"Ultralow-dose" CT Without Sedation in Pediatric Patients With Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Children with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing scoliosis surgery face substantial rates of complications. To mitigate surgical risks such as blood loss in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, this study focuses on enabling instrumentation planning for their abnormal vertebral and pelvic anatomy and osteopenia. This study assessed the feasibility of an "ultralow-dose" CT (ULD CT) protocol without sedation in pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who often have comorbid movement disorders. Our prospective quality improvement study aims: (1) to determine if ULD CT without sedation is feasible in this patient group; (2) to quantify the radiation dose from ULD CT and compare it with preoperative spine radiographs (XR); and (3) to assess if ULD CT allows accurate anatomical assessment and intraoperative navigation given the prevalence of movement disorders. METHODS: Children with neuromuscular scoliosis underwent spine XR and ULD CT scans. Chart reviews assessed disease etiology and comorbidities. Radiation dose was quantified through Monte-Carlo simulations giving dose indices and effective dose, with statistical analysis done using a paired student's t-test (α=0.05). CT image quality was assessed for its use in preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (5 males, 9 females, average age 14±3 y) participated. One patient needed sedation due to autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. The radiation dose for spine XR was 0.5±0.2 mSv, and ULD CT was 0.6±0.1 mSv. There was no statistically significant difference in radiation doses between methods. All ULD CT scans had adequate quality for preoperative assessment of pedicle diameter and orientation, obstacles impeding pedicle entry, S2 Alar-Iliac screw orientation, and intraoperative navigation. CONCLUSIONS: ULD CT without sedation is feasible for children with neuromuscular scoliosis. Radiation doses were comparable to standard radiographs. ULD CT provided accurate anatomical assessments and supported intraoperative navigation, proving beneficial despite movement disorders in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2-Development of diagnostic criteria on basis of consecutive patients (with universally applied reference widely accepted standard).

Surgical management of high-grade paediatric spondylolisthesis: meta-analysis and systematic review.

PURPOSE: There is currently no consensus on the management of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in paediatric populations. The objective of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of reduction followed by fusion (RFF) or in situ fusion (ISF) in paediatric patients. METHODS: Using major databases, a systematic literature search was performed. Primary studies comparing ISF with RFF in paediatric and adolescent patients were identified. Study data including patient-reported outcomes, complications, and spinopelvic parameters were collected and analysed. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 97 ISF and 131 RFF. Average patient age was 14.4 ± 2.1 years and follow up was 8.2 ± 5.1 years. Patients undergoing RFF compared to patients undergoing ISF alone were less likely to develop pseudarthrosis (RR 0.51, 95% CI, [0.26, 0.99], p = 0.05). On average, RFF led to 11.97º more reduction in slip angle and 34.8% more reduction in sagittal translation (p < 0.00001) compared to ISF. There was no significant difference between patient satisfaction and pain at follow up. Neurologic complications and reoperation rates were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Both RFF and ISF are effective techniques for managing HGS. Performing a reduction followed by fusion reduces the likelihood of pseudarthrosis in paediatric patients. The difference between risk of neurologic complications, need for reoperation, patient satisfaction, and pain outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Correlation with patient-reported outcomes still needs to be further explored. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

RASopathies and spinal deformities for screening of scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: The RASopathies (Noonan syndrome [NS] and Costello syndrome [CS]) are rare disorders. Although these have been characterized, precise delineation of the differences in the spinal deformities associated with RASopathy has not been described. This study characterized the spinal deformities found in NS and CS and describes a strategy for the screening of scoliosis. METHODS: The clinical records and spinal X-rays of 35 consecutive NS and CS patients were reviewed. Spinal X-rays were assessed to define the presence and progression of scoliosis. Clinical records were examined to identify the risk factors associated with scoliosis. In addition, we investigated the association between clinical records and scoliosis using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with NS and 11 with CS were included. Nine patients with NS and five with CS showed scoliosis. The mean ± SD age at diagnosis was 12.6 ± 2.4 years in NS and 11.4 ± 2.5 years in CS (p = 0.55), and mean follow-up period was 4.8 ± 2.6 years and 6.3 ± 2.4 years (p = 0.42), respectively. The coronal angular deformity at final follow-up was 27.3 ± 8.5° in NS and 19.4 ± 6.9° in CS (p = 0.030) with a mean annual progression of 2.8 ± 1.1° in NS 1.0 ± 1.0° in CS (p = 0.030). Cardiac disease was present in eight out of nine patients with NS with concomitant scoliosis in NS, and significantly more than in CS (p = 0.007). PTPN11 significantly correlated with scoliosis (odds ratio 12.4 0.035, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-128.00). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal deformity in NS is more severe than in CS. This study identified a relationship between PTPN11 and scoliosis. Therefore, PTPN11 can be used for the screening of scoliosis.

The use of e-consent in surgery and application to neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The integration of novel electronic informed consent platforms in healthcare has undergone significant growth over the last decade. Adoption of uniform, accessible, and robust electronic online consenting applications is likely to enhance the informed consent process and improve the patient experience and has the potential to reduce medico-legal ramifications of inadequate consent. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the utility of novel electronic means of informed consent in surgical patients and discuss its application to neurosurgical cohorts. METHODS: A review of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies of health interventions, and single group pre-post design studies in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled proportions of study outcomes. Patient satisfaction with the informed consent process and patients' gain in knowledge were compared for electronic technologies versus non-electronic instruments. A sub-group analysis was conducted to compare the utility of electronic technologies in neurosurgical cohorts relative to other surgical patients in the context of patient satisfaction and knowledge gain. RESULTS: Of 1042 screened abstracts, 63 studies were included: 44 randomised controlled trials (n = 4985), 4 non-randomised studies of health interventions (n = 387), and 15 single group pre-post design studies (n = 872). Meta-analysis showed that electronic technologies significantly enhanced patient satisfaction with the informed consent process (P < 0.00001) and patients' gain in knowledge (P < 0.00001) compared to standard non-electronic practices. Sub-group analysis demonstrated that neurosurgical patient knowledge was significantly enhanced with electronic technologies when compared to other surgical patients (P = 0.009), but there was no difference in patient satisfaction between neurosurgical cohorts and other surgical patients with respect to electronic technologies (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Novel electronic technologies can enhance patient satisfaction and increase patients' gain in knowledge of their surgical procedures. Electronic patient education tools can significantly enhance patient knowledge for neurosurgical patients. If used appropriately, these modalities can shorten and/or improve the consent discussion, streamlining the surgical process and improving satisfaction for neurosurgical patients.

Congenital Kyphosis: Progressive Correction With an Instrumented Posterior Epiphysiodesis: A Preliminary Report.

PURPOSE: Congenital kyphosis is a rare condition. In this case series we sought to identify the outcomes and complications of posterior instrumented fusion and the resultant epiphysiodesis effect in uniplanar congenital kyphosis in pediatric patients. METHOD: Pediatric patients were included if treated for a uniplanar congenital kyphotic deformity treated with posterior instrumented spinal fusion between October 2006 and August 2017, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patients were excluded if a coronal deformity >10 degrees was present. RESULTS: Six patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at surgery was 3.6 years. The mean kyphotic deformity before surgery was 49.7 degrees. All patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion with autogenous iliac crest graft and a cast or brace postoperatively. One patient showed a loss of motor evoked potential on prone positioning which returned to normal on supine positioning. No patient showed any postoperative neurological deficits. One patient was diagnosed with a wound infection which was successfully treated with oral antibiotics.By a follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 2.2 to 10.9 y) there was no failure of instrumentation. An epiphysiodesis effect (a difference of ≥5 degrees in the kyphotic deformity measured between the immediate postoperative and final follow-up lateral whole spine XR) of 16.2 degrees (range, 7.2 to 30.9 degrees) was seen in 5 patients. The mean annual epiphysiodesis effect was 2.7 degrees (95% confidence interval, 1.4-4.1 degrees). No kyphosis proximal to the instrumentation was observed for the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posterior instrumented fusion and epiphysiodesis is safe and effective. The epiphysiodesis effect occurs in 5/6 of cases, and our data suggests that the procedure is associated with an acceptable blood loss and a low incidence of neurological complications.

The Use of Halo Gravity Traction in Severe, Stiff Scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The correction of severe, stiff scoliosis in children is challenging. One method used to reduce the risk is preoperative halo gravity traction (HGT). In this study, the authors sought to define the efficiency and safety of HGT and characterize the chronology of the correction seen. METHOD: A consecutive group of pediatric patients with severe spinal deformities was treated with HGT before definitive correction. A standard protocol with the daily addition of weight to 50% of body weight at 3 weeks was used. Traction remained in place until signs of impending neurological complication or 6 weeks, whichever was sooner. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included with a mean age of 11.8 years. The mean coronal deformity was 123 degrees, with a T1-L5 height of 234 mm. The mean duration of traction was 42 days with a mean improvement in height of 72 mm with 82% occurring over the first 3 weeks. Hundred percent of the angular and 98% of T1-L5 height correction was reached by 6 weeks.One patient showed early signs of a cranial nerve palsy prompting early surgery and 8 patients showed pin loosening, 1 of which required revision of their halo. One patient underwent a slower progression of traction because of transitory urinary disturbance. Following fusion, angular correction of the major curve was 49%. CONCLUSION: HGT is a safe treatment for severe, stiff scoliosis because it can respond to early signs of impending neurological impairment. The first 3 weeks of treatment, reaching 50% of body weight as a traction force accounts for 80% of correction, with the remaining 20% in the following 2 weeks. At least 4 weeks of traction is recommended when following this protocol.

What is the Optimal Surgical Method for Achieving Correction and Avoiding Neurological Complications in Pediatric High-grade Spondylolisthesis?

BACKGROUND: Controversy persists in the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). Surgery is recommended in patients with intrusive symptoms and evidence debates the competing strategies. This study compares the radiologic outcomes and postoperative complications at a minimum of 2 years follow-up for patients with HGS treated with instrumented fusion with partial reduction (IFIS) with those treated with reduction, decompression, and instrumented fusion (RIF). We hypothesize that IFIS leads to a lower rate of complication and revision surgery than RIF. METHODS: A retrospective comparative methodology was used to analyze consecutive HGS treated surgically between 2006 and 2017. Patients diagnosed with ≥grade 3 spondylolisthesis treated with arthrodesis before the age of 18 years with a minimum of 2 years follow-up were included. Patients were excluded if surgery did not aim to achieve arthrodesis or was a revision procedure. Cases were identified through departmental and neurophysiological records. RESULTS: Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 4 years. Ten patients underwent IFIS and the remaining 20 underwent RIF. The 2 groups showed no difference in demographics, grade of slip, deformity or presenting symptoms. Of 10 treated with IFIS, the SA reduced by a mean of 10 degrees and C7 sagittal vertical line changed by 31 mm. In the RIF cohort, SA reduced by 16 degrees and C7 sagittal vertical line reduced by 26 mm. PT was unchanged in both groups. In IFIS cohort, 2 patients showed postoperative weakness, resolved by 2 years. None required revision surgery. In the RIF group, 4 sustained dural tears and 1 a laminar fracture, 7 showed postoperative weakness or dysaesthesia, 3 of which had not resolved by 2 years. Eight patients underwent unplanned further surgery, 3 for pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: RIF and IFIS show similar radiologic outcomes. RIF shows a higher rate of unplanned return to surgery, pseudarthrosis and persisting neurological changes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Utility of bedside leucocyte esterase testing to rule out septic arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Suspected septic arthritis is a common presentation to EDs. The underlying diagnosis is often non-infective pathology. Differentiating between aetiologies is difficult. A bedside test with high negative predictive value (NPV) may allow safe discharge of patients, reduce the time in the ED, hospital admission and associated costs. This study aims to evaluate the NPV of bedside leucocyte esterase (LE) in the assessment of these patients. METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study of ED adult patients referred to orthopaedics with suspected native joint septic arthritis between October 2015 and April 2016. At three hospital sites in the Bristol region, the results of the LE test exposed to aspirated synovial fluid were recorded along with Gram stain, culture, haematinics and length of stay. A positive LE test was considered 2+ or 3+ leucocytes based on the test strip colour. Data were analysed to establish sensitivity, specificity, NPV and positive predictive value (PPV) against the gold standard 48-hour culture. We determined the potential number of inpatient bed-days that might be avoided using this bedside test. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent joint aspiration. Five cases had positive 48-hour culture. All (5/5) infected cases showed ≥2+ LE, sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 47.8% to 100%) while the Gram stain was positive in only one case (sensitivity 20%, 95% CI 0.51% to 71.6%). Twenty-three LE were read negative or 1+, all with negative 48-hour culture results, resulting in an NPV of 100% (95% CI 82.1% to 1.00%) for a negative LE test. Specificity of a positive LE test was 30.7% (95% CI 20.5% to 42.45%) with PPV of 8.77% (95% CI 7.64% to 10.1%). It was calculated that 57 orthopaedic bed-days could have potentially been saved by immediately discharging those with a negative LE test. CONCLUSIONS: LE point-of-care testing for suspected septic arthritis of native joints has a high NPV. Implementation of LE may facilitate more rapid discharge of patients with negative results. This test has the potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and costs to the healthcare system.

The normal appearance of CT myelograms.

PURPOSE: CT myelography has been used since 1976 to diagnose neural compression in the axial skeleton. With the advent of routine MRI, its role in accurately diagnosing neural compression has been questioned as its normal appearances are not defined in the study. In this study, we examine a series of CT myelograms to define the normal appearances of the neural elements of the spine. METHODS: The CT myelograms of patients with unilateral symptoms were examined by four independent physicians. The lateral extent of contrast was examined and recorded. Concordance between the recorded extents was assessed using kappa scores. RESULTS: Thirty-six scans were reviewed. Kappa analysis shows that there is a fair agreement in the lateral extent of contrast at L1, L3 and L4. At L2 and L5, agreement is slight. CONCLUSION: The interpretation of CT myelography shows significant interobserver variability. As a result, the usefulness of this diagnostic tool can be questioned, and if misinterpreted, it could lead to questionable diagnoses and inadvertently erroneous management if used in isolation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Effect of Anaemia on Intra-operative Neuromonitoring Following Correction of Large Scoliosis Curves: Two Case Reports.

The correction of anemia is important in reversing significant intraoperative bilateral motor-evoked potential (MEP) loss following rod placement for correction of large scoliosis curves. This article presents a retrospective review of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) data, anesthesia records, and medical charts of two patients with significant bilateral MEP changes associated with posterior spinal surgery for deformity correction. A 70 kg 12-year-old and a 44 kg 16-year-old female with main thoracic curves underwent a posterior scoliosis correction with multilevel posterior column osteotomies. Following rod insertion, significant reduction in the bilateral lower extremity MEP occurred in both cases despite mean arterial pressure exceeding 70 mmHg, which was presumed to be due to the scale of the correction attempted in the setting of haemorrhage which rendered the patient acutely anaemic, thus compromising cord vasculature and oxygen delivery. The rods were removed and packed red blood cell transfusions were administered in response to acute anaemia as a result of haemorrhage in both cases. Neither was noted to be anaemic preoperatively. Once the MEP signals improved, the rods were reinserted and correction was attempted, limited by neuromonitoring signals and resistance of the bony anchors to pullout. At closure, the MEPs were near baseline in the first case and >50% of baseline in the second. There were no changes in the somatosensory evoked potential signals in either case. Post-operative neurological function was normal in both patients. Correcting the circulating haemoglobin concentration through blood product resuscitation allowed for safe correction of spinal deformity in two cases with significant bilateral MEP loss following the initial placement of rods.

The Prevalence of Scoliosis after Fontan Circulation Surgery Followed-Up to Adolescence.

Introduction: The advancement of surgical techniques and perioperative management for congenital heart disease (CHD) has increased life expectancy. The surgical creation of the Fontan circulation maintains pulmonary blood flow without relying on an effective pump from the abnormal heart, relying on peripheral vascular resistance to maintain effective flow through the lungs. Unfortunately, this delicate mechanism is compromised when scoliosis restricts ventilation, leading to Fontan failure and a poor prognosis for life. This report describes the prevalence of scoliosis with Fontan completion surgery and the role of screening and surgical correction. Methods: Ninety-six consecutive Japanese patients undergoing Fontan completion surgery for CHD between 2000 and 2017 were identified in our institutional records. The inclusion criterion was at least 7 years of follow-up after Fontan completion surgery, while the exclusion criteria were congenital, syndromic, and neuromuscular scoliosis. Radiographic and clinical parameters, including cardio-thoracic ratio (CTR) for cardiomegaly and cyanosis saturation, were compared between with and without scoliosis. Results: There were 23 and 40 patients in the scoliosis and no scoliosis groups, respectively. The mean age at the final follow-up was 18.5 and 16.7 years in the scoliosis and no scoliosis groups, respectively (p=0.02). Mean CTR was 43.7% and 39.4% in the scoliosis and no scoliosis groups (p=0.016), and the mean saturation in room air at the final follow-up was 88.8% and 93.2%, respectively (p=0.036). There were no significant differences to clarify the risk factors with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: The prevalence of scoliosis with Fontan completion surgery was 36.5%. Screening for scoliosis is important for children with Fontan circulation surgery as part of their routine follow-up at least until they reach adolescence.Evidence Level: 4.

Outcomes and Complications Associated With the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for clinical outcomes and patient safety. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique emerging in the literature for surgical management of cervical radiculopathy without the use of open incision. The adoption of endoscopic cervical foraminotomy may be hindered by the learning curve, although no review and meta-analysis exists to date on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception until July 11, 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, reported outcomes, and/or complications for endoscopic cervical spine surgery relevant to the learning curve and had full-text. A random effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes and complications. RESULTS: A total of three articles (n=203 patients) were included from 792 articles initially retrieved. The learning curves from four surgeons were examined with a FWM 21 procedures until the competency phase. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization length ( P =0.669), postoperative recovery room time ( P =0.415), intraoperative blood loss ( P =0.064), and total complication rates (10.9% vs . 1.2%, P =0.139) between endoscopic cervical foraminotomy procedures performed in the learning phase as compared with the competency phase of the learning curve. There was a significant decrease in operative time from the learning phase to the competency phase ( P =0.005). CONCLUSION: Competency was achieved on the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy after about 21 procedures. There is no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery room time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates between the learning phase and the competency phase of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, noting the relatively small sample size of this study that may underpower this finding.

Gene Therapy and Spinal Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Available Data.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the extant literature describing the application of gene therapy to spinal fusion. METHODS: A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed. The search query was designed to include all published studies examining gene therapy approaches to promote spinal fusion. Approaches were classified as ex vivo (delivery of genetically modified cells) or in vivo (delivery of growth factors via vectors). The primary endpoint was fusion rate. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate the overall odds ratio (OR) of fusion using a gene therapy approach and overall fusion rate. Subgroup analyses of fusion rate were also performed for each gene therapy approach. RESULTS: Of 1179 results, 35 articles met criteria for inclusion (all preclinical), of which 26 utilized ex vivo approaches and 9 utilized in vivo approaches. Twenty-seven articles (431 animals) were included in the meta-analysis. Gene therapy use was associated with significantly higher fusion rates (OR 77; 95% confidence interval {CI}: [31, 192]; P < 0.001); ex vivo strategies had a greater effect (OR 136) relative to in vivo strategies (OR 18) (P = 0.017). The overall fusion rate using a gene therapy approach was 80% (95% CI: [62%, 93%]; P < 0.001); overall fusion rates were significantly higher in subjects treated with ex vivo compared to in vivo strategies (90% vs. 42%; P = 0.011). For both ex vivo and in vivo approaches, the effect of gene therapy on fusion was independent of animal model. CONCLUSIONS: Gene therapy may augment spinal fusion; however, future investigation in clinical populations is necessary.

Academic Productivity at Orthopedic Spine Surgery Fellowships is Positively Correlated With Nonresearch Lifetime Industry Earnings: A Retrospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of academic productivity at both individual and program levels on lifetime industry earnings within US orthopedic spine fellowships. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physician-industry transparency was codified by the Physician Payments Sunshine Act (PSSA) in 2010. No study has explored the relationship between academic productivity and industry earnings at the fellowship level. METHODS: Inclusion criteria encompassed physicians with complete academic and industry data from orthopedic spine fellowship programs listed on the North American Spine Society (NASS) 2022-2023 fellowship directory. Academic productivity was defined via H-index on the Scopus website, and industry productivity by total lifetime earnings on the Open Payments Database (OPD). RESULTS: This analysis included 75 orthopedic spine fellowship programs with 320 individual physicians. Median individual physician lifetime earnings were $86,852.71 (mean: $666,580.23 ± $1,887,734.64; minimum-maximum: $10.86-$27,164,431.49) and the median individual physician (n=320 physicians) H-index was 17.0 (mean: 21.82 ± 19.28; minimum-maximum: 0-109). Median combined physician H-index per fellowship (n=75 fellowships) was 65.0 (mean: 93.08 ± 85.67; minimum-maximum: 3-434) and median combined physician lifetime earnings was $927,771.60 (mean: $2,844,075.64 ± $4,942,089.56; minimum-maximum: $1,112.32-$29,983,900.69). A positive correlation was observed between academic productivity and industry productivity at an individual level (P<0.001; Spearman's rho = 0.467). This correlation was stronger at the fellowship level (P<0.001; Spearman's rho = 0.734). There was no significant difference in total lifetime earnings (P=0.369) or H-index per fellowship (P=0.232) when stratified by region of the fellowship program in the United States. CONCLUSION: Orthopedic spine surgery fellowship programs in the United States exhibit a positive correlation between academic productivity and nonresearch industry lifetime earnings at both individual and program levels. This correlation is stronger at the program level, and regional differences among fellowship programs do not significantly impact academic or industry productivity.

Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between open, wiltse, and percutaneous approach to traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurological injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Traumatic thoracolumbar fracture fixation without neurological injury can be performed using the traditional open, mini-open Wiltse, and percutaneous approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare perioperative outcomes between these approaches. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all relevant observational comparative studies. Results: 5 randomized trials and 22 comparative cohort studies were included. Compared to the traditional open approach (n=959), the Wiltse approach (n=410) was associated with significantly lower operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of stay (LOS). There was no significant difference between the two in terms of postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Cobb angle. Compared to the percutaneous approach (n=980), the Wiltse approach was associated with shorter operative and fluoroscopy time, as well as significantly improved Cobb and vertebral body angles. The percutaneous approach was associated with improved vertebral body height. There was no significant difference between the two for blood loss, postoperative VAS, or LOS. Compared to the traditional open approach, the percutaneous approach was associated with shorter operative time, lower EBL, shorter LOS and better postoperative VAS and Oswestry Disability Index. There was no difference between the two in postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral angle, or vertebral body height. Overall study heterogeneity was high. Conclusions: Utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches holds great promise for lowering patient morbidity and optimizing care. A prospective trial is needed to assess outcomes and guide surgical decision making.

Opioid Use Prior to Adult Spine Deformity Correction Surgery is Associated With Worse Pre- and Postoperative Back Pain and Prolonged Opioid Demands.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter database post-hoc analysis. OBJECTIVES: Opioids are frequently prescribed for painful spinal conditions to provide pain relief and to allow for functional improvement, both before and after spine surgery. Amidst a current opioid epidemic, it is important for providers to understand the impact of opioid use and its relationship with patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pre-/postoperative opioid consumption surrounding ASD and assess patient-reported pain outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. METHODS: Patients ≥60 years of age from 12 international centers undergoing spinal fusion of at least 5 levels and a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain (NRS-B; NRS-L) at baseline and at 2 years following surgery. Opioid use, defined based on a specific question on case report forms and question 11 from the SRS-22r questionnaire, was assessed at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. RESULT: Of the 219 patients who met inclusion criteria, 179 (81.7%) had 2-year data on opioid use. The percentages of patients reporting opioid use at baseline (n = 75, 34.2%) and 2 years after surgery (n = 55, 30.7%) were similar (P = .23). However, at last follow-up 39% of baseline opioid users (Opi) were no longer taking opioids, while 14% of initial non-users (No-Opi) reported opioid use. Regional pre- and postoperative opioid use was 5.8% and 7.7% in the Asian population, 58.3% and 53.1% in the European, and 50.5% and 40.2% in North American patients, respectively. Baseline opioid users reported more preoperative back pain than the No-Opi group (7.0 vs 5.7, P = .001), while NRS-Leg pain scores were comparable (4.8 vs 4, P = .159). Similarly, at last follow-up, patients in the Opi group had greater NRS-B scores than Non-Opi patients (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .012), but no differences in NRS-Leg pain scores (2.2 vs 2.4, P = .632) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, almost one-third of surgical ASD patients were consuming opioids both pre- and postoperatively world-wide. There were marked international variations, with patients from Asia having a much lower usage rate, suggesting a cultural influence. Despite both opioid users and nonusers benefitting from surgery, preoperative opioid use was strongly associated with significantly more back pain at baseline that persisted at 2-year follow up, as well as persistent postoperative opioid needs.

A comparison of three- and two-rod constructs in the correction of severe pediatric scoliosis.

Purpose: Managing severe scoliosis is challenging and risky with a significant complication rate regardless of treatment strategy. In this retrospective comparative study, we report our results using a three-rod compared to two-rod construct in the surgical treatment of severe spine deformities to investigate which technique is safer, and which provides superior radiological outcomes. Methods: Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing posterior spine fusion for scoliosis between 2006 and 2017 were identified in our institutional records. Inclusion criteria were minimum coronal deformity of 90°, age < 18 years at the time of surgery and a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic and clinical parameters, as well as post-operative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 21 patients in the three-rod group and 25 in the two-rod group. The mean preoperative major coronal deformity was 100°± 9 and 102°± 10 in the three-rod and two-rod, respectively (p = 0.6). The average major curve correction was 51% and 59% in three-rod and two-rod groups, respectively (p = 0.03). The post-operative thoracic kyphosis was 30°± 11 and 21°± 12 in the three-rod and the two-rod groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The surgical time was 476 ± 52 and 387 ± 84 min in three-rod and two-rod, respectively (p < 0.01). One patient in the two-rod cohort showed permanent post-operative sensory deficit. There were three unplanned returns to operating theater in the two-rod group. Conclusions: Coronal correction was better with two-rod, whereas sagittal balance was superior with three-rod. Both techniques achieved balanced spine treating severe scoliosis. The two-rod technique was associated with a higher likelihood of requiring revision surgery. Level of evidence: level 3.

Antibiotic Use in Adult Spine Deformity Surgery: Results From the AO Spine Surveillance of the Management of Patients With Adult Spine Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional international survey with literature review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence for these strategies and to understand the current trends in prophylactic antibiotic use during ASD surgery through an international survey. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among international AO Spine members regarding the peri-operative management of patients with ASD. The details of perioperative systemic and topical antibiotic use were solicited. Descriptive data were summarized for the responding surgeons who perform at least 10 long-segment fusions of >5 levels extending to the pelvis annually. RESULTS: The literature supports the use of prophylactic antibiotic effective against gram positive organisms. The use of topical vancomycin remains debated, and there is limited evidence for topical tobramycin use. A total of 116 responses were received. 74 (64%) surgeons use topical vancomycin, most usually deep to the fascia only 45 (61%). The most usual dose used is 1-2 g. 4 (3%) surgeons use topical tobramycin deep to fascia. Following surgery, 90 (78%) surgeons use prophylactic cephalosporin with 3 (3%) using cloxacillin, 5 (4%) using ciprofloxacin and 9 (8%) using vancomycin and 6 (5%) using clindamycin either in addition or alone. CONCLUSIONS: The present survey identifies a trend towards systemic and topical antibiotic prophylaxis primarily targeted at gram positive pathogens. The use of topical tobramycin, proposedly effective against gram negative infections, remains uncommon. There is a lack of consensus in the selection of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, thus a prospective study of the rates of infection with each strategy would be useful to inform guidelines.

Prospective Randomized Control Trial to Compare the Role of Injection Cerebrolysin for 10 Days Duration Against Placebo in Operated Cases of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. OBJECTIVE: To analyze outcomes following the injection of cerebrolysin in surgically treated patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous research has concluded that superior functional outcomes are achieved with the use of cerebrolysin in surgically treated patients of DCM for 21 days. Our study has been conducted to analyze the use of this drug for a shorter duration (10 days) and compare its clinical efficacy. METHODS: Ninety operated cases of mild to severe DCM were randomized into two groups. Sixty patients received the injection Cerebrolysin for 10 days postoperatively. The remaining 30 patients received a placebo. Functional outcomes were measured using modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores and visual analogue scale (VAS). The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale was used to document neurological recovery. Hand function was assessed by measuring the grip strength and the upper limb function score the upper extremity motor mJOA plus upper extremity sensory mJOA score. Assessments were performed and preoperatively and postoperatively and at one-month, three-month, six-month, and one-year following surgery. RESULTS: Preoperative mJOA and VAS scores were comparable in both groups ( P >0.05). Both groups experienced an improvement in mJOA and VAS scores at all time-points during follow-up as compared with preoperative scores. However, the cerebrolysin group demonstrated significantly greater mJOA scores (16.37±1) when compared with the placebo (15.2±1.8) at one-year follow-up ( P <0.0001). Neurological improvement with cerebrolysin therapy was also superior ( P =0.04). No significant adverse reactions were documented. CONCLUSION: Injection cerebrolysin, when administered for 10 days postoperatively, can result in significantly greater neurological improvement and hand function in patients with DCM who also receive surgery.

Local contamination is a major cause of early deep wound infections following open posterior lumbosacral fusions.

PURPOSE: Postoperative surgical site infection in patients treated with lumbosacral fusion has usually been thought to be caused by perioperative contamination. With the proximity of these incisions to the perineum, this study sought to determine if contamination by gastrointestinal and/or urogenital flora should be considered as a major cause of this complication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adults treated with open posterior lumbosacral fusions between 2014 and 2021 to identify common factors in deep postoperative infection and the nature of the infecting organisms. Cases of tumor, primary infection and minimally invasive surgery were excluded. RESULTS: 489 eligible patients were identified, 20 of which required debridement deep to the fascia (4.1%). Mean age, operative time, estimated blood loss and levels fused were similar between both groups. The infected group had a significantly higher BMI. The mean time from primary procedure to debridement was 40.8 days. Four patients showed no growth, 3 showed Staphylococcus sp. infection (Perioperative Inside-Out) requiring debridement at 63.5 days. Thirteen showed infection with intestinal or urogenital pathogens (Postoperative Outside-In) requiring debridement at 20.0 days. Postoperative Outside-In infections led to debridement 80.3 days earlier than Perioperative Inside-Out infections (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: 65% of deep infections in patients undergoing open lumbosacral fusion were due to early contamination by pathogens associated with the gastrointestinal and/or urogenital tracts. These required earlier debridement than Staphylococcus sp. INFECTIONS: There should be renewed focus on keeping these pathogens away from the incision during the early stages of wound healing.