ABSTRACT
Group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) regulate immunity and inflammation, yet their role in cancer remains elusive. Here, we identify that colorectal cancer (CRC) manifests with altered ILC3s that are characterized by reduced frequencies, increased plasticity, and an imbalance with T cells. We evaluated the consequences of these changes in mice and determined that a dialog between ILC3s and T cells via major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) is necessary to support colonization with microbiota that subsequently induce type-1 immunity in the intestine and tumor microenvironment. As a result, mice lacking ILC3-specific MHCII develop invasive CRC and resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Finally, humans with dysregulated intestinal ILC3s harbor microbiota that fail to induce type-1 immunity and immunotherapy responsiveness when transferred to mice. Collectively, these data define a protective role for ILC3s in cancer and indicate that their inherent disruption in CRC drives dysfunctional adaptive immunity, tumor progression, and immunotherapy resistance.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/immunology , Colonic Neoplasms/therapy , Disease Progression , Immunity, Innate , Immunotherapy , Lymphocytes/immunology , Animals , Cell Communication/drug effects , Cell Plasticity/drug effects , Colonic Neoplasms/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/metabolism , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/pathology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/microbiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/pathology , Intestines/pathology , Lymphocytes/drug effects , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Microbiota/drug effects , Neoplasm Invasiveness , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Tissue DonorsABSTRACT
New York City has been at the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that has already infected over a million people and resulted in more than 70,000 deaths as of early May 2020 in the United States alone. This rapid and enormous influx of patients into the health care system has had profound effects on all aspects of health care, including the care of patients with cancer. In this report, the authors highlight the transformation they underwent within the Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology as they prepared for the COVID-19 crisis in New York City. Under stressful and uncertain conditions, some of the many changes they enacted within their division included developing a regular line of communication among division leaders to ensure the development and implementation of a restructuring strategy, completely reconfiguring the inpatient and outpatient units, rapidly developing the ability to perform telemedicine video visits, and creating new COVID-rule-out and COVID-positive clinics for their patients. These changes allowed them to manage the storm while minimizing the disruption of important continuity of care to their patients with cancer. The authors hope that their experiences will be helpful to other oncology practices about to experience their own individual COVID-19 crises.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Oncology Service, Hospital/organization & administration , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , Communication , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematology/methods , Humans , Medical Oncology/methods , New York City/epidemiology , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Isolation , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/organization & administrationABSTRACT
Fructose consumption is linked to the rising incidence of obesity and cancer, which are two of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally1,2. Dietary fructose metabolism begins at the epithelium of the small intestine, where fructose is transported by glucose transporter type 5 (GLUT5; encoded by SLC2A5) and phosphorylated by ketohexokinase to form fructose 1-phosphate, which accumulates to high levels in the cell3,4. Although this pathway has been implicated in obesity and tumour promotion, the exact mechanism that drives these pathologies in the intestine remains unclear. Here we show that dietary fructose improves the survival of intestinal cells and increases intestinal villus length in several mouse models. The increase in villus length expands the surface area of the gut and increases nutrient absorption and adiposity in mice that are fed a high-fat diet. In hypoxic intestinal cells, fructose 1-phosphate inhibits the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase to promote cell survival5-7. Genetic ablation of ketohexokinase or stimulation of pyruvate kinase prevents villus elongation and abolishes the nutrient absorption and tumour growth that are induced by feeding mice with high-fructose corn syrup. The ability of fructose to promote cell survival through an allosteric metabolite thus provides additional insights into the excess adiposity generated by a Western diet, and a compelling explanation for the promotion of tumour growth by high-fructose corn syrup.
Subject(s)
Fructose/pharmacology , High Fructose Corn Syrup/pharmacology , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/cytology , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Nutrients/metabolism , Animals , Cell Survival/drug effects , Enzyme Activation , Female , Fructokinases/metabolism , Fructose/metabolism , High Fructose Corn Syrup/metabolism , Hypoxia/diet therapy , Hypoxia/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Male , Mice , Pyruvate Kinase/metabolismABSTRACT
Interleukin (IL)-2 is a pleiotropic cytokine that is necessary to prevent chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract1-4. The protective effects of IL-2 involve the generation, maintenance and function of regulatory T (Treg) cells4-8, and the use of low doses of IL-2 has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease9. However, the cellular and molecular pathways that control the production of IL-2 in the context of intestinal health are undefined. Here we show, in a mouse model, that IL-2 is acutely required to maintain Treg cells and immunological homeostasis throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Notably, lineage-specific deletion of IL-2 in T cells did not reduce Treg cells in the small intestine. Unbiased analyses revealed that, in the small intestine, group-3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) are the dominant cellular source of IL-2, which is induced selectively by IL-1ß. Macrophages in the small intestine produce IL-1ß, and activation of this pathway involves MYD88- and NOD2-dependent sensing of the microbiota. Our loss-of-function studies show that ILC3-derived IL-2 is essential for maintaining Treg cells, immunological homeostasis and oral tolerance to dietary antigens in the small intestine. Furthermore, production of IL-2 by ILC3s was significantly reduced in the small intestine of patients with Crohn's disease, and this correlated with lower frequencies of Treg cells. Our results reveal a previously unappreciated pathway in which a microbiota- and IL-1ß-dependent axis promotes the production of IL-2 by ILC3s to orchestrate immune regulation in the intestine.
Subject(s)
Immunity, Innate/immunology , Interleukin-2/immunology , Intestines/cytology , Intestines/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Animals , Antigens/administration & dosage , Antigens/immunology , Crohn Disease/immunology , Crohn Disease/metabolism , Crohn Disease/pathology , Female , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Homeostasis/immunology , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/pathology , Interleukin-1beta/immunology , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , Interleukin-2/deficiency , Interleukin-2/metabolism , Intestine, Small/cytology , Intestine, Small/immunology , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Mice , Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88/deficiency , Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88/genetics , Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88/metabolism , Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein/deficiency , Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein/genetics , Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/classification , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Zolbetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting claudin-18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2), has shown efficacy in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. We report the results of the SPOTLIGHT trial, which investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (modified folinic acid [or levofolinate], fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin regimen) versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: SPOTLIGHT is a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients from 215 centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with CLDN18.2-positive (defined as ≥75% of tumour cells showing moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining), HER2-negative (based on local or central evaluation), previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, with radiologically evaluable disease (measurable or non-measurable) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via interactive response technology and stratified according to region, number of organs with metastases, and previous gastrectomy. Patients received zolbetuximab (800 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) plus mFOLFOX6 (every 2 weeks) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent review committee in all randomly assigned patients. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03504397, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between June 21, 2018, and April 1, 2022, 565 patients were randomly assigned to receive either zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 (283 patients; the zolbetuximab group) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (282 patients; the placebo group). At least one dose of treatment was administered to 279 (99%) of 283 patients in the zolbetuximab group and 278 (99%) of 282 patients in the placebo group. In the zolbetuximab group, 176 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. In the placebo group, 175 (62%) patients were male and 107 (38%) were female. The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·94 months in the zolbetuximab group versus 12·65 months in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment showed a significant reduction in the risk of disease progression or death compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0066). The median progression-free survival was 10·61 months (95% CI 8·90-12·48) in the zolbetuximab group versus 8·67 months (8·21-10·28) in the placebo group. Zolbetuximab treatment also showed a significant reduction in the risk of death versus placebo (HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·0053). Treatment-emergent grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 242 (87%) of 279 patients in the zolbetuximab group versus 216 (78%) of 278 patients in the placebo group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (2%) patients in the zolbetuximab group versus four (1%) patients in the placebo group. No new safety signals were identified. INTERPRETATION: Targeting CLDN18.2 with zolbetuximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with mFOLFOX6 versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 might represent a new first-line treatment in these patients. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma, Inc.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Claudins/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the KEYNOTE-590 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided statistically significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared with chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Change from baseline to week 18 in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) and QLQ-Esophageal cancer module (OES18) dysphagia, pain, and reflux scales were evaluated. RESULTS: The HRQoL analysis included 730 patients who received treatment and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 18 was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 reflux scales. The QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (LSM difference, -5.54; 95% CI, -10.93 to -0.16) and pain (LSM difference, -2.94; 95% CI, -5.86 to -0.02) scales favored pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy over placebo plus chemotherapy. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 dysphagia and reflux scales. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged median TTD, as seen on the QLQ-OES18 pain scale (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: The use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained HRQoL at week 18 relative to baseline and was comparable with placebo plus chemotherapy. These HRQoL results together with published reports of efficacy, support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV ID: NCT03189719.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/psychology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist for global prevalence of claudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) positivity and association of CLDN18.2 status with clinical and tumor characteristics in patients with locally advanced (LA) unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (mG/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. We report prevalence of CLDN18.2 positivity (phase 3; SPOTLIGHT, NCT03504397; GLOW, NCT03653507) and concordance of CLDN18.2 status between a subset of pair-matched tumor samples (phase 2, ILUSTRO, NCT03505320; phase 1, NCT03528629) from clinical studies of zolbetuximab. METHODS: Tumor samples from patients with LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma were tested for CLDN18.2 status by immunohistochemistry. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression was tested per central or local assessment. RESULTS: Across SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, the prevalence of CLDN18.2 positivity (≥ 75% of tumor cells demonstrating moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining) was 38.4%. Prevalence was similar in gastric versus GEJ adenocarcinoma samples and regardless of collection method (biopsy versus resection) or collection site (primary versus metastatic). CLDN18.2 positivity was most prevalent in patients with diffuse-type tumors. In ILUSTRO and the phase 1 study, concordance of CLDN18.2 positivity was 61.1% between archival (i.e., any time before treatment) and baseline (i.e., ≤ 3 months before first treatment) samples, and concordance of any CLDN18 staining (≥ 1% of tumor cells demonstrating moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining) was 88.9%. CONCLUSIONS: CLDN18.2 was a highly prevalent biomarker in patients with HER2-negative, LA unresectable or mG/GEJ adenocarcinoma. CLDN18.2 positivity remained relatively stable over time in many patients. Biomarker testing for CLDN18.2 should be considered in standard clinical practice in these patients.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Claudins , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Claudins/metabolism , Male , Female , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Middle Aged , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Protein Isoforms , Prevalence , AdultABSTRACT
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of two articles. The first article is about a clinical trial called SPOTLIGHT and it was published in the medical journal The Lancet in in April of 2023. The second article is about a clinical trial called GLOW and it was published in the medical journal Nature Medicine in July of 2023. WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Until recently, chemotherapy was the first treatment given to people with stomach cancer or gastroesophageal junction (or GEJ) cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. When cancer cells have high amounts of the protein CLDN18.2 but do not have high amounts of the protein HER2, the cancer is known as CLDN18.2-positive (or CLDN18.2+) and HER2-negative (or HER2-). New medicines to treat cancer are being developed. These medicines attach to proteins on cancer cells to help the body recognize and kill cancer cells.The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW included participants with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that was locally advanced unresectable or metastatic. These trials looked at whether adding a medicine called zolbetuximab to chemotherapy as the first treatment for cancer helped people live longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial. These studies also looked at whether adding zolbetuximab to chemotherapy helped people live longer after starting the trial. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: In SPOTLIGHT and GLOW, on average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 1.4 to 1.9 months longer before their tumors grew bigger or new tumors grew, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. On average, participants assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy also lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer, after starting the trial, than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy. These results suggest that zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy could be a new first treatment for people with CLDN18.2+ and HER2- stomach or GEJ cancer that is locally advanced unresectable or metastatic.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03504397 (SPOTLIGHT); NCT03653507 (GLOW).
The clinical trials SPOTLIGHT and GLOW showed that, on average, participants with stomach or GEJ cancer assigned to zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy lived 2.2 to 2.7 months longer than participants assigned to a placebo plus chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Claudins/metabolism , Clinical Trials as Topic , Neoplasm MetastasisABSTRACT
Treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are improving. Current guidelines recommend first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic ESCC, which has led to improvements in survival outcomes. Antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can act synergistically to convert the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to an immune supportive microenvironment, thus enhancing antitumor immune responses. In preclinical models, the antiangiogenic agent lenvatinib combined with an anti-PD-1 agent showed synergistic antitumor activity. We describe the design and rationale for the randomized, open-label, phase III LEAP-014 study of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC. Overall survival and progression-free survival are the dual primary end points.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04949256 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
[Box: see text].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dual-targeted anti-HER2 therapy significantly improves outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer and could be beneficial in other HER2-positive cancers. JACOB's end-of study analyses aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to pertuzumab/placebo plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy every 3 weeks. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 388 patients in the pertuzumab arm and 392 in the placebo arm. The safety population comprised 385 and 388 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was ≥ 44.4 months. Median OS was increased by 3.9 months (hazard ratio 0.85 [95% confidence intervals, 0.72-0.99]) and median PFS by 1.3 months (hazard ratio 0.73 [95% confidence intervals, 0.62-0.85]) in the pertuzumab vs. the placebo arm. ORR was numerically higher (57.0% vs. 48.6%) and median DoR 1.8 months longer with pertuzumab treatment. There was a trend for more favorable hazard ratios in certain subgroups related to HER2 amplification/overexpression. Safety was comparable between arms, except for serious and grade 3-5 adverse events, and any-grade diarrhea, which were more frequent with pertuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: JACOB did not meet its primary endpoint. Nonetheless, the study continues to demonstrate some, albeit limited, evidence of treatment activity and an acceptable safety profile for pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer after long-term follow-up. Trial registration NCT01774786; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01774786 .
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Trastuzumab , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: First-line therapy for advanced oesophageal cancer is currently limited to fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in advanced oesophageal cancer and Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 study across 168 medical centres in 26 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer or Siewert type 1 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 status), measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (chemotherapy), once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region, histology, and performance status. Patients, investigators, and site staff were masked to group assignment and PD-L1 biomarker status. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03189719, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between July 25, 2017, and June 3, 2019, 1020 patients were screened and 749 were enrolled and randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=373 [50%]) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=376 [50%]). At the first interim analysis (median follow-up of 22·6 months), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (median 13·9 months vs 8·8 months; hazard ratio 0·57 [95% CI 0·43-0·75]; p<0·0001), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (12·6 months vs 9·8 months; 0·72 [0·60-0·88]; p=0·0006), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (13·5 months vs 9·4 months; 0·62 [0·49-0·78]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (12·4 months vs 9·8 months; 0·73 [0·62-0·86]; p<0·0001). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was superior to placebo plus chemotherapy for progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·54-0·78]; p<0·0001), PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more (7·5 months vs 5·5 months; 0·51 [0·41-0·65]; p<0·0001), and in all randomised patients (6·3 months vs 5·8 months; 0·65 [0·55-0·76]; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 266 (72%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 250 (68%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated, advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 CPS of 10 or more, and in all randomised patients regardless of histology, and had a manageable safety profile in the total as-treated population. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SurvivalSubject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Progression-Free Survival , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/epidemiology , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/epidemiology , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Aim: Investigate the relationship between response to pembrolizumab and expression of the 18-gene T cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP) or PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) in esophageal cancer. Materials & methods: This analysis included heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who received pembrolizumab in the single-arm, phase II study KEYNOTE-180. PD-L1 CPS was evaluated with PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. Results: In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, trends toward enrichment for responders were observed for patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 tumors. In patients with adenocarcinoma, a trend was observed for TcellinfGEP but not for PD-L1. Conclusion: TcellinfGEP and PD-L1 CPS may enrich for responders to pembrolizumab in patients with esophageal cancer. Clinical trial registration: NCT02559687 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Platinum and fluoropyrimidine combinations typically comprise first-line (1L) therapy in advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA), although controversy exists regarding the use of 5doublet versus triplet cytotoxic regimens. Historically, second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) therapy has been fragmented. Recent trials have increased the need for optimal treatment sequencing in advanced G/GEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed manuscripts of randomized clinical trials examining 1L, 2L, and 3L+ therapy for advanced G/GEA published from 2009 through November 19, 2019. When available, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, overall response rate, and toxicity were extracted from each and compared descriptively. RESULTS: In 1L therapy, chemotherapy triplets demonstrated variable efficacy improvements with invariable increased toxicity compared with platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublets. Currently, the only published report of positive outcomes using biologics in 1L describes adding trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing advanced G/GEA. In 2L, doublet chemotherapy regimens are not uniformly more efficacious than single-agent taxanes or irinotecan, and ramucirumab has demonstrated improved outcomes both as monotherapy and in combination. CONCLUSION: For advanced G/GEA, review of trial results from 2009-2019 support 1L therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine and sequencing with taxanes or irinotecan in combination with biologics as effective 2L options. Escalating to a triplet may add some efficacy at the expense of added toxicity. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The rapidly changing treatment landscape for advanced gastric cancer includes increasing options for refractory disease. With multiple first-line platinum-based regimens, identification of those with the best benefit-to-risk ratio may provide guidance on treatment sequencing strategies. This article presents findings from the published literature of randomized controlled trials that included a first-line platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination and, for second-line trials, patients with platinum/fluoropyrimidine-refractory disease. This guiding summary could be a tool for clinicians to identify the optimal first-line regimen(s) followed by a strategy for subsequent regimens.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophagogastric Junction , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
Despite curative-intent treatment, most patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer will experience disease recurrence or locoregional progression, highlighting the need for new therapies. Current guidelines recommend definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients ineligible for surgical resection, but survival outcomes are poor. Pembrolizumab is well tolerated and provides promising antitumor activity in patients with previously treated, advanced, unresectable esophageal/esophagogastric junction cancer. Combining pembrolizumab with chemoradiotherapy may further improve outcomes in the first-line setting. Here, we describe the design and rationale for the double-blind, Phase III, placebo-controlled, randomized KEYNOTE-975 trial investigating pembrolizumab in combination with definitive chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced, unresectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Overall survival and event-free survival are the dual primary end points. Clinical trial registration: NCT04210115 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy , Clinical Protocols , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Research Design , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) expression in the tumor microenvironment is implicated in multiple protumorigenic processes. Andecaliximab (GS-5745), a monoclonal antibody targeting MMP9 with high affinity and selectivity, was evaluated in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I study was completed in two parts: part A was a dose-finding, monotherapy phase that enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors, and part B examined andecaliximab in combination with chemotherapy in specific patient cohorts. In the cohort of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 36), andecaliximab 800 mg every 2 weeks was administered in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Patients were treated until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death. Efficacy, safety, and biomarker assessments were performed. RESULTS: Andecaliximab combined with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel appeared to be well tolerated and did not demonstrate any unusual toxicities in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (75.0%), alopecia (55.6%), peripheral edema (55.6%), and nausea (50.0%). Median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (90% confidence interval, 6.9-11.0) with an objective response rate of 44.4% and median duration of response of 7.6 months. Maximal andecaliximab target binding, defined as undetectable, andecaliximab-free MMP9 in plasma, was observed. CONCLUSION: Andecaliximab in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel demonstrates a favorable safety profile and clinical activity in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of andecaliximab, a novel, first-in-class inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 9, with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma provided a median progression-free survival of 7.8 months and objective response rate of 44.4%. The majority of systemic biomarkers related to matrix metalloproteinase 9 activity and immune suppression increased at 2 months, whereas biomarkers related to tumor burden decreased. Although this study demonstrates promising results with andecaliximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, andecaliximab was not associated with a survival benefit in a phase III study in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Albumins , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Microenvironment , GemcitabineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: VEGF and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2)-mediated signalling and angiogenesis can contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of gastric cancer. We aimed to assess whether the addition of ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 antagonist monoclonal antibody, to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: For this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 126 centres in 20 countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive web response system to receive cisplatin (80 mg/m2, on the first day) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily for 14 days), every 21 days, and either ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. 5-Fluorouracil (800 mg/m2 intravenous infusion on days 1-5) was permitted in patients unable to take capecitabine. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention to treat in the first 508 patients. We did a sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint, including a central review of CT scans. Overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02314117. FINDINGS: Between Jan 28, 2015, and Sept 16, 2016, 645 patients were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=326) or placebo plus fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin (n=319). Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ramucirumab group than the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·753, 95% CI 0·607-0·935, p=0·0106; median progression-free survival 5·7 months [5·5-6·5] vs 5·4 months [4·5-5·7]). A sensitivity analysis based on central independent review of the radiological images did not corroborate the investigator-assessed difference in progression-free survival (HR 0·961, 95% CI 0·768-1·203, p=0·74). There was no difference in overall survival between groups (0·962, 0·801-1·156, p=0·6757; median overall survival 11·2 months [9·9-11·9] in the ramucirumab group vs 10·7 months [9·5-11·9] in the placebo group). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (85 [26%] of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 85 [27%] of 315 in the placebo group), anaemia (39 [12%] vs 44 [14%]), and hypertension (32 [10%] vs 5 [2%]). The incidence of any-grade serious adverse events was 160 (50%) of 323 patients in the ramucirumab group and 149 (47%) of 315 patients in the placebo group. The most common serious adverse events were vomiting (14 [4%] in the ramucirumab group vs 21 [7%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (11 [3%] vs 19 [6%]). There were seven deaths in each group, either during study treatment or within 30 days of discontinuing study treatment, which were the result of treatment-related adverse events. In the ramucirumab group, these adverse events were acute kidney injury, cardiac arrest, gastric haemorrhage, peritonitis, pneumothorax, septic shock, and sudden death (n=1 of each). In the placebo group, these adverse events were cerebrovascular accident (n=1), multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (n=2), pulmonary embolism (n=2), sepsis (n=1), and small intestine perforation (n=1). INTERPRETATION: Although the primary analysis for progression-free survival was statistically significant, this outcome was not confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of progression-free survival by central independent review, and did not improve overall survival. Therefore, the addition of ramucirumab to cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is not recommended as first-line treatment for this patient population. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/classification , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/drug effects , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/genetics , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/genetics , RamucirumabABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses of the phase II/III GATSBY study (NCT01641939) assessed whether patient subgroups experienced a survival benefit from trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus taxane therapy, and to advance understanding of HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC) disease biology. METHODS: Adults with HER2-positive AGC whose disease progressed during/after first-line therapy were enrolled and randomized to receive T-DM1 [Stage 1: 3.6 mg/kg q3w, 2.4 mg/kg qw, or taxane (docetaxel/paclitaxel); Stage 2: 2.4 mg/kg qw or taxane]. Primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS). Prespecified exploratory biomarkers included HER2, HER3, PTEN, PIK3CA mutation status, FcγR, and cMET. Tumor samples from patients who received 2.4 mg/kg T-DM1 (n = 228) or taxane (n = 117) were included. RESULTS: Median OS was longer in subgroups with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ [9.5 versus 8.3 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.68-1.43)] versus HER2 IHC 2+/in situ hybridization-positive [5.2 versus 9.2 months for T-DM1 versus taxane; HR 1.53 (95% CI 0.94-2.50)] tumors. Trends towards increased median OS were also observed in subgroups with > versus ≤ median HER2 mRNA expression, higher versus lower HER2 gene copy number, HER2 gene ratio and H score, and homogenous or nonfocal HER2 IHC staining. T-DM1 was not associated with superior OS versus taxane in any subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previously treated HER2-positive AGC with higher HER2 expression experienced a better treatment effect from T-DM1 than those with lower HER2 expression and may derive comparable survival benefits from T-DM1 and taxane therapy. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01641939 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01641939 ).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Esophagogastric Junction/metabolism , Polymorphism, Genetic , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Esophagogastric Junction/drug effects , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine is the standard treatment in metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma; however, there is limited data on the efficacy of trastuzumab in combination with a three-drug regimen in this setting. We examined the efficacy and safety of modified docetaxel, cisplatin and 5 fluorouracil (mDCF) plus trastuzumab in a single-arm multicenter phase II trial. METHODS: Previously untreated patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric or GE junction adenocarcinoma were treated with mDCF and trastuzumab every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: We enrolled 26 patients with metastatic HER2-positive gastric or GE junction adenocarcinoma between February 2011 and June 2015. The median age of patients was 62 years; 96% had a Karnofsky performance status equal to or greater than 80%. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the 6-month PFS was 73% (95% CI 51-86%). The objective response rate was 65%, the median PFS was 13 months (95% CI 6.4-20.7) and the median OS was 24.9 months (95% CI 14.4-42.5). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (42%), fatigue (23%), and hypophosphatemia (15%). There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The combination of mDCF and trastuzumab is effective and safe in patients with metastatic HER2-positive gastric or GE junction adenocarcinoma and can be considered as an option for selected patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515411.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/adverse effects , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Trastuzumab/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OPINION STATEMENT: Gastric cancer is a major health burden worldwide. Only about one-third of all the gastric cancer patients survive beyond 5-years. Management of this deadly disease has evolved over the last few decades due to the incorporation of better staging techniques, surgical approach, effective systemic treatment, and sequencing of different therapeutic modalities. There are some global differences in how local-regional gastric cancer is managed and treated. In the USA and some parts of Europe, perioperative chemotherapy is a preferred management approach. Adjuvant chemoradiation is considered if the surgical resection is performed upfront. However, in Asia, postoperative chemotherapy alone after D2 surgical resection is considered standard of care treatment. Based on recent evidence, perioperative treatment with triplet chemotherapy regimen FLOT (5FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) is the preferred regimen. However, doublet fluoropyrimidine/platinum combination is a reasonable alternative if triplet regimen cannot be given. At present, there are no approved targeted or immunotherapy agents in perioperative setting; however, there are a number of ongoing trials designed to examine the efficacy of targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors in various combinations with systemic therapy in perioperative setting.