dorsum and tip. The "3 points compartmentalization" technique described in this paper aims to fulfill the above goals by (1) dissection in a subperichondrial-subperiosteal plane and (2) reducing the dead space by three strategically placed key sutures that compartmentalize the nose and redrape the single-plane dissection in an anatomically correct position.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Combining Rotation and V-Y Design for Lower Forehead and Temporal Region Reconstruction With Myocutaneous Frontal Flap: Our Experience on 27 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: Because of direct sun exposure, lower forehead and temporal area are anatomical regions with frequently observed skin tumors. The resulting defects after oncological ablations are usually treated, especially in older patients, by split thickness skin grafting or A-to-T and O-to-T flaps if facing small defects. On specific sites that expose bone or periosteum as well as when a skin graft is best avoided for cosmetic reasons, alternative reconstructive procedures should be considered. An excellent option is the use of myocutaneous frontal flap with rotation and V-Y design, which provide a reliable coverage of defects especially of the temporal area, dispensing appropriate like-tissue by its wide arc of rotation. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2019, 27 patients underwent myocutaneous frontal flap with rotation and V-Y design reconstruction of medium-to-large-sized soft-tissue defects of the lower forehead and temporal area after tumor excision. The malignant skin lesions involved were basal cell carcinoma (n = 17), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 9), and melanoma (n = 1). Twenty one patients were male, and 6 were female with an average age of 64 (54-86) years. RESULTS: All defects were successfully resurfaced with no local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a modification to myocutaneous frontal flap harvesting, with emphasis on its extensive arc of rotation with a V-Y design to minimize donor-site morbidity. The advantages of myocutaneous frontal flap with rotation and V-Y design include a good contour with excellent color, texture, and thickness match and good to excellent aesthetic results.

Piezo-Assisted Turbinoplasty: A Novel Rapid and Safe Technique.

Consensus is still lacking on the ideal treatment of turbinate hypertrophy concurrent with rhinoseptoplasty. A novel technique of turbinoplasty consisting of incision-bone fracturing by the use of piezoelectric technique-intramucosal microcauterization-lateralization is described in detail. A series of 157 consecutive patients is reviewed with a maximum follow-up of one year. The technique is fast and easy and allows predictability in avoiding postoperative bleeding and preventing remedialization of the lateralized turbinates. Due to the technology required, its use is suggested especially when piezo is employed during other steps of rhinoseptoplasty.

"Radix Pillow" Constructs with Fascial Extension for Radix Augmentation in Primary Rhinoplasty.

Temporalis fascia and diced cartilage, in varying combinations, are currently commonly employed for augmentation of the radix in rhinoplasty. Although existing literature is replete with papers and suggested variations, there is some lack of practical detail on how to use such techniques. The authors present a reproducible, multilayered, "pillow" construct of temporalis fascia for selective radix augmentation in primary rhinoplasty, with or without the addition of diced cartilage. Precise measurements for accurate multiple folding, exact tailoring of the construct to recipient size dimensions, and fixation by a "litter" concept with proximal and distal fixation point are key to this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Current Practical Concepts for Using Rib in Secondary Rhinoplasty.

Rhinoplasty is universally considered as the most demanding procedure in facial plastic surgery. Secondary rhinoplasty is its crown jewel, even more complex, and likewise highly fascinating. The evolution of thought and practice in rhinoplasty in the last decades has been quick and steady, progressively acknowledging the importance of maintaining structure in primary rhinoplasty and rebuilding structure in secondary procedures. No longer is the paradigm to achieve a small, thin, and pointy nose, but rather a well-proportioned nose which looks natural, albeit elegant and breathing well. Rib is an essential tool in many secondary procedures, and thus some important concepts have to be well understood and some finesse points mastered. This will provide an elegant reconstruction, identical if possible, or at least not far apart, to what could be achieved by a well-executed primary rhinoplasty, while avoiding the feared luck of a bulky nose stuffed with grafts. These guiding concepts and specific nuances regarding harvesting rib and working with it are the scope and contents of this article.

A Modified Dorsal Split Preservation Technique for Nasal Humps with Minor Bony Component: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: In scenarios of a dorsal hump with minor bony cap, ideal esthetic dorsal lines can be preserved and refined by component separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septal T, resection of a septal strip and ethmoid bone wedge, adjustment of width and symmetry and final re-suture of the cartilaginous dorsum after pushdown, improving width and symmetry. The associated bony cap is managed by osteoplasty only with or without narrowing osteotomies, and septal deviations can be concomitantly corrected. OBJECTIVES: A novel technique of modified dorsal cartilaginous pushdown after component separation is described in detail. This method illustrates the importance of preserving the integrity of the septal T anatomy and the elastic keystone junction. METHODS: A preliminary series of 41 consecutive patients with follow-up up to 1 year, with a mean of 6 months, is reviewed. RESULTS: All patients presented favorable outcomes with a natural looking dorsum. A learning curve led to progressive improvements by suture fixation of the septal T, finesse adjustment of dorsal width and symmetry, fine-tuning of deviation and gradual extension of the technique to include cases that required osteotomies without transverse element and those with any degree of septal manipulation. CONCLUSION: Disrupting the keystone area is fraught with potential complications which often lead to secondary revision. A modified dorsal preservation technique with pushdown limited to the septal T component of the cartilaginous dorsum combines the popular component separation concept with the preservation of the delicate anatomy of the mid-vault. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Reconstruction of the Thoracic Wall With Biologic Mesh After Resection for Chest Wall Tumors: A Presentation of a Case Series and Original Technique.

INTRODUCTION: Synthetic materials have traditionally been used for tissue reconstruction in thoracic surgery. New biomaterials have been tested in other areas of surgery with good results. Non-cross-linked swine dermal collagen prosthesis has been used to reconstruct musculofascial defects in the trunk with low infection and herniation rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyze our initial experience of chest wall reconstruction on large defects using a non-cross-linked swine dermal collagen matrix mesh with a thickness of 1.4 mm. A total of 11 consecutive patients were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were taken into consideration. RESULTS: Eleven sarcoma patients with a mean age of 58.25 ± 12.9 years underwent chest wall resections. Complete thoracic wall defects ranged from 6 · 9 to 16 · 25 cm in size. In all cases, we used a porcine collagen matrix mesh, and in all patients, it was covered by transposition of myocutaneous flap. The complications occurred in 5 (45%) patients, 1 (9%) pneumonia, 1 atrial fibrillation (9%), and 3 (27%) wound healing difficulty because of hematoma or infection. There was no respiratory impairment, and the pulmonary function (total lung capacity, vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second) was not statistically different before and after surgery. The 30-day mortality was 0%, 1-year mortality and 2-year mortality was 27.2%. The collagen material resulted in a durable and good to excellent chest wall stability in clinical follow-ups, and on computer tomography scans spanning over 2 years. CONCLUSION: Non-cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen matrix is a feasible and reliable biological patch material for reconstruction of the thoracic wall. Excellent wound healing, long-term stability, low complication, and good pulmonary function are achieved even in large defects.