Latex and silicone drains in surgery − is the ban on rubber drains really a step forward or rather a step back?

The use of silicone and latex drains is an integral part of surgical practice. Experience and the review of the world literature show that silicone drain is characterized by a much lower rate of fibrotic reaction of the tissue around the drain. The ability of a latex, or rubber, or popularly called rubber drain, to induce the formation of ligaments in its surroundings is advantageously used in situations where the targeted formation of scar tissue is desired. This feature is absent in silicone drains. However, nowadays the rule in most surgical departments is to use almost exclusively silicone drains, which is based on prevention of latex allergy. This article is devoted to the description of the different and mutually irreplaceable use of silicone and latex drains. Subsequently, he also discusses the question of whether the twilight of the use of latex drains in modern medicine is really progress, or rather retrogression.

Management of ileocolic intussusception in the Czech Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Ileocolic intussusception is one of the most frequent causes of acute abdomen in infants and toddlers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment of ileocolic intussusception in the Czech Republic in 2019. METHODS: Fourteen departments of paediatric surgery participated in this multicentre retrospective study. A SurveyMonkey Inc. questionnaire was used for anonymous data collection of patients with ileocolic intussusception. RESULTS: In 2019, ileocolic intussusception was diagnosed in 162 patients; median age was 30 months (3 months to 9.5 years). Contrast enema was indicated in 133 patients, primary surgery in 14 patients and spontaneous reduction was found in 15 patients. All departments using contrast enema had a success rate of 89.5%; 12 departments approached the contrast enema procedure under general anaesthesia (including myorelaxation at 7 departments) and 2 departments under sedation. Contrast enema under general anaesthesia with/without myorelaxation was significantly more successful than contrast enema under sedation (108/113, 95.6% vs 11/20, 55%; p.

[Radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer is it time to move on?] / Radioterapie v lécbe karcinomu rekta - cas na zmenu?

Multidisciplinary treatment approach in accordance with current guidelines represents a gold standard of care for patients with rectal cancer. Radical surgical resection is a fundamental and the only curative treatment modality. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4N0M0 or anyTN1-2M0) are indicated for neoadjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. However, there are many controversies regarding neoadjuvant radiotherapy indications in the available literature. Evidence-based medicine data suggest that neoadjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved local control of the disease, but has no impact on patients survival. Moreover, neoadjuvant radiotherapy is associated with less favorable perioperative outcomes and significantly deteriorates anorectal function of patients after sphincter-preserving rectal resections.Key words: rectal cancer - radiotherapy - postoperative morbidity - survival - functional outcome.

[Nuss miniinvasive procedure for pectus excavatum in adolescents and adults]. / Miniinvazivní operace pectus excavatum u adolescentu a dospelých dle Nusse.

Pectus excavatum is a congenital chest wall deformity with depression of the sternum and adjacent costal cartilages. Severe forms of this deformity lead not only to psychosocial deprivation but also limit physical performance due to lung volume reduction and cardiac compression. Open surgical correction using stemochondroplasty represented the gold standard of surgical treatment of pectus excavatum. Miniinvasive technique of corrective steel bar insertion was published in 1998. Since then, so called Nuss operation has become widely accepted. Good experience with this type of the pectus excavatum correction have encouraged us to adopt this procedure. We use this technique not only in children and adolescencents but also in adults suffering from depressed anterior chest wall. We present our initial experience with the treatment of nine patients. We describe the benefits and pitfalls of the method which are known to us.