ABSTRACT
Coronary artery compression/damage by cardiac pacing/defibrillation leads is very rare and often an unknown complication of pacemaker implantation. Here, we present the case of a 71-year-old woman with late discovery of an asymptomatic compression of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery by a defibrillation lead implanted ten years before. This dissuaded us in removing this now malfunctioning lead with high threshold, and an additional right ventricular (RV) lead was implanted along with atrial and left ventricular (LV) leads for allowing resynchronization therapy. Based on the published data, a majority of RV leads are currently implanted in the "anteroseptal area," which is neighboring the course of the LAD.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: To phenotype patients referred to a tertiary centre for the exploration of a left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) starting from 12 mm of left ventricular wall thickness (LVWT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients referred for aetiological workup of LVH, beginning at 12 mm of LVWT were retrospectively included in this tertiary single-centred observational study. Patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis were excluded. Aetiological workup was reviewed for each subject and aetiologies were adjudicated by expert consensus.Among 591 patients referred for LVH aetiological workup, 41% had a maximal LVWT below 15 mm. LVH aetiologies were led by cardiac amyloidosis (CA, 34.3%), followed by sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (S-HCM, 32.1%), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (21.7%), unknown aetiology (7.6%) and other (4.2%), including Anderson-Fabry's disease (1.7%). CA and S-HCM affected over 50% of patients with mild LVH (12-14 mm); the prevalence of these aetiologies rose with LVH severity. Among patients with Anderson-Fabry's disease, 4 (40%) had a maximal LVWT <15 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Mild LVH (ie, 12-14 mm) conceals multiple aetiologies that can lead to specific treatment, cascade family screening and specific follow-up. Overall, CA is nowadays the leading cause of LVH in tertiary centers.
Subject(s)
Echocardiography/methods , Heart Ventricles/diagnostic imaging , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/etiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods , Tertiary Care Centers , Ventricular Function, Left/physiology , Aged , Female , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Humans , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/diagnosis , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Periostin (PN) epithelial and stromal overexpression in tumor pathology has been studied according to tumor growth, angiogenesis, invasiveness, and metastasis, but a limited number of studies address PN in thyroid tumors. AIM: Our study aimed to analyze PN expression in different histological variants of PTC and to correlate its expression with the clinicopathological prognostic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PN expression has been immunohistochemically assessed in 50 cases of PTC (conventional, follicular, oncocytic, macrofollicular, and tall cell variants), in tumor epithelial cells and intratumoral stroma. The association between PN expression and clinicopathological characteristics has been evaluated. RESULTS: Our results show that PTC presented different patterns of PN immunoreaction, stromal PN being significantly associated with advanced tumor stage and extrathyroidal extension. No correlations were found between PN overexpression in tumor epithelial cells and clinicopathological features, except for specific histological variants, the highest risk of poor outcome being registered for the conventional subtype in comparison to the oncocytic type. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates differences in PN expression in histological subtypes of PTC. Our results plead in favor of a dominant protumorigenic role of stromal PN, while the action of epithelial PN is less noticeable.