Hyperinsulinemia produces both sympathetic neural activation and vasodilation in normal humans.

Hyperinsulinemia may contribute to hypertension by increasing sympathetic activity and vascular resistance. We sought to determine if insulin increases central sympathetic neural outflow and vascular resistance in humans. We recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography, peroneal nerve), forearm blood flow (plethysmography), heart rate, and blood pressure in 14 normotensive males during 1-h infusions of low (38 mU/m2/min) and high (76 mU/m2/min) doses of insulin while holding blood glucose constant. Plasma insulin rose from 8 +/- 1 microU/ml during control, to 72 +/- 8 and 144 +/- 13 microU/ml during the low and high insulin doses, respectively, and fell to 15 +/- 6 microU/ml 1 h after insulin infusion was stopped. MSNA, which averaged 21.5 +/- 1.5 bursts/min in control, increased significantly (P less than 0.001) during both the low and high doses of insulin (+/- 5.4 and +/- 9.3 bursts/min, respectively) and further increased during 1-h recovery (+15.2 bursts/min). Plasma norepinephrine levels (119 +/- 19 pg/ml during control) rose during both low (258 +/- 25; P less than 0.02) and high (285 +/- 95; P less than 0.01) doses of insulin and recovery (316 +/- 23; P less than 0.01). Plasma epinephrine levels did not change during insulin infusion. Despite the increased MSNA and plasma norepinephrine, there were significant (P less than 0.001) increases in forearm blood flow and decreases in forearm vascular resistance during both doses of insulin. Systolic pressure did not change significantly during infusion of insulin and diastolic pressure fell approximately 4-5 mmHg (P less than 0.01). This study suggests that acute increases in plasma insulin within the physiological range elevate sympathetic neural outflow but produce forearm vasodilation and do not elevate arterial pressure in normal humans.

Role of oxidant stress in endothelial dysfunction produced by experimental hyperhomocyst(e)inemia in humans.

BACKGROUND: Moderate elevations in plasma homocyst(e)ine concentrations are associated with atherosclerosis and hypertension. We tested the hypothesis that experimental perturbation of homocysteine levels produces resistance and conduit vessel endothelial dysfunction and that this occurs through increased oxidant stress. METHODS AND RESULTS: Oral administration of L-methionine (100 mg/kg) was used to induce moderate hyperhomocyst(e)inemia ( approximately 25 micromol/L) in healthy human subjects. Endothelial function of forearm resistance vessels was assessed by use of forearm vasodilatation to brachial artery administration of the endothelium-dependent dilator acetylcholine. Conduit vessel endothelial function was assessed with flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery. Forearm resistance vessel dilatation to acetylcholine was significantly impaired 7 hours after methionine (methionine, 477+/-82%; placebo, 673+/-110%; P=0.016). Methionine did not alter vasodilatation to nitroprusside and verapamil. Flow-mediated dilatation was significantly impaired 8 hours after methionine loading (0.3+/-2.7%) compared with placebo (8. 2+/-1.6%, P=0.01). Oral administration of the antioxidant ascorbic acid (2 g) prevented methionine-induced endothelial dysfunction in both conduit and resistance vessels (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Experimentally increasing plasma homocyst(e)ine concentrations by methionine loading rapidly impairs both conduit and resistance vessel endothelial function in healthy humans. Endothelial dysfunction in conduit and resistance vessels may underlie the reported associations between homocysteine and atherosclerosis and hypertension. Increased oxidant stress appears to play a pathophysiological role in the deleterious endothelial effects of homocysteine.

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity is reduced in IDDM before overt autonomic neuropathy.

Studies of heart-rate variability have demonstrated that abnormal cardiac parasympathetic activity in individuals with IDDM precedes the development of other signs or symptoms of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. To determine whether IDDM patients have impaired sympathetic activity compared with normal control subjects before the onset of overt neuropathy, we directly recorded MSNA. We also examined the effects of changes in plasma glucose and insulin on sympathetic function in each group. MSNA was recorded by using microneurographic techniques in 10 IDDM patients without clinically evident diabetic complications and 10 control subjects. MSNA was compared during a 15-min fasting baseline period and during insulin infusion (120 mU.m-2.min-1) with 30 min of euglycemia. A cold pressor test was performed at the end of euglycemia. Power spectral analysis of 24-h RR variability was used to assess cardiac autonomic function. IDDM patients had lower MSNA than control subjects at baseline (8 +/- 1 vs. 18 +/- 3 burst/min, P < 0.02). MSNA increased in both groups with insulin infusion (P < 0.01) but remained lower in IDDM patients (20 +/- 3 vs. 28 +/- 3 burst/min, P < 0.01). In the IDDM group, we found no relationships between MSNA and plasma glucose, insulin, or HbA1c concentrations. BP levels did not differ at rest or during insulin. Heart-rate variability and the MSNA response to cold pressor testing in IDDM patients did not differ from those in healthy control subjects. IDDM patients had reduced MSNA at rest and in response to insulin. The lower MSNA is not attributable to differences in plasma glucose or insulin, but, rather, is most likely an early manifestation of diabetic autonomic neuropathy that precedes impaired cardiac parasympathetic control.

Hypoglycemia increases muscle sympathetic nerve activity in IDDM and control subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the increase in adrenomedullary catecholamine secretion and the sympathetic response to hypoglycemia is not well understood in humans. To explore this relationship more closely, we directly muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in control subjects and in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) subjects without clinically evident diabetic complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twelve IDDM subjects (22.5 +/- 3.9 years of age, diabetes duration of 9.8 +/- 8.3 years) and 12 age-matched control subjects were studied. MSNA was measured during insulin infusion (720 pM.m-2.min-1) with 30-min periods of 1) euglycemia, 2) hypoglycemia (target plasma glucose, 2.8 mM), and 3) recovery. The effect of increased insulin dose (1,440 pM.m-2.min-1) was studied in six subjects in each group, and the effect of prolonged hypoglycemia (1 h) was studied in five IDDM subjects and four control subjects. RESULTS: MSNA levels increased in IDDM and control subjects, 31 +/- 8 and 29 +/- 6%, respectively, above euglycemia during hypoglycemia and returned to euglycemic levels during recovery. MSNA levels during hypoglycemia were lower in IDDM subjects than in control subjects (26 +/- 3 vs. 35 +/- 2 bursts/min, P < 0.01). Importantly, no relationships were found between the MSNA and epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia in either group. Increasing the insulin infusion rate did not alter the MSNA response to hypoglycemia. During prolonged hypoglycemia, MSNA remained elevated above euglycemic levels throughout hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that insulin-induced hypoglycemia increases muscle sympathetic neural outflow in IDDM and control subjects. The lack of correlation between the MSNA and epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia indicates that the adrenomedullary and peripheral sympathetic responses to hypoglycemia are independently mediated.

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity is higher in intensively versus conventionally treated IDDM subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether poor long-term glycemic control may play a role in the lower muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) levels in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Intraneural electrodes were used to record MSNA from the peroneal nerve at baseline and during euglycemic insulin infusion (120 mU.m-2.min-1) in 16 IDDM subjects enrolled in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), 8 intensively treated (HbA1c 7.1 +/- 1.2%) and 8 conventionally treated (HbA1c 9.0 +/- 1.5%; P < 0.05). RESULTS: Fasting plasma glucose levels tended to be higher at baseline in the conventionally treated group (11.3 +/- 1.7 mmol/l) than in the intensively treated group (7.4 +/- 1.1 mmol/l, P < 0.1), but did not differ during insulin infusion (conventional, 5.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; intensive, 5.1 +/- 0.4 mmol/l). Plasma free insulin levels did not differ between groups either before or during insulin infusion. The intensively treated group had significantly high MSNA levels than the conventionally treated group both in the fasting state (16.2 +/-2.7 vs 10.5 +/- 4.4 bursts/min, P < 0.05 and during insulin infusion with euglycemia (27.8 +/- 2.1 vs 17.5 +/- 5.2 bursts/min. CONCLUSIONS: MSNA levels in intensively treated IDDM subject are higher than in conventionally treated subjects. These results suggest that improved long-term glycemic control is associated with increased sympathetic neural outflow to muscle. The mechanism for this effect remains unclear.

Mental stress increases sympathetic nerve activity during sustained baroreceptor stimulation in humans.

Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in humans is regulated in part by arterial baroreceptors. However, although mental stress increases blood pressure, it also increases MSNA. This suggests that baroreceptor control of MSNA is altered during mental stress. In nine healthy men (age range, 20-26 years), we recorded heart rate, blood pressure, and efferent MSNA (peroneal nerve, microneurography) during a 4-minute mental arithmetic task performed both before and during infusion of phenylephrine sufficient to markedly suppress resting MSNA. Before phenylephrine, mental stress significantly increased mean blood pressure (p less than 0.01), heart rate (p less than 0.01), and MSNA (from 18.5 +/- 3.2 to 24.8 +/- 3.5 bursts/min, p less than 0.001). Phenylephrine infusion increased resting mean blood pressure (from 84.0 +/- 2.6 to 90.0 +/- 2.7 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and decreased resting heart rate (from 65.6 +/- 1.7 to 55.6 +/- 2.0 beats/min, p less than 0.01). Resting MSNA decreased dramatically during phenylephrine (from 18.5 +/- 3.2 to 3.3 +/- 1.3 bursts/min, p less than 0.01). During phenylephrine, mental stress again significantly (p less than 0.01) increased mean blood pressure, heart rate, and MSNA (from 3.1 +/- 1.4 to 10.9 +/- 1.8 bursts/min). The magnitude of stress-induced increases in MSNA and heart rate were comparable before and during phenylephrine infusion despite the greater elevation in diastolic pressure during stress plus phenylephrine. The present study demonstrates that mental stress produces sympathoexcitatory and pressor responses even during sustained stimulation of arterial baroreceptors.

Dietary salt produces abnormal renal vasoconstrictor responses to upright posture in borderline hypertensive subjects.

We studied the effect of high and low NaCl diets in normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects to determine if a high NaCl diet produces abnormal renal vasoconstriction during the stress of upright posture in borderline hypertensive subjects. We studied 13 normotensive young men with diastolic blood pressures below 85 mm Hg and nine borderline hypertensive young men defined by diastolic blood pressures intermittently above 90 mm Hg. The subjects achieved comparable sodium balance during 6 days of low NaCl (10 mEq Na, 40 mEq Cl, 100 mEq K) and high NaCl (400 mEq Na, 400 mEq Cl, 100 mEq K) diets. In the normotensive subjects, standing for 30 minutes resulted in a tendency for diastolic blood pressure to fall during both diets. In contrast, during standing borderline hypertensive subjects showed no change in diastolic blood pressure during the low salt diet and a tendency for diastolic blood pressure to increase after the high salt diet. Standing reduced renal plasma flow in both groups during both diets. However, only during the high NaCl diet did the absolute decrease and percent decrease in renal plasma flow during standing differ significantly (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01, respectively) between the borderline hypertensive (-151 +/- 24 ml/min/1.73m2; -29 +/- 4%) and normotensive subjects (-79 +/- 17 ml/min/1.73m2; -15 +/- 3%). The resultant increase in the renal vascular resistance index with standing did not differ between the two groups during the low NaCl diet.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Elevated sympathetic nerve activity in borderline hypertensive humans. Evidence from direct intraneural recordings.

Reports of elevated plasma catecholamine levels and augmented responses to autonomic blockade suggest increased sympathetic tone in borderline hypertension. It is not known if this reflects greater sympathetic neural outflow. We directly recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) in 15 normotensive and 12 borderline hypertensive age-matched men to determine whether borderline hypertensive individuals have elevated sympathetic nerve activity. Supine heart rate, blood pressure, plasma norepinephrine, and efferent muscle sympathetic nerve activity (peroneal nerve) were measured after 6 days of both low and high dietary sodium intake (10 and 400 meq sodium/24 hr). Sympathetic nerve activity was elevated significantly in borderline hypertensive individuals on both low (37 +/- 1 in borderline hypertensive individuals vs. 29 +/- 1 bursts/min in normotensive individuals; p less than 0.01) and high (25 + 1 in borderline hypertensive individuals vs. 16 +/- 1 bursts/min in normotensive individuals; p less than 0.01) sodium diets. The borderline hypertensive group had higher systolic (p less than 0.01) and diastolic (p less than 0.05) blood pressures independent of sodium intake. Across both groups, high sodium intake reduced muscle sympathetic nerve activity (p less than 0.001), plasma norepinephrine (p less than 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.02), heart rate (p less than 0.002), and increased weight (p less than 0.005). A significant (p less than 0.05) group-by-diet interaction was observed for plasma norepinephrine levels. Specifically, compared with the normotensive group, plasma norepinephrine levels in the borderline hypertensive group tended to be higher on low sodium diet (p = 0.08) and lower on high sodium diet (p = 0.23).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of fludrocortisone on sympathetic nerve activity in humans.

Fludrocortisone reduces plasma norepinephrine in healthy humans, but forearm vascular and pressor responses to norepinephrine are potentiated. The effects of fludrocortisone on sympathetic nerve activity in healthy humans are not known. To investigate these effects we evaluated muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, and arterial pressure in 11 healthy volunteers during three protocols: (1) before and on day 7 of fludrocortisone (0.4 mg/d) treatment with ad libitum diet (n = 6); (2) before and on day 7 of fludrocortisone (0.4 mg/d) or placebo with a 150 mmol/24 h (mEq/24 h) sodium diet (n = 7); and (3) before and on day 2 of fludrocortisone (0.4 mg/d) or placebo with a 150 mmol/24 h (mEq/24 h) sodium diet (n = 4). Placebo did not alter any parameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Insulin increases sympathetic activity but not blood pressure in borderline hypertensive humans.

We have previously demonstrated that physiological hyperinsulinemia in normotensive humans increases sympathetic nerve activity but not arterial pressure since it also causes skeletal muscle vasodilation. However, in the presence of insulin resistance and/or hypertension, insulin may cause exaggerated sympathetic activation or impaired vasodilation and thus elevate arterial pressure. This study sought to determine if insulin causes a pressor response in borderline hypertensive humans by producing exaggerated increases in sympathetic neural outflow or impaired vasodilation. We recorded muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography, peroneal nerve), forearm blood flow, heart rate, and blood pressure in 13 borderline hypertensive subjects during a 1-hour insulin infusion (38 microunits/m2/min) while holding blood glucose constant. Plasma insulin rose from 12 +/- 3 microunits/ml (mean +/- SEM) during control to 73 +/- 7 microunits/ml during insulin infusion and fell to 9 +/- 2 microunits/ml 2 hours after insulin infusion was stopped. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity, which averaged 25 +/- 2 bursts per minute in control, increased significantly during insulin infusion (+9 bursts per minute) and remained elevated 1.5 hours into recovery (+7 bursts per minute, p less than 0.001). Despite increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity, there were significant (p less than 0.001) increases in forearm blood flow and decreases in forearm vascular resistance during insulin infusion. Further, systolic and diastolic pressures fell approximately 3 and 6 mm Hg, respectively, during insulin infusion (p less than 0.01). This study suggests that acute physiological increases in plasma insulin elevate sympathetic neural outflow in borderline hypertensive humans but produce vasodilation and do not elevate arterial pressure.

Postexercise hypotension and sympathoinhibition in borderline hypertensive men.

To determine if there would be a decrease in blood pressure after exercise in patients with borderline hypertension and if this decrease would be accompanied by a decrease in sympathetic nerve activity to muscle, we recorded multifiber postganglionic muscle sympathetic activity from the peroneal nerve at rest in nine men with borderline hypertension (age 25 +/- 1 years, mean +/- SEM) before and 60 minutes after 45 minutes of submaximal treadmill exercise. In addition, responses to a cold pressor test, handgrip, and the Valsalva maneuver were recorded before and after exercise. Four subjects were also studied before and after "sham" exercise. Sham exercise had no effect on blood pressure or sympathetic nerve activity whereas resting systolic blood pressure was lower after treadmill exercise in seven subjects (from 136 +/- 4 before to 123 +/- 2 mm Hg 60 minutes after exercise; p less than 0.01). Sixty minutes after exercise, sympathetic nerve activity was lower in all seven subjects (from 19 +/- 2 to 11 +/- 2 bursts/min, p less than 0.015; or from 27 +/- 3 to 14 +/- 2 bursts/100 heartbeats, p less than 0.005) but was slightly increased in the two subjects without postexercise hypotension. Heart rate and pressor and sympathoneural responses to the cold pressor test, handgrip, and the Valsalva maneuver were not altered by prior exercise. When nitroprusside was infused in five subjects to produce a reduction in systolic blood pressure similar to that seen 60 minutes after exercise, this drug increased sympathetic discharge from 37 +/- 6 to 57 +/- 4 bursts/100 heartbeats (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Contrasting autonomic and hemodynamic effects of insulin in healthy elderly versus young subjects.

Acute increases in plasma insulin produce both sympathoexcitation and vasodilation in normal young adults. Aging is associated with insulin resistance and may alter the sympathetic or the vascular responses to insulin. Therefore, we assessed sympathetic and vascular responses to acute physiological increases in plasma insulin levels in 10 healthy, normotensive elderly (65+/-2 years) and 12 normal young (27+/-1 years) subjects matched for body mass index (25+/-1 kg/m2 in both groups). We measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), FBF (plethysmography), heart rate, and blood pressure and calculated forearm vascular resistance and insulin sensitivity (M value) during a 90-minute hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp. M values were 4.3+/-0.4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in the elderly and 8.4+/-1.4 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) in the young subjects (P<.05). Baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity was higher in the elderly subjects (33+/-3 versus 15+/-2 bursts per minute, P<.05); however, the absolute and percent increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity were smaller in the elderly than in the young subjects (+10+/-1 versus +15+/-1 bursts per minute, or +37+/-11% versus +110+/-16%, P<.05). Forearm vascular resistance decreased with insulin from 46+/-2 to 31+/-3 units in the young but increased with insulin in the elderly subjects from 37+/-3 to 47+/-7 units (P<.05). Heart rate increased in young but not in elderly subjects. Insulin did not change blood pressure in either group. In conclusion, as opposed to vasodilation in young adults, insulin caused vasoconstriction in healthy elderly individuals. The failure of the vasodilator action of insulin in the elderly may permit even modest insulin-induced sympathoexcitation to elicit vasoconstriction. We speculate that the vasoconstrictor response to insulin may further potentiate insulin resistance in the elderly.

Dissociation of sympathoexcitatory and vasodilator actions of modestly elevated plasma insulin levels.

OBJECTIVE: To determine sympathetic and vascular responses to modest increases in plasma insulin level. BACKGROUND: Most studies of sympathetic and vascular actions of insulin have evaluated high plasma insulin levels ( > 50 microU/ml). Those levels increase sympathetic nerve activity but also cause vasodilation. Hypertension and obesity are associated with only modestly elevated fasting insulin levels. METHODS: We investigated the effects of a 90 min low-dose hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), forearm vascular resistance (plethysmography), heart rate, blood pressure and central venous pressure. Insulin and vehicle sessions were performed in 12 normal subjects. RESULTS: Plasma insulin levels were elevated from values of 10 +/- 2 in the fasting state to 25 +/- 3 microU/ml during insulin infusion. Insulin levels did not change during vehicle administration. Muscle sympathetic nerve activity increased from 16 +/- 2 to 25 +/- 3 burst/min during the insulin session and did not change during vehicle administration. In contrast to muscle sympathetic nerve activity, forearm vascular resistance did not change during insulin administration (from 50 +/- 3 to 51 +/- 4 U). Forearm vascular resistance tended to fall during vehicle administration (from 45 +/- 2 to 37 +/- 3 U). There were no changes in heart rate, blood pressure and central venous pressure that could be attributed to insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Modest elevations of plasma insulin levels produce sympathetic activation similar to that caused by high levels, but, in contrast to high levels modest elevations in plasma insulin level do not decrease forearm vascular resistance. The present findings suggest a dissociation between sympathoexcitatory and vascular actions of insulin at low plasma levels.

Effect of vitamin E on resistance vessel endothelial dysfunction induced by methionine.

We tested if vitamin E, a fat-soluble antioxidant, prevents resistance vessel endothelial dysfunction caused by methionine-induced hyperhomocysteinemia in humans. Moderate elevations in plasma homocysteine concentrations are associated with atherosclerosis and hypertension. Homocysteine causes endothelial dysfunction possibly through several mechanisms. No previous study has tested if a fat-soluble antioxidant can prevent endothelial dysfunction caused by experimental hyperhomocysteinemia. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 x 2 factorial, double-blind crossover study, receiving L-methionine (100 mg/kg at -6 hours) or vehicle, with and without vitamin E (1,200 IU at -13 hours). Endothelial function of forearm resistance vessels was assessed using forearm blood flow responses to brachial artery administration of endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent agents. Forearm resistance vessel dilatation to acetylcholine was significantly impaired 7 hours after methionine (placebo, 583 +/- 87% vs methionine 30 +/- 68%; p <0.05). Dilatation to bradykinin was also impaired (placebo, 509 +/- 54% vs methionine 289 +/- 48%; p <0.05). Methionine did not alter vasodilatation to the endothelium-independent vasodilators, nitroprusside, and verapamil. Methionine-induced impairment of resistance vessel dilatation to acetylcholine and bradykinin (p <0.05 vs placebo) was prevented by administration of vitamin E (acetylcholine, p = 0.004; bradykinin, p = 0.004; both vs methionine alone). Experimentally increasing plasma homocysteine concentrations by oral methionine rapidly impairs resistance vessel endothelial function in healthy humans and this effect is reversed with administration of the fat-soluble antioxidant, vitamin E.

Resistance vessel endothelial function in healthy humans during transient postprandial hypertriglyceridemia.

A single high-fat meal transiently impairs conduit vessel endothelial function. We tested the hypothesis that transient moderate hypertriglyceridemia by consumption of a high-fat meal impairs forearm resistance vessel endothelial function. Fifteen healthy persons consumed isocaloric high- and low-fat meals (900 calories, 50 and 4 g of fat, respectively) on 2 separate days. Endothelial function in forearm resistance vessels was assessed using blood flow responses to local intra-arterial infusion of nitroprusside, acetylcholine, bradykinin, and verapamil from 1 to 3 hours after the meal. Serum triglycerides increased from 112 +/- 15 mg/dl preprandially to 165 +/- 20 mg/dl 4 hours after the high-fat meal, which was a significantly larger increase than levels after the low-fat meal (p = 0.01). Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol concentrations did not change. There was no difference between high- and low-fat meals in vasodilation to the endothelium-dependent agents acetylcholine (low fat, 337 +/- 47%; high fat, 356 +/- 88%; p = 0.81) and bradykinin (low fat, 312 +/- 39%; high fat, 403 +/- 111%; p = 0.28), or to the endothelium-independent vasodilators nitroprusside (low fat, 313 +/- 27%; high fat, 355 +/- 42%; p = 0.31) and verapamil (low fat, 292 +/- 48%; high fat, 299 +/- 36%; p = 0.18). Thus, transient hypertriglyceridemia due to a high-fat meal does not impair resistance vessel endothelial function. These data contrast with previous studies in conduit vessels that showed substantial endothelial dysfunction. Therefore, although high-fat intake may contribute to large artery atherosclerosis, it probably does not predispose to hypertension or ischemia through resistance vessel dysfunction. The results suggest that the mechanism by which triglyceride-rich lipoproteins impair endothelial function in conduit vessels is not operative in resistance vessels.

Sympathetic nerve activity and insulin sensitivity in normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents.

Insulin resistance and elevated sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) are observed in young borderline hypertensive humans. A positive family history of hypertension (FH) is a strong risk factor for developing hypertension. To assess whether insulin resistance and increased sympathetic tone precede the onset of hypertension, we studied 17 young adults with and 17 without a documented family history of hypertension. Subjects were matched for age (33+/-0.4 years in FH positive and 32+/-0.5 years in FH negative; mean+/-SE) and body mass index (BMI, 25+/-1 kg/m2 in both FH positive and FH negative subjects). We measured blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, microneurography), forearm blood flow, and insulin sensitivity (total glucose uptake determined by an euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic clamp using stable isotope tracer infusion), and calculated forearm vascular resistance (FVR). Mean BP and HR were similar in both groups (86+/-3 mm Hg and 61+/-2 beats/min, and 85+/-2 mm Hg and 62 +/-2 beats/min, respectively, in FH positive and negative respectively, P = ns). Baseline MSNA (24 +/-3 bursts/min in FH positive v 20+/-3 bursts/min in FH negative, P = ns) and total glucose uptake [0.104+/-0.014 mg/(kg x min x microU insulin/mL) in FH positive v 0.095+/-0.014 mg/(kg xmin x microU insulin/mL) in FH negative, P = ns] did not differ between the groups. Sympathetic and vascular responses to insulin were also similar in both groups. The increase in MSNA was 10+/-2 bursts/ min in FH positive and 10+/-1 bursts/min in FH negative, P = ns. Thus, age- and weight-matched offspring with and without a FH of hypertension did not vary in MSNA or insulin sensitivity. These findings suggest that in the absence of obesity and high arterial pressure, a FH of hypertension may not be accompanied by decreased insulin sensitivity or increased MSNA.

Effect of local sympathetic blockade on forearm blood flow and glucose uptake during hypoglycemia.

During hypoglycemia, hepatic glucose production increases and peripheral glucose utilization decreases. Systemic beta-adrenergic blockade during hypoglycemia increases peripheral glucose utilization. To explore the local effects of increased alpha- and beta-adrenergic activity on skeletal muscle glucose utilization, we measured arterial and venous plasma glucose concentrations, forearm blood flow (FBF), and forearm glucose uptake (FGU) during a hyperinsulinemic (40 mU/m2/min) stepped-hypoglycemic clamp with intrabrachial artery infusion of saline, phentolamine, propranolol, or combined phentolamine and propranolol. A control study was also performed with a euglycemic clamp and intraarterial saline. During hypoglycemia with saline and phentolamine, there were significant increases in FBF (130% +/- 38% and 180% +/- 35%, respectively) and FGU (120% +/- 51% and 230% +/- 150%, respectively). During hypoglycemia with propranolol and phentolamine + propranolol, FBF remained constant. FGU during hypoglycemia with propranolol was not different versus hypoglycemia with saline. No differences were found in these studies for forearm lactate output (FLO) or venous free fatty acid concentrations. These results demonstrate that local, as opposed to systemic, blockade during hypoglycemia does not alter peripheral glucose utilization.

Lack of effect of alpha- and beta-adrenergic inhibition on forearm glucose uptake despite differences in forearm blood flow in healthy humans.

Insulin has both sympathoexcitatory and vasodilatory actions. It is unclear how these interact to affect muscular glucose uptake. The current study was designed to determine the systemic and local contributions of alpha- and beta-adrenergic activity to muscle glucose uptake. Forearm blood flow (FBF, plethysmography), arterial-venous glucose difference (AV-diff), and forearm glucose uptake (FGU) were measured during a 40-mU/m(2)/min insulin infusion with 120 minutes of euglycemia in 6 normal subjects (age, 28.8 +/- 4.9 years, mean +/- SD). Each subject was studied 5 times, once each with intravenous propranolol (IV PROP, 80 microg/min), intravenous phentolamine (IV PHEN, 500 microg/min), intra-arterial propranolol (IA PROP, 25 microg/min), intra-arterial phentolamine (IA PHEN, 12 microg/min/100 mL forearm tissue), and saline (SAL). FBF did not change during insulin with SAL, IA PROP, or IV PROP, but increased during insulin with IA PHEN and IV PHEN (P <.05). Despite the increased glucose delivery during insulin plus IA PHEN and IV PHEN, FGU did not differ between study sessions at any time during the insulin infusion. This was due to the lower AV-diff during insulin with IA PHEN and IV PHEN compared to the other studies (P <.05). AV-diff negatively correlated with FBF at the end of the insulin infusion (P <.001) for all studies. In normal humans, inhibition of basal sympathetic activity does not alter muscular glucose uptake. The increased insulin-induced vasodilation during alpha-adrenergic inhibition suggests that insulin-induced sympathetic activation prevents excess vasodilation. This inhibition does not alter glucose uptake because changes in flow are counterbalanced by changes in glucose extraction.

Hypoglycemic symptom variation is related to epinephrine and not peripheral muscle sympathetic nerve response.

Hypoglycemic unawareness may be due to diminished adrenal and/or peripheral sympathochromaffin responses to hypoglycemia. To determine whether hypoglycemic symptom awareness is more closely related to adrenal or nonadrenal sympathetic activity, we studied the relationship between symptoms and the epinephrine, norepinephrine, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses to hypoglycemia in ten IDDM and ten control subjects. MSNA was measured continuously using microneurography during hyperinsulinemic (720 pmol m-2 min-1), glucose clamp with 60 min of euglycemia, 30 min of hypoglycemia, and 30 min of recovery. Subjects were asked to rate a series of symptoms every 10 min during the last 30 min of each period and were unaware of their plasma glucose concentration. MSNA increased significantly in both groups during insulin clamp (p < 0.05) and further increased during hypoglycemia (p < 0.01). Both epinephrine and norepinephrine levels significantly increased during hypoglycemia (p < 0.02). The increase in adrenergic symptom responses during hypoglycemia positively correlated with epinephrine (r = 0.75, p < 0.01), but not with MSNA in the control subjects. A similar near significant relationship for epinephrine was seen in IDDM subjects (r = 0.65, p = 0.056). No significant predictors were found for neuroglycopenic or cholinergic symptoms. Thus, the variation in hypoglycemic symptoms is not related to the MSNA response to hypoglycemia. Adrenergic symptom variation is due to differences in adrenal epinephrine secretion.

Microneurographically determined muscle sympathetic nerve activity levels are reproducible in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Our objective was to determine whether microneurographically determined muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) levels are equally reproducible in control and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) subjects. We used a retrospective review of MSNA levels in 14 IDDM and 16 control subjects who had at least two microneurographic studies in the last 8 years in our laboratory. Results showed mean MSNA levels were lower in IDDM (9.2+/-1.2 bursts/min) than in control subjects (16.8+/-1.7 bursts/min) (p<0.002) but mean within individual MSNA coefficients (IDDM: 47+/-8%; controls 30+/-5%) and ranges of variation (IDDM: 6.6+/-1.9; controls: 7.5+/-1.9 bursts/min) did not differ between IDDM and control subjects. Thus, microneurographically determined MSNA levels are equally reproducible in IDDM and controls subjects. These results confirm and substantiate our previous findings of diminished MSNA in IDDM subjects.