Patient centered radiology: investigating 3 Tesla whole body MRI acceptance in cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) is a promising emerging imaging technology for detecting bone and soft tissue pathology, especially in the onco-hematological field. This study aims to evaluate cancer patients' experience of WB-MRI performed on a 3T scanner compared to other diagnostic total body examinations. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In this prospective committee-approved study, patients completed a questionnaire in person (n = 134) after undergoing a WB-MRI scan to collect data on their physical and psychological reactions during the scan, the global satisfaction level, and preference for other types of MRI or computed tomography (CT), or positron emission tomography (PET/CT). Of all patients who had performed a CT or PET/CT the previous year, 61.9% had already undergone an MRI. The most common symptoms reported were: 38.1% perceived a localized increase in temperature and 34.4% numbness and tingling of the limbs. The scan time averaged 45 min and was well tolerated by most patients (112, 85.5%). Overall, WB-MRI was appreciated by the majority (121/134-90.3%) of patients who said they would probably undergo the procedure again. Patients preferred the WB-MRI in 68.7% of cases (92/134), followed by CT in 15.7% of cases (21/134) and by PET/CT in 7.4% (10/134), with 8.4% (11/134) of patients without any preference. The preference for imaging modalities was age-dependent (p = 0.011), while (p > 0.05) was independent of sex and a primary cancer site. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a high degree of WB-MRI acceptance from a patient's point of view.

3-T magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (3 T-MR-HIFU) for the treatment of pain from bone metastases of solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Bone metastases (BM) are still the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, not only because of their complications, defined as skeletal-related events (SREs), but also because of the negative impact bone pain has on quality of life (QoL) and survival, especially when opioid analgesics and locoregional treatments fail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective study was carried out on 12 patients with symptomatic BM treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU). The primary endpoint was the effectiveness of MR-HIFU in reducing current and breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP) scores. The main secondary aims were the evaluation of circulating markers at different time-points and their relation to pain and procedure efficacy. Other secondary objectives included temporal evolution of pain response, evaluation of QoL, and side effects of the treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate primary and secondary endpoints. Questionnaires on pain and QoL completed at baseline and at 30 days were compared using appropriate statistical tests with exploratory intent. RESULTS: MR-HIFU was successfully completed in all 12 patients enrolled between September 2015 and December 2018. On day 30, 6 (50.0%) patients showed a complete response of current pain and 6 a partial response, while 5 (41.7%) obtained a complete BTCP response. A partial response of BM evaluated by MD Anderson criteria was obtained in 9 (81.8%) patients. Only one patient progressed in the target lesion after MR-HIFU. No treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Bone turnover markers CTX/RANK-L (P) do not demonstrate any significant change with the pain or BM response. CONCLUSION: In our patients, targeted therapy of painful BM with MRI-guided focused ultrasound ablation was safe and showed encouraging early-onset and functional results.

Radiation dosimetry of 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT studies in prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the Equivalent Doses (HTs) to highly exposed organs as well as the Effective Dose (ED) for (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT scan in the follow-up of prostate cancer patients. METHODS: Fifty patients were administered with (18)F-fluorocholine. The activities in organs with the highest uptake were derived by region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. OLINDA/EXM1.0 and Impact software were used to assess ED for the administered (18)F-fluorocholine and CT scan, respectively, and the (18)F-fluorocholine and CT-scan EDs summed to yield the total ED for the PET/CT procedure. RESULTS: The calculated (18)F-fluorocholine and CT scans EDs based on ICRP Publication 103 were 5.2 mSv/300 MBq and 6.7 mSv, respectively. The (18)F-fluorocholine HTs to the liver, kidneys, spleen and pancreas were about threefold higher than those from the CT, which contributed a greater proportion of the total ED than the (18)F-fluorocholine did. CONCLUSIONS: For (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT procedures, about 40% of the ED is contributed by administered (18)F-fluorocholine and 60% by the CT scan. The kidneys and liver were the highly exposed organs. Considering the large number of diagnostic procedures oncology patients undergo, radiation dosimetry is important in relation to the stochastic risk of such procedures.