What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for ß-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For ß-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with ß-lactam antibiotics. METHODS: Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion ß-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and ß-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels. CONCLUSIONS: The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Multicenter Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Unbound Ceftriaxone in Critically Ill Patients.

The objective of this study was to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in critically ill adult patients and to define optimized dosing regimens. Total and unbound ceftriaxone concentrations were obtained from two pharmacokinetic studies and from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at a tertiary hospital intensive care unit. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were used to assess the probability of achieving a free trough concentration/MIC ratio of ≥1 using Pmetrics for R. A total of 474 samples (267 total and 207 unbound) were available from 36 patients. A two-compartment model describing ceftriaxone-albumin binding with both nonrenal and renal elimination incorporating creatinine clearance to explain the between-patient variability best described the data. An albumin concentration of ≤20 g/L decreased the probability of target attainment (PTA) by up to 20% across different dosing regimens and simulated creatinine clearances. A ceftriaxone dose of 1 g twice daily is likely therapeutic in patients with creatinine clearance of <100 mL/min infected with susceptible isolates (PTA, ~90%). Higher doses administered as a continuous infusion (4 g/day) are needed in patients with augmented renal clearance (creatinine clearance, >130 mL/min) who are infected by pathogens with a MIC of ≥0.5 mg/L. The ceftriaxone dose should be based on the patient's renal function and albumin concentration, as well as the isolate MIC. Hypoalbuminemia decreases the PTA in patients receiving intermittent dosing by up to 20%.

Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin-Tazobactam/Amikacin Combination versus Meropenem against Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.

Carbapenems are recommended for the treatment of urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli; however, due to selection of carbapenem resistance, there is an increasing interest in alternative treatment regimens including the use of ß-lactam-aminoglycoside combinations. We compared the pharmacodynamic activity of piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin as mono and combination therapy versus meropenem monotherapy against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, piperacillin-tazobactam resistant E. coli using a dynamic hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) over 7 days. Broth-microdilution was performed to determine the MIC of E. coli isolates. Whole genome sequencing was conducted. Four E. coli isolates were tested in HFIM with an initial inoculum of ~107 CFU/mL. Dosing regimens tested were piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, plus amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, as combination therapy, and piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g, 6-hourly, amikacin 30 mg/kg, 24-hourly, and meropenem 1 g, 8-hourly, each as monotherapy. We observed that piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin monotherapy demonstrated initial rapid bacterial killing but then led to amplification of resistant subpopulations. The piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin combination and meropenem experiments both attained a rapid bacterial killing (~4-5 log10) within 24 h and did not result in any emergence of resistant subpopulations. Genome sequencing demonstrated that all ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates carried multiple antibiotic resistance genes including blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaEC, blaTEM-1, and aac(6')-Ib-cr. These results suggest that the combination of piperacillin-tazobactam/amikacin may have a potential role as a carbapenem-sparing regimen, which should be tested in future urosepsis clinical trials.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model.

BACKGROUND: Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened. OBJECTIVES: This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates. METHODS: E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days. RESULTS: Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of intermittent versus extended and continuous infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam in a hollow-fibre infection model against Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the bacterial killing and emergence of resistance of intermittent versus prolonged (extended and continuous infusions) infusion dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam against two Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a dynamic hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). METHODS: Three piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion) against a ceftriaxone-susceptible, non-ESBL-producing E. coli 44 (Ec44, MIC 2 mg/L) and six piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion; 4/0.5 g 6 hourly as 0.5 and 3 h infusions and 16/2 g/24 h continuous infusion) were simulated against a ceftriaxone-resistant, AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli 50 (Ec50, MIC 8 mg/L) in a HFIM over 7 days (initial inoculum ∼107 cfu/mL). Total and less-susceptible subpopulations and MICs were determined. RESULTS: All simulated dosing regimens against Ec44 exhibited 4 log10 of bacterial killing over 8 h without regrowth and resistance emergence throughout the experiment. For Ec50, there was the initial bacterial killing of 4 log10 followed by regrowth to 1011 cfu/mL within 24 h against all simulated dosing regimens, and the MICs for resistant subpopulations exceeded 256 mg/L at 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that, for critically ill patients, conventional intermittent infusion, or prolonged infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam may suppress resistant subpopulations of non-ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. However, intermittent, or prolonged infusions may not suppress the resistant subpopulations of AmpC- and ESBL-producing E. coli clinical isolates. More studies are required to confirm these findings.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC90 of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log10 kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log10 reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

A validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of the novel combination antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam, in plasma (total and unbound), CSF, urine and renal replacement therapy effluent: application to pilot pharmacokinetic studies.

OBJECTIVES: Novel treatment options for some carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens have been identified by the World Health Organization as being of the highest priority. Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic with potent bactericidal activity against the most difficult-to-treat multi-drug resistant and extensively drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to develop and validate a liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of ceftolozane and tazobactam in plasma (total and unbound), renal replacement therapy effluent (RRTE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine. METHODS: Analytes were separated using mixed-mode chromatography with an intrinsically base-deactivated C18 column and a gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid, 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile. The analytes and internal standards were detected using rapid ionisation switching between positive and negative modes with simultaneous selected reaction monitoring. RESULTS: A quadratic calibration was obtained for plasma (total and unbound), RRTE and CSF over the concentration range of 1-200 mg/L for ceftolozane and 0.5-100 mg/L for tazobactam, and for urine the concentration range of 10-2,000 mg/L for ceftolozane and 5-1,000 mg/L for tazobactam. For both ceftolozane and tazobactam, validation testing for matrix effects, precision and accuracy, specificity and stability were all within the acceptance criteria of ±15%. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology was successfully applied to one pilot pharmacokinetic study in infected critically ill patients, including patients receiving renal replacement therapy, and one case study of a patient with ventriculitis, where all patients received ceftolozane-tazobactam.

Ceftriaxone dosing in patients admitted from the emergency department with sepsis.

PURPOSE: Unbound ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics in adult patients have been poorly characterised. The objective of this study is to determine the ceftriaxone dose that achieves an unbound trough concentration ≥ 0.5 mg/L in > 90% of adult patients receiving once-daily dosing presenting to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a prospective single-centre pharmacokinetic study. A single unbound plasma ceftriaxone concentration was obtained from each patient using blood collected as part of routine clinical practice within the first dosing interval. Samples were analysed using a validated ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. RESULTS: A ceftriaxone concentration obtained throughout the first dosing interval was available for fifty adult patients meeting sepsis criteria. Using this concentration time-curve data, a pharmacokinetic model was developed with acceptable predictive performance per the visual predictive check. Simulations show that a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve the minimum therapeutic ceftriaxone exposure in > 90% patients with a creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min. However, a 2-g once-daily dose will provide a therapeutic exposure for target pathogens infecting patients with a creatinine clearance ≤ 140 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftriaxone administered as a 1-g once-daily dose is unlikely to achieve a therapeutic exposure in > 90% of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis. Increasing the ceftriaxone dose to 2 g once daily will likely achieve the desired exposure against target pathogens. Future clinical trials are required to determine any potential clinical benefit of optimised ceftriaxone dosing.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients with an Indwelling External Ventricular Drain.

The aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane-tazobactam in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of infected critically ill patients. In a prospective observational study, critically ill patients (≥18 years) with an indwelling external ventricular drain received a single intravenous dose of 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam. Serial plasma and CSF samples were collected for measurement of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam concentration by liquid chromatography. Unbound concentration-time data were modeled in R using Pmetrics. Dosing simulations were performed using the final model. A three-compartment model adequately described the data from 10 patients. For ceftolozane, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) area under the unbound concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (fAUC0-inf) in the CSF and plasma were 30 (19 to 128) h·mg/liter and 323 (183 to 414) h·mg/liter, respectively. For tazobactam, these values were 5.6 (2 to 24) h·mg/liter and 52 (36 to 80) h·mg/liter, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) CSF penetration ratios were 0.2 ± 0.2 and 0.2 ± 0.26 for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively. With the regimen of 3.0 g every 8 h, a probability of target attainment (PTA) of ≥0.9 for 40% fT>MIC in the CSF was possible only when MICs were ≤0.25 mg/liter. The CSF cumulative fractional response for Pseudomonas aeruginosa-susceptible MIC distribution was 73%. The tazobactam PTA for the minimal suggested exposure of 20% fT>1 mg/liter was 12%. The current maximal dose of ceftolozane-tazobactam (3.0 g every 8 h) does not provide adequate CSF exposure for treatment of Gram-negative meningitis or ventriculitis unless the MIC for the causative pathogen is very low (≤0.25 mg/liter).

Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Given that aminoglycosides, such as amikacin, may be used for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, optimization of therapy is paramount for improved treatment outcomes. This study aims to investigate the pharmacodynamics of different simulated intravenous amikacin doses on susceptible P. aeruginosa to inform ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and sepsis treatment choices. A hollow-fiber infection model with two P. aeruginosa isolates (MICs of 2 and 8 mg/liter) with an initial inoculum of ∼108 CFU/ml was used to test different amikacin dosing regimens. Three regimens (15, 25, and 50 mg/kg) were tested to simulate a blood exposure, while a 30 mg/kg regimen simulated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for potential respiratory tract infection. Data were described using a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify mutations associated with resistance emergence. While bacterial density was reduced by >6 logs within the first 12 h in simulated blood exposures following this initial bacterial kill, there was amplification of a resistant subpopulation with ribosomal mutations that were likely mediating amikacin resistance. No appreciable bacterial killing occurred with subsequent doses. There was less (<5 log) bacterial killing in the simulated ELF exposure for either isolate tested. Simulation studies suggested that a dose of 30 and 50 mg/kg may provide maximal bacterial killing for bloodstream and VAP infections, respectively. Our results suggest that amikacin efficacy may be improved with the use of high-dose therapy to rapidly eliminate susceptible bacteria. Subsequent doses may have reduced efficacy given the rapid amplification of less-susceptible bacterial subpopulations with amikacin monotherapy.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of intermittent versus extended and continuous infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam in a hollow-fibre infection model against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by intermittent versus prolonged infusion (i.e. extended or continuous), for ceftriaxone-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in an in vitro dynamic hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). METHODS: K. pneumoniae 68 (Kp68; MIC = 8 mg/L, producing SHV-106 and DHA-1) and K. pneumoniae 69 (Kp69; MIC = 1 mg/L, producing CTX-M-14) were studied in the HFIM over 7 days (initial inoculum ~107 cfu/mL). Six piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens for Kp68 (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions, 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion, 4/0.5 g 6 hourly as 0.5 and 3 h infusions and 16/2 g/24 h continuous infusion) and three piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens for Kp69 (4/0.5 g 8 hourly as 0.5 and 4 h infusions and 12/1.5 g/24 h continuous infusion) were simulated (piperacillin clearance = 14 L/h, creatinine clearance = 100 mL/min). Total and resistant populations and MICs were quantified/determined. RESULTS: For Kp68, all simulated dosing regimens exhibited approximately 4 log10 of bacterial killing at 8 h followed by regrowth to approximately 1011 cfu/mL within 24 h. The MICs for resistant subpopulations exceeded 256 mg/L at 72 h. Similarly, for Kp69, all simulated dosing regimens exhibited approximately 4 log10 of bacterial killing over 8 h; however, only the continuous infusion prevented bacterial regrowth. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with intermittent infusion, prolonged infusion did not increase initial bacterial killing and suppression of regrowth of plasmid-mediated AmpC- and ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. However, continuous infusion may suppress regrowth of some ESBL-producing susceptible K. pneumoniae, although more data are warranted to confirm this observation.

What Are the Predictors for Achieving Therapeutic Levetiracetam Serum Concentrations in Adult Neurological Patients?

BACKGROUND: Emerging studies suggest that levetiracetam pharmacokinetics can be difficult to predict in certain special patient populations, including the elderly, critically ill patients, and pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: To determine clinical characteristics that predict the attainment of target serum concentrations in a heterogeneous group of patients prescribed levetiracetam. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in adult neurological patients prescribed levetiracetam for the treatment or prophylaxis of seizures. Serum samples were collected after steady-state was reached, with a trough/steady-state serum concentration between 6 and 20 mg/L considered therapeutic. Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors associated with the attainment of therapeutic concentrations. RESULTS: One-hundred thirty patients (63 male) were included. The median (interquartile ranges) serum trough/steady-state concentration (Cmin/ss) was 16.2 (9.8-26.1) mg/L. The dose-normalized median (interquartile range) Cmin/ss was 11.5 (7.0-16.5) mg/L. The coefficient of variation of Cmin/ss and dose-normalized Cmin/ss were 69.4% and 64.2%, respectively. A weak correlation was observed between levetiracetam Cmin/ss and patient age (r = 0.21; P = 0.020), creatinine clearance (r = -0.26; P = 0.004), and daily dose (r = 0.42; P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified age and daily levetiracetam dose as significant factors predicting target Cmin/ss attainment. The influence of concomitant antiepileptic therapy was not determined. CONCLUSIONS: Age and daily dose were the most significant predictors of levetiracetam target-concentration attainment and should be considered in further investigations to develop a dosing algorithm for optimal levetiracetam therapy.

A Population Pharmacokinetic Model-Guided Evaluation of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration.

The aim of this work was to describe optimized dosing regimens of ceftolozane-tazobactam for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study in adult critically ill patients with clinical indications for ceftolozane-tazobactam and CVVHDF. Unbound drug concentrations were measured from serial prefilter blood, postfilter blood, and ultrafiltrate samples by a chromatographic assay. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. A four-compartment pharmacokinetic model adequately described the data from six patients. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) extraction ratios for ceftolozane and tazobactam were 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.73 ± 0.1, respectively. The mean ± SD sieving coefficients were 0.94 ± 0.24 and 1.08 ± 0.30, respectively. Model-estimated CVVHDF clearance rates were 2.7 ± 0.8 and 3.0 ± 0.6 liters/h, respectively. Residual non-CVVHDF clearance rates were 0.6 ± 0.5 and 3.3 ± 0.9 liters/h, respectively. In the initial 24 h, doses as low as 0.75 g every 8 h enabled cumulative fractional response of ≥85% for empirical coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering a 40% fT>MIC (percentage of time the free drug concentration was above the MIC) target. For 100% fT>MIC, doses of at least 1.5 g every 8 h were required. The median (interquartile range) steady-state trough ceftolozane concentrations for simulated regimens of 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h were 28 (21 to 42) and 56 (42 to 84) mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding tazobactam concentrations were 6.1 (5.5 to 6.7) and 12.1 (11.0 to 13.4) mg/liter, respectively. We suggest a front-loaded regimen with a single 3.0-g loading dose followed by 0.75 g every 8 h for critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF with study blood and dialysate flow rates.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Unbound Ceftolozane and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients without Renal Dysfunction.

Evaluation of dosing regimens for critically ill patients requires pharmacokinetic data in this population. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal impairment and to assess the adequacy of recommended dosing regimens for treatment of systemic infections. Patients received 1.5 or 3.0 g ceftolozane-tazobactam according to clinician recommendation. Unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations were assayed, and data were analyzed with Pmetrics with subsequent Monte Carlo simulations. A two-compartment model adequately described the data from twelve patients. Urinary creatinine clearance (CLCR) and body weight described between-patient variability in clearance and central volume of distribution (V), respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) parameter estimates for unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, were CL of 7.2 ± 3.2 and 25.4 ± 9.4 liters/h, V of 20.4 ± 3.7 and 32.4 ± 10 liters, rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from central to peripheral compartment (Kcp) of 0.46 ± 0.74 and 2.96 ± 8.6 h-1, and rate constant for distribution of unbound ceftolozane or tazobactam from peripheral to central compartment (Kpc) of 0.39 ± 0.37 and 26.5 ± 8.4 h-1 With dosing at 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h (q8h), the fractional target attainment (FTA) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was ≥85% for directed therapy (MIC ≤ 4 mg/liter). However, for empirical coverage (MIC up to 64 mg/liter), the FTA was 84% with the 1.5-g q8h regimen when creatinine clearance is 180 ml/min/1.73 m2, whereas the 3.0-g q8h regimen consistently achieved an FTA of ≥85%. For a target of 40% of time the free drug concentration is above the MIC (40% fT>MIC), 3g q8h by intermittent infusion is suggested unless a highly susceptible pathogen is present, in which case 1.5-g dosing could be used. If a higher target of 100% fT>MIC is required, a 1.5-g loading dose plus a 4.5-g continuous infusion may be adequate.

A validated LC-MSMS method for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and vaborbactam in human plasma and renal replacement therapy effluent and its application to a pharmacokinetic study.

A simple method for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and the recently approved ß-lactamase inhibitor, vaborbactam, in human plasma and renal replacement therapy effluent (RRTE) was developed and validated. This antibiotic combination protects a primary ß-lactam, meropenem, with a new ß-lactamase inhibitor, and expands the limited options for treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. Meropenem, vaborbactam, and the internal standards [2H6]-meropenem and sulbactam in plasma and RRTE were processed using acetonitrile followed by a chromatographic separation on a Poroshell HPH-C18 column with a gradient elution of the mobile phases and monitored using mass spectrometry detection. The calibration range was 0.05 to 100 µg mL-1 for both meropenem and vaborbactam. The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were less than 15% for both meropenem and vaborbactam and the recovery from plasma was 96% for both meropenem and vaborbactam and the recovery from RRTE was 93% and 103% for meropenem and vaborbactam, respectively. This methodology was successfully applied to an ex vivo characterisation study of the effects of renal replacement therapy modalities on the pharmacokinetics of meropenem and vaborbactam (Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62(10), 2018). Graphical abstract.

Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of intravenous posaconazole in adult critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound posaconazole following intravenous administration has not yet been described for the critically ill patient population. The aim of this work was, therefore, to describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of intravenous posaconazole in critically ill patients and identify optimal dosing regimens. METHODS: This was a prospective observational population pharmacokinetic study in critically ill adult patients with presumed/confirmed invasive fungal infection. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered intravenously as an add-on to standard antifungal therapy, and serial plasma samples were collected over 48 h. Total and unbound posaconazole concentrations, measured by chromatographic method, were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and perform dosing simulations in R using Pmetrics. RESULTS: From eight patients, 93 pairs of total and unbound concentrations were measured. A two-compartment linear model with capacity-limited plasma protein binding best described the concentration-time data. Albumin and body mass index (BMI) were included as covariates in the final model. Mean (SD) parameter estimates for the volume of the central compartment (V) and the elimination rate constant were 72 (43) L and 42.1 (23.7) h-1, respectively. Dosing simulations showed that high BMI was associated with a reduced probability of achieving target total and unbound posaconazole concentrations. Low serum albumin concentration was associated with a reduced probability of attaining target total but not unbound posaconazole concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: An important clinical message of this study is that critically ill patients with increased BMI may require larger than approved loading doses of intravenous posaconazole when considering currently recommended dosing targets. Variability in plasma albumin concentration appears unlikely to affect dosing requirements when the assessment is based on unbound concentrations. Where available, therapeutic drug monitoring of unbound concentrations may be useful.

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Posaconazole in Critically Ill Patients.

To date, there is no information on the intravenous (i.v.) posaconazole pharmacokinetics for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This prospective observational study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of i.v. posaconazole in critically ill patients. Patients with no history of allergy to triazole antifungals and requiring systemic antifungal therapy were enrolled if they were aged ≥18 years, central venous access was available, they were not pregnant, and they had not received prior posaconazole or drugs interacting with posaconazole. A single dose of 300 mg posaconazole was administered over 90 min. Total plasma concentrations were measured from serial plasma samples collected over 48 h, using a validated chromatographic method. The pharmacokinetic data set was analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Eight patients (7 male) were enrolled with the following characteristics: median age, 46 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40 to 51 years); median weight, 68 kg (IQR, 65 to 82 kg); and median albumin concentration, 20 g/liter (IQR, 18 to 24 g/liter). Median (IQR) pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were as follows: observed maximum concentration during sampling period (Cmax), 1,702 ng/ml (1,352 to 2,141 ng/ml); area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), 17,932 ng · h/ml (13,823 to 27,905 ng · h/ml); clearance (CL), 16.8 liters/h (11.1 to 21.7 liters/h); and volume of distribution (V), 529.1 liters (352.2 to 720.6 liters). The V and CL were greater than 2-fold and the AUC0-∞ was 39% of the values reported for heathy volunteers. The AUC0-∞ was only 52% of the steady-state AUC0-24 reported for hematology patients. The median of estimated average steady-state concentrations was 747 ng/ml (IQR, 576 to 1,163 ng/ml), which is within but close to the lower end of the previously recommended therapeutic range of 500 to 2,500 ng/ml. In conclusion, we observed different pharmacokinetics of i.v. posaconazole in this cohort of critically ill patients compared to those in healthy volunteers and hematology patients.

Ex Vivo Characterization of Effects of Renal Replacement Therapy Modalities and Settings on Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem and Vaborbactam.

The combination product meropenem-vaborbactam, with activity against KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, is likely to be used during renal replacement therapy. The aim of this work was to describe the extracorporeal removal (adsorption and clearance) of meropenem-vaborbactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). An ex vivo model was used to examine the effects of a matrix of operational settings. Vaborbactam did not adsorb to AN69 (acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulfonate copolymer) ST100 (surface area, 1 m2) hemofilter; the mean (±standard deviation [SD]) meropenem adsorption was 9% (±1%). The sieving coefficients (mean ± SD) with AN69 ST100 and ST150 (surface area, 1.5 m2) filters ranged from 0.97 ± 0.16 to 1.14 ± 0.12 and from 1.13 ± 0.01 to 1.53 ± 0.28, respectively, for meropenem and from 0.64 ± 0.39 to 0.90 ± 0.14 and 0.78 ± 0.18 to 1.04 ± 0.28, respectively, for vaborbactam. At identical settings, vaborbactam sieving coefficients were 25% to 30% lower than for meropenem. Points of dilution, blood flow rates, or effluent flow rates did not affect sieving coefficients for either drug. However, doubling the effluent flow rate resulted in >50 to 100% increases in filter clearance for both drugs. Postfilter dilution resulted in 40 to 80% increases in filter clearance at a high effluent flow rate (4,000 ml/h), compared with ∼15% increases at a low effluent flow rate (1,000 ml/h) for both drugs. For all combinations of setting and filters tested, vaborbactam clearance was lower than that of meropenem by ∼20 to 40%. Overall, meropenem-vaborbactam is efficiently cleared in CVVH mode.

How to optimize antibiotic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics for Gram-negative infections in critically ill patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Optimized antibiotic dosing regimens improve survival rates in critically ill patients. However, dose optimization is challenging because of fluctuating antibiotic pharmacokinetics both between patients and within a single patient. This study reviews the pharmacokinetic changes that occur in critically ill patients, along with the pharmacodynamics and toxicodynamics of antibiotics commonly used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections to formulate a recommendation for antibiotic dosing at the bedside. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies highlight that critically ill patients do not achieve therapeutic antibiotic exposures with standard antibiotic dosing. Although dose increases are required, the method of administration, such as the use of ß-lactam antibiotic continuous infusions and nebulized aminoglycoside administration, may improve efficacy and limit toxicity. In addition, the increased availability of therapeutic drug monitoring and antibiotic dosing software allow the formulation of individualized dosing regimens at the bedside. SUMMARY: When prescribing antibiotic doses, the clinician should consider antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles. Before initiating high-dose antibiotic therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring may be considered to assist the clinician to optimize antibiotic treatment and minimize potential toxicity.