[Cochlear implants reduce tinnitus in older patients in the long term]. / Eine Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung reduziert langfristig die Tinnitusbelastung bei älteren Patienten.

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is one of the most common otologic comorbidities, particularly in older patients with severe hearing loss or deafness. Cochlear implants (CI) have been used for hearing rehabilitation more and more successfully in elderly patients and CI treatment is performed in Germany without an age limit. The aim of this follow-up study was to assess the tinnitus burden in the long-term follow-up of elderly patients with hearing rehabilitation using CI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective longitudinal study included 15 patients between 72 and 92 years of age with preoperative tinnitus who had been treated unilaterally with a CI for the first time about six years ago. Monosyllabic speech understanding and tinnitus burden were assessed using the Mini-Tinnitus Questionnaire. The results were compared with our previous study 24, focusing on the first six months. RESULTS: Six years postoperatively, there was a nonsignificant increase in monosyllabic understanding to 61.7 ± 26.3%, compared with the results six months postoperatively (p = 0.069). The burden of tinnitus showed a stable low mean of 3.9 ± 3.6 points six years postoperatively, compared with the six-month control (p = 0.689) and significantly reduced compared to the preoperative status with 6.9 ± 6.5 points (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Hearing rehabilitation by using CI leads to a stable improvement of monosyllabic discrimination in elderly people as well as to a stable reduction of tinnitus burden over years.

Impact of the teaching method of the rub-in technique for learning hygienic hand disinfection in medical studies: a comparative effectiveness analysis of two techniques.

Objective: Hygienic hand disinfection is of major importance regarding nosocomial infections and antibiotic resistance. The six-step technique is the most commonly taught method, but its superiority has not been empirically demonstrated. This study compares two hand disinfection techniques with regard to their total distribution of the disinfectant. Methods: In this comparative effectiveness analysis, medical students were randomized into two groups. Group 1 was instructed in the 6-step technique, group 2 was referred to a self-responsible application. Learning success was measured using fluorescent disinfectant and black light photographs at three time points (directly, few days later, 5-12 weeks later). Photographs were evaluated quantitatively. Results: 198 students were included in the study (Group 1: 6-step technique; n=103, Group 2: self-responsible disinfection; n=95). 186 were followed up at the second measurement, 182 at the third measurement. Directly after training, there were no significant differences between the two groups. At the second measurement, Group 2 outperformed Group 1 for total, dorsal, and palmar areas (p<0.001, p=0.002, p<0.001). At the third measurement, Group 2 was significantly better (p=0.019) for palmar-sided hands. In Group 1, areas of disinfected skin deteriorated significantly between measurement 1 and 2 (p=0.019) and measurement 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Group 2 did not deteriorate between measurement 1 and 2 (p=0.269) but between measurement 2 and 3 (p<0.001). Conclusions: Compared to the established six-step technique, a self-responsible application method results in measurably better distribution of the hand disinfectant.