Update of the Standard Operating Procedure on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: We update the prior standard operating procedure for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate, and summarize the available data about the technique and clinical use for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. This update includes practical recommendations on the use of magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment and surveillance of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of clinicians from the American Urological Association and Society of Abdominal Radiology with expertise in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer evaluated the current published literature on the use and technique of magnetic resonance imaging for this disease. When adequate studies were available for analysis, recommendations were made on the basis of data and when adequate studies were not available, recommendations were made on the basis of expert consensus. RESULTS: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging should be performed according to technical specifications and standards, and interpreted according to standard reporting. Data support its use in men with a previous negative biopsy and ongoing concerns about increased risk of prostate cancer. Sufficient data now exist to support the recommendation of magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in all men who have no history of biopsy. Currently, the evidence is insufficient to recommend magnetic resonance imaging for screening, staging or surveillance of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the risk stratification, diagnosis and treatment pathway of men with prostate cancer is expanding. When quality prostate imaging is obtained, current evidence now supports its use in men at risk of harboring prostate cancer and who have not undergone a previous biopsy, as well as in men with an increasing prostate specific antigen following an initial negative standard prostate biopsy procedure.

AUA Policy Statement on the Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: We summarize the available data about the clinical and economic effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, and provide practical recommendations for its use in the screening, diagnosis, staging and surveillance of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of clinicians with expertise in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer evaluated the current published literature on the use and effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for this disease. When adequate studies were available for analysis, recommendations were made on the basis of data and when adequate studies were not available, recommendations were made on the basis of expert consensus. RESULTS: At this time the data support the use of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a previous negative biopsy and ongoing concerns about increased risk of prostate cancer. The data regarding its usefulness for initial biopsy suggest a possible role for magnetic resonance imaging in some circumstances. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend magnetic resonance imaging for screening, staging or surveillance of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Although it adds cost to the management of prostate cancer, magnetic resonance imaging offers superior anatomic detail, and the ability to evaluate cellular density based on water diffusion and blood flow based on contrast enhancement. Imaging targeted biopsy may increase the diagnosis of clinically significant cancers by identifying specific lesions not visible on conventional ultrasound. The clinical indications for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prostate cancer are rapidly evolving.

Pediatric interventional radiology clinic - how are we doing?

BACKGROUND: Development of a pediatric interventional radiology clinic is a necessary component of providing a pediatric interventional radiology service. Patient satisfaction is important when providing efficient, high-quality care. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the care provided by a pediatric interventional radiology clinic from the perspective of efficiency and parent satisfaction, so as to identify areas for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective study was both quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative component measured clinic efficiency (waiting times, duration of clinic visit, nurse/physician time allocation and assessments performed; n = 91). The qualitative component assessed parental satisfaction with their experience with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic, using a questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and optional free text section for feedback (n = 80). Questions explored the family's perception of relevance of information provided, consent process and overall satisfaction with their pediatric interventional radiology clinic experience. RESULTS: Families waited a mean of 11 and 10 min to meet the physician and nurse, respectively. Nurses and physicians spent a mean of 28 and 21 min with the families, respectively. The average duration of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic consultation was 56 min. Of 80 survey participants, 83% were satisfied with their experience and 94% said they believed providing consent before the day of the procedure was helpful. Only 5% of respondents were not satisfied with the time-efficiency of the interventional radiology clinic. CONCLUSION: Results show the majority of patients/parents are very satisfied with the pediatric interventional radiology clinic visit. The efficiency of the pediatric interventional radiology clinic is satisfactory; however, adherence to stricter scheduling can be improved.

ICD-10: are you ready?

With the signing of H.R. 4302 ( https://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4302 ), the implementation date for using ICD-0-CM codes for coding and billing medical encounters in the United States is now scheduled for October 1, 2015. This conversion from using ICD-9-CM codes will be a tremendous change in the way providers and practices deliver health care and could be financially devastating to those who are not properly prepared. Proper preparations will require educating virtually everyone involved in almost every aspect of patient care with a sufficient understanding of ICD-10 language, coding structure, and rules. Vital to this conversion is accurate documentation in the medical records by providers, knowledge of insurance coverage (local and national) rules, and acceptance of those codes by electronic health record systems, clearinghouses, and payors. Early preparation, appropriate education, and proper testing will minimize the financial impact.

Approaches to corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To outline current options for managing astigmatism during cataract surgery and update readers on new techniques for improving the final refractive outcome in these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies continue to show the effectiveness of peripheral corneal relaxing incisions (PCRIs) for correcting astigmatism in combination with monofocal, multifocal, and toric intraocular lens (IOL) implants. The options in toric IOLs are expanding. Intraoperative aberrometry is a new tool that can improve the accuracy of PCRIs and toric IOLs. SUMMARY: PCRIs and toric IOLs are currently the two main options for astigmatism management during cataract surgery. Refractive outcomes are improved by new techniques, which refine the effectiveness and accuracy of these two options.

Ocular adnexal MALTomas: case series of patients treated with primary radiation.

BACKGROUND: Ocular adnexal mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas (MALTomas) are rare, and there are no phase III trials to guide treatment. Primary radiation therapy has been the typical management. This retrospective series reports the experience of a single institution and adds to the current literature. METHODS: Our electronic medical record system and available paper charts were used to identify patients with MALTomas of the lacrimal gland or sac, conjunctiva, and orbital structures, including extraocular muscles. In order to determine pathology, staging, treatment information, local and distant control, salvage treatments, and late toxicity, records were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with ocular adnexal MALTomas had local radiation between 1992 and 2011 for primary or recurrent disease. Fifty percent of patients had lymphoma in the conjunctiva, 25% had lymphoma in the lacrimal sac/gland, and 25% of patients had lymphoma in the posterior orbit. Stage IAE disease occurred in 75% of patients, 6% had stage IIAE disease, and 19% of patients had a positive bone marrow biopsy. One patient received chemotherapy as part of initial therapy. The median radiation dose was 30 Gy (25.5-36 Gy) delivered with electrons (31%) or photons (69%). After a mean follow-up of 62.8 months, 2 patients had residual/progressive disease, 2 had contralateral recurrence, and 1 patient had a distant failure, for local control of 87.5% and overall disease control of 68.75%. Recurrence/progression occurred at a median of 35.45 months. Two patients with residual/progressive disease and 1 patient with a contralateral recurrence were followed, successfully salvaged, and have no evidence of disease. Fourteen patients are still alive, and there were no disease-related/toxicity deaths. Seven patients developed cataracts in the treated eye, 2 patients had radiation retinopathy, 2 had permanent dry eye syndrome, and 1 patient had severe keratopathy requiring enucleation. Six patients (3.75%) had worsening visual acuity of unclear etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Primary radiation therapy for ocular adnexal MALTomas with a median dose of 30 Gy led to excellent local control. Patients who did recur were successfully salvaged. Radiation was generally well tolerated, with expected cataractogenesis, given the dose required to achieve local control (with only 1 patient developing severe keratopathy after receiving the highest dose in this series).

Current State of Advanced Practice Providers in Urological Practice.

INTRODUCTION: This document provides an update to the 2015 consensus statement with new content on inpatient utilization, procedural data, and compensation. The full document is available on the American Urological Association (AUA) website (https://www.auanet.org/guidelines/guidelines/current-state-of-advanced-practice-providers-in-urologic-practice). This document was created by an ad-hoc group of urological providers formed by the AUA board of directors. METHODS: A workforce shortage of 65,000 physicians is projected by the year 2025. In 2018, there were 3.89 urologists per capita, which is amongst the most severe specialty shortages. Urology has the second oldest surgical subspecialty workforce with an average age of 52.5 years. According to the 2018 census, 72.5% of urologists used an advanced practice provider (APP) in their practice, and APPs accounted for 41% of a medical doctor/doctor of osteopathy full-time equivalent. The AUA endorses the use of APPs in the care of patients through a formally defined, supervised role with a board certified urologist under the auspices of applicable state law. This physician-led, team-based approach provides the highest quality urological care. RESULTS: Urologists work with APPs frequently, but many may not know the most efficient way to incorporate them into their practice. This document examines APP integration from a regulatory and practice management approach, as well as provides information on inpatient utilization, procedural data, and compensation. CONCLUSIONS: This document supports the AUA's policy statement that in a team-based approach with a board certified urologist in a supervisory role, APPs contribute to the care of the patient with genitourinary disease and, therefore, encourages the proper use of APPs.

A Multicenter Study Evaluating the Risk Factors and Outcomes of Repeat Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), currently the most common procedure for managing corneal endothelial dysfunction, may be repeated following DSEK failure from a variety of causes. This multicenter study reports the risk factors and outcomes of repeat DSEK. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved multicenter retrospective chart review of patients who underwent repeat DSEK. Twelve surgeons from 5 Midwest academic centers and 3 private practice groups participated. The Eversight Eye Bank provided clinical indication and donor graft data. We also assessed the role of the learning curve by comparing cohorts from the first and second 5-year periods. RESULTS: A total of 121 eyes from 121 patients who underwent repeat DSEK were identified. The average age of the patients was 70 ± 12 years. The most common indication for repeat DSEK was late endothelial graft failure without rejection (58%, N = 63). Average preoperative and 12-month postoperative repeat DSEK corrected distance visual acuities were 20/694 and 20/89, respectively. Visual acuity outcomes, endothelial cell density, and cell loss did not significantly vary between the 2 cohorts. Initial graft rebubble rates for the first and second cohorts were 51% and 25%. The presence of glaucoma, prior glaucoma surgery, or a history of penetrating (full thickness) keratoplasty did not significantly affect visual outcomes. The median, mean, and range of intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK were 15.0, 15.7, and 6 to 37 mm Hg, respectively. Patients with higher intraocular pressures before repeat DSEK had improved postoperative corrected distance visual acuities. CONCLUSIONS: Repeating DSEK improves vision following failed or decompensated DSEK surgery. Higher preoperative repeat DSEK IOPs were associated with improved visual outcomes, and initial graft rebubble rates, which decreased over time, were likely due to surgeon experience.

External refinement of the donor lenticule position during descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty.

The authors describe a technique to facilitate the centration of the donor lenticule during Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. The donor corneal lenticule is unfolded and grossly centered in the anterior chamber using a barbed 30-gauge needle on a 3-cc air syringe or a reverse Sinsky hook. Fine adjustments to center the lenticule can be achieved by applying external pressure to the cornea with a laser in-situ keratomileusis flap roller. This simple technique provides a mechanism for simultaneously removing interface fluid and allows the surgeon to center the donor corneal lenticule without further risk of direct mechanical trauma to the donor endothelium.

Insensitivity to transforming growth factor-beta results from promoter methylation of cognate receptors in human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP).

Prostate cancers often develop insensitivity to TGF-beta to gain a growth advantage. In this study, we explored the status of promoter methylation of TGF-beta receptors (TbetaRs) in a prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP, which is insensitive to TGF-beta. Sensitivity to TGF-beta was restored in cells treated with 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza), as indicated by an increase in the expression of phosphorylated Smad-2, type I (TbetaRI), and type II (TbetaRII) TGF-beta receptors, and a reduced rate of proliferation. The same treatment did not significantly affect a benign prostate cell line, RWPE-1, which is sensitive to TGF-beta. Mapping of methylation sites was performed by screening 82 potential CpG methylation sites in the promoter of TbetaRI and 33 sites in TbetaRII using methylation-specific PCR and sequence analysis. There were six methylation sites (-365, -356, -348, -251, -244, -231) in the promoter of TbetaRI. The -244 site was located in an activator protein (AP)-2 box. There were three methylated sites (-140, +27, +32) in the TbetaRII promoter and the -140 site was located in one of the Sp1 boxes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated DNA binding activity of AP-2 in the TbetaRI promoter and of Sp1 in the TbetaRII promoter after treatment with 5-Aza. To test whether promoter methylation is present in clinical specimens, we analyzed human prostate specimens that showed negative staining for either TbetaRI or TbetaRII in a tissue microarray system. DNA samples were isolated from the microarray after laser capture microdissection. Methylation-specific PCR was performed for TbetaRI (six sites) and TbetaRII (three sites) promoters as identified in LNCaP cells. A significant number of clinical prostate cancer specimens lacked expression of either TbetaRI and/or TbetaRII, especially those with high Gleason's scores. In those specimens showing a loss of TbetaR expression, a promoter methylation pattern similar to that of LNCaP cells was a frequent event. These results demonstrate that insensitivity to TGF-beta in some prostate cancer cells is due to promoter methylation in TbetaRs.

Novel everting urologic access sheath: potential advantages of decreased cellular advancement.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Axial forces are imposed on the urothelium during advancement of instruments across the urinary tract, potentially transferring cellular debris, bacteria, or urothelial carcinoma from one anatomic location to another. A prototype access sheath (Cystoglide; Percutaneous Systems, Mountain View, CA) was created that everts and radially dilates but does not provide axial forces during deployment that can be used in a variety of anatomic systems. We created a urinary-tract model to evaluate the in-vitro advancement of cells to compare this technology with using instruments alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blocks of sterile agar were created with 17F tracts of three lengths (2.7, 5.5, and 11 cm) with 5 mL of Luria-Bertani broth/ampicillin solution in a well at the end. The tips of a Cystoglide sheath and a traditional urologic instrument of the same diameter were dipped into a suspension of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli and advanced through the tracts. After a 10-second exposure, 4 mL of broth was collected and cultured. Bacterial growth was compared by measuring the optical density (OD) of the broth at multiple time points. RESULTS: The mean overall OD of the broth was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the novel-sheath cultures than with a traditional instrument for all advancements at all tract lengths. CONCLUSION: The Cystoglide sheath significantly reduces the advancement of cells within an artificial urinary tract compared with a non-everting instrument. Clinical studies are needed to assess the utility of this technology in vivo.