Detection of active gastrointestinal hemorrhage with CT angiography: a 4(1/2)-year retrospective review.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) angiography in the detection and localization of clinically active gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage of an unknown source. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six CT angiograms were obtained in 74 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute GI hemorrhage of an unknown source. Results of CT angiography were recorded, and the patients' electronic medical records were reviewed for documentation of subsequent interventional procedures performed within 24 hours of the reference CT angiogram to diagnose or control ongoing GI hemorrhage. Surgical, endoscopic, and final pathologic reports, if available, were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 86 CT angiograms (26%) were positive for active hemorrhage, with findings confirmed in 19 of the 22 cases (86%). Thirteen cases were confirmed with angiography, five cases were confirmed with surgery, and one case was confirmed with autopsy. Sixty-four of the 86 CT angiograms were negative, and 59 (92%) of the CT angiograms required no further intervention. These patients were discharged without incident. There were no cases in which CT angiography was negative and subsequent angiography within 24 hours was positive. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive value of CT angiography in the detection of active GI hemorrhage within this study population were 79%, 95%, 91%, 86%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CT angiography provides valuable information that can be used to determine the appropriateness of catheter angiography and guide mesenteric catheterization if a bleeding source is localized. The authors' experience with this study cohort supports its use before angiography in those patients with acute GI bleeding of an unknown source who are being considered for catheter-directed intervention.

The effects of splenic artery embolization on nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 16-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury has become the preferred treatment for hemodynamically stable patients. The application of splenic artery embolization (SAE) in NOM has been controversial. We hypothesized that incorporation of initial use of SAE into a practice protocol for patients at high risk for NOM failure (contrast extravasation or pseudoaneurysm on computed tomography, grade 3 injury with large hemoperitoneum, grade 4 injuries) would improve patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of three continuums of practice was performed: group I (January 1991-June 1998), SAE not part of routine NOM; group II (July 1998-December 2001), introduction and discretionary use of SAE; and group III (January 2002-June 2007), standardized use of initial SAE for patients considered at high risk of nonoperative failure. The primary outcome measure was the success of NOM. Failure of NOM was defined as the need for abdominal operation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, length of stay, and splenic salvage. RESULTS: Over 16 years, 815 patients with blunt splenic injury were treated at our level 1 trauma center. There were 222 patients in group I, 195 in group II, and 398 in group III. There was an increase in the use of SAE over time with a significant improvement in the utilization of NOM (61% in group I; 82% in group II; 88% in group III; p < 0.05). This was associated with an increase in successful NOM (77%, group I; 94%, group II; 97%, group III; p < 0.0001 group I vs. group II and III). Mortality, length of stay, and splenic salvage were similar in groups II and III but significantly improved when compared with group I. CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of initial SAE in high-risk patients expanded the successful use of NOM but was not associated with other incremental improvements.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques.

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality in the United States. The evaluation and treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding are complex and often require a multispecialty approach involving gastroenterologists, surgeons, internists, emergency physicians, and radiologists. The multitude of pathologic processes that can result in gastrointestinal bleeding, the length of the gastrointestinal tract, and the often intermittent nature of gastrointestinal bleeding further complicate patient evaluation. In addition, there are multiple imaging modalities and therapeutic interventions that are currently being used in the evaluation and treatment of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Initial experience indicates that multidetector computed tomographic angiography is a promising first-line modality for the time-efficient, sensitive, and accurate diagnosis or exclusion of active gastrointestinal hemorrhage and may have a profound impact on the evaluation and subsequent treatment of patients who present with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.