Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 45
Filter
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 82(6): 681-689, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37389490

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe diagnosis rates and compare common process outcomes between geriatric emergency departments (EDs) and nongeriatric EDs participating in the American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Emergency Data Registry (CEDR). METHODS: We conducted an observational study of ED visits in calendar year 2021 within the CEDR by older adults. The analytic sample included 6,444,110 visits at 38 geriatric EDs and 152 matched nongeriatric EDs, with the geriatric ED status determined based on linkage to the American College of Emergency Physicians' Geriatric ED Accreditation program. Stratified by age, we assessed diagnosis rates (X/1000) for 4 common geriatric syndrome conditions and a set of common process outcomes including the ED length of stay, discharge rates, and 72-hour revisit rates. RESULTS: Across all age categories, geriatric EDs had higher diagnosis rates than nongeriatric EDs for 3 of the 4 following geriatric syndrome conditions of interest: urinary tract infection, dementia, and delirium/altered mental status. The median ED site-level length of stay for older adults was lower at geriatric EDs compared with that at nongeriatric EDs, whereas 72-hour revisit rates were similar across all age categories. Geriatric EDs exhibited a median discharge rate of 67.5% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 60.8% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 55.6% for adults aged >85 years. Comparatively, the median discharge rate at nongeriatric ED sites was 69.0% for adults aged 65 to 74 years, 64.2% for adults aged 75 to 84 years, and 61.3% for adults aged >85 years. CONCLUSION: Geriatric EDs had higher geriatric syndrome diagnosis rates, lower ED lengths of stay, and similar discharge and 72-hour revisit rates when compared with nongeriatric EDs in the CEDR. These findings provide the first benchmarks for emergency care process outcomes in geriatric EDs compared with nongeriatric EDs.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Aged , Patient Discharge
2.
Crit Care Med ; 46(2): 189-198, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29112081

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of responsiveness to initial fluid challenge among hypotensive sepsis patients is unclear. To avoid fluid overload, and unnecessary treatment, it is important to differentiate these phenotypes. We aimed to 1) determine the proportion of hypotensive sepsis patients sustaining favorable hemodynamic response after initial fluid challenge, 2) determine demographic and clinical risk factors that predicted refractory hypotension, and 3) assess the association between timeliness of fluid resuscitation and refractoriness. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive-sample cohort. SETTING: Nine tertiary and community hospitals over 1.5 years. PATIENTS: Inclusion criteria 1) suspected or confirmed infection, 2) greater than or equal to two systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, 3) systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, greater than 40% decrease from baseline, or mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sex, age, heart failure, renal failure, immunocompromise, source of infection, initial lactate, coagulopathy, temperature, altered mentation, altered gas exchange, and acute kidney injury were used to generate a risk score. The primary outcome was sustained normotension after fluid challenge without vasopressor titration. Among 3,686 patients, 2,350 (64%) were fluid responsive. Six candidate risk factors significantly predicted refractoriness in multivariable analysis: heart failure (odds ratio, 1.43; CI, 1.20-1.72), hypothermia (odds ratio, 1.37; 1.10-1.69), altered gas exchange (odds ratio, 1.33; 1.12-1.57), initial lactate greater than or equal to 4.0 mmol/L (odds ratio, 1.28; 1.08-1.52), immunocompromise (odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.47), and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.48). High-risk patients (≥ three risk factors) had 70% higher (CI, 48-96%) refractory risk (19% higher absolute risk; CI, 14-25%) versus low-risk (zero risk factors) patients. Initiating fluids in greater than 2 hours also predicted refractoriness (odds ratio, 1.96; CI, 1.49-2.58). Mortality was 15% higher (CI, 10-18%) for refractory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Two in three hypotensive sepsis patients were responsive to initial fluid resuscitation. Heart failure, hypothermia, immunocompromise, hyperlactemia, and coagulopathy were associated with the refractory phenotype. Fluid resuscitation initiated after the initial 2 hours more strongly predicted refractoriness than any patient factor tested.


Subject(s)
Crystalloid Solutions/therapeutic use , Hypotension/drug therapy , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypotension/etiology , Hypotension/genetics , Male , Phenotype , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sepsis/complications , Shock, Septic/complications , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 71(3): 314-325.e1, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28669553

ABSTRACT

We provide recommendations for stocking of antidotes used in emergency departments (EDs). An expert panel representing diverse perspectives (clinical pharmacology, medical toxicology, critical care medicine, hematology/oncology, hospital pharmacy, emergency medicine, emergency medical services, pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric critical care medicine, poison centers, hospital administration, and public health) was formed to create recommendations for antidote stocking. Using a standardized summary of the medical literature, the primary reviewer for each antidote proposed guidelines for antidote stocking to the full panel. The panel used a formal iterative process to reach their recommendation for both the quantity of antidote that should be stocked and the acceptable timeframe for its delivery. The panel recommended consideration of 45 antidotes; 44 were recommended for stocking, of which 23 should be immediately available. In most hospitals, this timeframe requires that the antidote be stocked in a location that allows immediate availability. Another 14 antidotes were recommended for availability within 1 hour of the decision to administer, allowing the antidote to be stocked in the hospital pharmacy if the hospital has a mechanism for prompt delivery of antidotes. The panel recommended that each hospital perform a formal antidote hazard vulnerability assessment to determine its specific need for antidote stocking. Antidote administration is an important part of emergency care. These expert recommendations provide a tool for hospitals that offer emergency care to provide appropriate care of poisoned patients.


Subject(s)
Antidotes/supply & distribution , Consensus , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Guidelines as Topic , Hospitals/standards , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/standards , Poisoning/drug therapy , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Crit Care Med ; 45(6): 956-965, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28328652

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: 1) Determine frequency and magnitude of delays in second antibiotic administration among patients admitted with sepsis; 2) Identify risk factors for these delays; and 3) Exploratory: determine association between delays and patient-centered outcomes (mortality and mechanical ventilation after second dose). DESIGN: Retrospective, consecutive sample sepsis cohort over 10 months. SETTING: Single, tertiary, academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis or septic shock (defined: infection, ≥ 2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, hypoperfusion/organ dysfunction) identified by a prospective quality initiative. EXCLUSIONS: less than 18 years old, not receiving initial antibiotics in the emergency department, death before antibiotic redosing, and patient refusing antibiotics. INTERVENTIONS: We determined first-to-second antibiotic time and delay frequency. We considered delay major for first-to-second dose time greater than or equal to 25% of the recommended interval. Factors of interest were demographics, recommended interval length, comorbidities, clinical presentation, location at second dose, initial resuscitative care, and antimicrobial activity mechanism. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 828 sepsis cases, 272 (33%) had delay greater than or equal to 25%. Delay frequency increased dose dependently with shorter recommended interval: 11 (4%) delays for 24-hour intervals (median time, 18.52 hr); 31 (26%) for 12-hour intervals (median, 10.58 hr); 117 (47%) for 8-hour intervals (median, 9.60 hr); and 113 (72%) for 6-hour intervals (median, 9.55 hr). In multivariable regression, interval length significantly predicted major delay (12 hr: odds ratio, 6.98; CI, 2.33-20.89; 8 hr: odds ratio, 23.70; CI, 8.13-69.11; 6 hr: odds ratio, 71.95; CI, 25.13-206.0). Additional independent risk factors were inpatient boarding in the emergency department (odds ratio, 2.67; CI, 1.74-4.09), initial 3-hour sepsis bundle compliance (odds ratio, 1.57; CI, 1.07-2.30), and older age (odds ratio, 1.16 per 10 yr, CI, 1.01-1.34). In the exploratory multivariable analysis, major delay was associated with increased hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.61; CI, 1.01-2.57) and mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 2.44; CI, 1.27-4.69). CONCLUSIONS: Major second dose delays were common, especially for patients given shorter half-life pharmacotherapies and who boarded in the emergency department. They were paradoxically more frequent for patients receiving compliant initial care. We observed association between major second dose delay and increased mortality, length of stay, and mechanical ventilation requirement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/drug therapy , Sepsis/mortality , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data
6.
J Emerg Med ; 46(4): 551-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24411657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding correlates with patient safety. Difficulties quantifying crowding and providing solutions were highlighted in the recent Institute of Medicine (IOM) report calling for the application of advanced industrial engineering (IE) research techniques to evaluate ED crowding. ED personnel workload is a related concept, with potential reciprocal effects between the two. Collaboration between emergency medicine and IE is needed to address crowding and ED personnel workload. OBJECTIVE: We review ED crowding and workload literature, relationships between workload and ED crowding, and the potential application of information theory as implemented in IE frameworks entitled "entropy" in evaluating both topics. DISCUSSION: IE techniques have applications for emergency medicine and have been successful in helping improve ED operations. Lean and Six Sigma applications are some of these techniques. Existing ED workload measures don't account for all aspects of work in the ED (acuity, efficiency, tasks, etc.) Crowding scales, such as NEDOCS (National ED Overcrowding Study) and EDWIN (ED Work Index), fail to predict ED crowding. A new measurement "entropy" may provide a more comprehensive evaluation of ED workload and may predict work overload seen with crowding. Entropy measures task-based work and the information flow involved. By assigning an entropy value to patient type-specific tasks, we might predict when the ED is overwhelmed, and crowded. CONCLUSIONS: IE techniques provide solutions to the ED crowding problem and improve ED workload. We propose a technique novel to medicine: "Entropy," derived from information theory, which may provide insight into ED personnel workload, its potential for measuring ED crowding, and possibly, in predicting an overwhelming situation.


Subject(s)
Crowding , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Health Personnel , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Patient Acuity , Self Report , Time Factors , Time and Motion Studies
9.
J Emerg Med ; 44(5): e341-4, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23473815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many cases of acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (AHI) present to the Emergency Department (ED). Early diagnosis allows a patient to modify their behavior and seek early treatment. The Emergency Physician should know that the antibody response may be absent. OBJECTIVE: We report a case of AHI and review its presentation to increase the awareness of this important diagnosis. CASE REPORT: A 20-year-old black man who had a history of sex with men initially presented to the ED with a chief complaint of blood per rectum when he passed stool, and chills for the prior few days. His work-up was normal, including a rapid HIV screen, and he was discharged. He returned 2 weeks later with constipation, fatigue, myalgias, decreased urination, chills, and a productive cough. His physical examination was unremarkable, HIV antibody test was negative, but his laboratory tests showed an elevation of creatine phosphokinase, amylase, and lipase. His blood count showed a normal hematocrit and white blood cell count, but there were juvenile and vacuolated white cells and giant platelets reported. HIV viral load was reported as > 1,000,000 copies/mL. CONCLUSIONS/SUMMARY: This case illustrates that AHI can present as a non-specific illness. Patients at risk should be screened for HIV. However, AHI can occur before there is a significant antibody response. In such cases, a viral load test may help make the diagnosis, allowing for early treatment and patient counseling.


Subject(s)
Amylases/analysis , Fever/virology , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Lipase/analysis , Acute Disease , Blood Platelets/pathology , Creatine Kinase/analysis , Early Diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Fatigue/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Male , Neutrophils/pathology , Rectal Diseases/etiology , Vacuoles , Viral Load , Young Adult
10.
J Emerg Med ; 45(2): 206-9, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23522957

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flunexin is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug approved for veterinary use in horses and cattle. Acepromazine is a phenothiazine derivative used in horses, dogs, and cats. Human exposure to these substances is rare. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a human injection of two equine medications, flunixin and acepromazine, which resulted in altered mental status, respiratory alkalosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and elevation of liver transaminases in a 43-year-old woman who worked as a horse trainer. The patient intentionally self-injected these medications and subsequently presented to the Emergency Department with altered mental status and lethargy. The patient required hospitalization for metabolic abnormalities, including respiratory alkalosis, and suffered a gastrointestinal bleed requiring blood transfusion. The patient ultimately recovered with supportive measures. We believe this to be the first case of concomitant injection of flunixin and acepromazine in a human. CONCLUSIONS: This report explains a case of parenteral administration of two equine medications and the subsequent complications in a patient that presented to the Emergency Department. Human exposure to veterinary medications cannot be predicted by their effect in animals due to variations in absorption, distribution, and metabolism. Physicians should be aware that individuals who work with animals may have access to large quantities of veterinary medicine. This case also exemplifies the challenges that Emergency Physicians face on a daily basis, and generates additional consideration for overdoses and intoxications from medications that are not considered commonplace in humans.


Subject(s)
Acepromazine/poisoning , Alkalosis, Respiratory/chemically induced , Clonixin/analogs & derivatives , Dopamine Antagonists/poisoning , Metabolic Diseases/chemically induced , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Prostaglandin Antagonists/poisoning , Acute Disease , Adult , Clonixin/poisoning , Female , Humans
12.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 15(1): 4-11, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20977363

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the proportion of older adult emergency department (ED) patients with depression or cognitive impairment. To compare the prevalences of depression or cognitive impairment among ED patients arriving via emergency medical services (EMS) and those arriving via other modes. METHODS: Community-dwelling older adults (age ≥60 years) presenting to an academic medical center ED were interviewed. Participants provided demographic and clinical information, and were evaluated for depression and cognitive impairment. Subjects arriving via EMS were compared with those arriving via other modes using the chi-square test, t-test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test, where appropriate. RESULTS: Consent was obtained from 1,342 eligible older adults; 695 (52%) arrived via EMS. The median age for those arriving via EMS was 74 years (interquartile range 65, 82), 52% were female, and 81% were white. Fifteen percent of EMS patients had moderate or greater depression, as compared with 14% of patients arriving via other modes (p = 0.52). Thirteen percent of the EMS patients had cognitive impairment, as compared with 8% of those arriving via other modes (p < 0.01). The depressed EMS patients frequently reported a history of depression (47%) and taking antidepressants (51%). The cognitively impaired EMS patients infrequently reported a history of dementia (16%) and taking medications for dementia (14%). Conclusions. In this cohort of community-dwelling older adult ED patients, depression and cognitive impairment were common. As compared with ED patients arriving by other transport means, patients arriving via EMS had a similar prevalence of depression but an increased prevalence of cognitive impairment. Screening for depression and cognitive impairment by EMS providers may have value, but needs further investigation.


Subject(s)
Dementia/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Confidence Intervals , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Female , Geriatrics/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Interview, Psychological , Male , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics , Risk Factors , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(1): e12356, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33491003

ABSTRACT

In the spring of 2020, emergency physicians found themselves in new, uncharted territory as there were few data available for understanding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. In response, knowledge was being crowd sourced and shared across online platforms. The "wisdom of crowds" is an important vehicle for sharing information and expertise. In this article, we explore concepts related to the social psychology of group decisionmaking and knowledge translation. We then analyze a scenario in which the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), a professional medical society, used the wisdom of crowds (via the EngagED platform) to disseminate clinically relevant information and create a useful resource called the "ACEP COVID-19 Field Guide." We also evaluate the crowd-sourced approach, content, and attributes of EngagED compared to other social media platforms. We conclude that professional organizations can play a more prominent role using the wisdom of crowds for augmenting pandemic response efforts.

14.
J Emerg Med ; 39(2): 210-5, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20634023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The specialty of emergency medicine (EM) continues to experience a significant workforce shortage in the face of increasing demand for emergency care. SUMMARY: In July 2009, representatives of the leading EM organizations met in Dallas for the Future of Emergency Medicine Summit. Attendees at the Future of Emergency Medicine Summit agreed on the following: 1) Emergency medical care is an essential community service that should be available to all; 2) An insufficient emergency physician workforce also represents a potential threat to patient safety; 3) Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education/American Osteopathic Association (AOA)-accredited EM residency training and American Board of Medical Specialties/AOA EM board certification is the recognized standard for physician providers currently entering a career in emergency care; 4) Physician supply shortages in all fields contribute to-and will continue to contribute to-a situation in which providers with other levels of training may be a necessary part of the workforce for the foreseeable future; 5) A maldistribution of EM residency-trained physicians persists, with few pursuing practice in small hospital or rural settings; 6) Assuring that the public receives high quality emergency care while continuing to produce highly skilled EM specialists through EM training programs is the challenge for EM's future; 7) It is important that all providers of emergency care receive continuing postgraduate education.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Emergency Medicine/standards , Forecasting , Humans , Internship and Residency/standards , Nurse Practitioners/education , Physician Assistants/education , Workforce
15.
Emerg Med J ; 27(6): 465-9, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20562144

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction is related to the perception of care. Some patients prefer, and are more satisfied with, providers of the same gender, race or religious faith. This study examined emergency medical provider attitudes towards, as well as patient and provider characteristics that are associated with, accommodating such requests. METHODS: A survey administered to a convenience sample of participants at the 2007 American College of Emergency Physicians Scientific Assembly. The nine-question survey ascertained Likert-type responses to the likelihood of accommodating patient requests for specific provider types. Statistical analyses used Wilcoxon rank-sum, Wilcoxon signed-rank and Cochran's Q tests. RESULTS: The 176 respondents were predominantly white (83%) and male (74%), with a mean age of 42 y. Nearly a third of providers felt that patients perceive better care from providers of shared demographics with racial matching perceived as more important than gender or religion (p=0.02). Female providers supported patient requests for same gender providers more so than males (p<0.01). Provider race, practice location, type and duration did not significantly affect the level of accommodation. When requesting like providers, female patients had higher accommodation scores than male patients (p<0.001), non-whites than whites (p<0.05), with Muslim patients (male or female) most likely to be accommodated (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Accommodating patient requests for providers of specific demographics within the emergency department may be related to provider characteristics. When patients ask for same gender providers, female providers are more likely to accommodate such a request than male providers. Female, non-white and Muslim patients may be more likely to have their requests honoured for matched providers.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Choice Behavior , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Patient Participation/psychology , Racism , Religion , Sexism , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
16.
J Emerg Nurs ; 36(4): 330-5, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20624567

ABSTRACT

Physician shortages are being projected for most medical specialties. The specialty of emergency medicine continues to experience a significant workforce shortage in the face of increasing demand for emergency care. The limited supply of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, and other resources is creating an urgent, untenable patient care problem. In July 2009, representatives of the leading emergency medicine organizations met in Dallas, TX, for the Future of Emergency Medicine Summit. This consensus document, agreed to and cowritten by all participating organizations, describes the substantive issues discussed and provides a foundation for the future of the specialty.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Emergency Nursing , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Health Services Needs and Demand/trends , Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Medicine/trends , Emergency Nursing/education , Emergency Nursing/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Forecasting , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/supply & distribution , Nurses/supply & distribution , Physician Assistants/supply & distribution , Physicians/supply & distribution , Quality of Health Care/standards , United States , Workforce
17.
Ann Emerg Med ; 63(5): 651, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24746435
19.
Am J Emerg Med ; 27(6): 691-700, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19751626

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study was undertaken to describe the current status of the emergency medicine workforce in the United States. METHODS: Surveys were distributed in 2008 to 2619 emergency department (ED) medical directors and nurse managers in hospitals in the 2006 American Hospital Association database. RESULTS: Among ED medical directors, 713 responded, for a 27.2% response rate. Currently, 65% of practicing emergency physicians are board certified by the American Board of Emergency Medicine or the American Osteopathic Board of Emergency Medicine. Among those leaving the practice, the most common reasons cited for departure include geographic relocation (46%) and better pay (29%). Approximately 12% of the ED physician workforce is expected to retire in the next 5 years. Among nurse managers, 548 responded, for a 21% response rate. Many nurses (46%) have an associate degree as their highest level of education, 28% have a BSN, and 3% have a graduate degree (MSN or higher). Geographic relocation (44%) is the leading reason for changing employment. Emergency department annual volumes have increased by 49% since 1997, with a mean ED volume of 32 281 in 2007. The average reported ED length of stay is 158 minutes from registration to discharge and 208 minutes from registration to admission. Emergency department spent an average of 49 hours per month in ambulance diversion in 2007. Boarding is common practice, with an average of 318 hours of patient boarding per month. CONCLUSIONS: In the past 10 years, the number of practicing emergency physicians has grown to more than 42 000. The number of board-certified emergency physicians has increased. The number of annual ED visits has risen significantly.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Certification/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medicine/education , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , United States , Workforce
20.
J Hosp Med ; 14(6): 340-348, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30986182

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Differences between hospital-presenting sepsis (HPS) and emergency department-presenting sepsis (EDPS) are not well described. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to (1) quantify the prevalence of HPS versus EDPS cases and outcomes; (2) compare HPS versus EDPS characteristics at presentation; (3) compare HPS versus EDPS in process and patient outcomes; and (4) estimate risk differences in patient outcomes attributable to initial resuscitation disparities. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort. SETTING: Nine hospitals from October 1, 2014, to March 31, 2016. PATIENTS: All hospitalized patients with sepsis or septic shock, as defined by simultaneous (1) infection, (2) ≥2 Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, and (3) ≥1 acute organ dysfunction criterion. EDPS met inclusion criteria while physically in the emergency department (ED). HPS met the criteria after leaving the ED. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed overall HPS versus EDPS contributions to case prevalence and outcomes, and then compared group differences. Process outcomes included 3-hour bundle compliance and discrete bundle elements (eg, time to antibiotics). The primary patient outcome was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 11,182 sepsis hospitalizations, 2,509 (22.4%) were hospital-presenting. HPS contributed 785 (35%) sepsis mortalities. HPS had more frequent heart failure (OR: 1.31, CI: 1.18-1.47), renal failure (OR: 1.62, CI: 1.38-1.91), gastrointestinal source of infection (OR: 1.84, CI: 1.48-2.29), euthermia (OR: 1.45, CI: 1.10-1.92), hypotension (OR: 1.85, CI: 1.65-2.08), or impaired gas exchange (OR: 2.46, CI: 1.43-4.24). HPS were admitted less often from skilled nursing facilities (OR: 0.44, CI: 0.32-0.60), had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR: 0.53, CI: 0.36-0.78), tachypnea (OR: 0.76, CI: 0.58-0.98), or acute kidney injury (OR: 0.82, CI: 0.68-0.97). In a propensity-matched cohort (n = 3,844), HPS patients had less than half the odds of 3-hour bundle compliant care (17.0% vs 30.3%, OR: 0.47, CI: 0.40-0.57) or antibiotics within three hours (66.2% vs 83.8%, OR: 0.38, CI: 0.32-0.44) vs EDPS. HPS was associated with higher mortality (31.2% vs 19.3%, OR: 1.90, CI: 1.64-2.20); 23.3% of this association was attributable to differences in initial resuscitation (resuscitation-adjusted OR: 1.69, CI: 1.43-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: HPS differed from EDPS by admission source, comorbidities, and clinical presentation. These patients received markedly less timely initial resuscitation; this disparity explained a moderate proportion of mortality differences.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Resuscitation , Sepsis , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Multiple Organ Failure , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL